THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Premium .458 Bullets Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted
PREMIUM .458 CALIBER BULLETS

c 2005 by Andy Tillman

Raising and butchering North American Bison as a young man graphically taught me that a high impact velocity with a premium bullet of large sustained frontal area always killed a bison more quickly and humanely than a heavy bullet of low or moderate velocity. This is contrary to the conventional wisdom among many African hunters who select bullets of the highest possible Sectional Density (SD) and seldom exceed 2,400 fps muzzle velocity. In preparing for my own African buffalo and elephant hunt, I wanted to identify the .458 caliber bullet’s that would withstand point blank impact from a .450 Dakota or similar high velocity cartridge.

I evaluated twenty-four premium .458 caliber bullets over a four-year period. Bullets were fired from a .458 x 404 improved and 450 Dakota. The .458 x 404 is similar to a 460 GA but with a 25 rather than 15 degree shoulder which makes it unnecessary to fire-form basic-brass prior to hunting. This rifle was leant to me by Bill Steigers. Metalwork on the P-17 Enfield action was by Tom Burgess and the walnut stock by Al Biesen. This rifle has a .460 groove barrel with 1-10 inch twist. I later used my own 450 Dakota which was built on a CZ 550 action from Ed Plummer of American Hunting Rifles in Hamilton, Montana. AHR supplied the heavy 1-12 twist barrel, muzzle brake, metallic sights, and Model 70 style safety and trigger. It was plated and stocked with a McMillan BRNO 602 stock by ROBAR of Phoenix, Arizona. Shawn Thomason of Craigmont, Idaho made it all work. Both rifles had quick twist barrels to help stabilize mono-metal and premium bullets.



LOAD DEVELOPMENT.

Due to the high expansion ratio of these large capacity cases, medium burning propellants like IMR 4064 and RL-15 provide high velocity with relatively modest 90 – 104 gr. powder charges. IMR 4895 and Varget were somewhat faster burning than 4064 and RL-15, but were very dense and may be preferable in slightly smaller capacity cartridge cases or with longer bullets. IMR 4350 was useful for reduced loads at low chamber pressure but behaved erratically at maximum loading density and fouled badly. Vhita Vouri 550 showed promise with the heavier bullets. I standardized on RL-15, which worked equally well with all bullet weights. The 450 Dakota case had a 100 – 150 fps advantage over the 458 x 404. This was most useful with the 450 gr. bullet. The two cases were very tolerant of normal changes in reloading components and bullets. I used Norma, RWS and HDS .404 brass, and factory Dakota which has held up to 7 reloads without losing a single case. The 400 and 450 gr. Bullets, including the Barnes solids, grouped into one inch of each other at 100 yards from the Dakota. The 500 gr. bullets were four to nine inches low depending on velocity. A 17 pound bag of #8 shot and/or a PAST recoil pad was used to protect my shoulder when shooting off the bench.

TEST MEDIUM



I knew from thirty years of evaluating bullets and weapon effects that 5-gallon nylon buckets filled with water closely duplicated live animals. To stop most .458 caliber soft points requires three or more five-gallon nylon buckets filled with water. I standardized on those from Home Depot which cost $4.95 apiece. It costs $15 - 25 to recover a single bullet. The buckets have a 0.090” wall thickness, are 11 inches in diameter, and were secured with a matching lid which can usually be re-used. When aligned front to back they have a 1 ½ inch air space between buckets due to the width of the lid and a ½ inch taper from the top of the bucket to base. I calibrated the water buckets with Remington .416 Remington ammunition, which is loaded with 400 gr. Swift A-Frame bullets. These will perforate 3 buckets and dent the front face of a 4th. The Swift’s expand to .78 caliber at point blank range and maintain 95% weight retention. At 100 yards the .416 Swift expands to .759 caliber and 97.5% retained weight.



These bullets were compared to the late George Hoffman’s extensive collection of .416 caliber Swift A-Frames recovered from African Cape Buffalo. Mr. Hoffman measured typical expanded bullets for me in July of 2001. They averaged .80 - .85 caliber and 90% weight retention. The correlation between bullets recovered in water buckets and Mr. Hoffman’s collection is 91% for expansion and 95% for retained weight. The nylon buckets can be used over a wide velocity range, and closely duplicate test shots into IWBA calibrated gelatin with bullets as diverse as a 147 gr. sub-sonic 9mm JHP or a 55 gr. 5.56mm FMJ at 3,200 fps. The nylon buckets significantly reduce the diameter of an expanded bullet compared to firing into a homogenous water tank. IWBA tests have concluded that water by itself, in either a water tank, cardboard milk jugs, or plastic zip lock bags, will over expand a bullet by about 20% compared to live animals. A protocol has been developed by the IWBA for water soaked newspapers, but it is so complex and time consuming that I would almost rather use gelatin. The nylon buckets are a difficult target, and are capable of ripping the solid copper wings off a Barnes X or the bonded “bear claws” off a Trophy Bonded Bear Claw.



Mr. Hoffman told me that, “The 400 Swift will penetrate both shoulders and be under the skin on a broadside shot every time. If you get behind the shoulder it will go completely through most of the time.” This correlates to penetrating the rear of the third can and bouncing off the front face of the fourth. I calculated the permanent wound cavity produced by each bullet by converting the caliber of the recovered bullet to square inch of frontal area and multiplying times penetration. This is a very conservative method of determining relative wounding power since the temporary cavity of a high-energy rifle bullet is much larger than the expanded bullet. Only IWBA calibrated gelatin or live animals can accurately measure temporary cavity. However, I was able to make relative comparisons of the bullets to each other by recording whether a bullet left a diameter entry or exit wound in the nylon bucket, broke off a large piece of plastic, split the bucket open from top to bottom, or even tore the bucket in two! I added one inch of penetration for a large dent on the rear face of a bucket, and another inch for an exit. A bullet which penetrated a bucket but did not dent the inside rear face was given credit for ½ of a bucket (5 1/2 inches). Buckets were elevated to the same height parallel to the ground as the rifle’s bore on three saw horses.

Despite the high correlation between bullets recovered from Cape buffalo and the test medium, I do not contend that recovering bullets in water filled nylon buckets is science. It is a simple and consistent method to filter out totally inappropriate bullets, and suggest those that will be most successful for the intended purpose. If a bullet does not perform well in a nylon water bucket it certainly will not do so in a 1,600 pound testosterone filled bag of red meat!

400 GR.



With a SD equal to a 180 gr./.308 or a 250 gr./.358, a 400 gr. .458 should have no problem holding up to an impact velocity equal to a 30-06 or 35 Whelan. Yet most African hunters would never consider using a bullet with a SD of .272 on the “Southern Buffalo.” As the penetration of the 400gr. Barnes X, North Fork, and TBBC demonstrate, the SD of a bullet in the box is not nearly as significant as the SD of the expanded bullet itself!

400 grain Barnes X.



The 400 gr. Barnes X and 450 gr. Northfork CP had more penetration than any other expanding bullet. That’s right, a 400 gr. Barnes had more penetration than a 500 gr. Barnes. Frontal area appears to influence penetration more than any other characteristic, even retained weight. The 400 gr. Barnes blew off all four X petals and was reduced to a 283 gr. wad cutter, but it penetrated 4 cans and nearly punctured a 5th. That is equal to 46 inches penetration, seven inches more than its nearest competitors, the 450 and 500 gr. Swift. As the bullets modest permanent wound cavity (10.3 cubic inches) indicates, losing so much frontal area has an adverse effect on its lethality. Sure, it might shoot from pelvis to pleural cavity on a buffalo, but it will also take much longer to exsanguinate than if it was hit with a high expansion bullet like the 450 gr or 500 gr Kodiak. The Barnes X is essentially an “expanding solid.” Without it’s X petals, the Barnes averaged just .534 caliber. Since monometal’s have modest expansion, the .375 and larger calibers make most sense in the Barnes X. In these large capacity cases, all three bullets had similar pressure and velocity as their peers. All three weights of the Barnes X have the same depth (1/2“) and diameter (1/4”) of hollow point. Only the length of their bearing surface is different. This bullet is probably best used in the .458 WM.

400 grain North Fork.

The North Fork was the most reliable 400 gr. and one of the most effective bullets regardless of weight. It actually had more penetration and expansion than the reference standard .416 Remington. And it had as much or more retained weight as a 450gr. Barnes X, 500gr. TB Speer or conventional 510 gr. Winchester RNSP! The North Fork had four inches more penetration than a .416 Remington despite having more frontal area to overcome and slightly less retained weight. How is that possible? More energy. The .450 Dakota can easily reach 2,700 fps from my relatively short 21 ½ inch barrel. Anyone who owns a .458 Winchester magnum (WM) can closely duplicate the effectiveness of a factory .416 Remington by using the North Fork or TBBC.

I tested the 400 gr. North Fork twice at point blank (PB) range and once at 100 yards. Weight retention was 364 gr. at PB and 388 gr (97%) at 100 yards. Expansion was a uniform 0.819 diameter at PB and 0.843 at 100 yards. Penetration was 39 inches at PB and 34 inches at 100 yards. Despite its relatively light weight, this is one of the most consistent premium bullets available. The North Fork appeared to have a safety margin of at least 150 fps before fracturing the expanded mushroom. You can just barely see the rim of the solid copper base imprinted beneath the bonded mushroom. The NF maintained 42 gr. more weight than the TBBC and penetrated ½ more water buckets. As Mr. Hoffman observed, this would probably mean the difference between finding a bullet underneath the hide on the far side of a buffalo’s shoulder or exiting and leaving a blood trail. The North Fork is readily available and accurate. The semi-spitzer design chambered as smoothly as a FMJ-RN. Mine were shipped the same day the order was received. The grooved driving bands of the NF provided many locations to crimp the case neck into the bullet, and were useful for sealing the loaded ammo with a lacquer weather sealant, but did not appear to reduce chamber pressure compared to its peers.

400 grain Swift.

The 400 gr. Swift was not tested since it has a very large meplat, and is intended for use in the .45-70. Oddly enough, the 400 gr. Swift is available in 450 Dakota ammunition. The 400 gr. North Fork would be a much better choice.

400 grain Trophy Bonded Bear Claw.

The Trophy Bonded Bear Claw (TBBC), which is actually 390 gr., is no longer sold as a reloading component. I purchased mine prior to the sale of Federal who owned Trophy Bonded to Alliant Industries (Speer). The TBBC is an excellent bullet and is still available in Federal .458 WM ammunition. The North Fork and TBBC are both bonded core with a “solid shank,” a design which is also used in the South African Rhino bullet. Bill Steigers of Lewiston, Idaho made the first bonded core hunting bullet, the Bitterroot, from copper tubing in 1965. In 1972 he made a large batch of 300 gr. 375 caliber “Ackley Solid Base Expanding” bullets from extruded copper rod. While none of his later imitators have given Bill Steigers credit for developing bonded bullets 40 years ago, he asked and received permission from P.O. Ackley to use his solid base design, and then greatly improved it by bonding the jacket and core. The experiment with the solid base Bitterroot’s was abandoned after African tests on Cape buffalo demonstrated that it was inferior to his original design. The late Jack Carter, the founder of Trophy Bonded, popularized the bonded “solid shank” ten years later. The widespread availability of CNC machines and new copper alloys has made the solid base design much more useful than it was thirty years ago. It solves one basic problem facing any bonded bullet maker and that is how to seal the base of a tubular bullet that is filled with molten lead during the bonding and annealing process.

400 grain Woodleigh.

If the 400 gr. Barnes under expanded, it’s probably fair to say the 400 gr. Woodleigh over-expanded. It retained a bit more weight than the Barnes but “only” penetrated two cans, which is still equal to many of the best .308 to .375 caliber bullets made. While this would probably make a shoulder-to-shoulder shot on most medium sized game, the bullet mashed flat and is in danger of fragmenting. Fergus Bailey in Australia uses the 400 gr. Woodleigh in his lightweight Sako re-chambered to .458 Lott. He has killed many wart hogs with this combination, and reports the bullet exits completely at a reduced velocity of 2,400 fps. Dr. Norbert Hansen of Germany has used this bullet extensively for plains game in his .458 Lott. I would probably recommend it for the .458 WM only.

At 2,600 fps a 180 gr./.308 Woodleigh, which has a similar velocity and SD as the 400gr./.458, expands only 1/2 of the way down the bearing surface of the bullet. At 3,380 fps it still retains 140 gr. and has ¼ inch left of the bearing surface yet to go! Duncan McPherson has demonstrated that heavy bullets continue to expand over a longer dwell time than lighter ones. I’m not sure when the mass of the bullet becomes so great it adversely affects the Woodleigh, but it appears to with bullets as light as a 270 gr./.375 which turns inside-out like a badminton birdie at 2,900 fps in my .375 H&H Improved.

The 400 grain Woodleigh was one of the most accurate bullets of this test, grouping into a single ragged hole at 100 yards with 98 grains RL-15.

425 GRAIN.

425 grain Rhino.

A 425 grain .458 is a non-standard but useful bullet weight. I could easily reach 2,650 fps with RL-15, just 50 fps less than a typical 400 gr. With a SD of .289, the 425 gr./.458 is equal to a 160 gr./7mm or 225 gr/.338. This is certainly adequate if not ideal for a premium bullet, especially one that uses a solid base configuration. The Rhino has been available internationally since 1999, and is manufactured by Kobus Van der Westhuizen of the Republic of South Africa (RSA) and sold in the U.S. by their distributor Bill Isenbarger of Houston, Texas. I ordered mine by E-mail on a Wednesday night and they were shipped by Fed Ex two days later. At $33.20 per box of twenty, they are less expensive than a Trophy Bonded Speer but 50% more than a similar Woodleigh or North Fork. The 425 grain is a spitzer. Rhino also makes a bonded 485 grain and 500 grain RN and a 500 grain monometal solid. They are moly-coated and required 4 gr. more powder to reach similar pressure levels as non-coated bullets.

The 425 gr. Rhino survived at PB range better than the 485 gr. Rhino despite over 200 fps greater impact velocity. This well demonstrates the importance of testing your hunting bullets prior to going on safari. The 425 gr. Rhino lost one of it’s four expanded “propellers.” The 485 gr. Rhino lost three of four. The 425 gr. Rhino’s spitzer shape may have delayed expansion compared to the heavier Rhino’s RN. I sectioned both bullets and they appear to share a 3mm thick jacket, the thickest jacket of any bullet tested. The cavity for the lead core appears to have been made with a 5mm wide drill bit 18 mm deep. Neither bullets had any taper to the inside diameter of their jacket. This may adversely affect the bullets ability to expand at lower velocities. I would advise anyone shooting either bullet from a low velocity cartridge like the .458 WM to recover one in water buckets at typical hunting ranges prior to actually using them. When this thick jacket is swaged into a spitzer rather than a RN, the jacket almost completely covers up the meplat, leaving very little exposed lead. To encourage expansion and reveal some of the lead core, the manufacturer appears to have used a dual diameter drill bit to decrease the thickness of the jacket at the meplat. This gives the lead core of a sectioned bullet a coke bottle profile that is highly unusual.

The 425 gr. Rhino penetrates 2 ½ water buckets, and has a permanent wound cavity of 14.7 cubic inches. This is similar to a 450 gr. Barnes X which had less expansion but more penetration, or the 500 gr. Trophy Bonded Speer which had similar penetration. Damage to the water buckets was modest and is consistent with delayed expansion. Like the Barnes X line, the Rhino’s probably have a very narrow velocity envelope within which they maintain the expanded propellers. While the Rhino bullets share the same basic architecture of the original Trophy Bonded Bear Claw or North Fork, they are relatively crude in comparison. A tapered and swaged (rather than drilled) jacket would provide a greater retained weight, FA and velocity envelope. The 425 gr. Rhino consistently shot 1-3 inches higher than the 485 gr. Rhino with no difference in windage. It can certainly be used as a light plains game bullet in conjunction with a heavier bullet for dangerous game.

450 GRAIN.



With a SD of .307, the 450 grain .458 should have as much or more penetration as a comparable 175 gr./7mm, 200 gr./.308, 250 gr./.338, or 300 gr./375. That’s good company and sufficient reason to try this under-appreciated bullet weight. The 450 gr. offers somewhat reduced recoil compared to the 500 gr., and larger temporary cavity due to 100 – 150 fps greater velocity. There are three exceptional monolithic solids available in this weight range, all of which were easy to regulate to the same point of impact as the premium soft points.

450 grain Barnes X.

The 450 gr. Barnes X is 0.16 inches longer than a typical 510 gr. RNSP. With a rotational velocity of 2,905 revolutions per second (rps) in a 1-10 twist, the 450 gr. X bullet did not tumble in the complex target array and had an acceptable blend of penetration and frontal area. Experienced Barnes users will recognize the distinctive “square” profile of this X bullet. The 450 gr. maintained the base of each X petal, which gives the bullet a square rather than round appearance. Frontal area is increased by 40% over the 400 gr. and the permanent wound cavity is increased by four cubic inches. One petal was recovered near the first can and another in the second. The second and third cans were crushed, indicating a sustained temporary cavity. Nick Caico, from Seaford, NY, shot a cape buffalo forward of the hip with a 458 Lott at 2,450 fps, and recovered a perfectly expanded 450 gr. X bullet in the lungs, a distance of at least 4 ½ feet. This is entirely consistent with my results. The .458 Barnes has a narrow velocity range that the X petals will remain intact, but the 450 gr. is likely to expand as intended at normal hunting ranges. Nick’s bull was shot at 90 yards as he ran uphill. Expansion was 0.92 caliber. This compared to just .711 caliber at the higher velocities used in my test. I prefer the 450 gr. X to either the 400 or 500 gr. Barnes. It does not yaw like the 500 gr. or blow off its front end as easily as the 400 gr. The 450 gr. Barnes RN solid fed reliably, was accurate, and easy to regulate to the same point of impact as the other 450 gr. bullets. Unfortunately, it has been replaced with a banded FN in their 2005 catalog.

450 grain Barnes Triple Shock.



The Triple Shock has four narrow grooves cut into the bearing surface of the bullet which may reduce pressure, and provide a reservoir for copper fouling. At 1.519 inches long, only the 500 grain Barnes X is longer. The width and depth of the HP appeared to be unchanged from the original Barnes X line. I could easily reach 2,509 fps in my Dakota. This was the first Barnes X type bullet that shot accurately in my rifle. Even during load development with 2.0 grain powder increments I was able to build a nice group at 50 yards, stringing bullets in a single vertical line as the powder charge was increased. It eventually turned in a 1 ¼ inch group at 100 yards. The Triple Shock did not foul my barrel like the original Barnes X did either. Many Barnes X shooters blame copper fouling on a rough bore, but my rifle would print virtually one hole groups with Woodleigh, North Fork, and Trophy Bonded bullets, and shoot a 3-4 inch pattern with the Barnes X. The Triple Shock works.

Expansion and penetration was similar to the Barnes X. Due to higher MV, the Triple Shock lost a bit more weight and FA, averaging .284 square inch. Retained weight was just 79%. It lost all four X petals, but held onto them longer than the original Barnes X. I recovered the first petal in the rear of bucket #2, and the remaining three in the rear of bucket #3. The fragments average 22.3 gr. each. The bullet veered off course just 1 inch in #3 and #4 and bounced off the front face of the 5th bucket. I gave it credit for 44 inches penetration. The Triple shock may have retained its X petals longer than the original Barnes X due to my 1-12 twist putting less pressure on the expanded X petals than the 1-10 twist. The Triple Shock did not appear to tip, and with an expanded length of 0.936 inches was adequately stabilized at 2,509 rps rotational velocity. The larger FA of the 450 gr. NF-CP did much more damage to the third water bucket than the Triple Shock even though they had similar penetration. The extra retained weight and FA of the NF really did make a difference. Permanent wound volume was a modest 12.5 cubic inches. The Triple Shock did not disturb any of the water buckets. They were left standing on the test stand, and I was able to actually re-use the last two buckets, which was very unusual. I suspect the Triple Shock would retain its X petals at 100 yards. While there are certainly more effective bullets, I would hunt with it. Some hunters will find great comfort in knowing they are shooting what is essentially a one inch long rod of solid copper that is .60 caliber in diameter.

450 grain Kodiak.

One of the most rewarding discoveries of this test was the Alaska Bullet Works Kodiak. Their 450 and 500 gr. RNSPs were two of the top seven bullets in the test. The 450 gr. expanded to over an inch in diameter and retained 94.7% of its original weight! Only the 500 gr. Kodiak and experimental 418 gr. Bitterroot had a larger permanent wound cavity. The bullet expanded to just 0.049 inch past the base of the bullet, compared to 0.137 for the 500 gr. Kodiak. I would consider this to be ideal expansion. It was fired from a 1-10 twist and was very stable, showing no signs of tipping. This is one of the best .458 caliber bullets in the world and is equally at home on a .458 WM in SE Alaska as it is on a 450 Dakota in Zimbabwe. Company spokesmen claim it will shoot through and exit both shoulders of a 9-foot brown bear from a .458 WM. This is consistent with my test where it penetrated 2 ½ buckets of water. The Kodiak jacket tapers from 30/1000 inch to 50/1000 at the heel in a five degree taper and is made from 95-5 copper/zinc. The RNSP has a relatively blunt 1-½ caliber ogive, which is similar to the 500 gr. Woodleigh. The 450 and 500 gr. Kodiaks are loaded in Buffalo Bore .458 WM ammunition. I recommend this bullet for use in .458 WM, Lott and Ackley class wildcats. It’s blunt ogive and short length is most appropriate for cartridges that are limited to a 3.6 inch OCL or less.

While the Kodiak may appear to have over expanded, it is not in the least bit fragile, brittle, or in any danger of fragmenting. It has a deep covering of lead still bonded to the jacket. This compares very favorably to the 500 gr. TBS which “washed off” the lead and left a thin film of solder covering a jacket which appeared to be no thicker than a varmint bullet. According to company spokesmen, Alaska Bullet works has been making bonded bullets since 1980, and can bond 40 .458 bullets a minute, and 90 .30 calibers a minute. They are among the least expensive bonded bullet in the United States, and demonstrably better than ones costing twice as much. Look at these bullets photographed from their base; it makes all of the other bullets look like a medium bore. African hunters frequently site the need for extreme penetration because buffalo so often turn and run when hit. All I can say is that if you hit a buffalo with either the 450 or 500 gr. Kodiak you won’t need a follow up shot! (Nor will you over penetrate and wound a buffalo standing behind your target). Experienced African hunters have told me that this would also make an excellent lion or leopard load. The Kodiak and Barnes X bullets were the least accurate of this test but still shot into 2 ½ - 3 inch dispersion at 100 yards, which is more accurate than any shooter can maintain off-hand with a large bore rifle.

450 grain North Fork Soft Point.



Pictured 400 and 450 grain at point blank and 100 yards.

The 450 gr. North Fork is the obvious choice for an all-around dangerous game bullet in this caliber. During the course of this test, it soon became obvious that the 400 or 450 grain NF’s were in a class by themselves. One of them would become my standard reload. As a result, I tested this bullet twice at PB and twice at 100 yards. The first test shot was loaded with IMR-4350 powder which later proved to be erratic at maximum loading density. The recovered bullet had a large polished center like it had smacked the rear of the third bucket, but there was no obvious dent in the off-side nylon wall so I gave it a penetration of “only” 2 ½ cans, or 28 inches, even though it had probably penetrated a full 33 inches. Twenty-eight inches of penetration would yield a permanent wound cavity of only 14.6 cubic inches, or 28% less than the 400 gr. NF. This surprised me so much I retested the 450 gr. a second time loaded with RL-15 and chronographed the shot. Muzzle velocity was 2,547 fps. It exited the rear of the 3rd can and bounced off the 4th. Unlike conventional bullets which may over expand, the North Fork penetrates farther the faster you shoot them. I gave it a penetration of 35 inches, which is similar to the 450 gr. Barnes X. Once I switched powders to RL-15 or IMR 4064, I had no more surprises with any of the bullets. I tested the 450 gr. NF twice at 100 yards and it penetrated 35 inches both times, expanded to 0.833 diameter, and retained 439.2 gr. (97.6%) weight. This is equal to a 19 cubic inch permanent wound cavity. The four recovered bullets are nearly identical.

An aquaitence recently shot three Tanzanian Cape buffalo with the 450 gr. NF at 2,580 fps from his 450 Dakota. All three were one-shot kills. The recovered bullets weighed a uniform 416 grains with a diameter of .88 caliber, a 95% correlation to my water buckets. Two shots were broad-side behind the shoulder and were recovered underneath the hide on the opposite side. One ran 40 yards and died before a second shot could be fired, and the other died in his tracks despite no shoulder, spine or Central Nervous System (CNS) involvement. The third bull was shot front-on in the chest. He stumbled backwards and died in his tracks. One-shot kills like this are very unusual in Cape buffalo and are a testimonial to a remarkable man and bullet.

Mike Brady, the owner of North Fork, recommends the 400 gr., “For moose, lion, brown bear, and eland-class,” animals, and the 450 gr. for buffalo. If I had to load 40 rounds of ammo for a ten-day safari to Tanzania tomorrow, I would probably select the 450 gr. NF even though it was not quite as consistent as the 400 gr. NF. As the photos demonstrate, the North Forks have a substance and structural integrity that is a confidence builder when facing an animal that is three feet wide and six feet long with a bad attitude. North Fork also makes a 450 gr. monometal solid with a truncated Flat Nose which is turned out of the same H4 copper alloy as used in the soft point. It is a dual diameter bullet, with seven driving bands, and about 50 fps less pressure at similar loading density as the soft point. It was more sensitive to OCL in my rifle than North Fork’s original RN-FN which I tested in the wooden stop-box. Some rifles may require use of a Dremel tool to smooth the edge of their feed ramp.

450 grain North Fork Cup Point.



The North Fork Cup Point (CP) is an expanding solid, the only bullet really like it in the world. The CP is based on North Forks monolithic FN solid. The CP is just 0.027 inch longer than the FN and has a shallow concave hollow point machined into the meplat. The side walls of this wide but shallow HP are thicker than a conventional HP, there fore the name, Cup Point. The CP holds about 1 grain (0.1 cc) of water which is curiously enough, identical to the volume of the Barnes X or Triple Shock HP. The FN and CP are both made from the same H4 solid copper used in North Fork’s bonded soft point. The CP has five full diameter driving bands which spin the bullet, a sixth in the middle of the bullet that helps align it in the bore, and a full dimension heel. The bearing surface between driving bands has been reduced to .4465 diameter. I examined several recovered bullets and this reduced surface area does not contact the rifling. As a result, the FN and CP have less pressure than conventional bullets and required 2- 4 grains more powder charge to reach a similar velocity level as the other 450 grain bullets.

The CP expanded to an average .614 caliber and blew off less than 1/3 of the expanded mushroom entering the second water bucket. Compare this bullets dimensions and expansion with the Barnes X line and you will see that Mike Brady’s innovation offers more penetration and retained weight than the 450 grain X bullet, and more penetration than the 500 grain X. While the impact velocity of this bullet was relatively high, it is within the envelope of a 300 gr/.375 or 370 gr./.416, and I would expect similar behavior from these CP solids. The CP split the first water bucket completely in two like the better soft points, a top to bottom split in the rear of the second bucket, and blew out ½ of the base on the third. Damage in each water bucket was proportional to velocity. The CP should offer a deep and predictable wound profile which is certainly appropriate for large dangerous game hunting. It closely resembles the wound profile of a .416 Remington with the reference standard 400 grain Swift, but with one full bucket more penetration. That’s saying something. It produced more damage to the third bucket than any other bullet.

Despite it’s great penetration, the permanent wound cavity created by the CP is less than all but three other expanding bullets, but 50% greater than a monolithic FN. That is exactly what most users would hope for. While the CP is a very conservative bullet design it is well executed and at slightly less velocity would probably have maintained 100% weight retention and 0.73 caliber expansion. The CP equaled or exceeded the penetration of the 400 Barnes X and 450 gr. Triple Shock, but did so with 25% more FA. It tied with the 400 X for the greatest penetration of any expanding bullet in the test. African hunters who have traditionally loaded one SP followed by a magazine full of FMJ’s for buffalo hunting will hail this bullet as the most significant innovation since smokeless powder. It is both an expanding bullet and a solid. We know from it’s first African outing in 2004 that the CP expands modestly at .404 Jeffery and .470 Nitro velocities and shoots stem to stern on Cape buffalo. It is comforting to know that it will also hold up to use in higher velocity cartridges. The 450 gr. CP remained point forward through out its bullet path and showed no signs of tipping or tumbling when fired from my 450 Dakota with 1-12 twist.

North Fork has managed to improve on the A-Square concept of a “triad” of bullets. The North Fork SP, CP and FN could be fired into a single ½ x 1 inch group at 50 yards with express sights, and about the same with a 3 X scope at 100 yards. Why look any farther?

450 grain Swift.

The 450 gr. Swift was a bit of a disappointment. The bullet had a more frontal area than the NF and a bit less retained weight, yet it penetrated 3 ½ cans of water! And it did so consistently. Based on the reputation of the .416 Swift, I conducted three test shots. One lost its front core and was recovered in the fourth can of water weighing 292 gr. and .517 diameter, a second fractured but did not separate, and a third remained intact. The last two bullets were nearly identical at .863 caliber and 90% retained weight. A 250 gr./.375 Swift with much less SD, withstands 3,050 fps impact in my .375 Improved which has a 1-8 “ twist. The heavy .458’s really are hard on a bullet! The 450 gr. Swift is loaded in Remington .458 WM Safari ammunition. At a modest 2,250 fps it is likely to be among the best factory ammunition available. At high velocity, with a 22.8 cubic inch permanent wound cavity, it will probably kill 40% faster than a .416 Remington. (If it does not blow off its front core). I cannot explain why it has more penetration than the North Fork, other than it was fired in a 1-10” twist barrel. The expanded Swift is 0.15 inch shorter than the NF, so it may be inherently more stable. It showed no signs of tipping. I would trust this bullet at velocities up to and including the .458 Lott (2,350 fps).

465 GRAIN

465 grain A-Square Dead Tough.



Pictured, L to RT, Dead Tough, Woodleigh RNSP and Hornady Interbond.

The A-Square “triad” of bullets is once again available in the United States. This includes the bonded Dead Tough, fragmenting Lion Load and Monolithic Solid. I tested the Dead Tough (DT) and Monolithic Solid (MS). The 465 gr. DT is shorter than either a 400 grain Barnes X or North Fork which makes it appropriate for cartridges with modest powder capacity like the .458 Winchester or Lott. A 465 grain bullet is unusual in the English system, but is equal to 30 grams in the metric. If I can’t kill a buffalo or elephant with a bullet weighing 30 grams, I think I will just stay back in camp drinking whiskey and telling lies. The 30 gram DT and MS can easily reach 2,500 fps. It’s SD is > to such well regarded calibers as the 250 grain/.338, 500 grain/.475, 570 grain/.510, and 750 grain/.585. With a SD of .317, a 30 gram .458 should be adequate with almost any premium bullet design. The 30 gram DT is loaded in A-Square’s .458 Winchester ammunition. Most users would select the 500 grain DT for a large capacity case like the Dakota, but since the A-Square was the most expensive bullets of the test, I wanted to see how it would compare to the 450 grain North Fork which became the reference standard by which all other bullets were compared.

The jacket of the Dead Tough covers the radius of the RN to ensure reliable feeding but this may encourage the bullet to expand inward rather than outward. Out of respect for the manufacturer, I tested the A-Square twice. Despite a .350 diameter meplat of exposed lead, the DT had very modest expansion. It averaged .662 diameter in two short, asymmetrical propellers. It retained less than 400 grains weight and despite its modest weight and short overall length, was the 5th longest recovered bullet of the test. The lead core appears to have a high antimony content which would explain why it crumbled rather than mushroomed. The bullet’s jacket should control expansion, not the core. The DT had excellent penetration as you would expect from a bullet with a FA of .334, either sticking in the rear of #4 or bouncing off the front face of #5. (This is similar to the 450 gr. Barnes Triple Shock). The second bullet veered one inch off track in #4 and had identical penetration (43 inches) for both shots. In medium weight bullets I prefer the North Fork SP and CP, Kodiak, and Triple Shock.

485 GRAIN.

485 grain Rhino.



The 485 grain Rhino is probably intended for the 450 Nitro which is regulated with a 480 grain RN. Since I favor velocity over mass when using premium bullets I was happy to try this heavy weight rather than the more conventional 500 grain Rhino. Sectional Density is .330 compared to .327 for the 480 grain and .341 for the 500 grain. With 20mm of solid copper behind the base of the lead core, there is little reason to favor an even heavier bullet. The width and depth of the core is 5 x 15mm, with the same un-tapered 3mm thick sidewall as the 425 grain spitzer. Since the bullet is a RN, a dual diameter drill bit was not necessary to thin the jacket near the meplat. Both Rhino’s functioned flawlessly through my un-modified CZ feed ramp. The 485 gr. Rhino appeared to have a 50 fps velocity advantage over 500 gr. bullets at similar pressure. Due to their lighter weight and moly coating, I could increase the powder charge 4 grains over a 500 grain un-coated bullet. Even in the large capacity Dakota case, this is a useful bullet weight.



I recovered two 485 grain Rhino bullets. The first test shot was 2,527 fps, 86 fps faster than the 2,441 fps average velocity I had established as a working maximum during load development. This unexpectedly high velocity was probably due to a combination of using a new can of RL-15 powder and not having previously coated my barrel with moly coated bullets. The Rhino lost three of its four expanded petals, and retained only 78% of it’s original weight. It penetrated 3 ½ water buckets and averaged .761 caliber. This results in a permanent wound cavity of 17.6 cubic inches. This is probably slightly more damage than it deserves credit for, but like the 400 gr. Woodleigh and 500 gr. Barnes X, the expanded bullet shape was difficult to measure accurately. Damage to the water buckets was predictable, but fairly shallow. The first bucket was torn in two and the front face of the second split vertically, with a small split in the rear of the second bucket. A diameter sized hole was found in the front face of the third and fourth bucket. This sequence of events is consistent with the bullet losing most of it’s FA in the first two buckets. The bullet appeared to tip sideways as it entered the 4th bucket. Two 22-36 grain bonded jacket fragments were found nearby the first and second water bucket.

Four deep, round indents were imbedded into the heel of the Rhino’s “solid shank” near the base of the bullet. The bullet expands into four individual propellers rather than a uniform mushroom, which reduced its effective FA but may be more likely to cut rather than crush tissue. The propellers must have hit the heel of the bullet with some force to make such a deep indentation. The expanded propellers of the 485 grain Rhino were not as wide as those of the 425 grain Rhino. Curious.

I retested the Rhino again after adjusting the powder charge 2.0 grains and recorded a second shot at a more realistic 2,426 fps. This bullet retained three of its four propellers, and 93.5% of its weight. What a difference 85 fps makes! Penetration was slightly less than the first shot. The bullet veered off course one inch in the 2nd and 3rd bucket, and two inches in the 4th, striking the interior sidewall near its entry point. I gave it credit for 35-36 inches penetration. A bullet which expands in a uniform fashion like the Swift and North Fork will track much straighter than one with asymmetric propellers. The FA (.472 square inch) was somewhat greater than the first shot. The permanent wound cavity was at least 16.5 cubic inches, slightly less than the first shot. The damage to the second and third bucket was greater on this shot, showing the importance of frontal area. The 485 grain Rhino was not as tolerant of high velocity as the North Forks , original TBBC, or even the 425 grain Rhino. But it is probably superior to the heavier TB Speer. The expanded propellers appear to be quite brittle at their base. My reservations about the unusually thick jacket not withstanding, the Rhino is best utilized in a .458 Lott or slower cartridge. The Rhino’s were accurate and functioned well in my unmodified feed ramp. The bullet profile with small flat meplat and radius ogive would make a nice FMJ.

500 GRAIN.





500 grain Barnes X.

It is difficult to estimate the frontal area of an expanded 500 gr. Barnes X because it has such a complex shape. I measured the bullet in three locations and averaged. This gave it a FA of 0.559 square inches, which is probably a bit more than it deserves. A number of other bullets had complex shapes, and a more accurate assessment would only be possible with digital imaging tools like Image J which can be downloaded from the National Institute for Health.

The 500 gr. Barnes X is 0.30 inch longer than a typical 510 gr. RNSP. That’s a lot! It is 0.168 - 0.177 inch longer than either of the next longest bullets. Even at a rotational velocity of 2,803 rps (2,334 fps) from the 1-10” twist, the 500 gr. X bullet did not stabilize in the target. (This is equal to a velocity of 2,725 fps in a standard 1-14” twist!) It turned over 180 degrees, and lost two of its four X petals. The first bucket was not torn in two like the other bullets, just split. (A 450 gr. GS FN solid does more damage). The rear of the second can was also split open indicating a modest but deep temporary cavity. The two remaining X petals expanded normally, but were work hardened and ready to fracture. You can clearly see a fracture line where the remaining petals were bent backwards a second time as the bullet re-oriented base forward. I was curious to determine exactly when the X bullet turned over and fired it into a wooden “stop box” consisting of 72 one-foot square ¾ inch thick plywood boards. I normally use this stop box to recover FMJ bullets. (See related article). The Barnes X had completely turned over 180 degrees by the 23rd board and expanded to .701 caliber. It was recovered in the 28th board. A FMJ at the same velocity will penetrate 70 boards.

None of this will disturb African hunters who accept the fact the X petals are almost always torn off the long, unstable monometals. Saeed al-Maktoum of the United Arab Emerate’s has killed over 100 cape buffalo with the 300 gr. Barnes X in his .375 x .404. Almost all of his recovered bullets are bent, show signs of tumbling and/or have lost their X petals. Despite the Barnes excellent reputation in Africa I don’t trust any bullet that is so unstable. Remember I shot the 500 gr. Barnes X in a custom .458 x .404 with 1-10” twist rather than a standard 1-14” twist, and was shooting 300 fps faster than possible in a .458 WM, and it still tumbled! Unless you are willing to order a 1-8 or 1-9” twist and push this bullet to maximum velocity in a .450 Dakota or .460 Weatherby, the .450 gr. Barnes X is a better choice. The 500 gr. X bullet had modest pressure despite its great length. Velocity and pressure appeared to be identical to the 500 gr. Swift in both the .458 x .404 and .450 Dakota.

500 grain Hornady Interbond.





Hornady has replaced their conventional 500 grain RNSP with the Interbond. It is the least expensive of all bonded bullets tested, and there is certainly no excuse for not practicing with your hunting ammo when using the Interbond. The Hornady is a relatively streamlined RN and is somewhat longer than a Woodleigh RN or conventional 510 grain RNSP. The Hornady did not hold up well to an impact velocity of 2,365 fps and I cannot recommend it for use in the large capacity Dakota case. The Interbond over- expanded and only penetrated to the rear of the second bucket. Most .308 Winchester ammunition can equal or exceed that. Retained weight was 349 grains (70%), with 86.6 grains of fragments recovered in the second bucket. The expanded bullet was recovered edge on stuck to the rear of the second bucket. The Hornady expanded into five star shaped fingers but three of these fractured. At maximum expansion it probably exceeded 1.7 inches across, which explains its modest penetration. As recovered it averaged 0.922 caliber. The Interbond mashed flat and was only .464 tall as recovered. The bullet appeared to have turned over 180 degrees as one of the remaining fingers was bent backward and then forward, and was about to fracture at the cannelure. It’s permanent wound cavity was 14.7 c.i., about like the 425 gr. Rhino, 450 gr. Barnes X, or 465 gr. Dead Tough. (recalculate for 23 inches pen). I actually have more faith in a good conventional bullet like the 510 gr. Winchester Power Point than the Interbond. Just bonding a bullet to a conventional jacket does not make a premium hunting bullet.

500 grain Kodiak.



Pictured 450 and 500 grain Kodiak.

The 500 gr. Kodiak had similar expansion as the 450 gr. Kodiak but only 17 gr. more retained weight. However, the heavier bullet penetrated ½ more water buckets. It was recovered half-way through, and stuck to the rear, of the 3rd bucket. One side of the Kodiak was bent backwards 90 degrees at the cannelure, so it was not quite as symmetrical as the 450 gr. Kodiak. This is a very tough bullet. To survive almost completely intact, while fully expanded after perforating five or six layers of nylon is an amazing achievement for a bullet without a partition or solid base. The volume and duration of the temporary wound cavity must have been enormous, as it not only ripped the first water bucket in two; it actually crushed it into jagged pieces. (So did the 450 gr. North Fork). The energy transfer to the test stand was so great that it shattered two saw horses! I know of several credible reports of .375 and .416 caliber Bitterroot’s hitting Cape buffalo in the hip, rumen, or “paunch” (one of their four stomachs), and stopping the animal in its tracks, with one shot. The 500 gr. Kodiak should do the same. This bullet is the best-kept secret of African hunting. Whether you are shooting a .450 Nitro Express double rifle, .450 Dakota, or a well-used .458 WM from the Park Service, you need this bullet!

Continued on next post.
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
458 Premium bullets, Continued.

500 grain Swift.

The 500 gr. Swift was as reliable as the 400 gr./.416. It actually had more penetration than the reference standard while having over 20% more frontal area and 30% larger permanent wound cavity. It decelerates slowly and had enough residual velocity to split open the front of the third water bucket. Only the 500 gr. Swift and NF-CP managed to carry this much over pressure into the third water bucket. This is a significant achievement. (A .416 Swift will also split the front face of the 3rd bucket, which may account for it’s excellent reputation as a buffalo gun). The Swift had the highest retained weight of any bullet tested other than the experimental 418 gr. Bitterroot. The lead core is so dark, it is almost black, and appears to be made from pure lead.

Most Swift bullets when they are recovered from game have a characteristic “beer barrel” bulge in the bearing surface of the bullet, where the un-bonded rear core has migrated toward the partition. While there was only 108 fps difference between the 450 and 500 gr. bullets, the heavier Swift is not even close to losing its front core. This puzzled me for two years until I measured the diameter of the two bullets bearing surface. The 500 gr. was a uniform .587 caliber. The 450 gr. was noticeably smaller at .517. The swollen rear core of the 500 gr. bullet supports the expanding mushroom much better than the lighter core of the 450 gr. I will probably re-test the 500 gr. Swift at 2,450 fps and see if it still holds up to point blank impact. I am 90% certain that it will. The Swift is available in factory 450 Dakota ammunition, and was one of the most effective bullets of this test. It was also one of the most accurate, routinely shooting into one inch groups with 96 gr. RL-15.

500 grain Trophy Bonded by Speer.



Based on the performance of the 400 gr. TBBC, and my experience with the Federal Trophy Bonded .223, .25-06 and .308, I had expected the 500 gr. TBS to be a reference standard by which all other bullets were compared. However it had the lowest permanent wound cavity of any soft point (9.5 cubic inches). Even a .338 Winchester with a 210 gr. Nosler partition has a larger permanent cavity. The TBS has a very blunt ogive, and had to be seated deeper than any other bullet at 3.510 ocl. The jacket appeared to be made from gilding metal rather than pure copper, and was relatively brittle. At 2,412 fps it folded back alongside the bearing surface of the bullet, which greatly reduced its frontal area. The jacket of the original 400 gr. TBBC was made from pure copper and has a noticeably darker color than the 500 gr. Trophy bonded Speer. I don’t know if Speer changed the technical data package they received from Federal in any way, but it is possible to bond lead (which melts at 619 degrees F) but not anneal the copper jacket which requires >900 degrees F. This may be the problem, or it may be the thickness, taper, and composition of the jacket. Whatever the reason, it does not look like a typical “picture perfect” Trophy Bonded.

The .458 Trophy Bonded lost one 25.2 gr. fragment in the second water can and had a recovered diameter of .604 x .789. The nylon water buckets act as a “witness plate” and you can clearly see how the TBS had only one wing of its expanded “bear claw’s” intact as it exited the first bucket. This probably acted as a “rudder,” and tipped the bullet sideways 90 degrees. It “key-holed” exiting the second bucket. The solid base, which was worn smooth on this side, also confirmed that it had tumbled. The TBS measures .740 x .784 sideways (.456 square inch), and actually has more frontal area in profile than it does straight on. With a modest retained weight of 346 gr., and tumbling, the TBS “only” penetrated 2 ½ cans. It is most suitable in the .458 WM and Lott. The Speer was one of the most accurate bullets tested and would actually group into over-lapping clover leafs at 100 yards.

500 grain Woodleigh RN.

The 500 gr. Woodleigh has the same length as a conventional RNSP, and is available in two styles of cannelure. One has a simple rolled cannelure and the other, made for the custom rifle maker Darcy Echols, has a 1/16th inch wide crimping groove in front of the cannelure. I tested this version since I was concerned it might excessively weaken the jacket. According to their web site, the Woodleigh jacket is made from 90-10 cu/zinc “gilding metal.” This would probably be called “commercial bronze” in the United States. Neither alloy is as ductile as pure copper used in the Bitterroot and original Trophy Bonded bullets. Woodleigh claims to use 100% pure lead in their core, but the bright lead appears to have some tin or antimony content which may help bonding. The Woodleigh had the least pressure of any 500 gr. bullet and required 2 gr. more powder to reach similar velocity levels in the .450 Dakota. This sample was recovered at a modest 2,384 fps.

The Woodleigh did not fragment, and expanded into a large 0.612 x 1.15 diameter two- bladed “propeller.” It had 112 gr. more retained weight than a conventional 510 gr. Winchester RNSP. I gave it credit for 34 inches of penetration since it punched out a two-inch diameter piece of plastic in the rear of the 3rd bucket. The bullet was recovered inside the 3rd bucket and it did not dent the front of the 4th. The Woodleigh, like the Kodiak, quits expanding at the cannelure. As you can see from the photographs, this is not a good location to weaken the jacket! While the Woodleigh retained over 90% of its original weight, at these enhanced velocities, it would benefit from a thicker and/or more tapered jacket.

I visited Champlin Firearms, in Enid, Oklahoma recently and they reload Woodleigh RNSP and FMJ’s almost exclusively in their extensive collection of double rifles. Their experience is probably similar to that of Patrick Munn of Peachtree City, GA who used the 500 gr. Woodleigh at a muzzle velocity of 2,070 fps to kill a large bodied bull in Zimbabwe in 2001. The bull was at very close range at dusk and was hit behind the near shoulder. “Plop,” he went down. Retained weight was 421 grains. Expansion was about one inch. However, a higher muzzle velocity and/or a hit on either shoulder would probably have fragmented this bullet. At .458 Lott velocities, Bill Campbell from Pennsylvania, reports that the Woodleigh will penetrate from chest to large intestine on a cape buffalo.

500 grain Woodleigh Protected Point (PP).

The 500 gr. Woodleigh has recently been offered in a Protected Point (PP) configuration like that used with their 400 gr. bullet. This is a flat nose spitzer similar to the Swift. Since powder capacity and OCL are not issues with the .450 Dakota class cartridges, I would strongly suggest the PP rather than RN for these large capacity cases. The very small diameter meplat (.150 inch) may delay expansion compared to the RN. The PP expanded into three wide propellers while the RN at slightly less velocity expanded into two. The PP had noticeably more expansion as a result and averaged .938 diameter and .687 FA. Penetration was equal between the two bullets at 34 inches, breaking a hole in the rear face of the third bucket but being retained there. The PP retained 20 more grains as the mushroom was better supported by the three propellers and less lead was washed off. The recovered PP was 0.1 inch taller than the RN. The PP did not look in danger of fragmenting like the RN. While the PP’s permanent cavity was the third highest of the test, damage to the second bucket was more modest than the RN and was somewhat less severe than the third bucket of either the 450 grain North Fork or Barnes Triple Shock By the time the bullet expands it may have lost quite a bit of velocity. A slightly larger meplat might be appropriate, but I would certainly hunt with this bullet.

500 grain Nosler Partition.



Text to follow.

The Nosler had the most penetration of any 500 grain bullet which will be important to many African hunters.



This proves once again that expanded frontal area governs penetration more than retained weight.



550 GRAIN.

550 grain Woodleigh.

Woodleigh offers a 550 gr. RN for use in large capacity cases like the .450 Dakota. The SP and a matching FMJ (with a SD of .375!), is offered in factory .450 Dakota ammunition at a velocity of 2,250 fps. I did not test this bullet as I had reached my tolerance level for recoil, and my hunting experience has taught me to within reason value velocity over mass. A thicker and more ductile jacket would probably control expansion more reliably than additional SD. Due to less frontal area and more mass, I would not be surprised if this soft point penetrated four water buckets. The penetration of the FMJ in a quick twist should be impressive.

OTHER .458 BULLETS.

I tested three other .458 caliber bullets, including an experimental 418 gr. Bitterroot, the 450 gr. GS FN, which is a monolithic copper solid, made in South Africa, and the conventional (un-bonded) 510 gr. Winchester RNSP.

418 grain Bitterroot.

As a favor to me, Mr. Steigers made a handful of .458 caliber Bitterroots that came out of his swage die at 418 gr. Bill is 75 years old and has not made any bullets for two years. I don’t know if there will ever be a commercially available .458 caliber Bitterroot, but I have included the data from this test as an inspiration to other premium bullet makers. A 98% weight retention without using a partition, monometal, or solid base configuration at 2,650 fps from a bullet with a SD less than that of a 225 gr. .338! There is as much craft as science in producing bonded bullets, and Mr. Steigers has a 25-year head start on all of his competitors. The expanded Bitterroot’s look a lot like a 450 or 500 gr. Kodiak except they have a tapered jacket which is 0.65 inch thick at the heel. This keeps the mushroom from bending backward at all. The six-caliber ogive and soft annealed pure copper jacket allowed the 418 gr. BBC to be fired at less pressure than a 400 gr. North Fork and TBBC. Only the 500 gr. Kodiak had a larger permanent wound cavity, and with a uniform 1.012 inch diameter (0.97 square inch frontal area) and 250 – 300 fps more velocity, the BBC would undoubtedly have the largest temporary cavity of any bullet in the test.

450 grain GSFN.



I could not recover the GSFN is water buckets. It exited four buckets plus six ¾ inch plywood boards used as a backstop, and is still going for all I know. It penetrated over 50 inches of test media. It nearly split the first bucket in two. The bucket was barely attached at the base, indicating at high velocity, the monometal FN does not give up much temporary cavity to an expanding soft point. The second bucket was crushed front and rear, and third split open (like the 500 gr. Swift) indicating the bullet had barely slowed down. It exited the third bucket with a diameter-sized hole and tumbled coming and going in the fourth can. It exited six ¾ inch plywood boards used as a back stop sideways. Permanent cavity was only 8.3 cubic inches. George Hoffman told me before he passed away that he would never allow his clients to shoot FMJ bullets at buffalo. The chance of injuring another animal was too great. (It is not uncommon for several hundred buffalo to travel together). Dr. Ron Berry from South Dakota, shot a Botswana cape buffalo through the front leg (humerus), that perforated the heart with a .416 Rigby using a 385 gr. GS FN at 2,509 fps. Even though it had perforated the heaviest bone in a buffalo’s body, it still made a 1 ½ inch diameter entrance hole in the heart and a greater than 2 inch exit. The buffalo died within 40 yards of the shot. While some of the bullets I tested would probably destroy all or most of the heart, that is excellent performance from a monometal. The larger diameter .458 at a similar or greater velocity should be even more effective!

510 grain Winchester.



The 510 gr. Winchester RNSP was chosen as a conventional base line because like all other Winchester Power Points, it has a brass jacket with a flash coating of copper. The brass jacket is relatively soft and ductile compared to 95-5 copper-zinc (gilding metal) used in most jacketed bullets, and I predicted that this would be the best of the conventional RNSP’s. A 270 gr./.375 caliber WW Power Point can easily withstand 3,000 fps in my .375 Improved. Yet the heavy .458 requires a much higher SD to perform as well. There is some truth to the conventional wisdom that a SD of .300 or more is necessary for large bore bullets! Look at the recovered Winchester compared to the 500 gr. Woodleigh or Kodiak, and you will see why I am so impressed by the Power Points. The thick ductile jacket of the Winchester stopped expansion 0.029 – 0.068 inch sooner than either of the bonded bullets. This is entirely due to the thickness and composition if its jacket.

RECOMENDATIONS.



Pictured, the 450 and 400 grain North Fork soft point at 2550 and 2750 fps recovered from Cape Buffalo at nearly point blank range.

For hunters who use a big bore to hunt small to medium sized game, or for shooter’s who are still getting acclimated to the recoil of a big bore rifle, the 400 gr. North Fork can be used with complete confidence at any velocity up to 2,750 fps. It groups to within one inch of the various 450 grain bullets, and it would actually be possible to use the lighter bullet for small to medium sized game and the matching 450 grain soft point and solid for buffalo and elephant. However, I firmly believe in adopting one reload for each rifle or pistol I own, particularly a DGR. Due in large part to the versatility and availability of the three North Forks, and excellent selection of 450 grain bullets, I have standardized on the bonded 450 gr. North Fork SP.



The monolithic CP and FN exactly overlap point of impact with the SP at 50 and 100 yards. For hunters who absolutely must have a traditional 500 gr. bullet at 2,400 fps, I sincerely recommend the 500 gr. Kodiak, Swift, or Nosler.

An honorable mention must go to the 450 gr. Barnes Triple Shock, 450 gr. Kodiak, 450 gr. North Fork CP, and 500 gr. Woodleigh PP. I would hunt dangerous game with any of these bullets.
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
I will post an Excell spread sheet of all the bullets retained weight, frontal area, and permanent wound cavity if someone can tell me how to cut and paste that into our on-line format.

Thanks, I've been meaning to do this for a long time!

More pictures to come as I have time to upload to Photobucket and then insert into the text.
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Hog Killer
posted Hide Post
quote:
the P-17 Enfield action
killpc killpc killpc shame

MODEL 1917 is a U.S. service rifle, not a Brit gun. They used the P #.

Rant off.

Keith


IGNORE YOUR RIGHTS AND THEY'LL GO AWAY!!!
------------------------------------
We Band of Bubbas & STC Hunting Club, The Whomper Club
 
Posts: 4553 | Location: Walker Co.,Texas | Registered: 05 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of WORLDHUNTER1
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all the work Andy.
Please excuse Hog killer for his bad taste
 
Posts: 238 | Location: MI | Registered: 04 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Hog Killer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WORLDHUNTER1:

Please excuse Hog killer for his bad taste


Calling a thing by it's CORRECT name is never in "bad taste".

Maybe, Amdy will learn something new to him.

Keith


IGNORE YOUR RIGHTS AND THEY'LL GO AWAY!!!
------------------------------------
We Band of Bubbas & STC Hunting Club, The Whomper Club
 
Posts: 4553 | Location: Walker Co.,Texas | Registered: 05 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
Outstanding report Andy, that's a lot of information to digest. My 458 win Mag is on it's way to my FFL as we speak so this information is of immense value to me.

Thanks for doing all the hard work.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12540 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Andy,
With all due respect, may I suggest you go read through this thread
http://forums.accuratereloadin...4711043/m/2861098911

It is a "sticky" on the top of this and could well end up saving you some buckets!

I absolutely love your description of the behavior of the GSC FN bullet, as well as the NF CP.

Regards
 
Posts: 758 | Registered: 08 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Andy, thanks for sharing. AIU
 
Posts: 3720 | Registered: 03 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Esskay:
Andy,
With all due respect, may I suggest you go read through this thread
http://forums.accuratereloadin...4711043/m/2861098911

It is a "sticky" on the top of this and could well end up saving you some buckets!



tu2 +1

Very extensive testing covering most bullets on the market today including the CEBs, correlating terminal performance in wet newspaper media with actual in the field results on Buffalo and Elephant.
 
Posts: 8489 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It's good that Andy has shared his experience with us. It's always healthy to compare results and look for areas of common ground.

I note that Andy and Michael both champion North Fork bullets - I'm going to try the North Fork bonded soft points. I already have both CEB and Barnes FN banded solids.

Actually, I'm not surprised that there are many good premium bullets available today for hunting dangerous game.

Thanks again, Andy.
 
Posts: 3720 | Registered: 03 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Eskay,

Michaels report was published 4-5 years after mine.

So it wont save me any buckets.

I started publishing these results on Accurate Reloading about 2001. 8 years before Mikes data began.

I RESPECT ALL OF YOU GUYS WHO GET YOUR HANDS DIRTY (OR BLOODY) RECOVERING BULLETS.

Nice thing about the water buckets is that Anyone can duplicate my data, or add to it with new bullet designs.

Mike and I both like NF.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Hog Killer, you are correct. There is an old Chinese saying that "wisdom begins by calling things by their proper name!"

Thanks, Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Monometals.



450 Barnes X, Tripple Shock and NF CP.



NF FN recovered from elephant and used to help calibrate Dr. Ron Berrys Iron Buffalo a few years ago. (5-7 years I think?) Geez we are getting old.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Andy,

You mentioned that the Nosler 500 grain penetrated deeper than any other soft. Can you expound more on that.

Thanks!

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of crshelton
posted Hide Post
Andy,
Good report, thanks. Good to see that your testing proved out the effectiveness of some of our favorite bullets. Smiler

I will bookmark this for a detailed read and future reference.


NRA Life Benefactor Member,
DRSS, DWWC, Whittington
Center,Android Reloading
Ballistics App at
http://www.xplat.net/
 
Posts: 2294 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 25 May 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Walt,

You will probably remember this discussion from 2008.

http://forums.accuratereloadin...=143103839#143103839

The bullet and front core were both recovered in 4th bucket, which is very unusual to find departed lead core carried so far.

346 retained weight.

I need to get out my portable hard drive to retreive the little write up I did on it, and will do so in next few days.

In mean time this link gives all the data you need to make your own conclusions.

It had ALOT of penetration, nearly making it out of 4th bucket.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
awesum report...............well done. i know for a fact that woodleighs pancake at speeds of 2400 fps plus, but are a good preformers at lower speeds in the big 45's............. Cool
 
Posts: 191 | Location: Australia | Registered: 17 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Excellent bullet test-very straightforward! I also think that 100% water is an excellent test medium.I find that when I shoot my 458 Lott bullets into a sand and dirt mound the 500gr A frame and the 550 Woodleigh RNSP come out flattened out but still intact.I would say that they might be equal in penetration in your tests but the Woodleigh expands more.I also found that the 500gr TSX does not expand at all in the dirt mound unless it is covered in heavy snow.I would choose the 550 Woodleigh RNSP as the ultimate 458 bullet.It gives maximum penetration and expansion.
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Shootaway,

Do you have any 550 grain Woodys recovered from critters?

If not, I would love to see one recovered from the 5 gallon nylon water buckets.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Andy,yes I do.Look in my recent hunt report.There is a 550 recovered from a neck shot on a huge buff.The shot was slightly quartering and the bullet was found in the jaw on the opposite side.I would love to see one recovered from a water bucket too.The 550 is really tough-as tough as the 500gr A frame and there is plenty of expansion.Here is the recovered bullet. [URL= ]550gr RNSP[/URL]
[URL= ]entrance hole[/URL] It was a one shot instant kill.Fired from my Lott,I never recovered a 550 RNSP that flattened out more than the one in this pic in any test.I know from experience that if the 550 looks like that in the pic,then the 500 a frame will look like a pancake.
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Andy,

The bullet on the far right is a 550 grain .458 Wodleigh SP recovered from a cape buffalo. It entered the buffalo just in front of the quartering away buffs right thigh. Penetrated the stomach, liver, spleen, left lung, rib cage and the base of the scapula about three or four inches above the elbow joint. It was found bulging the skin on the off side. Velocity was 2,150 fps from a Lott. Well over three feet of penetration, probably closer to four feet.



465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Andy:
Monometals.



450 Barnes X, Tripple Shock and NF CP.



NF FN recovered from elephant and used to help calibrate Dr. Ron Berrys Iron Buffalo a few years ago. (5-7 years I think?) Geez we are getting old.

Andy


What happened to the rifling on the cup point? Can you measure the bands and shank to see if the bands were stripped.


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27596 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
Andy, I've read this post a couple of times. Since your testing was with the high velocity 458 cartridges, would your recommendations be that same for the newby buffalo hunter shooting a 458 Win Mag?


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12540 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Fjold,

Excellent question.

I would still recommend the 450 and 400 grain North Fork soft point.

They were designed for the 458 and just happen to hold up to 100 grains of powder velocity.

The 400 grain will expand about like a 416 swift, so you have a 416 remington-like option there in your 458, or you can go for a bit more penetration and use the 450.

I would use a 450 FN or 500 grain FMJ for elephant.

There is really no other bullet like them on the market today.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Boomstick,

The photo of CP is over exposed and you cant see rifling engravement very well. I will see if Ive got a better exposure.

this one is better.



You can copy and save it and then zoom in w photoshop or similar program to see rifling.

What impressed me about the CP style grooves was that there was absolutely no engraving on the bullet other than the driving bands. Not a bit, so they are doing their job.

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Andy, a lot of good info, thanks for the post. Andy do you know or anyone else reading this post; Is the overall length of the 450 grain GS solid and the NF FN solid the same overall length?


"An individual with experience is never at the mercies of an individual with an argument"
 
Posts: 1827 | Location: Palmer AK & Prescott Valley AZ | Registered: 01 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Dirk,

Here is photo of some of the solids.

NF a hair longer I think. But moly coating will make more difference than anything?



I have every generation of the FN except the current one probably!

Here is the first version next to GS and the 400 and 450 Barnes RN solid. (Bonded Kodiak FN with high hardness lead shold have not compressed but it did. Probably due to softening o jacket in bonding process?



The NF FN expands less than GS. Hardly and compression at all on NF 9 paces from cow elephant at 2550 fps, or wooden boards.



Unfired line up.



450 Barnes FN and Nosler semi FN on Right.
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
465 and Shootaway,

Would one of you guys be willing to thump a few of the Home Depot buckets with lids attached for me?

They are even cheaper now that when I did my test.

Get 4-5 of them and put some boards on either side in case bullet exits sideways since they expand a bit asymetrically.

Shootaway, what a nice bull!
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Andy:
465 and Shootaway,

Would one of you guys be willing to thump a few of the Home Depot buckets with lids attached for me?

They are even cheaper now that when I did my test.

Get 4-5 of them and put some boards on either side in case bullet exits sideways since they expand a bit asymetrically.

Shootaway, what a nice bull!


Sorry Andy,

I no longer have a Lott.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Andy:
465 and Shootaway,

Would one of you guys be willing to thump a few of the Home Depot buckets with lids attached for me?

They are even cheaper now that when I did my test.

Get 4-5 of them and put some boards on either side in case bullet exits sideways since they expand a bit asymetrically.

Shootaway, what a nice bull!
Andy,if I had a place to do that I would be more than happy to.They would throw me out of the range if I tried that there.
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andy
posted Hide Post
Shootaway,

I enjoyed your hunt report.

I also hunted Dande North (2005).

Did you just make the one (perfect) FMJ RN shot on the buff cow? (No 550 SP).

Have you hunted with the 500 gr Swift prior to using the 550 Woodleigh?

They might mash flat in a backstop but as the late George Hoffmans collection of 400 grain 416 Swift's demonstrated, the water buckets predict Swift performance just about perfectly.

One thing this test has demonstrated, to me at least, is that a bullet cant have both maximum penetration and maximum expansion among its peers. Expanded Frontal Area determines most of a bullets penetration, and then momentum.

One reason you are getting so much penetration from the 550 grain is probably because they appear to loose 1/2 of their mushroom (and frontal area).

I am surprised they expand back so far at just 2,150 fps. About like a 500 grain Kodiak at 2,400 fps. Guess I should have tested them, but I really had reached the limit of my recoil tolerance.

They are certainly doing a good job for you, and there is no doubt the heavier FMJ's penetrate more than the lighter ones, so it makes sense (especially for elephant hunters), to use a matching weight SP.

Since I have a 1-12 high velocity rifle, I would probably use a 500 grain NF FN for elephant next time. I have already removed my 3 X scope and replaced it with a NEGC peep, so it is set up for elephant rather than buffalo.

If anyone wants to donate 5 or 6 550grain to me I will test them and post results. (I would probably need that many to get close to a working load).

RL-15 is my go to powder but the 550 grain might need something alot slower. Does anyone have 450 Rigby or 450 Dakota data for the Woodleigh?

Andy
 
Posts: 1278 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Andy:
Fjold,

Excellent question.

I would still recommend the 450 and 400 grain North Fork soft point.

They were designed for the 458 and just happen to hold up to 100 grains of powder velocity.

The 400 grain will expand about like a 416 swift, so you have a 416 remington-like option there in your 458, or you can go for a bit more penetration and use the 450.

I would use a 450 FN or 500 grain FMJ for elephant.

There is really no other bullet like them on the market today.

Andy


Thanks Andy,

I'll pick up some 400 and 450 grain NF SPs and see which one the gun likes.

I appreciate your advice.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12540 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fjold:
quote:
Originally posted by Andy:
Fjold,

Excellent question.

I would still recommend the 450 and 400 grain North Fork soft point.

They were designed for the 458 and just happen to hold up to 100 grains of powder velocity.

The 400 grain will expand about like a 416 swift, so you have a 416 remington-like option there in your 458, or you can go for a bit more penetration and use the 450.

I would use a 450 FN or 500 grain FMJ for elephant.

There is really no other bullet like them on the market today.

Andy


Thanks Andy,

I'll pick up some 400 and 450 grain NF SPs and see which one the gun likes.

I appreciate your advice.


Just my opinion, but if your after Buffalo I would definately use the North Fork 450 grain SPs. Easy enough to obtain 2250-2300 fps out of the win. mag. I would save the 400 grain 458 North Fork softs for a softer target than Buffalo...
 
Posts: 1999 | Location: Memphis, TN | Registered: 23 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jjs:

Just my opinion, but if your after Buffalo I would definately use the North Fork 450 grain SPs. Easy enough to obtain 2250-2300 fps out of the win. mag. I would save the 400 grain 458 North Fork softs for a softer target than Buffalo...


Thanks, after seeing the price of the NF bullets I'm definately going to try one box first. Big Grin


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12540 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Andy,the cow was shot in the neck first using a 550 sp.The cow hit the ground and got back up and then I quickly used the solid.The soft exited and there was alot of blood.I used the swift 500 on my first buff hunt.The first shot was a slightly quartering body shot and the bullet showed very little expansion and was bent in the front.It might have hit a branch or small tree before hitting the buff.The second shot was a frontal brain shot and was recovered from the brain. [URL= ]500 A frame from lott[/URL] [URL= ]b[/URL]
The a frames that I recovered from the backstop were stressed much more that the one(a frame) in the pic and the 550 sp`s that I recovered from the backstop looked exactly like the one I pictured recovered from my recent buff. IMO,the 550 sp offers 100% reliable expansion and 100% reliable penetration.If the 550`s come off the backstop still intact with some of the rear left and the 500 a frame comes out looking almost flat then that shows that the 550 sp is one tough bullet.I am really looking forward to seeing what they look like recovered from the bucket.Also,I was told by a surgeon that the jaw bone is the toughest bone in the body.
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Andy,when I get my hunting DVD I`ll send you a copy.You will really like the footage especially the leopard!Just send me your address and I`ll mail it to you when it arrives.You will see the 550 in action!
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Shootaway,

If you used a 500 grain Swift and shot a buff with a frontal and the bullet stopped in the brain, I would be concerned about limited penetration. The buff head isn't that tough.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
465,

I `ve shot a 500gr TSX into a dead log,less than a foot thick, and it didn`t go through.The skinners at HHK told me they recovered the bullet from the brain.The other 500 swift pictured passed through the buff slightly quartering and was found just under the hide.If the 500 from the brain looks like that then I guess the buff head must be hard as hell.
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shootaway:
465,

I `ve shot a 500gr TSX into a dead log,less than a foot thick, and it didn`t go through.The skinners at HHK told me they recovered the bullet from the brain.The other 500 swift pictured passed through the buff slightly quartering and was found just under the hide.If the 500 from the brain looks like that then I guess the buff head must be hard as hell.


Other than the boss, the hardest thing in a buffalos head are the molars.

465H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia