THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13

Moderators: Aaron Neilson, ledvm
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Lion Skull Size vs. Lion Age!
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smarterthanu:
quote:
As an accomplished wildlife biologist yourself sir...why would you lump the lion biologists into the anti-hunting group. I assure you that some are are not and many see the value in hunting.

Don't put words in my mouth. I lumped you into the anti-hunting group.

The people that really know me would get a huge laugh from that statement.

In the short period of time we have been operating...we have already made progress. What have you done to stop the decline in lions and bring both sides (hunters & scientists...NOT anti's) to the table???


I don't waste peoples time deciding I am going to spread shame amongst the ranks of hunters and play the childish game that anti-hunters hope you fall into.

You are wasting my time in this conversation. I have done my best be civil, I have said what I believe to be the truth, and I have conceded to you the time I thought you were correct. Argue away sir...you have the stage!


Lane in Green this time. Smiler


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38410 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree totally that they want us not to shoot any lions and so far that is working in our favor. Yes I think they have scientist and they are the same ones. They are only on ourside if we do what they are saying. No they do not have other lion scientist that will sway decisions at CITES the 7 or eight we are both useing will testify and by what I see here we will lose as we can not get a simple agreement not to shoot obviously young lions. You can think what you want, but they have said that exactly. The antis lost round one for admitting they just hated hunters, we want them to say that. We want the scientist which are not hunters to testify that hunters and hunting will help the sustainability of lions. I know you are smarter than me as I have read your post but it seems no matter what you insist that is ok to shoot young lions no matter what the results.I will keep trying with hunters to understand there are no great answers to the aging process but it is really easy not to shoot anoticably young lion.
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: 24 September 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smarterthanu:
quote:
Sir,

I am NOT alienating anyone. I welcome both of you. I have seen that 505 is a great hunter. I applaud all of his accomplishments.

I just said things have become clearer as to why I see y'all tag team all the time.



You think you got tag teamed because someone stated he thought a discussion was getting interesting? He took no sides. He did not attack you. Don't piss down someones coller and say its rain. Your post towards 505 was a bunch of trash and you know it.


Take it however you feel appropriate sir...all one has to do is do a search on the handles and see what goes on AR. Have a nice day! Smiler


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38410 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Take it however you feel appropriate sir...all one has to do is do a search on the handles and see what goes on AR. Have a nice day!



At least I can man up and say when I am trying to be offensive. You could only come up with self righteous passive agressive behavior. Like I said you are an anti-hunter of the worst kind, because you don't even realise what you do and you are just smart enough to riggle into the groups trying to influence decisions, but you are a face of hunting I hope no non-hunter ever has to see.
 
Posts: 2826 | Location: Houston | Registered: 01 May 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So now that we have that cleared up can someone tell me the harm of killing a 3 year old lion if the quotas have been set properly?
 
Posts: 2826 | Location: Houston | Registered: 01 May 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
smarterthanayone-- I have seen everyone here concede good points when made but you have never and I am pretty sure you never will but if lion hunting dissapears you will say it was going to happen anyway---SO TYPICAL
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: 24 September 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
what good would it do to inform you of anything-you surely already have the answer
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: 24 September 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smarterthanu:
quote:
SMU - I'm sorry if you have only seen a lion stay on bait for over 48 hrs, one time. I've seen it many times, so I'm not sure what to tell ya?

I assure you, I totally understand the dynamics of a pride, the total AREA they can range, etc, etc. We have discussed this all before. Certainly male lions, who have a pride, can and are often away from a pride for long periods of time. The females, my or may not show up, etc, etc. I was referring to a guideline, not an absolute. If I saw lion #2 at my bait, and unless I already somehow KNEW for sure he was holding a pride with dependent cubs, I'm shooting him straightaway! I have often said I somewhat disagree with Bwanamich and some of their ideals, but I still appreciate what they are doing, and I certainly am not criticising them for it.
That is my point also. Bwana claims to know what works for managing lions in his area and that sounds great, but now all hunters must use the same plan. Now there are a huge number of hunters who won't stand a chance in hell of ever killing a lion. Not all lions behave the way they do where Bwanna hunts. That was my point also.

SMU, you will have to correct me if I am wrong, cause very possibly I am. I know you've hunted lion in the Save, not sure where else? Bwana hunts mainly in some very good/wild areas of TZ, I personally have hunted both, and many other places in between! Without question, I will tell you that lions from the Save act much differently than the lions in more wild/remote places of Zambia/Tanzania. Lions like those in the Save are much more weary, much more cautious, and without question that's because they see/hear and are associated with people and hunting on a much more frequent basis. Places like the Save, I agree, a good male lion is less likely to stay on bait for an extended period of time. They are often more nocturnal, etc. On the flip side, I kept a lion that we did shoot, on bait in Tanzania for exactly 7 days, a full 7 days! Of course he walked 1/2 mile to get water, and sometimes he was back in the long grass, but we could find him ON the bait, every day, for 7 days in a row. I've seen the same thing in Zambia on numerous occasions,and I see the lions in these "wild" places, acting much differently than the lions in places like the Save, or areas similar to it. I think the mistake that Bwanamich is making, is applying the things that have worked for them in TGT, to the rest of Africa, without consideration of the differences. I think perhaps you are doing the same.

Now if you know all wild lions live to 4 on average, you know more than anyone else, including the leading scientists, and certainly more than I. I try to deal with what I know for certain, strictly from personal experience, the time I've spent hunting lion for the past 16 yrs, and the time I've spent with the likes of Dr. White observing the Zambian Lion Project, the conversations I personally had with Dr. Craig Packer, Dr. Colleen Begg, Dr. Luke Hunter and Dr. Guy Balme. Every single expert that I know, that I have talked to or dealt with all agree, and Lane has previously put it in plain english. The hunting/shooting of young/immature lions, those that are less than 5 yrs old, is and should be an unacceptable management practice, as it pertains to the longevity of the wild lion. Now certainly, if your data, and any collaborating data from the scientific experts you are working with says differently, please bring it to our attention. I assure you, I would be the first one to pay attention, and support it, if the evidence/science said it.

Then ask those scientists why lion populations in the zambezi skyrocketed when they have been shooting young lions and pride males for decades and still are.

Dude, those of us involved with the LCTF, don't always agree on everything either. Bwanamich and I often disagree! But we both support eachother, because we recognize that we do bring experience, data, and other important values to the table, as it pertains to the African Lion. I don't agree with everything the NRA or SCI does or says, but I certainly support them as a whole. I would hope you would recognize that sometimes you might dis-agree with us, but overall the LCTF is working to preserve the lion and the longevity of lion hunting all across Africa. We look for support and experience, not alienation of anyone.



I understand yall's intentions are true. But you are playing a hand of cards that the antis are dealing you. You need to learn how to set the stage.


SMU - Nobody's proved to me that the lion populations in the Valley have sky-rocketed! Have you spent months their to determine this yourself, or are you taking it as second hand info from someone else? Trust me when I say, I hope they have.

First off, my opinion of some of the lion/buffalo problems we hear about in the valley, is not so much the case of lion/buffalo problems as it is over-hunting problems. When a couple of the major blocks re-allocated a few years ago, the operators paid SO much money for them, that they had NO choice but to insist on higher buffalo quotas, and the use of that quota. Exactly why it became harder to find hard-bossed bulls there too, as a side note. Now I'm certain nobody would agree with me publically, but I've have several agree with me in private.

But, speaking of wildlife management, think of it in terms of most of Colorado's deer herd, compared to what we have in eastern Colorado, just follow me here for a minute. When you look across most of the state, the buck/doe ratio is as low as 12/100, probably averages 14/100, versus what we have in eastern Colorado of 40+/100. Thus the reason the majority of the bucks killed throughout the state are 2.5 - 3.5 yrs old, and score 150" or less, is because that's pretty much what's there. The vast majority of the big bucks have long since been killed, and once many of the bucks are 2 - 3 yrs old, they too are being killed. Now, the deer herd is doing just fine, and in most places it has increased over the past 10 - 15 yrs, lots of does, and lots of immature bucks, but few old/mature bucks, because they are not allowed to live that long. Same is absolutely true of much of Colorado's elk herd. lots of elk, lots of cows/young bulls, few old, mature bulls. The opposite is true in eastern Colorado on the places we lease, and its NOT because of the tag numbers/quota for each unit. I guarantee you, I could easily over-shoot the big bucks on our best ranches in 1-2 yrs, based on the quota of tags given by the Game & Fish at this very moment. GUARANTEED, NO QUESTION ABOUT IT! We consistently shoot big deer every year for one reason, our OWN management/hunting practices. We will not shoot a deer that we feel confident is not at least 5.5 yrs old, regardless of size. Trust me, two years ago I had a bow-hunter freak out, because I would not let him shoot a mid 180's muley, that I was positive was not over 4.5 yrs old. It takes more than quota/tag numbers to manage/create mature, older animals. Exactly why you see a fair number of lions in the Valley, but yet, if they are over run with lions, why are they still shooting mostly young lions, and rarely old/mature lions. Because they have for too long, shot too many male lions, just like the deer in Colorado, and that leaves you only with young up and commers, who get shot long before their prime. In the case of deer, the above example is not as severe an issue, as deer are not socialistic/pride animals like lions. Nor are they facing population number estimates like the lion either.

SMU, I am not saying you are WRONG! What I am saying is to date, the science and the scientific experts, based on data compiled from the field, are saying and supporting that the shooting of lions, under the age of 5, is detrimental to the longevity of the lion. If you really think that's wrong, the best thing to do is prove its wrong. I've never seen a single ounce of evidence that supports the shooting of 2-4 yr old lions as a positive effect on the lion's longevity. So logic says you should provide the proof/evidence that supports the shooting of young lions as a non-detrimental effect on the lion, and I will be the first one to jump up and scream.

My friend, this has nothing to do with antis or the cards they have dealt! This has to do with proper lion management practices, that are supported by the best science available at the moment.


Aaron Neilson
Global Hunting Resources
303-619-2872: Cell
globalhunts@aol.com
www.huntghr.com

 
Posts: 4888 | Location: Boise, Idaho | Registered: 05 March 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
At least I can man up and say when I am trying to be offensive. You could only come up with self righteous passive agressive behavior. Like I said you are an anti-hunter of the worst kind, because you don't even realise what you do and you are just smart enough to riggle into the groups trying to influence decisions, but you are a face of hunting I hope no non-hunter ever has to see.


Maybe Aaron will kick me out of the group and I can quit wasting time on things that make no money and get back to work.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38410 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
smarterthanayone-- I have seen everyone here concede good points when made but you have never and I am pretty sure you never will but if lion hunting dissapears you will say it was going to happen anyway---SO TYPICAL



No gerry. I will say that hunters let it happen and that is the sadest part.
 
Posts: 2826 | Location: Houston | Registered: 01 May 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 505 gibbs:
this has turned into a terrific thread.

quote:
505,

Now I understand why I see you and STU on so many threads all over the AR forums stirring up shit and playing the devil's advocate.

You two brothers are just like a couple older nomad lions with out a pride...just wondering around stirring up shit. I have watched y'all on many a thread.


Dang, I go to work for a couple of hours and come back and realize I missed all the fun.
Lane,
Pardon me for being blunt, but your statement above is chickenshit. I posted my statement in complete honesty. The little guy eating popcorn was put up because I looked forward to coming back and reading ALL sides of this debate. This had and has remained an excellent thread. Tremendous points have been made by some, and some foolishness has been spewed by others. I have seen where STU has fallen into some of the same traps he has accused others of and consequently am suspect of that data. You on the other hand, have yet to make a logical arguement in my opinion. Your posts are laden with emotion and personal offense and do not further the cause of the LCTF or the lion for that matter. It is easy to say that killing young lions is bad, but anyone with any sense and a little experience realizes that the issue is much more complicated than that. If anyone wants to have an honest discussion about lion hunting and management, they should take the emotion out of it, compile, organize and disseminate masses of factual data, come up with a management quota, adhere to it religiosuly, document and examine the results, adjust the management quota accordingly and get the numbers where they need to be. You present this data to the powers that be and as the old saying goes, "the numbers don't lie". What you and others on these threads are doing is fighting a PR battle riddled with emotion. Those battles are ALWAYS "no win" situations for those in the right (which I believe your cause is) because the facts are never considered. You and the others freaking out everytime a pic of a "young" lion shows up and starting a multi-page tirade about how fucked up recent lion hunting is, does nothing positive for hunting or lions. One of the signs of a true zealot is when one refuses to concede that a point of view from any other angle could be valid. I would challenge you to give me an example in history where zealotry has ended in anything other than defeat.
 
Posts: 5199 | Registered: 30 July 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
SMU - Nobody's proved to me that the lion populations in the Valley have sky-rocketed! Have you spent months their to determine this yourself, or are you taking it as second hand info from someone else? Trust me when I say, I hope they have.

Every operator in the zambezi valley have confirmed that the numbers there had sky rocketed. I was just at a presentation given by Craig boddington and he also brought up the fact that numbers had skyrocketed over a period of a few years.

First off, my opinion of some of the lion/buffalo problems we hear about in the valley, is not so much the case of lion/buffalo problems as it is over-hunting problems. When a couple of the major blocks re-allocated a few years ago, the operators paid SO much money for them, that they had NO choice but to insist on higher buffalo quotas, and the use of that quota. Exactly why it became harder to find hard-bossed bulls there too, as a side note. Now I'm certain nobody would agree with me publically, but I've have several agree with me in private.

The substantial overshooting of bulls in the Zambezi is known and that is not what I am factoring in here. But you could look at how many calves are actually surviving.

But, speaking of wildlife management, think of it in terms of most of Colorado's deer herd, compared to what we have in eastern Colorado, just follow me here for a minute. When you look across most of the state, the buck/doe ratio is as low as 12/100, probably averages 14/100, versus what we have in eastern Colorado of 40+/100. Thus the reason the majority of the bucks killed throughout the state are 2.5 - 3.5 yrs old, and score 150" or less, is because that's pretty much what's there. The vast majority of the big bucks have long since been killed, and once many of the bucks are 2 - 3 yrs old, they too are being killed. Now, the deer herd is doing just fine, and in most places it has increased over the past 10 - 15 yrs, lots of does, and lots of immature bucks, but few old/mature bucks, because they are not allowed to live that long. Same is absolutely true of much of Colorado's elk herd. lots of elk, lots of cows/young bulls, few old, mature bulls. The opposite is true in eastern Colorado on the places we lease, and its NOT because of the tag numbers/quota for each unit. I guarantee you, I could easily over-shoot the big bucks on our best ranches in 1-2 yrs, based on the quota of tags given by the Game & Fish at this very moment. GUARANTEED, NO QUESTION ABOUT IT! We consistently shoot big deer every year for one reason, our OWN management/hunting practices. We will not shoot a deer that we feel confident is not at least 5.5 yrs old, regardless of size. Trust me, two years ago I had a bow-hunter freak out, because I would not let him shoot a mid 180's muley, that I was positive was not over 4.5 yrs old. It takes more than quota/tag numbers to manage/create mature, older animals. Exactly why you see a fair number of lions in the Valley, but yet, if they are over run with lions, why are they still shooting mostly young lions, and rarely old/mature lions. Because they have for too long, shot too many male lions, just like the deer in Colorado, and that leaves you only with young up and commers, who get shot long before their prime. In the case of deer, the above example is not as severe an issue, as deer are not socialistic/pride animals like lions. Nor are they facing population number estimates like the lion either.

I completely understand your point about the deer herds and that is why I say the quotas have to be right, and they can not be corrupted. It sounds like the state of Colorado doesn't know as much as you do when it comes to their target harvest numbers, whcih proves my point that the people doing proper science in the field should have the biggest say in the management of the species.

SMU, I am not saying you are WRONG! What I am saying is to date, the science and the scientific experts, based on data compiled from the field, are saying and supporting that the shooting of lions, under the age of 5, is detrimental to the longevity of the lion. If you really think that's wrong, the best thing to do is prove its wrong. I've never seen a single ounce of evidence that supports the shooting of 2-4 yr old lions as a positive effect on the lion's longevity. So logic says you should provide the proof/evidence that supports the shooting of young lions as a non-detrimental effect on the lion, and I will be the first one to jump up and scream.

Then I want to know if shooting a lion that is not a pride lion because he is not old enough to outcompete other males and falls within proper, not corrupted quotas, how does this hurt the lion population. According to yall no infanticide will result from his death.

My friend, this has nothing to do with antis or the cards they have dealt! This has to do with proper lion management practices, that are supported by the best science available at the moment.


This has everything to do with the anti-hunting movement. The simple fact is the strongest lion populations are either in a very few national parks or within hunting areas. But where there are people and no hunting the lions are being whiped out. The overall dwindling numbers that hunters are not responsible for nor can we do very little about is used as amunition to attack hunting. That is an emotional response, without logic, to a finite problem. Now that is the tool of the anti-hunter. He does not find a solution to the problem of decreasing lion populations. Instead he attacks you the hunter. You mark my word they will attack shooting female lions. Do you know why they don't attack the millions of African farmers who poison and trap lions? Because the Africans don't give a damn what a bunch of whimpy anti-hunters think or even what game laws result. They attack you because they know you are lawfull and logical men and therefore you will be the most easily defeated.
 
Posts: 2826 | Location: Houston | Registered: 01 May 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
that is why we are doing what we think will save it.If everyone would quit all the banter and just agree with not shooting obviously young lion. if that method is wrong so be it but thats what they are going to base their decision on.so its simple don't do it no matter if you or me or anyone thinks it does not matter to the CITES people it does.
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: 24 September 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
that is why we are doing what we think will save it.
Like I stated before I am happy yall want to keep lion hunting going, but just because you are doing something doesn't make it the right move. Every body takes turn when playing chess. Both sides of board have the best intention of winning, but only one does.
If everyone would quit all the banter and just agree with not shooting obviously young lion.
Then the antis have decided what you can and can't shoot once again and little bit more of your hunting heritage slips away and we as a group are weaker.
if that method is wrong so be it but thats what they are going to base their decision on.
Now you confess that we are playing a hand dealt to us.
so its simple don't do it no matter if you or me or anyone thinks it does not matter to the CITES people it does.


So how is that logic working out for elephant management? How about polar bears. The big desk jockies rarely get it right.
 
Posts: 2826 | Location: Houston | Registered: 01 May 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
you are a genius so shoot the shit out of the them post them on AR and speed up the process to eliminate hunting lions. I do give UP you are SMARTER THAN ANYONE
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: 24 September 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13 
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia