THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HANDGUN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: MS Hitman
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
45 acp for elk
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I have been thinking about this for some time. While bow hunting I have been 5-20 yards away from elk.During rifle season It should not be any harder. I'm no john wayne but point a hair out, I'll hit it. So from 5 to 40 yards can the 45 humanely kill an elk ?
 
Posts: 145 | Location: Haines Oregon | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Possible yes , appropraiate NO. Get yourself a 44 mag or hot loaded 45 Long Colt.
Give careful thought to what what you expect that bullet to do as far as penetration and expansion in an animal of the size you're hunting.Consider less than perfect bullet placement as you'll deal with field conditions.
 
Posts: 7636 | Registered: 10 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I guess if you have shot enough elk so you not worried about not killing one. You should be able to do it.

For me I wouldn't want to waste a elk tag on the the slim change of waiting for the perfect shot one would have to have to make it work.
 
Posts: 19710 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I generally make it a practice to not tell others what to do, HOWEVER...
Since you asked.
That is an incredibly poor idea.
CAN it be done...of course.
WOULD it be done...in actual practice....
MAYBE, and I'd not go afield with only a "MAYBE" to count on. My respect for the animal transcends any desire to perform some kind of STUNT HUNT.
 
Posts: 953 | Location: Florida | Registered: 17 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It's a terrible idea IMO.
 
Posts: 272 | Location: North Carolina,USA | Registered: 17 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of SGraves155
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kenoneill:
It's a terrible idea IMO.

+1

Anyone hunting for sport owes it to the animal to use a cartridge that ensures a quick and humane death if hit appropriately. To me, anything less than 1000 ft lb of energy at the target(elk) would be ridiculous. The 45 acp has less than half this energy at the muzzle.


Steve
"He wins the most, who honour saves. Success is not the test." Ryan
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Stalin
Tanzania 06
Argentina08
Argentina
Australia06
Argentina 07
Namibia
Arnhemland10
Belize2011
Moz04
Moz 09
 
Posts: 8100 | Location: NW Arkansas | Registered: 09 July 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I decided years ago if I am serious about killing something when out hunting I take a rifle of proper cailber.

If by law or season I will use a bow, handgun or muzzle loader.

If I just want to make it harder also then it bow, handgun, or muzzle loader.
 
Posts: 19710 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Surprisingly, as long as the 45ACP was fired in a " manually operated centerfire rifle or handgun at least 27 caliber, using all lead projectiles or bullets of at least 130 grains designed to expand on impact" it would be perfectly legal here in Pennsylvania.

Personally, I think if fired from a Colt 1911 or similar semi-auto, they might just bounce off a good sized bull elk. stir
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It is about the same ratio wise as someone hunting you with a 22lr...................
 
Posts: 440 | Location: South Central PA | Registered: 11 November 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ty_falcon:
I have been thinking about this for some time. While bow hunting I have been 5-20 yards away from elk.During rifle season It should not be any harder. I'm no john wayne but point a hair out, I'll hit it. So from 5 to 40 yards can the 45 humanely kill an elk ?



Yes, if the correct load is chosen it should work just fine.
If I were going to use the 45ACP, I would go with the Buffalo Bore 255 grain hard cast +P load at 925 FPS or a near duplicate hand load


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SGraves155:
quote:
Originally posted by kenoneill:
It's a terrible idea IMO.

+1

Anyone hunting for sport owes it to the animal to use a cartridge that ensures a quick and humane death if hit appropriately. To me, anything less than 1000 ft lb of energy at the target(elk) would be ridiculous. The 45 acp has less than half this energy at the muzzle.


Energy is a poor way to rate lethality. I can assure you that the Buffalo Bore 255 RNFP hard cast +P at 925 FPS will exit on broad side shots and a 45 caliber projectile through the vitals will bring rapid incapacitation


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of don444
posted Hide Post
It's not a good idea JMHO
 
Posts: 551 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 27 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by don444:
It's not a good idea JMHO



How about a 45 Colt with a 260 grain bullet at 900 FPS?


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of SGraves155
posted Hide Post
Hits thru the lungs with the mentioned handgun loads might lead to "rapid incapacitation" or they may more easily lead to miles of poor blood trail and a lost animal. If you're gonna hunt big game, do it with a load that will destroy lots of lung tissue on such a mentioned shot. High velocity wounds are much more efficient killers than low velocity rounds. If its a canned hunt for bison or elk, then the handgun won't make much difference, as the animal won't suffer long until its finally put down.
In Zimbabwe, elk sized critters can only be hunted with cartridges developing over 2000FPE.
That might be a good idea for some of the elk hunting states to look at:
"Class A game
■Elephant, buffalo, hippo
■A minimum bullet diameter of 9.2mm and energy level of 5,300 joules (3,910 ft-lbs) is required. In practice this means a 9.3x62 as the minimum caliber but most operators regard the .375 H&H or 9.3x64 as the minimum.
■A special permit is required for hunting Class A game with a bow.

Class B game
■Lion, giraffe, eland
■A bullet diameter of at least 7mm (.284) and an energy level of 4,300 joules (3,170 ft-lbs) is necessary.
■In practice, a 7mm Remington Magnum with a 175 grain bullet is the minimum. Most operators would regard the .300 Magnum as the minimum while many require a .338 Winchester Magnum as the minimum for lion.
■A compound bow with a draw weight of at least 35 kg (77 pounds) and an arrow of minimum 45 gram (702 grains) is required. The broadhead may have only two cutting edges.

Class C game
■Leopard, crocodile, hyena, kudu, sable antelope, blue wildebeest, waterbuck, zebra, nyala, tsessebe, hartebeest, gemsbok, blesbok
■A bullet diameter of at least 7mm (.284) and an energy level of 3,000 joules (2,115 ft-lbs) is necessary.
■In practice this means a 7x57mm Mauser with a 140 grain bullet.
■A compound bow with a draw weight of at least 32 kg (71 pounds) and an arrow of minimum 40 gram (624 grains) is required.

Class D game
■Warthog, impala, reedbuck, bushbusk, sitatunga, jackal and animals smaller than 25 kg (56 lbs).
■A bullet diameter of at least 5.56mm (.22) and an energy level of 850 joules (630 ft-lbs) is necessary.
■In practice this means a .22 Hornet with a 45 grain bullet. However, most professional hunters will require a larger caliber like a .243."


Steve
"He wins the most, who honour saves. Success is not the test." Ryan
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Stalin
Tanzania 06
Argentina08
Argentina
Australia06
Argentina 07
Namibia
Arnhemland10
Belize2011
Moz04
Moz 09
 
Posts: 8100 | Location: NW Arkansas | Registered: 09 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
A better idea would be to use a bullet that penetrates deeply enough to perferate the vitals. All that energy is not much good if the bullets integrity good enough to penetrate deeply

I am glad that the bear and Moose couldn't read and didn't realize that I din't have the minimum 2000 FPE, but since they didn't know they fell to only one shot each from my revolver. I took the Bear and the Moose in the left of the photo




Another 1 shot kill and the bullet exited without 2000 FPE




Another kill without 2000 FPE and the bullet exited through both shoulders and breaking the main support bone in the shoulder and the Asain Buffalo went no where



To claim that a minimum of 2000 FPE is required is ridiculous


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My only real problem is that he may not get as close to the elk in rifle season as he does in bow season.

.
Rifle for longer shots would make me feel better if I drew an elk tag.
 
Posts: 440 | Location: South Central PA | Registered: 11 November 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 257x50:
My only real problem is that he may not get as close to the elk in rifle season as he does in bow season.

.
Rifle for longer shots would make me feel better if I drew an elk tag.



Not getting close enough is a legitimate concern. Given the parameters of the opening post to a max of 40 yards it is certainly doable


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
JWP475;
Just reread that............missed the 40 yard thing entirely........
Ethics..........much better than someone blazoing away with a rifle and not having any.
.
The man may be better with that 45ACP than some are with their super custom magnum.......
.
The man maybe one of the minority who is asking a real question.
.
NOT like the guy on a welding forum who's first post is a question:
What welder should I buy?
No budget, no type, no material.
.
Okay John, you have got me on this one........
.
Guess I was answering the question I heard instead of the question he asked.
.
Hell when you think of it. There are people who hunt Marine Special Ops with a 223...........I would rather hunt elk with a 380..............
 
Posts: 440 | Location: South Central PA | Registered: 11 November 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 257x50:
JWP475;
Just reread that............missed the 40 yard thing entirely........
Ethics..........much better than someone blazoing away with a rifle and not having any.
.
The man may be better with that 45ACP than some are with their super custom magnum.......
.
The man maybe one of the minority who is asking a real question.
.
NOT like the guy on a welding forum who's first post is a question:
What welder should I buy?
No budget, no type, no material.
.
Okay John, you have got me on this one........
.
Guess I was answering the question I heard instead of the question he asked.
.
Hell when you think of it. There are people who hunt Marine Special Ops with a 223...........I would rather hunt elk with a 380..............


Under the pareameters that the OP set IMHO properly loaded with a heavy hard cast and driven to 900 or so FPS it will work. Not the best choice by no means and one would need to pick his shot well IMHO. I would look for a broadside shot into the rib cage.
A 45 Colt with a 300 grain hard cast at 1200 or so FPS with a wid flat point would be a great choice IMHO


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If we look hard enough we can find a way to justify any caliber for game & I'm sure its been done in a pinch, but there are so many ways that are better when taking on an elk.
These kinds of discussions come up several times a year, one time a guy told me elephants had been taken with the 22 LR....well, how do you argue with that, you don't.
Most of us consider these types of things to be in the "stunt" class, yes it will work but please don't do it, elk are very, very tough.

Dick
 
Posts: 135 | Location: Soda Springs, Idaho | Registered: 16 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have shot whitetail deer and mule deer with a 45ACP. It did the job, but not in an impressive way.

When I carry a 45 ACP in the field I carried 230gr ball, and later, the Buffalo Bore 230gr FP +P. The cast 255 gr load would be better, IMHO but was not around when I carried the 1911 as a backup on a couple of bear hunts.

If I did hunt elk on purpose with a handgun, a 44 Mag with a 240gr hard cast, full power load would be my minimum.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys for the answers. YES this is a legitimate question. It looks like NO is the most answered. I know it could be done,but I know how tough an elk is. So thats why I asked. It looks like this is one of those I wish ideas.
 
Posts: 145 | Location: Haines Oregon | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
General guidelines for Roosevelt elk and humane kills is 2,000 ft. lbs. bullet energy at the target. 45 ACP doesn't come close. Besides which, you can't find a 45 ACP bullet designed to penetrate and kill tough hide, large animals. 45 ACP is designed and intended for anti-personnel defense, and so that's the bullet design for this caliber.

An arrow makes a large wound channel, deeply, and the animal bleeds out. I don't think it's particularly humane, but then I view elk as some of my personal front yard pals.
 
Posts: 1841 | Registered: 13 January 2011Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rothke:
General guidelines for Roosevelt elk and humane kills is 2,000 ft. lbs. bullet energy at the target. 45 ACP doesn't come close. Besides which, you can't find a 45 ACP bullet designed to penetrate and kill tough hide, large animals. 45 ACP is designed and intended for anti-personnel defense, and so that's the bullet design for this caliber.

An arrow makes a large wound channel, deeply, and the animal bleeds out. I don't think it's particularly humane, but then I view elk as some of my personal front yard pals.


And you are hard pressed to find any hunting handgun round (.454 Casull, .480 Ruger, .475 Linebaugh, .500 Linebaugh, .500 JRH, etc.) that "produces" (actually, ME is a calculated figure not something that can be measured) that comes anywhere near 2,000 ft-lbs. It is a meaningless figure, that has no merit and is an absolutely poor way of determining lethality. You certainly can find loaded ammo from companies such as Buffalo Bore, and Double Tap that are loaded with heavy, flat-nosed hardcast that are more than up to the task of penetrating -- as long as the shooter does his part and is close enough. Is it optimal? No, but it never ceases to amaze me how folks immediately throw up their hands in protest at the suggestion of using a .45 acp for anything but personal defense.

Rothke, do you hunt much with a handgun? Just curious.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ty_falcon:
I have been thinking about this for some time. While bow hunting I have been 5-20 yards away from elk.During rifle season It should not be any harder. I'm no john wayne but point a hair out, I'll hit it. So from 5 to 40 yards can the 45 humanely kill an elk ?


Yes, if you think like a bow hunter. The 45acp will give just enough to poke a hole in the lungs, but not much more. And the animal isn't going to bleed out like they would from an arrow.

Next time you get one down, pop a few holes in it with the 45acp and see what you think.


Well, at least have an OK day Smiler
 
Posts: 242 | Location: NW Oregon | Registered: 08 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Posted 05 February 2011 21:20 Hide Post
Hits thru the lungs with the mentioned handgun loads might lead to "rapid incapacitation" or they may more easily lead to miles of poor blood trail and a lost animal. If you're gonna hunt big game, do it with a load that will destroy lots of lung tissue on such a mentioned shot. High velocity wounds are much more efficient killers than low velocity rounds. If its a canned hunt for bison or elk, then the handgun won't make much difference, as the animal won't suffer long until its finally put down.
In Zimbabwe, elk sized critters can only be hunted with cartridges developing over 2000FPE.
That might be a good idea for some of the elk hunting states to look at:
"Class A game
■Elephant, buffalo, hippo
■A minimum bullet diameter of 9.2mm and energy level of 5,300 joules (3,910 ft-lbs) is required. In practice this means a 9.3x62 as the minimum caliber but most operators regard the .375 H&H or 9.3x64 as the minimum.
■A special permit is required for hunting Class A game with a bow.

Class B game
■Lion, giraffe, eland
■A bullet diameter of at least 7mm (.284) and an energy level of 4,300 joules (3,170 ft-lbs) is necessary.
■In practice, a 7mm Remington Magnum with a 175 grain bullet is the minimum. Most operators would regard the .300 Magnum as the minimum while many require a .338 Winchester Magnum as the minimum for lion.
■A compound bow with a draw weight of at least 35 kg (77 pounds) and an arrow of minimum 45 gram (702 grains) is required. The broadhead may have only two cutting edges.

Class C game
■Leopard, crocodile, hyena, kudu, sable antelope, blue wildebeest, waterbuck, zebra, nyala, tsessebe, hartebeest, gemsbok, blesbok
■A bullet diameter of at least 7mm (.284) and an energy level of 3,000 joules (2,115 ft-lbs) is necessary.
■In practice this means a 7x57mm Mauser with a 140 grain bullet.
■A compound bow with a draw weight of at least 32 kg (71 pounds) and an arrow of minimum 40 gram (624 grains) is required.

Class D game
■Warthog, impala, reedbuck, bushbusk, sitatunga, jackal and animals smaller than 25 kg (56 lbs).
■A bullet diameter of at least 5.56mm (.22) and an energy level of 850 joules (630 ft-lbs) is necessary.
■In practice this means a .22 Hornet with a 45 grain bullet. However, most professional hunters will require a larger caliber like a .243."


Steve
"He wins the most, who honour saves. Success is not the test." Ryan
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Stalin
Tanzania 06
Argentina08
Argentina
Australia06
Argentina 07
Namibia
Caprivi04
Arnhemland10

Dia and this fella are really telling the truth. Poking a hole just sucks and without internal damage you are going to lose the animal unless you can watch it until death.
Why does anyone think a hole is enough?
Most love a large caliber rifle with tons of energy but think a revolver that pokes a hole is as good.
You NEED energy in the right place. You need to transmit the energy to the animal at the right time.
More agree but some post the same tired crap.
I am sure if I shoot a bison with a .22 and followed it for days, it might die but it also can recover. Poking a hole through an animal does not make it dead.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Bfrshooter;
Wouldn't you say it takes more energy to make a bigger hole?
 
Posts: 440 | Location: South Central PA | Registered: 11 November 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:

And you are hard pressed to find any hunting handgun round (.454 Casull, .480 Ruger, .475 Linebaugh, .500 Linebaugh, .500 JRH, etc.) that "produces" (actually, ME is a calculated figure not something that can be measured) that comes anywhere near 2,000 ft-lbs. It is a meaningless figure, that has no merit and is an absolutely poor way of determining lethality. You certainly can find loaded ammo from companies such as Buffalo Bore, and Double Tap that are loaded with heavy, flat-nosed hardcast that are more than up to the task of penetrating -- as long as the shooter does his part and is close enough. Is it optimal? No, but it never ceases to amaze me how folks immediately throw up their hands in protest at the suggestion of using a .45 acp for anything but personal defense.

bsflag


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
45 acp for elk

thumbdown


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Dia and this fella are really telling the truth. Poking a hole just sucks and without internal damage you are going to lose the animal unless you can watch it until death.
Why does anyone think a hole is enough?
Most love a large caliber rifle with tons of energy but think a revolver that pokes a hole is as good.
You NEED energy in the right place. You need to transmit the energy to the animal at the right time.
More agree but some post the same tired crap.
I am sure if I shoot a bison with a .22 and followed it for days, it might die but it also can recover. Poking a hole through an animal does not make it dead.




I can tell you why I like to poke holes, because holes through the vitails kills and kills quickly

45 Colt WFN at about 1150 FPS muzzle velocity impact about 50 yards









Bullet exited, now try that with a 55 grain 22 cal varmint bullet at 3600 it has a lot more energy, but will not give the penetration or exits

Energy is a poor way of rating lethality.

My 338 Lapua with a 300 grain SMK has more energy than a 458 win with a 500 grain bullet, I know which one is a better cartridge for Elephant. Hint it ain't the Lapua


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of SGraves155
posted Hide Post
jwp, your hot loaded 45 certainly performs better than would standard 45 caliber loads. Your loads also have about twice the energy of standard .45ACP commercial loadings. The Thompson-LaGarde beef-killing efforts with different caliber pistols from .30 to .476 showed how inadequate standard loads are for elk-sized game in .45.
The beeves went from 750-1300lbs--i.e. from large RockyMtn Bull to large Roosevelt bull in weight.
They shot 13 different animals. The only one that died with one shot was from a .30 Luger. Most took 5-10 shots, and were then killed with a hammer after several minutes.
http://www.sightm1911.com/lib/history/background.htm


Steve
"He wins the most, who honour saves. Success is not the test." Ryan
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Stalin
Tanzania 06
Argentina08
Argentina
Australia06
Argentina 07
Namibia
Arnhemland10
Belize2011
Moz04
Moz 09
 
Posts: 8100 | Location: NW Arkansas | Registered: 09 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of dpcd
posted Hide Post
Definitely a bad idea; the .45 is a very poor penetrator and little energy for an elk. Once I had a supply sergeant who decided to off himself; he took a .45 with hardball ammo and shot himself in the stomach with it. Thinking that was a poor idea, he proceeded to drive himself to the hospital, and made a full, quick recovery. Of course, that was a gut shot...but you get the idea.
 
Posts: 17373 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If it was all I had I would use it.But with other choices in the gun safe..This is not a set in stone goal of mine..I was just looking for opinions on the subject. And the majority has given good explanation why my idea is a bad one. Thank you.
 
Posts: 145 | Location: Haines Oregon | Registered: 15 February 2004Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:

And you are hard pressed to find any hunting handgun round (.454 Casull, .480 Ruger, .475 Linebaugh, .500 Linebaugh, .500 JRH, etc.) that "produces" (actually, ME is a calculated figure not something that can be measured) that comes anywhere near 2,000 ft-lbs. It is a meaningless figure, that has no merit and is an absolutely poor way of determining lethality. You certainly can find loaded ammo from companies such as Buffalo Bore, and Double Tap that are loaded with heavy, flat-nosed hardcast that are more than up to the task of penetrating -- as long as the shooter does his part and is close enough. Is it optimal? No, but it never ceases to amaze me how folks immediately throw up their hands in protest at the suggestion of using a .45 acp for anything but personal defense.

bsflag


Vapo, have you taken much game with a handgun? Even a .22-250 can boast more "muzzle energy" than a .500 Linebaugh. Can you guess which one is better for big game? Not trying to be combative, but you come here and fly the B.S. flag and you offer no explanation for your opinion on this matter. All we have is a large diameter, heavy bullet with very limited velocity. As I said before, I don't think it is optimal -- actually pretty far from it, but if one uses the right bullets, gets close, and places his shot well, it should work. That was the OP's original question/concern.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dpcd:
Definitely a bad idea; the .45 is a very poor penetrator and little energy for an elk. Once I had a supply sergeant who decided to off himself; he took a .45 with hardball ammo and shot himself in the stomach with it. Thinking that was a poor idea, he proceeded to drive himself to the hospital, and made a full, quick recovery. Of course, that was a gut shot...but you get the idea.


Ball ammo is a poor choice for any hunting situation. It is the bullet that is the limiting factor more than anything else.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Vapo, have you taken much game with a handgun?



The smart money in on NO!!!


This is the exit in the offside of a 6X7 Bull Elk made from a 300 Win witha a 180 grain bullet with an impct velocity of about 2600 FPS calculating to 2700 FPS

I am holding an unfired 300 Win for size comparison




This is the exitin the off side rib cage of the same Elkk, made from a 500 JRH revovler with a 440 grain wide meplat Hard Cast with a muzzle velocity of 950 FPS for a calculated 888 FPE

I am again holding an unfired 300 Win for size comparison



The wound from the revolver with 888 FPE at the muzzle was larger from start to finnish. The bullet exited the Elk and buried into the ground beyound the Elk deeper than I could dig with my fingers and was not recovered

FPE is a very poor way to rate lethality


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
wow, it appears that there's some of the "know it alls" from the big bore forum hanging around, ya know, the place where a 458 lott is considered small.

anyway, vapodog, you really don't know much about this and show your lack of experience in matters concerning handguns and hunting with them. not one waterbuff, bison, or any other well over 1500lb game animal knew my 454 didn't have 2K 3K or 5K in muzzle energy.


it's not about the caliber, it's about the bullet. to quote how poor the penetration of the 45 acp is and then quote results from hollow points and hardball. totally irrelevant, unless you discuss results with flatpoint hardcasts. end of story.
 
Posts: 559 | Location: texas | Registered: 31 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tradmark:
wow, it appears that there's some of the "know it alls" from the big bore forum hanging around, ya know, the place where a 458 lott is considered small.

anyway, vapodog, you really don't know much about this and show your lack of experience in matters concerning handguns and hunting with them. not one waterbuff, bison, or any other well over 1500lb game animal knew my 454 didn't have 2K 3K or 5K in muzzle energy.


it's not about the caliber, it's about the bullet. to quote how poor the penetration of the 45 acp is and then quote results from hollow points and hardball. totally irrelevant, unless you discuss results with flatpoint hardcasts. end of story.



+1........ Spot on...... tu2


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
One of the great things about African hunting is that even if you only draw blood you still pay the trophy fee.....yes...even if you don't ever get it down or ever see it again.....and the daily fee is the same if one actually gets anything or not!

Essentially it's a put your money where your trigger finger is!

A lot fewer people would use substandard firearms if that was the case in the US!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
A lot fewer people would use substandard firearms if that was the case in the US!




Substandard by whose definition? Yours? I tend to agree with tradmark when it comes to assessing your knowledge on the subject
tu2


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia