THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HUNTING FORUMS

Merry Christmas to our Accurate Reloading Members

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Stu Taylor incident on TV
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by npd345:
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
It seems a lot of our American friends are applying the same rules they have in America to what happens in other countries.

America has become such a lawyers paradise, that everyone wants to sue someone else for anything.

To the extent that international insurance companies, who will cover you anywhere in the world, have to have a separate policy or an expensive add on to cover you in America.

Also, many people here seem to assume things which we are not privy to between Tim and Stu.

How do we know what Tim is paying Stu?

Non of us have any idea about it.

Tim might be trying to get as much money for Stu as he possibly can get, from himself and others who wish to help a fellow hunter in need.

How many of those posting here have donated money to Stu?

How many of those who did donate sizeable amounts said anything about it?

Is Tim supposed to give up his work, and give all his life savings to Stu?

How do we know that because he is paying Stu, he has to work to earn his money?

This was an accident, pure and simple.

And it could happen to any of us who do hunt.


"Is Tim supposed to give up his work, and give all his life savings to Stu?"

Absolutly!! If that is what it takes to get Stu's life back together to the point it was before he was shot.

"This was an accident, pure and simple."

What accident? This gun did not shoot on its own. nor did it point itself at someone else.

"And it could happen to any of us who do hunt."

Absolutly and I pray it never does. One of the few things that can help is to practice gun safety; in all situations.

In stressful situations the only wasy to do this is train for it.

Also, this has been asked in a couple of the posts; where can we send a donation to?

I do not want to send it to anyone or place that has involvement with the show.

I have seen mention of the "Conservation Fund", is this a place that can see that Stu's get the funds to help him out?


Conservation Force is collecting funds on Stu''s behalf and remitting the funds to him.
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
The opinion of Martin Pieters that was demonstrated to be wrong months ago?

quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
Martin's post was quickly shown to contain factual errors

Todd,
You now make 2 who have made this statement, I asked Mike to clarify, he has not. I am now asking you, could you point me in the right direction that confirms your above statement?
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
Brad,

I have to leave for work in less than an hour and I'm facing a 6 hour drive to get there. I don't have time right now to look it up, but depending on work requirements today, I'll try to this evening or perhaps tomorrow. If you have a link back to the original thread on all of this, it should be contained in those posts. I will respond but I'm just rushed for time today.
 
Posts: 8537 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
Understood, and no hurry. Below is a link to the thread
Martin's post
I have gone through it fairly thproughly and see nothing establishing "factually" that what Martin posted was incorrect. In fact, I would encourage others to browse through the thread reading only Martin & Tims posts, I think they paint a fairly clear picture.
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
Wonder how much this cost?

Tim's new trophy room

Tasteless
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
Here Tim appears worried:
quote:
originally posted by Tim Herald:
Lane- if this is a loss, but they don't decide until Nov-Dec. do you think it will be immediately enforced? In other words, will legally shot lions before the decision be importable, or not? Obviously asking for selfish reasons...

...Well- I gotta kill one first. That's the major hurdle. Will be in Niassa in August, but it takes them at least a year to get them back over here at best...

Then LEDVM...
...If killed in Mosambique this year Tim...you will be fine for export in 2014...in my opinion.

back to Tim...
...Hope so on both counts

Good Hunting,

Tim Herald

I am happy evertything worked out for Tim.
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:

Is Tim supposed to give up his work, and give all his life savings to Stu?


No one is saying he should give up his life savings, but the image he is projecting is not helping his case. Lots of writers have never shot any lions, buffalo, or even been to Africa. The writer who has focused the most on Africa recently declared bankruptcy, so it can't be that lucrative - in fact, I can only conclude a writer goes to Africa to write about Africa because he wants to, not because he has to. '

I have no idea how much Tim has given Stu; I only know the following:

1. He asked us to contribute on the very FIRST post about Stu.
2. I suggested he auction off his big ticket hunts on the condition the buyer agrees to be filmed; I can't think of a better way to raise funds. No answer from Tim, other than a turkey hunt.
3. He recently went on lion hunt and visit to RSA with his family in tow; that trip alone would have paid for most of Stu's wages this year.
4. He has stated that he will not reveal what he has personally contributed. So we have no idea. We only know he continues to go on hunts most AR members only dream of.

Should Tim have forked over his life savings to pay for Stu's injuries? Well, if that lion hunt cost him his life's savings, then I say, "Yes, he should." If his life savings exceed the cost of that hunt, then he can afford to pay the damages. He has made some interesting choices about how he spends his money.


Todd:

Like I said, there are plenty of writers making a living without spending money on big ticket hunts. Some focus solely on whitetails and seem to do quite well.

He could have auctioned the moose and lion hunt off and still gotten a story. He chose not to. In fact, he didn't even try.


AAZ,

I hear what you are saying, and on the surface, the auctioning of some of the hunts as you suggested sounds like a good plan. But, you said it yourself,

quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
I have no idea how much Tim has given Stu


That being said, do we know whether or not he has contributed more or less than one of these hunts, if auctioned, would have provided? I don't, therefore I'll not pick at his bones, but rather contribute what I can in a positive manner for now, that being making a contribution to Stu's recovery fund. I'll be sending out a check tomorrow.


And I will be sending another check to the Brendan Morrocco Road to Recovery Trust:

http://www.brendanmarrocco.org...y/About_Brendan.html

It is wonderful we all have choice when it comes to how we spend our money.


Yes it is! Being a veteran of the first Iraq war myself, I've been a contributor to the Wounded Warrior project from early on. Mr. Morrocco certainly sustained some truly terrible injuries. Do you know this young man AAZ?


I have not communicated with Brendan but I have spoken with his father via phone and email several times. His father sends a very nice letter when you contribute.

Brendan is an incredible guy. He even likes to hunt; I told his dad when he is ready go hunting again to let me know.


Don't Ever Book a Hunt with Jeff Blair
http://forums.accuratereloadin...821061151#2821061151

 
Posts: 7583 | Location: Arizona and off grid in CO | Registered: 28 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Brad:

I have not looked to verify. I seem to recall that Tim made a statement that the amounts referenced were not correct. Beyond that, I do not recall.
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by larryshores:
npd:

If he gives up his work, how can he help Stu?


Valid point.

My point is that when someone messes up another s life he should accept responsibility and if financial aid is what it takes he should do so to the full extent he is able.

If that includes his "life savings" so be it. That is what responsibility is.

But an even more important point is that we do not know for sure what Tim has, or has not, done.

He may, or may not, be even able to say what he has or has not done because of legal advice he has been given or even a stipulation from an insurance company.

Quite frankly I am not sure it is any of our business. Though it would be nice to know if Stu's needs have been satisfied so we know whether are donations are still needed.

I will be donating to the Conversation Fund; if someone can post on how they can be contacted. Is this thru SCI?

I am sure they can use any and all funds they receive to help Stu and/or someone else in need.
 
Posts: 1464 | Location: Southwestern Idaho, USA!!!! | Registered: 29 March 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree with what you are saying.

Conservation Force can be contacted at :

www.conservationforce.org

(504)837-1233
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Navaluk:
"Shit doesn't happen". That's a piss poor excuse, brought up by the boobs who have no business handling a gun. How many people have been to Africa 6 or more times without shooting a person? It's panic, its self defensive without regard to others. Its me first and f*€K you! It's embarrassing. I alone apparently will not be watching, Magnum "Nancy's" hunting whatever is in front of the gun when I pull the trigger. I guess in this day and age if you are a back shooter, you better get insurance, and if you work for an outfitter as a PH, you better be willing to say "I will not hunt with this POS!

This thread has really gone far enough in my opinion. Buying insurance in case you are a piece of shit? Buying insurance in case you sign on to guide a POS? Really, that's what it has come to? Come on.


GREAT POST!!!!

I carry liability insurance becasue things happen in life that are out of my control. Hence the term blanket policy. Suppose someone falls off a ladder working at my house? Since you are apparently sanctified in all areas of your life I assume you have no such concerns. My post was related to the finacial difficulties facing both parties. It WAS NOT related to the incident itself. To imply that such insurance some how lowers my standards for firearm safety or makes one a boob. Well You just sound foolish.

Best

Jeff
 
Posts: 2857 | Location: FL | Registered: 18 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
It seems a lot of our American friends are applying the same rules they have in America to what happens in other countries.

America has become such a lawyers paradise, that everyone wants to sue someone else for anything.

To the extent that international insurance companies, who will cover you anywhere in the world, have to have a separate policy or an expensive add on to cover you in America.

Also, many people here seem to assume things which we are not privy to between Tim and Stu.

How do we know what Tim is paying Stu?

Non of us have any idea about it.

Tim might be trying to get as much money for Stu as he possibly can get, from himself and others who wish to help a fellow hunter in need.

How many of those posting here have donated money to Stu?

How many of those who did donate sizeable amounts said anything about it?

Is Tim supposed to give up his work, and give all his life savings to Stu?

How do we know that because he is paying Stu, he has to work to earn his money?

This was an accident, pure and simple.

And it could happen to any of us who do hunt.



Absolutely correct Saeed!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38632 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
quote:
Brad:

I have not looked to verify. I seem to recall that Tim made a statement that the amounts referenced were not correct. Beyond that, I do not recall.

He did, that does not make it the case. Martin stated that he was there on behalf of his membership, and his information had come first hand from Stu, just because Tim refuted it, does not make it "fact". This is my point, Martin is compelled to address this situation and it is "hearsay", Tim says he gave more than $1k and this discredits competely what Martin said (to some). I disagree, Tim has shown the depth of his charachter since the beginning of this tragedy, just because he "says so", holds no weight with me. And, I am shocked the people it does hold weight with.
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Yes it is! Being a veteran of the first Iraq war myself, I've been a contributor to the Wounded Warrior project from early on.


Just a heads up, I don't know if you are aware that 66c out of every dollar donated to to the Wounded warrior project goes to admin, fund raising and programme costs, and the CEO takes home in the region of 300K per year. Not being an American, I have no dog in this fight, but as ex Military I baulk at my money being paid on admin when there are so many other organizations that pay directly to Vets in need or support them more substantially.

PS. Sorry for the Hijack
 
Posts: 73 | Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa | Registered: 10 February 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 505 gibbs:
Here Tim appears worried:
quote:
originally posted by Tim Herald:
Lane- if this is a loss, but they don't decide until Nov-Dec. do you think it will be immediately enforced? In other words, will legally shot lions before the decision be importable, or not? Obviously asking for selfish reasons...

...Well- I gotta kill one first. That's the major hurdle. Will be in Niassa in August, but it takes them at least a year to get them back over here at best...

Then LEDVM...
...If killed in Mosambique this year Tim...you will be fine for export in 2014...in my opinion.

back to Tim...
...Hope so on both counts

Good Hunting,

Tim Herald

I am happy evertything worked out for Tim.


BTW...Brad,
That hunt was with Kambako Safaries (Stu's outfit). Don't you think they (Kambako) have a responsibility to help Stu as the employer? And...if so...didn't that hunt benefit Stu? If the outfit thought as some here that Tim is a POS and a liability...do you think they would have still done the hunt?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38632 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 505 gibbs:
[QUOTE]Brad:

I have not looked to verify. I seem to recall that Tim made a statement that the amounts referenced were not correct. Beyond that, I do not recall.

He did, that does not make it the case. Martin stated that he was there on behalf of his membership, and his information had come first hand from Stu, just because Tim refuted it, does not make it "fact". This is my point, Martin is compelled to address this situation and it is "hearsay", Tim says he gave more than $1k and this discredits competely what Martin said (to some). I disagree, Tim has shown the depth of his charachter since the beginning of this tragedy, just because he "says so", holds no weight with me. And, I am shocked the people it does hold weight with.[/QUOTE
I agree that is doesn't make it so.
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
quote:
BTW...Brad,
That hunt was with Kambako Safaries (Stu's outfit). Don't you think they (Kambako) have a responsibility to help Stu as the employer? And...if so...didn't that hunt benefit Stu? If the outfit thought as some here that Tim is a POS and a liability...do you think they would have still done the hunt?

1st, Kambako is not "Stu's outfit", Stu is either an employee or contract PH for them (I would assume the latter).

2nd, As far as them having "responsibility" to help Stu, maybe so. They did donate a complete Buffalo hunt with all proceeds going to Stu that ended up going for $15k (from what I heard). Here is a question, why didn't Tim or his company buy that hunt and then market and sell it to one of their "hunt club members", make a show out of it, I am sure with all of the glory whores around this place, someone would have paid top dollar to stand shoulder to shoulder with the mighty Tim, then donate the proceeds to Stu. That would have turned a $15k donation into a $30k-$45k donation. I floated this idea by Tim before, so perhaps they did.

3rd, As far as Kambako taking Tim as a client again, I see no reason to discount them because they took a paying hunter, whoever it is. Just like, I don't absolve Tim of anything he has or has not done because he found someone to take him lion hunting? Perhaps I do not understand your point?
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have been thinking about this. Hypothetically speaking, if Tim/Magnum have not done enough, I would think legal action would be taken. Perhaps it has been. I have no idea.
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
Ya, maybe so, although, I have not heard particularly stunning reports of Amicus Curiae Chilembe, Esq. who is the highest paid plaintiffs attorney in Bulawayo....

 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Choice of venue would be interesting.............
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
just got back from Zim. spoke to my Zim PH. Tim was flying in as we few out to hunt an elephant with Nixon in SSG area. At frist he was coming a day early or that was what we were told, ended up we left just before he was to get there. i would have been very unconfortable with him in camp, not because of gun safty, but because I am of the mind that if you hurt someone you are responsible for that person. Accident or not. Really glad I was not there when he arrived. My PH said the Zim guys just don't think like we americans about sueing. It seems like a hand out to them. I suggested that Tim would have ins. and Stu should sue to get his medical bills paid and get some income from lost wages.
I bet him one thing, I bet him Tim had spoken to an attorney already even if Stu had not. I have made a donation to Stu. I hate it for him. He will likely never again be whole again, while Tim continues to persue all the things in life he loves. Lion, ele and SA trips are expensive. I hope he is giving Stu at least 10% of what these trips cost...


NRA LIFE MEMBER
DU DIAMOND SPONSOR IN PERPETUITY
DALLAS SAFARI CLUB LIFE MEMBER
SCI FOUNDATION MEMBER
 
Posts: 1366 | Location: SPARTANBURG SOUTH CAROLINA | Registered: 02 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 505 gibbs:
1st, Kambako is not "Stu's outfit", Stu is either an employee or contract PH for them (I would assume the latter).

I thought Stu was a partner with Jumbo Moore in Kambako??? But I could be wrong.

2nd, As far as them having "responsibility" to help Stu, maybe so.

If I have a an employee holding a horse in my hospital and that horse just loses it for some reason, becomes unruly, rears up, paws my employee in the head, and the employee gets permanent brain damage...who is liable/responsible for that employee's medical bills and livelyhood??? Me??? The horses owner??? or Whom???

3rd, As far as Kambako taking Tim as a client again, I see no reason to discount them because they took a paying hunter, whoever it is. Just like, I don't absolve Tim of anything he has or has not done because he found someone to take him lion hunting? Perhaps I do not understand your point?

Well, some on here are stating that Tim is so dangerous he should not be hunted with again. And...I would think...if they had a severe problem with how Tim was treating Stu...that they would not do business with him.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38632 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
quote:
Tim was flying in as we few out to hunt an elephant with Nixon in SSG area

2020
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by larryshores:
I agree with what you are saying.

Conservation Force can be contacted at :

www.conservationforce.org

(504)837-1233


Thanks for the link for "Conservation Force"!


Now is a the time for all of us to quit this bickering and put our money were our mouths/keyboards are!

Contribute and/or shut up!
Shane
 
Posts: 1464 | Location: Southwestern Idaho, USA!!!! | Registered: 29 March 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
Just a little reminder of what Stu is up to for those carrying on with there lives....
This was posted by Frik Muller, back in July, to me it tells the story of a man doing what he must to provide for his family...

quote:
I see Stu at least once a week his spirt is up ,and he is trying to set someyhing up on a small piece of land to try and do some market gardening so that he has some sort of income, as he still has a long road ahead of him his recover is very slow.I will give you some feedback on his visit to the specialist today ,once he gets back.
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I don't think Stu will have any standing to sue Tim for a tort claim in US courts. Might have to get very creative but unlikely any US court will allow Stu to claim tort damages from Tim.

Tim and his employers got to thank his/their lucky stars this gun incident/accident took place in Moz and not the US, Canada or Australia or any place with rule of law. Independent of possible criminal actions there would close to 100% possibility of civil litigation.

I am really surprised that Smith & Wesson who owns Thompson is letting Tim use, in a product endorsement sense, a highly modified rifle that they have not modified or that they do not sell.

If a Alaskan guide had his shoulder blown up with a modified Icon 458 that is being promoted by Thompson/SWHC spokesperson - I bet the main party being sued would not be Tim or magnum hunt club or some TV production company or booking agency but SWHC - the one with the deep pockets.

Also in every safari I have been to there is a contractual clause where they assume no liability as hunting is a dangerous activity.

If you get shot or injured on safari in Africa as a client I would assume you will have zero recovery. Maybe best case you can sue your US based booking agent.

I always work under the assumption that all my African hunting is a self insurance activity. I don't expect any damages for accidents or injury from my PH. Therefore, choose your ph and outfitter very careful. I don't think suing anyone in Africa is practical anyway.

My fear in Africa is always what happens if one gets entangled in the legal system. A accidental shooting could land one in a zim or moz jail and that would be as scary as any buffalo charge till hopefully the US consulate comes and rescues you. Tim got to be glad he never got entangled in the moz legal system and can go back hunt lion within a year in Moz.

Tough spot for Stu to be in - disabled PH with no income in Africa.
 
Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mike:

I agree . Magnum appears to do a lot of business in Moz. Given that and the location of the shooting, I would be surprised if this was not considered if Stu's bills are not being paid.
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
Brad,

This was my post from that thread where I think the dollar figure Martin quoted is incorrect. At the point where he stated Tim had given a total of $1,000 TO DATE, Martin was quoting a total of $2,500 had been sent to Stu. He did not account for the additional $38,000. Whether or not that $1,000 of the $2,500 amount being from Tim is an accurate statement, I don't know. I was told Tim left quite a bit more than that with Stu prior to his leaving for the States. I have no way of knowing for sure if that is the case. Martin says one thing and Tim says another. Martin says Stu told him one thing and Tim says Stu told him another as well, concerning the initial funds provided for his treatment. That is the reason I asked if Stu had come here and told us in his own words as to what has transpired.

http://forums.accuratereloadin...931076281#9931076281

You and I will not agree on this. That's fair enough. Personally, I'm going to attempt to help Stu by contributing instead of crucifying Tim. Tim says he has helped far in excess of what Martin reported. I have no reason not to believe him. Martin made a statement that to me seems inaccurate.

Interestingly enough, Martin, in his initial post, states that Stu is on a good medical plan which has helped considerably! He then makes the point that he needs help with paying the daily living expenses (ie making up for lost work). So is the issue taking care of Stu's medical bills or replacing his salary, or both? If about paying his salary, for how long? Until he can get back on his feet with another source of income or for the rest of his days? BTW, I fully realize the limitations of "other" sources of income for the Zim guys. Just asking the question.

quote:
Originally posted by Martin Pieters:
Stu was luckily on a decent medical aid which has helped considerably, he is however struggling as he has lost a whole season and 2013 does not look very rosy. His annual income is approximately $ 75k, he has no other source of income and has monthly expenses.
 
Posts: 8537 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:

If I have a an employee holding a horse in my hospital and that horse just loses it for some reason, becomes unruly, rears up, paws my employee in the head, and the employee gets permanent brain damage...who is liable/responsible for that employee's medical bills and livelyhood??? Me??? The horses owner??? or Whom???



You'd be in deep schittt I would think, especially after some bottom feeding plaintiff atty got wind of it.

After posting what I posted originally, and reading and thinking about this unfortunate situation, I'm leaning the way 505 is. No, I have no proof, but from where I sit It smells bad in TH's camp. I know I personally would handle it much differently.
 
Posts: 2276 | Location: West Texas | Registered: 07 December 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of A.Dahlgren
posted Hide Post
So 75k/year and 100/150 day in tips for let's say 170 day guiding adds up to 100k for the period that's open to hunting..really some insurance company must be interested in starting a ph/guiding insurance ?? No ? Just in Zim are several hundred guides/phs. To be uninsured in this line if business must be a bad way to go for client, outfitters and phs..

Anyway I came to think of my friend Russell Caldecott and his accident I can be misinformed or remembering it wrong but was he not out guiding clients that ended up he loosing his legs.

Anyway there are accidents like Anthony, Owain, Greef and many more that never reaches AR's gossip column that probably needed more help, with an insurance either from client, outfitter or by themselves could had helped a lot
 
Posts: 2638 | Location: North | Registered: 24 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JGRaider:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:

If I have a an employee holding a horse in my hospital and that horse just loses it for some reason, becomes unruly, rears up, paws my employee in the head, and the employee gets permanent brain damage...who is liable/responsible for that employee's medical bills and livelyhood??? Me??? The horses owner??? or Whom???



You'd be in deep schittt I would think, especially after some bottom feeding plaintiff atty got wind of it.

After posting what I posted originally, and reading and thinking about this unfortunate situation, I'm leaning the way 505 is. No, I have no proof, but from where I sit It smells bad in TH's camp. I know I personally would handle it much differently.


Not really. Workers comp is the exclusive remedy in most states.
 
Posts: 12160 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JGRaider:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:

If I have a an employee holding a horse in my hospital and that horse just loses it for some reason, becomes unruly, rears up, paws my employee in the head, and the employee gets permanent brain damage...who is liable/responsible for that employee's medical bills and livelyhood??? Me??? The horses owner??? or Whom???



You'd be in deep schittt I would think, especially after some bottom feeding plaintiff atty got wind of it.

After posting what I posted originally, and reading and thinking about this unfortunate situation, I'm leaning the way 505 is. No, I have no proof, but from where I sit It smells bad in TH's camp. I know I personally would handle it much differently.


If you go by that line of reasoning...then...it is Kambako that has the liability for Stu...at least for his medical bills and such.

As for my scenario...engagement in equine activities with an equine professional is an assumed risk and the equine professional cannont be held liable as the person assumes the risk when agreeing to work with horses.

Our workman's comp would cover the medical expenses.

My point is that I don't see Stu's situation as much different. He had a dangerous job. He assumed the risk of doing that job.

The point of failure here is that Kambako does not carry the equivalent insurance to Workman's comp on its PH's and Stu, knowing they did not carry such, did not get a policy of his own.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38632 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of A.Dahlgren
posted Hide Post
Damn I just think I agreed with Lane for the first time since I joined Wink
 
Posts: 2638 | Location: North | Registered: 24 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505 gibbs
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
Interestingly enough, Martin, in his initial post, states that Stu is on a good medical plan which has helped considerably! He then makes the point that he needs help with paying the daily living expenses (ie making up for lost work). So is the issue taking care of Stu's medical bills or replacing his salary, or both? If about paying his salary, for how long?


I would say that it is probably about both as Tim Herald acknowledged in his first post that Stu's insurance had denied the claims.

quote:
originally posted by Tim Herald:
I know that Stu had insurance for medical and loss of wages, etc. - and those companies are denying him- which is terrible, obviously...
 
Posts: 5203 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeff h:
just got back from Zim. spoke to my Zim PH. Tim was flying in as we few out to hunt an elephant with Nixon in SSG area. At frist he was coming a day early or that was what we were told, ended up we left just before he was to get there. i would have been very unconfortable with him in camp, not because of gun safty, but because I am of the mind that if you hurt someone you are responsible for that person. Accident or not. Really glad I was not there when he arrived. My PH said the Zim guys just don't think like we americans about sueing. It seems like a hand out to them. I suggested that Tim would have ins. and Stu should sue to get his medical bills paid and get some income from lost wages.
I bet him one thing, I bet him Tim had spoken to an attorney already even if Stu had not . I have made a donation to Stu. I hate it for him. He will likely never again be whole again, while Tim continues to persue all the things in life he loves. Lion, ele and SA trips are expensive. I hope he is giving Stu at least 10% of what these trips cost...


A man would be a right fool betting that Herald & Co. have not consulted some legal eagles,
to see what the possible ramifications are concerning Mr.Heralds untimely firearm discharge,that inflicted grievous bodily harm.


quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
It seems a lot of our American friends are applying the same rules they have in America to what happens in other countries.
...America has become such a lawyers paradise, that everyone wants to sue someone else for anything.

....This was an accident, pure and simple....


Saeed,

You call it simply an accident, Herald also conveniently refers to it as just an accident.

so all is sweet-hunky-dory, cause Zim folks dont 'sue' like Americans, correct?

When you are privi to knowledge that Mr.Herald has adopted the 'Zim' attitude rather than the 'American' attitude,
and has not consulted lawyers to help protect himself,...please, do let us all know.
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Texas allows one to opt out of workman's comps. If you can insure your commercial activity/operations outside of workman's comp you don't need to be in government scheme. That is great about Texas - bad thing is outside of workman's comp you will be subject to other common law legal remedies. May not exactly want an East Texas plaintiff's attorney on your back.

In Zim or Moz or most places in Africa one could only get insurance for PH via some form of cooperative. Anyone here really think that in Uncle's Bob Zimbabwe - the PH are going to create a mutual to insure themselves. Maybe the 51% black owners will do that cause it the right thing to do. They will also create a defined benefit pension plan to go along.

We can argue that African hunting companies and hunting countries should have also have US workman comp systems. But you cannot pick and choose a US workman's comp system and ignore a US tort liability system that comes hand in hand.

As I have said earlier - Tim and Magnum Hunt should be glad the incident/accident happen in Africa not the US.

Stu and any other PH is Zim/MOZ take the risk to work in a dangerous occupation. What happened to Stu could happen to any other PH. I have asked a few PHs about getting shot by accident and they shrug and say it is a cost of business.

No one asks anyone going to Africa to take any competency test. All you need is a checkbook and you can be the next great hunter.

This hunting liability is a two way street. If you get injured killed or maimed in Africa - don't expect much financial compensation.

Pick your PH and outfitter carefully. Same for your charter flight operator.

The financial aspect of the hunting business makes that PHs hunt with whoever has the checkbook.
 
Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
if i get injured by an animal, that's OK. i get injured( shot ) by someone careless, that's not OK. and i highly doubt it would be a PH doing the shooting. i seem to recall my Daddy telling me repeatedly to get my finger OFF the trigger, safety on the gun and muzzle pointed AWAY from whatever was not the target until the moment i was ready to shoot something....


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13655 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You know if one leaves ones car on a steep driveway,to go to a mailbox
- without properly putting the hparkbrake on,
and it rolls away becoming a big slow moving heavy projectile,
and it ends up running over ones own[or someone elses] cat or child,great-grandmother or pool-cleaner,
its not negligence on ones behalf causing death or grievous bodily harm

....because it was just an accident. popcorn
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Saeed, You call it simply an accident, Herald also conveniently refers to it as just an accident.so all is sweet-hunky-dory, cause Zim folks dont 'sue' like Americans, correct?When you are privi to knowledge that Mr.Herald has adopted the 'Zim' attitude rather than the 'American' attitude,and has not consulted lawyers to help protect himself,...please, do let us all know.



Are you actually saying that Tim shot Stu on purpose?

If not, which I am sure you are not, can you call it but an accident?


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69714 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Lets put it this way,

The bullet hiting Stu Taylor was an un-intentional consequence, following/as a result of,

a persons actions that were careless and negligent whilst handling a loaded firearm.

Lack of safety is not an accidental thing,
it is due to personal carelessness-lack of awareness-lack of discipline.
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia