THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    The criteria for a true DangerousGame cartridge.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The criteria for a true DangerousGame cartridge. Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mike

Rich occasionally wobbles---be kind to him----


beer


"The rule is perfect: in all matters of opinion our adversaries are insane." Mark Twain
TANSTAAFL

www.savannagems.com A unique way to own a piece of Africa.

DSC Life
NRA Life
 
Posts: 3386 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 05 September 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by michael458:
quote:
My favorite 9mm quote:

"9mm? If I want to get someone angry, I'll just insult them ..."

Regards,

Chuck



I like that.... Some of these same sort of discussions run around handgun circles, I am not much of a 9 fan, much prefer 45 of course, but thing is
I never see anyone willing to go downrange and catch a few 9s??? HEH......

quote:
2 For Michael - B&M bolt Winchester action with CEB bullet - in any caliber above .400. Barrel MUST be 18". Any longer and velocity actually drops!


HEH.... Naki, pretty good..... I think however lets change up on the .400.. lets start that dance at .458 and go up.. And you can add some North Forks to that too..... The new Nose Profile of the solids is superb to say the least....


Reading comprehension is still a major issue here......

I said;

quote:
I actually had a Round Nose FMJ----9mm FMJ round nose bullets [QUOTE]


THEY SAID;

[QUOTE] Copper washed lead bullets are not RN solids, btw.


And then they said;

quote:
perhaps what Michael was shooting was steel jacketed



I know the difference in "copper washed" and FMJ.... and "Steel Jacketed"... No, I never said I was shooting steel jacketed 9mm...
Fact is, a copper washed lead would have smashed itself into pieces against steel targets... Steel plates.... Pieces might have returned to shooter as they often do, but not the whole bullet... Shooting steel targets with Copper FMJ handgun rounds.... Not "Steel Jacketed Bullets"


quote:
Christ, timing the responses to your posts? Get a life dude.


rotflmo Yeah right, sitting there with a stop watch just waiting...... rotflmo


You know, that the date and time is posted on each post don't you?? Something like this......

quote:
posted Feb 23, 2014 11:21 PM



animal


Ya'll have fun, this has run its course........... I am outta here, on to better things................


Yes, Michael, I have noted the date and time is included with each post. But you actually calculated the time difference in order to come to your erroneous conclusion regarding 465H&H or my participation in this thread.

And OK, it wasn't a copper washed lead bullet, and it wasn't a copper washed, steel jacketed bullet, but yet it was a FMJ. So, what was the bullet construction? All NATO rounds are copper washed steel jacketed, ball ammo, which isn't steel jacketed, is often erroneously referred to as FMJ, a copper or guilding metal bullet with lead core isn't a FMJ... Running out of options.

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
don't forget the 416 B&M---


Ah yes,
. . .
10. Sean Russell - a 416 B&M, a little powder keg with more wallop than the 416 Taylor and deserving not to be abandoned by its 458 loving founder, #2 above.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LionHunter:
Maybe you share your friend Rich's affinity for Scotch?



LH -- would you please stop picking on the Scotch?! shocker



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jens poulsen:
In many years(ages really) many have search for the ideal DG cartridge. Many criterias can mention as far as caliber, bulletweight, energy and abillity in stoppingpower.
Some cartridges may have the energy like .378WEa, but lacks the caliber and bulletweight. Some cartridges may have caliber like a .50 S&W but lacks energy and bulletweight. etc etc.
When I am thinking of the ideal cartridge I think of "5"!. As I see it the ideal cartridge should meet these criterias to fulfill what a minimum DG cartridge should have:
1) 5000 ft/ibs.
2) .500cal.
3) 500grain.

Give me you thoughts.


Please forgive me for returning to the original question, but my take on the subject is that the hunter should use the largest caliber rifle he or she can shoot effectively, be it .375 H&H or .577 NE, but that the hunter should realize that the ability to withstand recoil is not a fixed quantity and that one can accomodate one's self to increasingly heavy recoil over a period of time.

I personally started with a .375 Taylor and progressed to a .458 Winchester Magnum and from there to an 8 3/4 lb. rifle firing a .505 cartridge which developed over 100 ft./lbs. of free recoil.

Like Jens I find that .50 caliber bullets represent a decided improvement over .458 caliber bullets at the same velocity, and most of my thick skinned dangerous game was killed with my .505.

The Kynoch 570 grain solids I used, although a bit too pointed for modern tastes, never failed to do the job. One recovered from my first elephant had penetrated the entire skull and was found lodged in the eye socket on the opposite side.
 
Posts: 1748 | Registered: 27 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
And as for your buddy 465H&H , to him I say that if you are quoting a post of mine in the manner you have then I will continue to construe your comments as personal and directed at me.



Lion Hunter,

If that is the case, then the problem is your's not mine!

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
And OK, it wasn't a copper washed lead bullet, and it wasn't a copper washed, steel jacketed bullet, but yet it was a FMJ. So, what was the bullet construction? All NATO rounds are copper washed steel jacketed, ball ammo, which isn't steel jacketed, is often erroneously referred to as FMJ, a copper or guilding metal bullet with lead core isn't a FMJ... Running out of options.
Interesting comments. As piss poor as Wikipedia is, at least it acknowledges the common usage of 'full metal jacket' going back to its Swiss Army invention 1882 and French army adoption in 1886. Excerpted, "A Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) is a bullet consisting of a soft core (usually made of lead) encased in a shell of harder metal, such as gilding metal, cupronickel or less commonly a steel alloy. This shell can extend all around the bullet (alternatively termed a total metal jacket round) or, more often, just around the front and sides with rear lead part left eased."

I don't believe a 'copper washed lead' bullet would qualify a a FMJ bullet - at least according to the Hague Convention requirements - as copper washed lead bullets easily obliterate.

If I recollect correctly, the use of bismuth for lead and steel and cupronickel for gilding metal was brought about by military use solely due to scarcity of lead and/or materials for gilding metal.

Again recollection, it wasn't until about WWI that copper plated steel jackets began use for African DG FMJ bullet construction and closer to WWII, or afterwards, before it became commonplace in DG FMJ bullet construction.


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
quote:
And OK, it wasn't a copper washed lead bullet, and it wasn't a copper washed, steel jacketed bullet, but yet it was a FMJ. So, what was the bullet construction? All NATO rounds are copper washed steel jacketed, ball ammo, which isn't steel jacketed, is often erroneously referred to as FMJ, a copper or guilding metal bullet with lead core isn't a FMJ... Running out of options.
Interesting comments. As piss poor as Wikipedia is, at least it acknowledges the common usage of 'full metal jacket' going back to its Swiss Army invention 1882 and French army adoption in 1886. Excerpted, "A Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) is a bullet consisting of a soft core (usually made of lead) encased in a shell of harder metal, such as gilding metal, cupronickel or less commonly a steel alloy. This shell can extend all around the bullet (alternatively termed a total metal jacket round) or, more often, just around the front and sides with rear lead part left eased."

I don't believe a 'copper washed lead' bullet would qualify a a FMJ bullet - at least according to the Hague Convention requirements - as copper washed lead bullets easily obliterate.

If I recollect correctly, the use of bismuth for lead and steel and cupronickel for gilding metal was brought about by military use solely due to scarcity of lead and/or materials for gilding metal.

Again recollection, it wasn't until about WWI that copper plated steel jackets began use for African DG FMJ bullet construction and closer to WWII, or afterwards, before it became commonplace in DG FMJ bullet construction.


If I remember correctly, jacketed military bullets were in common use well before WW1 and even before the turn of the centuary. Calibers such as the 6.5 MS, 7mm Mauser and 8mm Mauser among others had metal jacketed bullets in the late 1800s.


465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
quote:
And OK, it wasn't a copper washed lead bullet, and it wasn't a copper washed, steel jacketed bullet, but yet it was a FMJ. So, what was the bullet construction? All NATO rounds are copper washed steel jacketed, ball ammo, which isn't steel jacketed, is often erroneously referred to as FMJ, a copper or guilding metal bullet with lead core isn't a FMJ... Running out of options.
Interesting comments. As piss poor as Wikipedia is, at least it acknowledges the common usage of 'full metal jacket' going back to its Swiss Army invention 1882 and French army adoption in 1886. Excerpted, "A Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) is a bullet consisting of a soft core (usually made of lead) encased in a shell of harder metal, such as gilding metal, cupronickel or less commonly a steel alloy. This shell can extend all around the bullet (alternatively termed a total metal jacket round) or, more often, just around the front and sides with rear lead part left eased."

I don't believe a 'copper washed lead' bullet would qualify a a FMJ bullet - at least according to the Hague Convention requirements - as copper washed lead bullets easily obliterate.

If I recollect correctly, the use of bismuth for lead and steel and cupronickel for gilding metal was brought about by military use solely due to scarcity of lead and/or materials for gilding metal.

Again recollection, it wasn't until about WWI that copper plated steel jackets began use for African DG FMJ bullet construction and closer to WWII, or afterwards, before it became commonplace in DG FMJ bullet construction.


If I remember correctly, jacketed military bullets were in common use well before WW1 and even before the turn of the centuary. Calibers such as the 6.5 MS, 7mm Mauser and 8mm Mauser among others had metal jacketed bullets in the late 1800s.

465H&H
H,

Commencing 1886 FMJ bullets became commonplace in military rifle cartridges as various countries sought to catch up with the French. And use of FMJ bullets became a requirement amongst the signatories of the 1899 Hague Convention.

My issue is the inference that a steel or coated steel jacket enclosing a lead or bismuth core is a requirement for bullet to be termed a 'FMJ bullet'. The Hague Convention only required a non-expanding metal jacketed bullet be used against the human combatants of opposing military armies. I believe that gilding metal or cupronickel comprised the predominate metal used to form the metal jackets of these FMJ bullets at the end-of-19th century/turn of 20th century for use against human army personal from rifles and handguns.

I do not dispute that clad-steel jacketed FMJ bullets were used by military forces but that it was principally driven by that nations economic needs if used against human targets rather than a military need such as against fortifications.


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Capoward,

I did some research after your first post on the subject and you are correct. I was under the mistaken impression that FMJ referred to steel jacketed bullets rather than all bullets with complete jackets or complete jackets save for the base, as is the case.

It seems that copper washed hard lead bullets meet requirements for military use, at least according to one source.

In addition, it appears that "ball" ammo doesn't have a tight definition and can be an odd mix of copper washed hard lead, just hard lead or fully jacketed ammo. For example, the Marine Corp calls its 22 target ammo something like "...ball ammunition, caliber 22, long rifle, target..." but also calls its M855 and M855A copper clad steel penetrator equipped 5.56 NATO round "ball" ammo.

So then, what was Michael shooting, steel jacketed RN's - a FMJ bullet and how some European NATO 9mm ammo is made, copper clad RN's - also meeting the definition of a FMJ, or what?

JPK


Free 500grains
 
Posts: 4900 | Location: Chevy Chase, Md. | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
Hey JPK,

It definitely is a 'loose world' when it comes to identifying FMJ bullets.

I'm not sure what the bullet composition was on Michael's 9mm bullet but when he states it was neither copper washed lead nor clad-steel construction I believe him. My supposition is that the bullet was the traditional C&C construction using a hard gilding metal jacket encapsulating a lead core. But that's just my supposition without direct knowledge supporting it.


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
quote:
And OK, it wasn't a copper washed lead bullet, and it wasn't a copper washed, steel jacketed bullet, but yet it was a FMJ. So, what was the bullet construction? All NATO rounds are copper washed steel jacketed, ball ammo, which isn't steel jacketed, is often erroneously referred to as FMJ, a copper or guilding metal bullet with lead core isn't a FMJ... Running out of options.
Interesting comments. As piss poor as Wikipedia is, at least it acknowledges the common usage of 'full metal jacket' going back to its Swiss Army invention 1882 and French army adoption in 1886. Excerpted, "A Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) is a bullet consisting of a soft core (usually made of lead) encased in a shell of harder metal, such as gilding metal, cupronickel or less commonly a steel alloy. This shell can extend all around the bullet (alternatively termed a total metal jacket round) or, more often, just around the front and sides with rear lead part left eased."

I don't believe a 'copper washed lead' bullet would qualify a a FMJ bullet - at least according to the Hague Convention requirements - as copper washed lead bullets easily obliterate.

If I recollect correctly, the use of bismuth for lead and steel and cupronickel for gilding metal was brought about by military use solely due to scarcity of lead and/or materials for gilding metal.

Again recollection, it wasn't until about WWI that copper plated steel jackets began use for African DG FMJ bullet construction and closer to WWII, or afterwards, before it became commonplace in DG FMJ bullet construction.


If I remember correctly, jacketed military bullets were in common use well before WW1 and even before the turn of the centuary. Calibers such as the 6.5 MS, 7mm Mauser and 8mm Mauser among others had metal jacketed bullets in the late 1800s.

465H&H
H,

Commencing 1886 FMJ bullets became commonplace in military rifle cartridges as various countries sought to catch up with the French. And use of FMJ bullets became a requirement amongst the signatories of the 1899 Hague Convention.

My issue is the inference that a steel or coated steel jacket enclosing a lead or bismuth core is a requirement for bullet to be termed a 'FMJ bullet'. The Hague Convention only required a non-expanding metal jacketed bullet be used against the human combatants of opposing military armies. I believe that gilding metal or cupronickel comprised the predominate metal used to form the metal jackets of these FMJ bullets at the end-of-19th century/turn of 20th century for use against human army personal from rifles and handguns.

I do not dispute that clad-steel jacketed FMJ bullets were used by military forces but that it was principally driven by that nations economic needs if used against human targets rather than a military need such as against fortifications.


I agree with you 100%! You said what I was trying to say, only you did a much better job of it.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
I agree with you 100%! You said what I was trying to say, only you did a much better job of it.
I think many of us have been beating the same bush from many angles for numerous postings. I do believe we've pretty much obliterated it down by now. LOL...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of PD999
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by xausa:
Like Jens I find that .50 caliber bullets represent a decided improvement over .458 caliber bullets at the same velocity, and most of my thick skinned dangerous game was killed with my .505.

+1 old


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition” ― Rudyard Kipling
 
Posts: 1231 | Location: London, UK | Registered: 02 April 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    The criteria for a true DangerousGame cartridge.

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia