THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    The criteria for a true DangerousGame cartridge.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The criteria for a true DangerousGame cartridge. Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by JPK:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
I don't think that any one caliber, bullet weight or velocity is perfect for the wide range of animals that we call "dangerous game". The perfect rifle for leopard, lion or bear is vastly different than the perfect rifle for buffalo, hippo, rhino or elephants. The minimums expressed in the opening post will work well for elephant but are definitely not the best for leopard. Useable?, yes, but perfect?, definitely not.

465H&H


Saeed has it wrong, a relatively light cartridge can stop an animal intent on killing you if the shot is a perfect CNS hit, but there have been references to "stopping rifles" for 120 years since the advent of the 450NE, and for a reason, after decades of use it became obvious that a cartridge similar or more powerful than a 450NE was a reasonably reliable elephant stopper while those of lesser bullet weight, diameter and energy were not.

465H&H has it right. What is a great rifle for an elephant can't be a great rifle for a leopard.

I've settled on the 458wm as my elephant rifle, but would love to try a 500NE. Hippo hunted out of the water would be in the same league, same with rhino.

It's fun shooting buff up close with an express sighted double rifle, but a bolt 375H&H or 416 or 458wm, Lott with a low power scope with about 1x at the low end would all meet the definition of ideal, imo.

All else the 375H&H shines, partly because of it's broad utility.


I know someone who shot a cow elephant in frontal brain shot. He missed the brain, and the cow just shock here head as if nothing has happened.

I personally missed the brain on an elephant bull, he dropped to the ground struggling and I added another shot to the top of his head, killing him.



I quess that is with a big bore versus your 375 - just to make the point??
But in such small numbers the same could be experienced with a 6mm versus your 375... but in very large numbers (like Harland, La Grange, Nyeschens and others have shot) it is clear that the bigger bores have MUCH more stopping power or felling power as Harland put it... Remember I agree - nothing replaces correct bullet placement... But on a marginal shot - everything else equal - a big bore will be better than a medium bore.. And the bigger the better...
 
Posts: 873 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eagle27:
JPK, I had no intention of comparing cape buffalo with elephant and agree in the most with what you have said in regards elephants an hunting them. I just used the shots on buffalo between myself and MS as an example of how one can show an entirely different scenario.

I don't think any one, including myself, on this forum doubts the effectiveness of big doubles on the big DG. Your video shows that and I acknowledged that and of course you and anyone else can hold the belief that a big double is the only one that should be used on the big varieties of DG. of course we should all be free and civil enough to debate that.

What I have said is that in the scenario you show I could see no reason why you had to bring in the idea that a lessor calibre might not have done that. By the same token another hunter standing there with a big double may have failed to do what you did with your double.

To me your video only shows what you did on the day in that place with your double, nothing else as there was nothing else there to compare it with. Had another hunter or your PH shot and hit the elephant with a lessor calibre and failed to stop the charge then yes you would have a great video to show that under those circumstances your double done the job.

I thought this objective take on it was quite simple.
Unfortunately many cannot have anyone call into question their idea on what various DG guns can or can't do and can't have a civil debate without starting to get snotty and name calling.

Again unfortunately there is so much evidence both past and present of hunters and PHs able to utilise the so called lessor calibres to very successfully hunt and guide on DG in Africa. The lessor calibres may not be for everyone just as the big calibres are not for everyone.

For those that say Saeed knows nothing about hunting DG or Atkinson is kidding himself thinking the 375, 9.3 or 40 cals are ideal, and of course Selby was a dreamer if he thought a 416 Rigby would not see him out as one of the longest serving PH's, and oh yes so I can become more like Trax as some would have it, we have that perennial thorn in the side with the man named Bell who probably shot more DG and other game than all the modern day forum posters put together. How dare we even hint at using him as an example of what a lessor calibre is capable of.

I know damn well who I would sooner stand beside in a charge, I can't bring Bell back but Saeed will do nicely thank you very much.


Eagle, you did compare elephants to buffalo.

And you continue to miss the entire point. The efficacy of the big bore stopping rifle pretty much begins and ends with elephants, no other DG.

No one has said that an elephant can't be killed with a lighter rifle, the evidence is expansive that they can be, with rifles as light as 5.56mm. But the evidence is equally expansive that lighter rifles do not stop elephants reasonably reliably while those rifles of about the 450NE level do (and as noted earlier, some include the 416R in it's historical loading, and so every other similarly loaded rifle,) and that is the point - mine, Harland's, Nychen's, Taylor's Groebler's, Scheepers, Duckworth's, Whittall's, etc, etc, etc, ....

The incident where I stopped the elephant cow is merely one of thousands, one of two personal examples, the other being a bull. It is a little hypocritical to attempt to isolate my cow example while at the same time lumping all of the many successful hunts with lighter rifles, and comparing apples to oranges in the process. Take my one or two (successful) examples of stopping an elephant charge with a big bore stopping rifle and add them to the experiences (successful and not) of those elephant hunters past and still present who have hunted thousands of elephants.

Likewise, add the charge stopping stopping (or failing to stop) experiences of those using medium bore rifles.

The great weight of experience informs us that if you wish to hunt elephants close, in thick bush and rely on yourself to keep your hide intact, you ought to choose a big bore rifle.

FWIW, I have been told by a number of PH's that a good 1/3 of hunters when charged by an elephant bolt when the elephant gets close (In Zimbabwe, a defensive shooting must be within 10yds, further than 10yds and the presumption is that the elephant did not need to be shot.)

You don't read about those incidents, eh?

With Saeed's often repeated penchant for avoiding any dangerous situation while hunting DG (DG isn't dangerous at 50yds!!!) I can think of more than a handful of other already proven AR members who I would prefer to be beside when the elephant comes. Richard Harland would have to lead the list, followed by Buzz Charlton, Martin Pieters, Thierry Labatt, Neil Duckworth and perhaps a few other well tested game rangers or PH's I have over looked, and then followed by Oz Hunter and other AR members who have stood their ground and stopped charging elephants. Perhaps Saeed has already been tested, if so I have not read of it.

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by JPK:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
I don't think that any one caliber, bullet weight or velocity is perfect for the wide range of animals that we call "dangerous game". The perfect rifle for leopard, lion or bear is vastly different than the perfect rifle for buffalo, hippo, rhino or elephants. The minimums expressed in the opening post will work well for elephant but are definitely not the best for leopard. Useable?, yes, but perfect?, definitely not.

465H&H


Saeed has it wrong, a relatively light cartridge can stop an animal intent on killing you if the shot is a perfect CNS hit, but there have been references to "stopping rifles" for 120 years since the advent of the 450NE, and for a reason, after decades of use it became obvious that a cartridge similar or more powerful than a 450NE was a reasonably reliable elephant stopper while those of lesser bullet weight, diameter and energy were not.

465H&H has it right. What is a great rifle for an elephant can't be a great rifle for a leopard.

I've settled on the 458wm as my elephant rifle, but would love to try a 500NE. Hippo hunted out of the water would be in the same league, same with rhino.

It's fun shooting buff up close with an express sighted double rifle, but a bolt 375H&H or 416 or 458wm, Lott with a low power scope with about 1x at the low end would all meet the definition of ideal, imo.

All else the 375H&H shines, partly because of it's broad utility.


I know someone who shot a cow elephant in frontal brain shot. He missed the brain, and the cow just shock here head as if nothing has happened.

I personally missed the brain on an elephant bull, he dropped to the ground struggling and I added another shot to the top of his head, killing him.



I quess that is with a big bore versus your 375 - just to make the point??
But in such small numbers the same could be experienced with a 6mm versus your 375... but in very large numbers (like Harland, La Grange, Nyeschens and others have shot) it is clear that the bigger bores have MUCH more stopping power or felling power as Harland put it... Remember I agree - nothing replaces correct bullet placement... But on a marginal shot - everything else equal - a big bore will be better than a medium bore.. And the bigger the better...


Well put!

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Seasons44:


yeah..sure.. now tell me what HP does, again? dancing[/QUOTE]

My point of the energy comment was it does not determine lethality or stopping potential,this was expanded by both Whitworth and Micheal458 in regards to big bore pistols, so it is pointless to reiterate what was said.

I will not go into the debate of energy transfer, its a battle I am choosing to stay out of because 99.9% of us do not have the sophisticate equipment to accurately measure this, and this includes myself.

458wm, shooting 500gr Woodleigh solids at 2,135fps for a little more than 5,000lbs' of energy.

500 Linebaugh 460gr Punch 1150 fps 1350 fpe

Both are stopping rounds, although the numbers are worlds apart, this was my point

Idaho Sharpshooter,

Thank you for the grammatical correction, but I can assure you, I spell above the third grade level most of the time! Cool[/QUOTE]

XXXXXXXXXX

You confuse stopping with killing.

Your 500Linebaugh may be adequate to kill and elephant, but it is no reliable stopper, as the history of pre cordite rifles with not dissimilar ballistics reveals.

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Perhaps we should quantify the topic as follows.
Killing cartridges: The cartridge and platform you you are most precise and proficient

Stopping cartridge: The largest cartridge in a platform you you are most precise and proficient.

Deeply penetration bullets.
Ones who's design gives greatest penetration without deviation or deflection and maintains bullet integrity during it's terminal travel (inside the animal )
Items that can assist this; bullet weight, caliber, sectional density. Increasing the combination of these make for a bigger hammer.

I'd rather hunt with someone with precise efficiency in a smaller caliber than someone with a cannon that couldn't hit the door of the outhouse whilst sitting inside on the crapper.
 
Posts: 151 | Registered: 17 July 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kaytod:
Perhaps we should quantify the topic as follows.
Killing cartridges: The cartridge and platform you you are most precise and proficient

Stopping cartridge: The largest cartridge in a platform you you are most precise and proficient.

Deeply penetration bullets.
Ones who's design gives greatest penetration without deviation or deflection and maintains bullet integrity during it's terminal travel (inside the animal )
Items that can assist this; bullet weight, caliber, sectional density. Increasing the combination of these make for a bigger hammer.

I'd rather hunt with someone with precise efficiency in a smaller caliber than someone with a cannon that couldn't hit the door of the outhouse whilst sitting inside on the crapper.


Precise efficiency is always the goal, no matter the rifle, and it is a hell of a lot more frequently achieved at stand off distances with adequate time than when an elephant intent on killing you or one of your party is bearing down on you or breaking through the bush inside of 10yds.

No matter how you wish to try to redefine stopping rifle, if it isn't capable of reasonably reliably stopping an elephant when you err, or when the angle or presentation does not allow for perfection, it isn't a stopping rifle.

Since I get the impression that your post was directed at me, and pertaining to me missing the brain on the charging elephant, I will provide you with an example of precise shooting with the same rifle:



Note: The klipspringer was at about 75yds and he wasn't charging!

On penetration, enough is enough, for the first shot. Imo, for elephant, for the first shot only, you can have too much. A bullet capable of penetrating six or seven feet or more depletes it's energy over those six or seven or more feet. A bullet that will reliably penetrate straight three to four feet is preferred. All of it's energy is expended within or close to the skull, providing the greatest effect in the event of a missed brain shot. And recall, none of Groebler, Harland, Whittall, Duckworth, Taylor, Nychens or so many other greats relied on their infallibility to brain an elephant, as evidenced by their choice of stopping rifles over medium bore rifles.

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
eagle27,

The debate on weather it is better to use a smaller caliber that typically can be shot more accurately or a large bore 45+ that has proven stopping power on elephants has been going on ever since we switched from black powder to nitro cellulose.

Nothing new can be said that hasn't already been said at least once over the last 120 years. What we can do is to look at what those with vast experience at hunting elephant choose to keep them selves alive. We can also look at data collected on outcomes of elephant charges and what the comparative success rates of various calibers where during those charges.

In the early years late 1890s and early 1900s, the enhanced penetration on earl nitro cartridges like the 6.5 MS, 7X57 Mauser and 8mm Mauser over black powder cartridges were preferred. But over time and with experience gained from their use, it was found that these small calibers lacked enough hitting power to reliably stop an elephant charge. The large bores then took over as the favorite among professional elephant hunters. They counted on their rifles on a daily basis versus a client that may use it for that purpose only once in his life time.

DR. Don Heath, ex Zim National Parks and Zim PH, presented some data here from elephant charges recorded by ZNP. I don't remember the exact figures but the 375 H&H didn't stop any, the 416 clan stopped a greater number, the 450 group stopped a still greater percentage and not until you got up to the 50 caliber cartridges did the stopping rate exceed 90%. Hopefully, Don will see this thread and correct my poor memory if needed.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JPK:


XXXXXXXXXX

You confuse stopping with killing.

Your 500Linebaugh may be adequate to kill and elephant, but it is no reliable stopper, as the history of pre cordite rifles with not dissimilar ballistics reveals.

JPK



I am not confusing lethality with stopping capabilities, Why do you consider big bore pistols as not a reliable stopper?

Wouldn't the shooter be the limiting factor?

IMHO a stopping firearm has two major qualities bore diameter and bullet weight, though more importantly then weight is proper bullet construction, velocity is just an added bonus which aids in more momentum.

I have a fair understanding of the history of the pre-cordite rifles and as we all know the one limiting factor was bullet construction,not velocity

JPK, I highly recommend you take Whitworth up on his offer to shoot some of him big boomers I think you will be surprised.


Simply, Elegant but always approachable
 
Posts: 354 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: 24 May 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Seasons44:


I have a fair understanding of the history of the pre-cordite rifles and as we all know the one limiting factor was bullet construction,not velocity



Velocity and bulletconstruction goes hand-in-hand. The more velocity, the stronger the bulletconstruction is required.
From a historical foothold, the late Sir Samuel Baker didn´t like the .577 3,25" express. It created too much velocity for any hard lead bullet to exeed game. However the 3" version with a hardned solid leadbullet killed many elephants in India( some bullets went through). Arthur Neumann killed many african elephants with a succes also with a .577Bpe.


DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway
 
Posts: 2805 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Seasons44:
quote:
Originally posted by JPK:


XXXXXXXXXX

You confuse stopping with killing.

Your 500Linebaugh may be adequate to kill and elephant, but it is no reliable stopper, as the history of pre cordite rifles with not dissimilar ballistics reveals.

JPK



I am not confusing lethality with stopping capabilities, Why do you consider big bore pistols as not a reliable stopper?

Wouldn't the shooter be the limiting factor?

IMHO a stopping firearm has two major qualities bore diameter and bullet weight, though more importantly then weight is proper bullet construction, velocity is just an added bonus which aids in more momentum.

I have a fair understanding of the history of the pre-cordite rifles and as we all know the one limiting factor was bullet construction,not velocity

JPK, I highly recommend you take Whitworth up on his offer to shoot some of him big boomers I think you will be surprised.


Bullet construction was a problem, and it still is when all lead bullets are concerned.

The most obvious difference between a big bore revolver and a big bore stopping rifle of similar bore diameter is velocity, and its effects on momentum or energy or whatever yardstick you want to choose regarding potential.

The next most significant is bullet weight. A 500NE is a stopper with a 570gr bullet at 2050-2100fps.

Pushing a lighter bullet slower does not improve a .500 bore's performance it reduces it. The same with a 460 bore. The same with any bore size. For example, a 458Lott/Watts to 458wm, or the 458wm to the 45/70.

Conversely, using the same bullets but adding several hundred fps turns a rifle from marginal as hell to a stopping rifle, for example the 45/70 vs. the 458wm, and a good stopping rifle into a better one, 458wm to 458Lott/Watt's.

I wrote in my response to Whitworth that I would like to have an opportunity to shoot his big bore revolvers. I hope he invites me to try.

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BaxterB
posted Hide Post
quote:
the preferred spelling is "figures".

It's hard to take anything a person who spells at a third grade level says seriously. U noe?



It is also preferred that you capitalize the first letter of a sentence, and that punctuation go inside the final quotation mark.

Also, you have a misplaced modifier, but I'll let you figure out where it is...
 
Posts: 7832 | Registered: 31 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BaxterB:
quote:
the preferred spelling is "figures".

It's hard to take anything a person who spells at a third grade level says seriously. U noe?



It is also preferred that you capitalize the first letter of a sentence, and that punctuation go inside the final quotation mark.

Also, you have a misplaced modifier, but I'll let you figure out where it is...


Here you go:
The preferred spelling is "figures."

It is hard to take seriously a person who spells at a third grade level.

Did I pass?

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BaxterB
posted Hide Post
With aplomb JPK! ISS is still on grammargirl.com figuring it out...


Ok, back on track..nice shooting!!
 
Posts: 7832 | Registered: 31 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ahhh, the things we do to fill that gap between hunting season and fishing season....

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rusty
posted Hide Post
My only requirement is that the cartridge contain the words "Nitro Express"!


Rusty
We Band of Brothers!
DRSS, NRA & SCI Life Member

"I am rejoiced at my fate. Do not be uneasy about me, for I am with my friends."
----- David Crockett in his last letter (to his children), January 9th, 1836
"I will never forsake Texas and her cause. I am her son." ----- Jose Antonio Navarro, from Mexican Prison in 1841
"for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320-“. . .It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”
 
Posts: 9797 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 21 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Here is the expert shooting his dangerous game rifle!!!
Notice the great control he has. Great for a follow up shot.


The only easy day is yesterday!
 
Posts: 2758 | Location: Northern Minnesota | Registered: 22 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rusty:
My only requirement is that the cartridge contain the words "Nitro Express"!
Ah Rusty that just eliminates good arguments.

Oh wait, no it doesn’t!
quote:
Nitro Express

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Nitro Express (NE) series of cartridges are used in large-bore hunting rifles, also known as elephant guns or express rifles. They are named after the propellant they use, cordite, which is composed of nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine. Express from express train, due to the substantially higher velocities available with cordite compared to black powder loadings. The term was coined by James Purdey the younger in 1856 to publicise his double rifles. Some of the Nitro Express cartridges remain popular today due to their effectiveness on dangerous game. The .470 NE is perhaps the most popular.[1] The .700 NE is one of the most powerful non-military rifle cartridges.

So if cordite is the required propellant for a cartridge to be monikered with ‘Nitro Express’, how did the .700 Nitro Express get away with the nomenclature? After all it was designed in 1988 and never loaded with cordite!

All rightee… Let the arguments roll! And yes it is a very slow boring day!!!


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Cappy,

The 700 NE is the exception that proves the rule! Wink

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
H that's no fun! Frowner


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rusty:
My only requirement is that the cartridge contain the words "Nitro Express"!


So your list would include the .400/375 Belted Nitro Express?

I am SHOCKED!!!

See here info on the 400/375 BELTED Nitro Express!: http://www.kynochammunition.co...ge%20collection.html

Nothing like 235grs of bullet at 2400fps producing 2840lb' of ME. Yea, that'll get 'er done! and a BELT too!


JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pegleg:
Here is the expert shooting his dangerous game rifle!!!
Notice the great control he has. Great for a follow up shot.


Isn't that what they mean when they speak of free floating a barrel?


Mike
 
Posts: 21988 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by Pegleg:
Here is the expert shooting his dangerous game rifle!!!
Notice the great control he has. Great for a follow up shot.


Isn't that what they mean when they speak of free floating a barrel?


Maybe, but I've never heard of a free floating pistol grip!

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BaxterB
posted Hide Post
I've not laughed so hard in a long time...
 
Posts: 7832 | Registered: 31 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
I wonder if the rest of the photo sequence is actually missing? Perhaps in reality he was doing a Chuck Connors Rifleman flip of the rifle?


Mike
 
Posts: 21988 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by JPK:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
I don't think that any one caliber, bullet weight or velocity is perfect for the wide range of animals that we call "dangerous game". The perfect rifle for leopard, lion or bear is vastly different than the perfect rifle for buffalo, hippo, rhino or elephants. The minimums expressed in the opening post will work well for elephant but are definitely not the best for leopard. Useable?, yes, but perfect?, definitely not.

465H&H


Saeed has it wrong, a relatively light cartridge can stop an animal intent on killing you if the shot is a perfect CNS hit, but there have been references to "stopping rifles" for 120 years since the advent of the 450NE, and for a reason, after decades of use it became obvious that a cartridge similar or more powerful than a 450NE was a reasonably reliable elephant stopper while those of lesser bullet weight, diameter and energy were not.

465H&H has it right. What is a great rifle for an elephant can't be a great rifle for a leopard.

I've settled on the 458wm as my elephant rifle, but would love to try a 500NE. Hippo hunted out of the water would be in the same league, same with rhino.

It's fun shooting buff up close with an express sighted double rifle, but a bolt 375H&H or 416 or 458wm, Lott with a low power scope with about 1x at the low end would all meet the definition of ideal, imo.

All else the 375H&H shines, partly because of it's broad utility.


I know someone who shot a cow elephant in frontal brain shot. He missed the brain, and the cow just shock here head as if nothing has happened.

I personally missed the brain on an elephant bull, he dropped to the ground struggling and I added another shot to the top of his head, killing him.


Saeed, let's keep it reasonable and accurate if we can. Of course, one cannot simply choose a 577NE and "aim for the head" expecting the elephant to drop, simply by striking it's noggin "somewhere"! Specifically what we are talking about is the very real effect of being able to cause an elephant to turn its charge, knock it down, or possibly even "out" temporarily with a close miss to the brain. As we've discussed before, this phenomenon does't seem to apply to buffalo, strictly elephant.

Can an elephant be turned, knocked down, or knocked out with a smaller caliber than .458? Of course it can. A 275 Rigby as Bell used? Probably under some circumstances but I wouldn't know for sure, nor would I want to rely on it in close quarters. But what seems very clear is that as the caliber increases, along with enough momentum to drive the bullet deep enough to affect the brain in this manner, the distance one can "miss" the brain and still get that same effect increases as well; but I'll add that the miss distance will never be extreme, at least not reliably so. Many things can happen such as the bullet fragmenting a portion of bone near the brain cavity, driving that fragment into the organ, or simply just causing a disruption to normal function due to force of blow. Different than actually driving the bullet through the organ with a spot on CNS hit.

Regarding some of the other comments, absolutely NO ONE in their right mind would state Saeed doesn't have experience with DG. Obviously he does, and more so than almost all others here, if not more so than ALL outright, but I still have some differences of opinion based on my limited experience to date. I'm very confident with my shooting of big bore rifles; nothing special there other than the fact that I just spend A LOT of time on the range with them and practice often, and for some reason, I'm not particularly sensitive to recoil. Many others on this site are the same in this regard. I mention this simply because to the best of my knowledge, no one, and I do mean NO ONE can be relied upon to hit that elephant's brain EVERY TIME without fail, certainly not myself. There are so many unknowns regarding the myriad of situations one can find themselves in that a perfect 10X can't be relied upon every time. And the good news is that with proper caliber selection, it doesn't have to be. I don't know what the specific distance one can miss the brain by and still achieve the desired result but I'd say it varies by many factors such as angle, bullet construction, caliber and energy, not to mention variables no one has control over.

Personally, I like shooting the 500NE because IMO it provides the best trade off in terms of producing this knock down, turn, or knock out effect with weight of rifle and ammo as compared to both lighter and heavier weapons. I don't know how many times I've heard the red herring / straw man comment about using big bores as a way to compensate for other "manly" shortcomings, or that guys who shoot big bores are scared of their quarry, etc. All simply absurd statements and without merit, at least in my case and the other fellows I'm familiar with who hunt DG. Simply stated, I enjoy shooting big bore rifles purely because they are fun ... to me at least. And I like to match different weapons to the desired quarry. I'm not "scared" of elephants but I do have a healthy respect for them that would preclude me from attempting to hunt them at 10 yards or less with a .375. At 50 yards, I'm confident I can hit the brain or take a fatal heart shot with a .375, but when you get into 10 yards or so, unpredictable things happen and happen quickly such as the ele deciding to fight instead of flee, quickly throwing it's head around, making a perfect brain shot most difficult at best. Under that scenario, not only do I just enjoy the 500NE, I have confidence in my ability to get close enough to the brain to save my bacon, if not with the first shot, the quick second shot being a very good life insurance policy.

But as stated earlier as well, the 500NE isn't the "perfect DG" rifle for all DG animals. Certainly not for the big bears, leopard, or lion, except possibly for follow up.
 
Posts: 8537 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Todd Williams:
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by JPK:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
I don't think that any one caliber, bullet weight or velocity is perfect for the wide range of animals that we call "dangerous game". The perfect rifle for leopard, lion or bear is vastly different than the perfect rifle for buffalo, hippo, rhino or elephants. The minimums expressed in the opening post will work well for elephant but are definitely not the best for leopard. Useable?, yes, but perfect?, definitely not.

465H&H


Saeed has it wrong, a relatively light cartridge can stop an animal intent on killing you if the shot is a perfect CNS hit, but there have been references to "stopping rifles" for 120 years since the advent of the 450NE, and for a reason, after decades of use it became obvious that a cartridge similar or more powerful than a 450NE was a reasonably reliable elephant stopper while those of lesser bullet weight, diameter and energy were not.

465H&H has it right. What is a great rifle for an elephant can't be a great rifle for a leopard.

I've settled on the 458wm as my elephant rifle, but would love to try a 500NE. Hippo hunted out of the water would be in the same league, same with rhino.

It's fun shooting buff up close with an express sighted double rifle, but a bolt 375H&H or 416 or 458wm, Lott with a low power scope with about 1x at the low end would all meet the definition of ideal, imo.

All else the 375H&H shines, partly because of it's broad utility.


I know someone who shot a cow elephant in frontal brain shot. He missed the brain, and the cow just shock here head as if nothing has happened.

I personally missed the brain on an elephant bull, he dropped to the ground struggling and I added another shot to the top of his head, killing him.


Saeed, let's keep it reasonable and accurate if we can. Of course, one cannot simply choose a 577NE and "aim for the head" expecting the elephant to drop, simply by striking it's noggin "somewhere"! Specifically what we are talking about is the very real effect of being able to cause an elephant to turn its charge, knock it down, or possibly even "out" temporarily with a close miss to the brain. As we've discussed before, this phenomenon does't seem to apply to buffalo, strictly elephant.

Can an elephant be turned, knocked down, or knocked out with a smaller caliber than .458? Of course it can. A 275 Rigby as Bell used? Probably under some circumstances but I wouldn't know for sure, nor would I want to rely on it in close quarters. But what seems very clear is that as the caliber increases, along with enough momentum to drive the bullet deep enough to affect the brain in this manner, the distance one can "miss" the brain and still get that same effect increases as well; but I'll add that the miss distance will never be extreme, at least not reliably so. Many things can happen such as the bullet fragmenting a portion of bone near the brain cavity, driving that fragment into the organ, or simply just causing a disruption to normal function due to force of blow. Different than actually driving the bullet through the organ with a spot on CNS hit.

Regarding some of the other comments, absolutely NO ONE in their right mind would state Saeed doesn't have experience with DG. Obviously he does, and more so than almost all others here, if not more so than ALL outright, but I still have some differences of opinion based on my limited experience to date. I'm very confident with my shooting of big bore rifles; nothing special there other than the fact that I just spend A LOT of time on the range with them and practice often, and for some reason, I'm not particularly sensitive to recoil. Many others on this site are the same in this regard. I mention this simply because to the best of my knowledge, no one, and I do mean NO ONE can be relied upon to hit that elephant's brain EVERY TIME without fail, certainly not myself. There are so many unknowns regarding the myriad of situations one can find themselves in that a perfect 10X can't be relied upon every time. And the good news is that with proper caliber selection, it doesn't have to be. I don't know what the specific distance one can miss the brain by and still achieve the desired result but I'd say it varies by many factors such as angle, bullet construction, caliber and energy, not to mention variables no one has control over.

Personally, I like shooting the 500NE because IMO it provides the best trade off in terms of producing this knock down, turn, or knock out effect with weight of rifle and ammo as compared to both lighter and heavier weapons. I don't know how many times I've heard the red herring / straw man comment about using big bores as a way to compensate for other "manly" shortcomings, or that guys who shoot big bores are scared of their quarry, etc. All simply absurd statements and without merit, at least in my case and the other fellows I'm familiar with who hunt DG. Simply stated, I enjoy shooting big bore rifles purely because they are fun ... to me at least. And I like to match different weapons to the desired quarry. I'm not "scared" of elephants but I do have a healthy respect for them that would preclude me from attempting to hunt them at 10 yards or less with a .375. At 50 yards, I'm confident I can hit the brain or take a fatal heart shot with a .375, but when you get into 10 yards or so, unpredictable things happen and happen quickly such as the ele deciding to fight instead of flee, quickly throwing it's head around, making a perfect brain shot most difficult at best. Under that scenario, not only do I just enjoy the 500NE, I have confidence in my ability to get close enough to the brain to save my bacon, if not with the first shot, the quick second shot being a very good life insurance policy.

But as stated earlier as well, the 500NE isn't the "perfect DG" rifle for all DG animals. Certainly not for the big bears, leopard, or lion, except possibly for follow up.


I agree 100% with Todd on his post. The only possible difference between us is that I have the same amount of confidence in the 465 NE and 470 NE as he has in his 500NE. I don't think either of us is wrong.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
A .475/500-grain FN solid at 2150 fps is more than adequate for anything.
A .475/500-grain RN solid at 2150 fps is adequate for squirrels.
A .375/300-grain FN solid at 2750 fps is more than adequate for anything.
Hey! They are all 5000-foot-pounders! What a coincidence! stir
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
A .475/500-grain FN solid at 2150 fps is more than adequate for anything.
A .475/500-grain RN solid at 2150 fps is adequate for squirrels.
A .375/300-grain FN solid at 2750 fps is more than adequate for anything.
Hey! They are all 5000-foot-pounders! What a coincidence! stir


The last one lacks bullet weight! Adequate for killing an ele, not so much for stopping one.

Back to the topic, while perusing other posts I ran across this from Buzz Charlton:
"We were hunting double tuskless cow with JB . It was a bow hunt. The first day we followed a herd and no opportunity presented itself. The second day we followed a large herd for a couple of hours before catching up to them. There was a single tuskless that we intended to shoot. She was however on the left side of the group as they moved up a gully. We were on the right side, down wind and were stalking parallel with them hoping the tuskless would eventually come to the left side and into bow distance.

A tusked cow then spotted us and charged. I shouted her down at about 10 metres and she stopped and ran off, only to turn around and come again. I shouted but it was obvious she was not stopping. At about 5 meters though thick bush, I attempted a frontal brain shot, which failed to stop her. She barely missed me and JB/ trackers. I thought that she had missed us all and when she went down on her knees I thought that she was falling from the shot . She had in fact knocked Luc down and was going down on her knees as she tried to gore him and squash him with her forehead. When she lifted her head slightly I side brained her and she fortunately fell off Luc."

I saw the photo of the dead ele, and where the missed frontal entered, his missed brain shot couldn't have been too far off, and it didn't stop the cow. Buzz shoots a 416 Rigby, or at least did circa 2009, when this incident occurred.

Also, in addition to reinforcing the notion that the 416 isn't a stopper, the story both reinforces the fact that a hunter ought to be prepared to save his own hide, and the fact that even the very best elephant hunters are not going to make perfect brain shots every time. There are few alive today with more elephant experience than Buzz Charlton. He missed, and his 416 failed to deter the charge.

So much for precise efficiency carrying the day.

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rusty
posted Hide Post
Somewhere there is a picture of Rich sitting. The rifle is suspended in mid air in front of him!


Rusty
We Band of Brothers!
DRSS, NRA & SCI Life Member

"I am rejoiced at my fate. Do not be uneasy about me, for I am with my friends."
----- David Crockett in his last letter (to his children), January 9th, 1836
"I will never forsake Texas and her cause. I am her son." ----- Jose Antonio Navarro, from Mexican Prison in 1841
"for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320-“. . .It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”
 
Posts: 9797 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 21 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
While looking for the statistical table 465H&H referred to regarding the by the caliber success of hunter stopping charging elephant in Zimbabwe, I ran across the following, from an article by Ganyana, aka, Don Heath which I thought you all might find interesting:

The following
is from 10 year’s (1987 to 1996) worth of records.
The hunting “casualties” include local citizen hunters
and professional photographic guides, as well as professional
hunters and their clients. The simple, condensed
version is interesting:
Statistical Realities of African Hunting
By Ganyana
DANGEROUS
GAME
May-June 2012 • SUCCESSFUL HUNTER 39
successfulhunter.com
• 264 injured, 214 by leopard (81%)
• 14 killed, 11 were by elephants (79%) 3 by buffalo.
During this period 6,071 elephants were hunted by
both local sport hunters and visiting sportsmen, and
8,108 buffalo.
From the same period are the following fatalities
among rural tribesmen: 103 by elephants; lion, 17; buffalo,
17; rhino, 14; hyena, 47; and hippo, 11. Among
National Parks staff involved in elephant and buffalo
culls, problem animal control and general duties around
dangerous game, the following deaths were recorded: 17
by elephants, 2 by buffalo and 3 by lion.

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rusty:
My only requirement is that the cartridge contain the words "Nitro Express"!


Rusty,

.242 Rimless Nitro Express
.26 Rimless Nitro Express
.318 Rimless Nitro Express
.360 Nitro Express
.360 No. 2 Nitro Express
.369 Nitro Express
.375 Flanged Nitro Express


stir


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12828 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
And this, from further down the article:
"A PH
can bail out a client 99 percent of
the time, but we are not God. We
make mistakes, we experience bullet
failure, and our rifles do occasionally
jam."

I think 99% might be a little optimistic, but Ganyana has distinct distrust of client hunters, probably well earned, and equally distinct enthusiasm for too many PH's, probably not so well earned.

BTW, I read "bullet failure" as "we miss!"

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Who was the African hunter that said when choosing a rifle caliber suitable for your hunt, lock yourself in a room with the animal and then make your choice.

Lets go hypothetical for a minute. If they made soft body armor that could stop ANY projectile and you had to take a bodyshot with it on, what caliber would you choose?

If numbers are meaningless, would you pick a 400 grain bullet at 1400fps of a 570 grain at 2150, or maybe a 900 grain at 2300 fps? It seems according to some they would all have the same impact force.

It should go without saying, shot placement is everything, along with bullet construction. Now if we could all make perfect shots every time we would have nothing to talk about. Smiler Just saying.
 
Posts: 406 | Registered: 17 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rusty
posted Hide Post
Sounds good to me Frank! Big Grin


Rusty
We Band of Brothers!
DRSS, NRA & SCI Life Member

"I am rejoiced at my fate. Do not be uneasy about me, for I am with my friends."
----- David Crockett in his last letter (to his children), January 9th, 1836
"I will never forsake Texas and her cause. I am her son." ----- Jose Antonio Navarro, from Mexican Prison in 1841
"for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320-“. . .It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”
 
Posts: 9797 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 21 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
A .475/500-grain FN solid at 2150 fps is more than adequate for anything.
A .475/500-grain RN solid at 2150 fps is adequate for squirrels.
A .375/300-grain FN solid at 2750 fps is more than adequate for anything.
Hey! They are all 5000-foot-pounders! What a coincidence! stir



Gee! I must be related to Daniel Boone as I have taken, if I can count correctly, around 16 elephants with the squirrel load. None took more than two rounds including finishers, except for one that needed three.

465H&H.
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It's okay 465, you're still my hero...

ISS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
A .475/500-grain FN solid at 2150 fps is more than adequate for anything.
A .475/500-grain RN solid at 2150 fps is adequate for squirrels.
A .375/300-grain FN solid at 2750 fps is more than adequate for anything.
Hey! They are all 5000-foot-pounders! What a coincidence! stir



Gee! I must be related to Daniel Boone as I have taken, if I can count correctly, around 16 elephants with the squirrel load. None took more than two rounds including finishers, except for one that needed three.

465H&H.


Finally a strike!
Catch and release ... fishing
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rusty:
Somewhere there is a picture of Rich sitting. The rifle is suspended in mid air in front of him!


Yes! The infamous Jedi rifle hold. The Force is strong with Rich.


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27620 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
JPK,
Sir, I meant no disrespect to anyone here, nor was my post directed at you. Merely an (possibly ill fated )effort to oversimplify the topic, if even possible.

Precise, consistent shot placement in the hands of the proficient marksman can take large and dangerous game with small calibers. However, when the designation for a dangerous game cartridge, a big hammer is preferred, providing one can wield it. The biggest one can wield efficiently is the limitation of the shooter.

I have witnessed poor marksmanship efficiency by folks with small caliber rifles, Conversely, I have seen some remarkable marksmanship with rifles that could be termed "dangerous game" class.

My primary criteria for said cartridge would be the effective application of the shooter. However, if you ask my personal opinion of where the class of cartridge starts,
my opinion is that it begin with the number .4.
 
Posts: 151 | Registered: 17 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
A .475/500-grain FN solid at 2150 fps is more than adequate for anything.
A .475/500-grain RN solid at 2150 fps is adequate for squirrels.
A .375/300-grain FN solid at 2750 fps is more than adequate for anything.
Hey! They are all 5000-foot-pounders! What a coincidence! stir



Gee! I must be related to Daniel Boone as I have taken, if I can count correctly, around 16 elephants with the squirrel load. None took more than two rounds including finishers, except for one that needed three.

465H&H.


Finally a strike!
Catch and release ... fishing


RIP,

No problem with you stir here. In fact, thank you for the oppurtunity to get my message across again! wave

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    The criteria for a true DangerousGame cartridge.

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia