THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Mark Sullivan won't be at SCI 2010
 Login/Join
 
Moderator
Picture of Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
We have folks commenting on this thread that hunt the quotas on other people's licenses that apparently view that practice as ethical, yet want to call into question the ethics of others.


?



 
Posts: 7123 | Location: The Rock (southern V.I.) | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
I have hunted with a game scout who told us he hunted with Mark Sullivan. And that he did intentionally wound the animals before approaching them to video the charges.

In one camp we were told how he booked to hunt on someone concession, and when he left they found over 20 dead buffalo.

Apparently they went into thick bush where Sullivan did not have the balls to follow them. This apparently caused a fistfight between Sullivan and the concession holder.

I have hunted with several PHs who have a combined experience of over 100 years, and they all agree Sullivan does something no PH would ever dream of doing.

He is the ultimate unprofessional hunter currently operating in Africa.

I have seen enough of his videos to know what he does is not what any decent hunter would do.

If one hunts enough, one would wound animals. But, to go as far as to wound them on purpose to get a charge, is not what I would call the behaviour of a real PH.

It takes a special sort of client to pay him to do this, and I am certainly not one of them.

I prefer to shoot and kill my own animals. And the least involved my PH gets into the action the better it is.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69225 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
[

Rich[/QUOTE]

Yes, several. And there are probably many more that simply are never included in his videos (lacking, one supposes, 'blood-on-the-boots'). However, Sullivan does manage to provoke more than his share of DG charges for the camera, which is simply explained by the fact that in many cases (though not all) neither he nor his clients fire back-up shots as they approach their wounded animal. Watch his videos and you'll see: His client fires - and Sullivan fires almost simultaneously - after which they both begin to track 'their' buffalo.

Now, when a wounded animal is eventually sighted, most of us immediately take additional shots to kill it quickly and humanely. My guess is that most buffalo are killed by follow-on rounds taken at a distance after the first shots are fired. This is where Sullivan is different - he and his client approach the wounded animal until they are close enough to where the buffalo perceives the closing threat and charges - probably around 10-15 meters. They also approach the buff 'face on' and not from behind or from the flank. Mind you, Sullivan is not deliberately wounding anything; it is just that after the initial volley, Sullivan hopes that the wounded buff has the fortitude to up and charge as he approaches. It is then that he fires the ultimately lethal shots that have made him (in)famous.

Granted it's not the way most of us choose to hunt; but then, if SCI is going to be the arbiter of how dangerous game ought to be hunted, that opens up an industrially-sized can of 'ethics' worms. What about canned lion hunting? Or electronic animal calls? Or laser-optics with automated bullet-drop compensators? Is SCI going to legislate these issues for the rest of us? It's their show, of course, but many of us support its existence. A degree of transparency in non-profits is a good thing, and unless this has privacy issues associated with it (e.g., failure to pay fees, etc.), SCI's decision on this ought to be out in the open for all of us to see and discuss.[/QUOTE]

Gentlemen - I have not even got past page one of this thread and yet Kim has again provided a reasoned and reasonable angle to the big story. I would concur largely with his post - and especially when there are many big name Tanz PH's/Outfitters who regularly shoot buffalo from the car. Sullivan at least deserves a hearing. I wonder who he pissed off? And Out of Africa are still allowed there???

something is rotten in the state of - "SCI"
 
Posts: 280 | Location: Tanzania | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of PSmith
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
I am sitting here, just waiting for someone who has one of his videos to state that they have seen a client kill an animal cleanly without a charge.

Hello... Anybody?

Rich


Rich, I have seen several of the dvds and I agree with you that the vast majority of them are mostly the charges and then the shooting of the animal by the client then Mark Sullivan (and sometimes in the reverse order).

But I do know that his client Kelly Gill has shot many elephant and buffalo with his .577 double on his own on the Sullivan dvds, and also with Buzz Charlton in his dvds. I'm not 100% sure, but I don't recall ever seeing Kelly charged.

I would think that the Sullivan announcement would be in the Safari Times where these things are normally published but I don't recall seeing that. Maybe it will be in an issue to come.

Happy holidays to all.


Paul Smith
SCI Life Member
NRA Life Member
DSC Member
Life Member of the "I Can't Wait to Get Back to Africa" Club
DRSS
I had the privilege to fire E. Hemingway's WR .577NE, E. Keith's WR .470NE, & F. Jamieson's WJJ .500 Jeffery
I strongly recommend avoidance of "The Zambezi Safari & Travel Co., Ltd." and "Pisces Sportfishing-Cabo San Lucas"

"A failed policy of national defense is its own punishment" Otto von Bismarck
 
Posts: 2545 | Location: The 'Ham | Registered: 25 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of KPete
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MacD37:
Kim, much of what you state in both your posts are true! Anyone who knows me will tell you I have no love for any chest beating PH who shoots a lot of his client's animals! MS, IMO, does this for two reasons, #1 is because he wants to shoot every buffalo he sees, and the client gets to pay for "HIS" hunt. #2 is because it sells films!


Mac,

You've go to admit that MS has an enviable business model: The client pays huge fees so that Sullivan can shoot their trophies! Great work if you can get it.


Kim

Merkel Double .470 NE
Whitworth Express .375 H&H
Griffin & Howe .275 Rigby
Winchester M70 (pre-64) .30-06 & .270


"Cogito ergo venor" René Descartes on African Safari
 
Posts: 526 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
takes a special sort of client to pay him to do this, and I am certainly not one of them.

I prefer to shoot and kill my own animals. And the least involved my PH gets into the action the better it is.


+1 beer


nothin sweeter than the smell of fresh blood on your hunting boots
 
Posts: 746 | Location: don't know--Lost my GPS | Registered: 10 August 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of larrys01
posted Hide Post
quote:
I prefer to shoot and kill my own animals. And the least involved my PH gets into the action the better it is.


A+A+A+ clap



 
Posts: 1525 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 08 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I have hunted with a game scout who told us he hunted with Mark Sullivan. And that he did intentionally wound the animals before approaching them to video the charges.

In one camp we were told how he booked to hunt on someone concession, and when he left they found over 20 dead buffalo. Are there any official reports of these activities reported by this game scout. Did he just stand there at let this all happen?

Apparently they went into thick bush where Sullivan did not have the balls to follow them. This apparently caused a fistfight between Sullivan and the concession holder.
Does not sound good if in fact this is all true. However at this point this is all heresay. Has this concession holder ever comeforward to substantiate this alleged outrageous act?


I have hunted with several PHs who have a combined experience of over 100 years, and they all agree Sullivan does something no PH would ever dream of doing.

He is the ultimate unprofessional hunter currently operating in Africa. If what you are posting here is verifiable I would agree 100%. Again, if it can be proven beyond a doubt that this is in fact the case.

I have seen enough of his videos to know what he does is not what any decent hunter would do.

If one hunts enough, one would wound animals. But, to go as far as to wound them on purpose to get a charge, is not what I would call the behaviour of a real PH.

It takes a special sort of client to pay him to do this, and I am certainly not one of them.

I prefer to shoot and kill my own animals. And the least involved my PH gets into the action the better it is.

I concur.

I think that it is fair to say that there are plenty of rumors out there about Mark Sullivan's activities. But, I have yet to see any facts that substantiate the rumored activities. All I have seen is as posted above, a secondhand account of somewhat dubious orgins. Nobody has for the record put their name on any defacto affidavit, or otherwise - just the usual grumblings and the spot-judgements. A prime example of this is the account of the 20 Buffalo being found deal after MS was on the concession and the allegations that he was respponsible for this. Wouldn't there have been legal action taken if in fact this were the case? I don't see much legitimacy to that story.

Mark is for better or worse, an icon in certain circles (not mine by the way). With that status comes a fair amount of envy and suspicion.

Videos being what they are, of late, no proof on any factual basis has surfaced that Sullivan is acting in the unethical manner for which he is so openly accused. He is being condemnd by those willing to trust apparent heresay.

That mindset my friends is a component of Draconian law for which there should be no place in the minds of ethical men.
 
Posts: 2554 | Registered: 23 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I personally would like to see more videos of up close in your face charges from wounded lion and leopard (preferably thick bush) from Mark's videos. These encounters would probably occur just as frequently one would expect as any other of the other big five hunted given he follows the same protocol with all his hunts. He certainly does deserve an explanation though for his expulsion, but it is most likely to boil down to ethics and/or money.
 
Posts: 302 | Location: England | Registered: 10 November 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It sounds as if Mark pissed off some one high up in SCI.
SCI and the ethics committee put a screwing to me twice about 15 years ago because of who the complaint was against. The bad thing was all of the mediators sided with me but refused to do anything. I would guess Mark will never know the truth if anything.

James
 
Posts: 658 | Location: W.Va | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of larrys01
posted Hide Post
Does anyone know if Mark will be attending the Dallas Convention?



 
Posts: 1525 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 08 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cable68
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
I am sitting here, just waiting for someone who has one of his videos to state that they have seen a client kill an animal cleanly without a charge.

Hello... Anybody?

Rich


I've seen one. Sullivan guided an older client who didn't seem to be moving that well. got in close to an old dagga boy. Client killed him no charge, actually he was very polite and professional.



Oh by the way, the Sullivan involved was the younger one, Mark's son. Wink


Caleb
 
Posts: 1010 | Location: Texan in Muskogee, OK now moved to Wichita, KS | Registered: 28 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of LionHunter
posted Hide Post
Sullivan deserves an answer from SCI as to the reason for his expulsion, as well as a hearing before the Ethics Committee - presuming they are the ones who initiated this action - as required by the SCI rules.

Although I am no fan of MS, I am a past president and board member of a large SCI chapter and have attended the BoD meetings in D.C. Let no one doubt that SCI is very political and that it is run by good ole boy millionaires who essentially control the organization BoD. I formally applied to serve as a member of the Ethics Committee but never received an answer. Since I am not a millionaire myself (far from it) perhaps that was the reason (I was otherwise eminently qualified).


Mike
______________
DSC
DRSS (again)
SCI Life
NRA Life
Sables Life
Mzuri
IPHA

"To be a Marine is enough."
 
Posts: 3577 | Location: Silicon Valley | Registered: 19 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I think that it is fair to say that there are plenty of rumors out there about Mark Sullivan's activities



Jeff the rumours have been driven from this site and have spread from there. That is exacactly why no one can ever substantiate any of the allegations.

As was said before, Saeeds own convictions on the subject and the fact that his owning the site combined with his African expreince have given him credibility which he may have abused to drive an agenda.
Having watched Saeeds own hunting videos I think him to be one of the least ethical hunters I have ever seen, more of a sniper really than a hunter. But that is just my opinion.

The fact of the matter is that both Saeed and Mark, despite their individual vices are both responsible for bringing people to Africa in their own way. Mark however gets my vote, he has only ever been kind and giving in any dealings we have had and he is 100% correct that his films have contributed more to bringing hunters to Africa than any others. He wrote the book that everyone else has copied to bring us the hunting networks/productions today. It has all been watered down and PC'd but its all due to him and to a lesser extent PHC and sportsmen on Film.

When Saeed can provide us with even 1 client who can support his attack I will listen to him, but in the meanwhile I really just wish he would give it up for a while as he only ever seems to repeat the same baseless accusations and in so doing just makes us all think less of him.

Anyway, I think that Sullivan has been sacrificed for the sake of SCI preserving their name in some way, but I dare say this is going to backfire the same way the Namibians PR stunt did. This guy wont go down without a fight and he has a hell of a following.
 
Posts: 423 | Location: Natal - South Africa | Registered: 23 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I don't imagine that he will be at DSC because he is scheduled to be at the International Sportmans Expo in Denver that weekend. That is how I found out about the whole thing.
 
Posts: 481 | Location: Denver, CO | Registered: 20 June 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I couldn't care less about MS or SCI for that matter.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Do you guys really think the buffalo gives as damm if some one is killin him faster or a couple of mints later?If the buffalo can think,wht ever tots that went through its head during those few secs before a clean kill would be the same as what would have been going through in case of a shot in the lung(well with a bunch of buffalo expletives Smiler )

Personally if some one tried to kill me ,I would like nothing better than having a go at him before I die.Even if it means being in pain for a while.Why would the buffalo be any different,I think among all the big 5 the buffalo for sure thinks this way lol..
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 25 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think the video craze is promoting the risk taking to provoke charges. I just watched a DVD I have involving a highly regarded PH hunting elephant. I think the elephants are pushed too hard to create good cinema and I saw a lot of shooting by PHs. Other than the cornball dialogue MS inserts I don't see much difference ethically. Lets face it the charge aspect is what sells DVDs. I wonder if these elephant would have been stalked to within feet if there was no camera rolling. I met two gentlemen from Oregon who hunted with MS twice and said he was a great PH and did not fire a shot. Of course there was no camera rolling either.
 
Posts: 3073 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: 11 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LJS:
I wonder if these elephant would have been stalked to within feet if there was no camera rolling.


If I was paying for the hunt they would be. A proper elephant hunt is done up close and personal; for me, it would be shameful to take a heart/lung crack at an elephant at 75 yards.

When you watch DVDs, remember it may say as much about how the client wants the hunt to be conducted as it says about the PH.


Mike
 
Posts: 21844 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hey Marc!

Putting the whole MS and Craig Boddington thing aside, it seems that the "egotistical hunting personalities" quote struck a nerve with you .....am I correct Bwana Mojo??

quote:
Originally posted by SableTrail:
quote:
quote:
How many egotistical "hunting personalities" would have done the same thing???


That's just so stupid and catty. Leave Craig out of this! He gives more of himself to kids and adults, donating more of his time to the industry than anybody. For that poster to write that, you show an ignorance for what's great about hunting.
 
Posts: 6080 | Location: New York City "The Concrete Jungle" | Registered: 04 May 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
see


To be frank ,if I had the skill and the courage I would definitely do the same,walk right upto the animal and give it a chance to charge and shot it a few feet away from me .But then maybe once or twice ,more than tht bad for my nerves lol..

Now tell me which Dg hunter hasnt dreamt about an elephant or a buffalo charging at him and shot it a few feet away..Some are lucky enough to get in every day Smiler and some never lol.

BTW I was watching a small clip of one of Ivan Carter's client shot a buff in a charge ,the man was steady and as cool as any of the best around,name was nelson somthing not sure,is he a member here?

excuse my spellin got just 1 hand to use for another month or so.
 
Posts: 16 | Registered: 25 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of KPete
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LJS:
I think the video craze is promoting the risk taking to provoke charges. I just watched a DVD I have involving a highly regarded PH hunting elephant. I think the elephants are pushed too hard to create good cinema and I saw a lot of shooting by PHs. Other than the cornball dialogue MS inserts I don't see much difference ethically. Lets face it the charge aspect is what sells DVDs. I wonder if these elephant would have been stalked to within feet if there was no camera rolling. I met two gentlemen from Oregon who hunted with MS twice and said he was a great PH and did not fire a shot. Of course there was no camera rolling either.


I'm not sure the videos themselves are promoting risk so much as they are simply feeding a latent desire to reintroduce a modicum of risk that has historically been a fundamental element of dangerous game hunting. Come on, most of us will admit to having imagined how well we would react to a charging buffalo - and Sullivan delivers plenty of that in his DVDs. Honestly, there is very real appeal to me in a purest approach that includes double rifles and hunting dangerous game 'up-close' - and not sniping from the safety of a remote hillside.

Obviously this is a subject that is very much a matter of personal choice. That said, I feel that by pushing the limits on how far away you shoot dangerous game, you eliminate what should be an intrinsic element of the experience: Risk. Risk is a part of the tradition and history of safari hunting, and the reason that I've chosen to hunt buffalo with a double rifle rather than a scoped bolt-action. By obligating myself to getting closer to a cape buffalo or elephant, I reduce the number of trophy opportunities and incur a measure of risk that serves as partial payment for the privilege of hunting dangerous game.

On his videos, Sullivan undoubtedly comes across as boorish, egomaniacal, patronizing, and too-fast-on-the-trigger, and for me these can make them painful to watch. On the other hand, they can also be wildly entertaining - and as Craig Boddington has said - "he handles big doubles exceptionally well".


Kim

Merkel Double .470 NE
Whitworth Express .375 H&H
Griffin & Howe .275 Rigby
Winchester M70 (pre-64) .30-06 & .270


"Cogito ergo venor" René Descartes on African Safari
 
Posts: 526 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Vlam:
Having watched Saeeds own hunting videos I think him to be one of the least ethical hunters I have ever seen, more of a sniper really than a hunter. But that is just my opinion.


That is about the most rediculous thing I have ever read on the internet. You may not like the way Saeed hunts but questioning the ethics of it is unbelievable.



 
Posts: 7123 | Location: The Rock (southern V.I.) | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mike: I'm not saying 75 yards but I do think 10 to 15 yards is close enough for an elephant. I think the number of tuskless cows now being hunted to inside 10 yards is an invitation to disaster. It is just a matter of time till someone doesn't come home from one of these cow hunts. This is just my opinion and not a criticism of those who like to get up close. I value my live more than the adrenalin rush being near death brings. And yes, I have hunted elephants so I have been among them.
 
Posts: 3073 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: 11 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I think ya'll need to take a valium/tylenol pm, and go to bed! Roll Eyes

Mad Dog
 
Posts: 1184 | Location: Indiana | Registered: 17 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had a chance to watch all, or most all of MS videos..... I did it with the sound off after the first few minuetes, and they were fine to watch then!
 
Posts: 7429 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What we know for certain about Mark...My top 15.

1) He's an excellent shot with a double rifle, perhaps the best I've seen.
2) He has big balls and lotsa courage.
3) He has a big ego, but to hunt dangerous game the way he does, you have to pack a little ego.
4) He likes charges & I don't.
5) I like to kill stuff with one shot. He likes many bullets.
6) He's a handsome guy and a self taught success story.
7) His SCI booth is one of thee busiest constantly throughout the four days.
8) He's become a man some like to dislike.
9) He has brought a lot of notoriety to African hunting.
10)He has been a generous donor over his years.
11)His methods of hunting are not endorsed by this hunter and he relishes the image he has.
12)He is a friend of mine, despite the fact the NY Times chose to interview him over me a couple years ago.
13)I have purchased a lot of his stuff and thought about doing a DVD with him several years ago called "Marc and Mark", but we couldn't figure out who'd get to do most of the talking and shooting on the video. He wanted to call it a movie. I told him movies are for actors.
14) He's a bad actor
15)I've heard all the allegations from game scouts and PH's that everyone else has, but as of this moment they are all hearsay.
 
Posts: 636 | Location: The Hills | Registered: 24 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I want to make something very clear from my post on page 1. I was NOT referring to CB when I said egotistical hunting personalities. He has always been congenial at the shows. As a matter of fact, he has been a damn shade more congenial than I would be after listening to all the BS that comes with working a booth. I worked the booth deal for about 5 years and you will hear more ridiculous crap and world records shot than any sane man should be required to hear. My hats off to guys like CB and Buzz as they are two that always seem to be ready to talk.
With all due respect to Saeed, if you ask a game scout if there is a dinosaur in the next valley and that's what he thinks you want to hear then there be a HUGE dinosaur in the next valley. (Thanks Jeff W for sorting out Saeeds comments.)
If you notice, all the stuff said about MS is hearsay, no one has come forward to say they have seen him intentionally wound a buffalo to get footage. I've seen buffalo shot nine times with a big bore rifle, is that intentionally wounding a buff with the first shot???. How in the hell do you intentionally wound a buffalo???? 20 buff carcasses?? what did MS use, a .577 Nitro auto on a helicopter??
Admit it guys, who would like for one time in our overly protected lives to shoot a charging buffalo at 10 steps??
 
Posts: 725 | Location: Texas | Registered: 18 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of KPete
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SableTrail:
What we know for certain about Mark...My top 15.

1) He's an excellent shot with a double rifle, perhaps the best I've seen.
2) He has big balls and lotsa courage.
3) He has a big ego, but to hunt dangerous game the way he does, you have to pack a little ego.
4) He likes charges & I don't.
5) I like to kill stuff with one shot. He likes many bullets.
6) He's a handsome guy and a self taught success story.
7) His SCI booth is one of thee busiest constantly throughout the four days.
8) He's become a man some like to dislike.
9) He has brought a lot of notoriety to African hunting.
10)He has been a generous donor over his years.
11)His methods of hunting are not endorsed by this hunter and he relishes the image he has.
12)He is a friend of mine, despite the fact the NY Times chose to interview him over me a couple years ago.
13)I have purchased a lot of his stuff and thought about doing a DVD with him several years ago called "Marc and Mark", but we couldn't figure out who'd get to do most of the talking and shooting on the video. He wanted to call it a movie. I told him movies are for actors.
14) He's a bad actor
15)I've heard all the allegations from game scouts and PH's that everyone else has, but as of this moment they are all hearsay.


Marc:

Nicely done and very clever! And 50% more than your average Top 10 - that's value added, just like with your videos.


Kim

Merkel Double .470 NE
Whitworth Express .375 H&H
Griffin & Howe .275 Rigby
Winchester M70 (pre-64) .30-06 & .270


"Cogito ergo venor" René Descartes on African Safari
 
Posts: 526 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Wow Mark Sullivan is a real lightning rod. Before I had ANY experience in Africa I watched all of his videos. They ARE exciting and really made me WANT to get on a Plane and go to Africa, not with him, he seemed a little on edge and obviously full of himself but man did you get bang for your buck with his videos. It wasn't until later that I realized he MAY have provoked most if not all of the charges and he surely shot more than the client. Ethics...well ethics are different for most of us, but really everyone deserves an explanation or hearing for any dispute. We may not agree with his methods but in many ways he has contributed a lot to our sport...so I think it is only fair for Mark to have his "day in court" IMHO....Happy New Year to you all.
 
Posts: 98 | Location: NW Missouri | Registered: 26 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of KPete
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sevenmagltd.:
Admit it guys, who would like for one time in our overly protected lives to shoot a charging buffalo at 10 steps??


With the right PH beside me, you bet!


Kim

Merkel Double .470 NE
Whitworth Express .375 H&H
Griffin & Howe .275 Rigby
Winchester M70 (pre-64) .30-06 & .270


"Cogito ergo venor" René Descartes on African Safari
 
Posts: 526 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Singleshot03
posted Hide Post
How much of his videos are actually what happen second to second? Any chance that they could be edited to enhance danger?

Jim
 
Posts: 1493 | Location: Cincinnati  | Registered: 28 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
And 50% more than your average Top 10 - that's value added


Thanks Kim. Given that it's MS, I thought he deserved an extra five!
 
Posts: 636 | Location: The Hills | Registered: 24 January 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SableTrail:
What we know for certain about Mark...My top 15.

1) He's an excellent shot with a double rifle, perhaps the best I've seen.
2) He has big balls and lotsa courage.
3) He has a big ego, but to hunt dangerous game the way he does, you have to pack a little ego.
4) He likes charges & I don't.
5) I like to kill stuff with one shot. He likes many bullets.
6) He's a handsome guy and a self taught success story.
7) His SCI booth is one of thee busiest constantly throughout the four days.
8) He's become a man some like to dislike.
9) He has brought a lot of notoriety to African hunting.
10)He has been a generous donor over his years.
11)His methods of hunting are not endorsed by this hunter and he relishes the image he has.
12)He is a friend of mine, despite the fact the NY Times chose to interview him over me a couple years ago.
13)I have purchased a lot of his stuff and thought about doing a DVD with him several years ago called "Marc and Mark", but we couldn't figure out who'd get to do most of the talking and shooting on the video. He wanted to call it a movie. I told him movies are for actors.
14) He's a bad actor
15)I've heard all the allegations from game scouts and PH's that everyone else has, but as of this moment they are all hearsay.


Well said. I'd have to agree on all of them, except #13 (have not considered doing a "movie" with him personally Smiler ). On that, makes me chuckle...he's the PH and you had to discuss who'd do the most shooting. Big Grin Probably would have preferred "Mark and Marc" too. lol

On #15, for clarification...you heard the same allegations from actual game scouts and PH's? Do you think that they read them here first? LOL



 
Posts: 7123 | Location: The Rock (southern V.I.) | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree totally with Saeed. If you can read his book with puking--I don't know how. Watch the videos and see how many of the buffs. are broken down in the hind quarters. Shot there to slow them down. The video that was made to be covered up at SCI was because it was right at the entrance door and was being watched by some antis. My PH of many years takes great pride in how close we can get and no charges are the rules of the game. His comment is I will not let the buff. kill you but he is yours to kill. Isn't that what we go for. Not to have some ass kill for you.

Do we have anybodys word that SCI didn't have communications with except him. I don't have any great love for SCI but this has been discussed on the floor for years and I suspect that only his large $ contributions that he openly braggs about is the only thing that has kept him going to Reno for this. AS for me --I won't miss the guy.
 
Posts: 337 | Registered: 23 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jorge
posted Hide Post
I know a gentleman of impeccable integrity who sadly I hear is in bad health and no longer posts here and hunted with Sullivan on several safaris. According to him Sullivan is a very conciencious, affable and competent PH who freely admitted to him his movies were designed to make money and the clients involved were all aware and cooperated. Whetehr we like or agree with his style is irrelevant. Even the accused at Nuremberg received a detailed explanation as to why they were going to be executed. Sullivan deserves the same from SCI. jorge


USN (ret)
DRSS Verney-Carron 450NE
Cogswell & Harrison 375 Fl NE
Sabatti Big Five 375 FL Magnum NE
DSC Life Member
NRA Life Member

 
Posts: 7149 | Location: Orange Park, Florida. USA | Registered: 22 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Charles_Helm
posted Hide Post
quote:
I know a gentleman of impeccable integrity who sadly I hear is in bad health and no longer posts here



I'm very sorry to hear this.
 
Posts: 8773 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Vlam, Jeff Wemmer, Buzz C., Karl Stumpfe and Sable Trail
and at least a few more have to have their posts respected
as those posts are totally logical. I've spoken to M S on
the phone twice and he was excellent to converse with,
EXCELLENT! Given the $$$ I'd book with him. Tanz. is big
bucks though, as we all know.



Jack

OH GOD! {Seriously, we need the help.}

 
Posts: 2791 | Location: USA - East Coast | Registered: 10 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
.
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ALF:
I do not know Mr MS personally, nor do I know anyone personally who know him or have personally dealt with him.

What I do have are copies of his videos.

Thus any inference is not against his person but against the content of these videos.

Now having watched them over years, over and over I can but only comment on the content of those videos.

The first and foremost observation of anyone who has watched them with me is, how is it possible to shoot so many buffalo with what are by all accounts adequate guns of adequate caliber and not have a single buffalo drop at the first shot or at least a short time after a single or second shot?

If there is any doubt to this, why is it that the culmination of a charge always ends with the buffalo going down ? why did the buffalo not go down when the first shot / shots were fired ?

if it could be downed with the last shot why did it not go down with the first shot?

After much debate I have concluded that there is likely a direct attempt to wound animals either by using Solid bullets and placing them in such a way as not to render an incapacitating shot or shots, it then sets up on purpose for benefit of the video a situtation where a charge is provoked..... Do I have proof of this ? no but having shot a fair number of buffalo myself this is the only conclusion I can come to.

What makes it more questionable is the fact that individuals then benifit financially from this. ie the object of the excercise is to induce animal suffering to further individual financial gain.

If dog fighting and cock fighting can and is outlawed on this basis the same could happen to trophy hunting.

It then raises questions which lead to conclusions that puts trophy hunting in peril as a whole, and this should concern us all, because it puts our past time directly in harms way!

Now when it comes to ethics of modern hunting there is a common golden thread the world over, SCI promote it, Boone and Crocket, in fact each and every pro hunting organization the world over promote and proclaim it, Wildlife authorities demand it !

.....and I do not care what anyone says or argues, fact is it is our common purpose and duty to dispatch our quarries as humanely and cleanly as possible!

Failure to do so or at least to try and do so will be our downfall as hunters.

At this very moment the whole world over there is a very real threat against hunting based on this very premise, ie the failure to dispatch animals quickly and humanely or then a percieved notion that hunters bring undue suffering to their prey.

Already most countries and jurisdictions have legislation in place used for other purposes such as cruelty against domestic animals that can be easily enacted against hunters if this premise is not fulfilled.


I agree entirely ALF. Well said.

I will differ slightly on one small point (not one you made, but one that is inferred in your post and made explicitly by others above). I think its very fair to have an opinion of Mark Sullivan the person entirely based on watching his videos, reading his book or reading his website. He is representing himself in all those media...not playing a fictional role in a "movie".



 
Posts: 7123 | Location: The Rock (southern V.I.) | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: