THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
One elk ,one shot, one Matchking.
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I just got in from Wyoming from a cow elk hunt I shot about a 4 year old cow at 273 yards(lasered) with one shot from my 300win mag and a 180 gr match king. I felt really sorry for the elk as she only ran about 75 feet. I know that she should not have died so fast being shot with a match king. But after having her lungs and heart taken out I don't think she had much choice. Did't recover the bullet
 
Posts: 19711 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Congratulation p dog shooter,
Sounds like you have your freezer full for this winter [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 1525 | Location: Hilliard Oh USA | Registered: 17 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I suggest you contact Sierra and ask them why they specially recommend against using their MatchKings on game. I did. E
 
Posts: 1022 | Location: Placerville,CA,USA | Registered: 28 May 2002Reply With Quote
<Tippex>
posted
No need to contact Sierra, bullet wasn�t recovered because it was partly fragmentised into one billion parts... Been there, done that and now i�m spitting copper fragmens from every steak. :-)
Regards
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Wendell Reich
posted Hide Post
Wow, finally.

Now I can rest knowing this argument has been settled with such conclusive data! [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 6273 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: 13 July 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
[Smile] Ermicus no need to contact serria ,match kings work just fine on game one shot one kill. [Wink] Tippex I don't shoot my game in the steaks so no need to worry about fragments texas heart shots are out. [Big Grin] Buffalobwana glad some one has seen the light [Wink] For the rest of you that don't know about match kings you all should research the match king thread and read all 140 plus pages. [Roll Eyes] [Roll Eyes]
 
Posts: 19711 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Pdogshooter,

Sorry about you having to walk the extra 74 feet. Consider Partitions next time.

Had to do it. [Smile]

[ 11-01-2002, 19:30: Message edited by: steve y ]
 
Posts: 612 | Location: Atlanta, GA USA | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Are you sure it was 273 yards and not 274? [Big Grin]
smallfry
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I believe if Sierra, Nosler or whoever would manufacture a styrofoam bullet with strict warnings against doing anything except punching paper with it, someone would start shooting game with them just to prove a point.

I'll stick with game kings, thanks.
 
Posts: 199 | Location: North Central Indiana | Registered: 09 September 2002Reply With Quote
<2 Bore>
posted
pdogshooter, you were lucky with that stunt shot! Personally I think people like you should be jailed. Honestly, stunts like yours cause the senseless wounding of countless animals.

It sickens me.

RAB
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol Bull
posted Hide Post
Too bad she ran 75 yards. Maybe try a Nosler Partition or Swift A-Frame next time [Razz]
 
Posts: 1117 | Location: Helena, MT, USA | Registered: 01 April 2001Reply With Quote
<Boyd Heaton>
posted
P Dog Shooter.Was there ANY doubt.. [Big Grin] ...Congrat's on the Elk.Elk must not be as tough as the Texas "dillo's" [Big Grin] ....Must grow them pretty tough in old KenTuk too.RAB......Never mind........

[ 11-02-2002, 05:50: Message edited by: Boyd Heaton ]
 
Reply With Quote
<FarRight>
posted
I love it when people say they know more about a gun, bullet, ect than the manufacturer.

I am not about to flame, even if I disagree with the practice. I've seen and heard from a fair share of people who claim the MatchKings are good hunting bullets--Sierra claims otherwise. I doubt if anyone knows more about Sierra bullets than Sierra.

Could be luck or maybe something else. Whatever it is, I don't think it is too intelligent considering another life is at stake. Seems like these people are the same who will do anything just to prove they can.

Just because you can doesn't me you should. Someday your luck will run out and then you'll be sorry--the first time the animal runs of wounded and you have to track it down and watch it suffer...

I'll stop before I get too hot and bothered.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
Just like FarRight, I don't want to start a flame. But why would one go against a manufacturer's recommendation when there are so many better choices out there?

My take on the matter:

1 elk + 1 MatchKing = 1 bad decision
 
Posts: 9438 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
<Boyd Heaton>
posted
[Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Reply With Quote
<Zeke>
posted
Oh No!!! Here we go again!!!
 
Reply With Quote
<swede7>
posted
Congratulations... you shot a premier game animal with a target bullet... too lazy or just plain don't give a sh-- enough to work up a load with a proper hunting bullet? Aren't you proud.... cripes!
 
Reply With Quote
<green 788>
posted
My brother once dropped a fair sized whitetail doe with one shot from a .22 LR.

The key word there is once... [Wink]

Dan
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
For all of you that doubtt I guess that you don't remember that are Very own Saeed shot a bunch of afican game with them and they killed just fine.
[Eek!] ,,,,,RAB you really need to get a life no stunt just plain good shooting. I have shot many other game animals with so called hunting bullets and can't see any differants in the way they react.
[Wink] ,,,, Over 40 it was 75 feet most of the time you lung heart shot something they go farther then that.
[Big Grin] ,,,Boyd no doubt just need to stir the old match king debate.
[Wink] ,,,,Swede 7 you and Rab need to go hunting togather. [Roll Eyes] I am really surprize it to this long to get this going.
 
Posts: 19711 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Shot selectivity and accurate placement are what put animals down consistently.

I am a big fan of Nosler Partitions if I am going to shoot at normal ranges. If I can afford to pass up the less than ideal prey angle, and want to extend my range, I'll use a MatchKing every time. The increased level of consistent accuracy is desirable for precise placement at the longer distances. Bullet performance has been most satisfactory so far in my experience with the Sierra pill.

This year's antelope was 383, (LRF 800), yards with a 7-8 mph cross. Bullet was a .25 calibre 100 grain MatchKing at 3200 fps. This load consistently groups better than my premium bullet loads at 300 yards.

My desire was to get a 400 yard antelope and I hunted with that goal in mind. The MatchKing load performed very well, one shot to the lungs, in and out. Shot was fired from the prone with a short Harris bipod. Terminal velocity should have been around 2450 fps.

I have not taken a long shot at an elk as my skill level is not high enough yet for a heavy bodied animal at extended range. Additionally, I do not own a long range rifle in a proper elk calibre....

yet!

~Holmes

[ 11-03-2002, 09:10: Message edited by: Holmes ]
 
Posts: 1171 | Location: Wyoming, USA | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FarRight:
I love it when people say they know more about a gun, bullet, ect than the manufacturer....Sierra claims otherwise. I doubt if anyone knows more about Sierra bullets than Sierra.

GM also tells me that if I modify my brakes, engine, or suspension, much less drive 140+ MPH on a racetrack I will surely die! What do I say to that? Bite me....

 -

It's called covering your ass. They know they might fail in the wrong hands under the wrong conditions and don't want to be blamed. But for those that know how to use them, they can be quite deadly....

[ 11-03-2002, 09:35: Message edited by: Jon A ]
 
Posts: 920 | Location: Mukilteo, WA | Registered: 29 November 2001Reply With Quote
<FarRight>
posted
quote:
They know they might fail in the wrong hands under the wrong conditions
Wrong condition = hunting

quote:
But for those that know how to use them, they can be quite deadly
Deadly? To targets, by all intents and purposes, yes. To elk, no...you want to compare bullets to cars and apples to oranges. Trying to turn a MatchKing into a game bullet is like turning you Chevy into an all terrain vehicle--it is simply asking it to do something it was never intended to do and even though you may get it to suffice, admitidly much better options exist...
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I just witnessed my 11 year old Grandson in Texas,at the old home place, shoot a standing broadside Mule Deer at 200 plus yards with a 222 Rem shooting a 60 gr. Hornady..It tore hell out of the lungs and heart and was recovered under the hide on the off side. A perfect mushroom, or rather a perfect tiny mushroom.It ran 20 yards and piled up....I used my 25-35 Win. for my deer later on...

So by P dogs standards of basing all on one animal killed, then the 222 is the perfect long range mule deer rifle...I think not....but, in both instances it does show the importance of shot placement, but thats about all it proves..I also know how to use my 25-35 and thats up close and personal...

I might add that I was well rested on a rock with my 300 H&H and the boys deer was on an open bald hill..It fell just as I was about to squeeze off an insurance shot...

My personal criteria is a bullet and caliber that will shoot lenthwise through any animal I am hunting and one that will normally break both shoulders on a broadside shot. Unless I am willing to close the gaps and hunt much like one would with a bow or muzzleloader... I believe this makes a lot more since.

Is the matchking a good elk bullet, it is if all your shots are close and broadside and you don't hit the shoulder bones...I don't like the odds of getting that posed shot every time I hunt elk...If I take them as they come and I need a tougher bullet...I chose this year a 300 gr. Woodleigh RNSP or a 250 gr. Nosler Partition in a 338. and you can bet next year I will use something very simular.

Bottom line anything will work if used properly and one can use lesser guns and inferior bullets if he adjusts his hunting methods to meet the need. During WW2, when ammo was not available, I killed deer with military ball ammo..It had to be right or a long tracking job would result.
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
Well said Ray, as always.
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
<swede7>
posted
Sorry P Dog, guess I still have to wonder why at the yardage you were shooting you couldn't find a bullet designed for hunting that you couldn't feel confident of shooting to the point of aim. Glad it worked for you, really glad for the elk. I suppose I'm hopeless, doesn't seem like the right, or smart choice to me. Hope you have a good gun season here in WI.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FarRight:

Deadly? To targets, by all intents and purposes, yes. To elk, no...

I guess p dog had better go to his freezer and make sure the elk inside hasn't gotten up and run away.

Would a 180 Matchking be my personal choice for elk? No. My elk hunting experience and attitude is much like Ray describes. I would prefere a tougher bullet. But if somebody puts one in the boiler room what do you think will happen? Is it going to bounce off?

I'd really like to see some side-by-side penetration tests of a 180 Matchking vs. O'Connor's much beloved non-premium 130 grain 270 loads. I'd put down money that says we would find out O'Connor wasn't using a "hunting load" all that time. How did he do it? He didn't shoot them in the ass.

I'll be using the 240 SMK for deer this year and I've personally tested it against the 180 Scirocco and 180 XBT for penetration. Guess which one penetrates the farthest? Guess which does the most damage along the entire length of the penetration? I'll give you a hint, it isn't the 180's.

But I suppose my old 140 Ballistic Tip 7mm-08 load that wouldn't even exit a broadside antelope (you want to talk about "not a hunting bullet!") would really be much "deadlier." [Roll Eyes]
 
Posts: 920 | Location: Mukilteo, WA | Registered: 29 November 2001Reply With Quote
<Boyd Heaton>
posted
Jon A.I too will be using the 240's in both of my 300 Ultra's....My "Light gun" 30" Hart barrel will chuck them to 3000fps with a Stiff load of RL25.My Heavy gun,36" Krieger.Will run them to a touch over 3200fps.Will try for a 2000 yard kill this year.I will be video taping the kill's and taking picture's of entry and exit wound's.Should be fun..
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ray, did you file the tips off the ball ammo to make "softpoints" or shoot them as is? Does fileing the tips amount to anything near expansion if you do?
 
Posts: 941 | Location: VT | Registered: 17 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ray no one elk doesn't tell it all, [Wink] I have shot more than one big game animal with the 180 gr match king haven't seen a differants in them from other so call hunting bullets. As you said shot placement is what kills. Gut shoot or blow a front leg off and they all run a long ways no matter what you shoot them with. So all of you that get down on match kings have you ever shot a big game animal with one. Having watch this along with the famous match king thread I see two types of shooters those who have and those who say you shouldn't. Most of those who say you shouldn't have not done so. Most of those who have do not see any differants between match kings and standard hunting bullets.
,,,,,,, [Wink] So all of you who say it shouldn't be done lets see some real life storys no making them like Todd where they have failed with good shooting if is easy to say a bullet doesn't work if you have bad shot placement.
 
Posts: 19711 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Jon A I just had some elk steak for dinner Oh wait I think I feel the critter starting to run around in there. Dam.
 
Posts: 19711 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Seems simple enough to me, if you want to use Mks to hunt with, by all means use them, and if you don't, don't and, for Pete's sake, shut up about someone else using them. How many dead animals do you guys need to see that they WILL KILL big game. Geeesh.
 
Posts: 17099 | Location: Texas USA | Registered: 07 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The people that are anti Matchking because Sierra does not recommend them for hunting should consider two things.

Firstly, Sierra needs and wants the freedom to make those bullets to achieve peak accuracy. Many many years ago the Matchkings were Full Metal Jacketed. Perhaps in 5 years time the Matchkings by "accident" will be ideal bullets for Rhino. On the other hand they might not even be suitable for a 20 pound animal. Likewise, Sierra is probaly not going to recommed their game bullets for target use because future development of their spitzer game bullets might mean improved killing power but a loss of accuracy.

Secondly, how many people that adhere to the view that the "manufacturer's recommendation" is the key point also criticise the manufacrure when it comes to another topic.

Mike
 
Posts: 7206 | Location: Sydney, Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
TSj,
Yes I filed the points down on the ball ammo..two things were likly to happen, instant kill or a long tracking job, basically the same experience that I have had without filing them down...

P Dog,
I have use the matchkings on big game and in a couple of culling operations and I personally didn't care for them as they will fail on ocassion.

I also recall back when Sierras were all the handloader had to play with, not matchkings but just Sierra spitzers.they blew up on blesbok and springbok from time to time...They worked fine most of the time.

That is the problem with those types of bullets, most of the time they do work, then when you really get to trusting them they fail....

Sooner or later that light will dawn on you..From time to time you will finds exploded bullets with the matchkings. That should be your first clue to pending failure. It was with me and I ignored it until it happened a few times...fortunatly I got them killed.

My question is WHY? when you and I both know that there are better bullets available at the same price!, what are you trying to prove? I don't deny you the right, but I question your reasoning ability, and ethics, but I must admit to committing the same crimes over the years...I have always been a hopeless bullet experimentor...I finally proved we(you and I) were just waisting our time trying to make bad bullets work....
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The problem Ray is that all bullets well fail once in awhile. Nothing is perfect even the best well do something stange now and then. Drive the wrong bullet to fast place in the wrong spot ect they well not be perfect. Having watch all these treads it seems to me almost every body has had a bullet do what its wasn't surpose to just a couple of weeks ago a guy said his nosler partations failed on deer we can go on and on. Like you ray I have emptied boxs and boxs of bullets trying to find the perfect one. There is no such critter. Just when you think you have found it something well happen to make you wonder.
 
Posts: 19711 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of POP
posted Hide Post
What I do not understand is why use those matchkings when there are hunting bullets around. Always amazed by this. [Mad]
 
Posts: 3865 | Location: Cheyenne, WYOMING, USA | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
POP if I remember right you are the one who started the famous match king thread. To answer you Question is becase they work!!!!!!!!!!
 
Posts: 19711 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by p dog shooter:
I just got in from Wyoming from a cow elk hunt I shot about a 4 year old cow at 273 yards(lasered) with one shot from my 300win mag and a 180 gr match king. I felt really sorry for the elk as she only ran about 75 feet. I know that she should not have died so fast being shot with a match king. But after having her lungs and heart taken out I don't think she had much choice. Did't recover the bullet

Hmmm, you shot a big game animal with a bullet not designed for expansion.

Technically, you are in violation of Chapter 32, Section 4 of the Wyoming Game & Fish regulations.

What do you have to say to that?

George
 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of POP
posted Hide Post
Amen George!

PD: Can't you find a bullet that is designed for this type of use?

We can help you .... just ask. We're here for you man!

[Smile]
 
Posts: 3865 | Location: Cheyenne, WYOMING, USA | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of POP
posted Hide Post
BOYD:

Let me get this straight, you're going for a 2000 yard kill this year? Is this correct?

[ 11-04-2002, 23:08: Message edited by: POP ]
 
Posts: 3865 | Location: Cheyenne, WYOMING, USA | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GeorgeS:
Hmmm, you shot a big game animal with a bullet not designed for expansion.

Technically, you are in violation of Chapter 32, Section 4 of the Wyoming Game & Fish regulations.

What do you have to say to that?

George

I suppose you could prove they are specifically designed to not expand? That's what would be required to be in violation of the regulation.

Are they a FMJ? No.

Does the jacket have serrations from the hollow point down nearly 1/2"? Yes. You didn't know that, did you?

SMK's expand just as readily as ballistic tips, maybe even more. That's one of the specific reasons why people that hunt at extreme ranges like them so much. They will expand at ranges where a Barnes X, Win Failsafe or a Swift A-Frame would punch through like a FMJ.

How about you get your facts straight before you accuse somebody of violating the law next time?

What do you have to say about that? [Razz]

[ 11-04-2002, 23:22: Message edited by: Jon A ]
 
Posts: 920 | Location: Mukilteo, WA | Registered: 29 November 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia