quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
She was removed from this nation, without the consent or knowledge of her father who has as much legal right to the child as the mother until a court says otherwise.

JudgeG ... just counting time 'til I am again finding balm in Gilead chilled out somewhere in the Selous.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Lane,
It's always amazing to me, when people from other states that have lower population than TX has illegals, offers to opine on the illegals problem - There's more illegals in some square miles of Houston than were sent to NYC, but in NYC, they are a problem and a drain on economics - but when the problem, with it's consequences, are handled, they skyscream -- must be exhausting

Agreed

Yawn, has zero to go with this Citizen grind removed from the United States so any regard for their citizenship nor her citizen father.

The above has zero to do with the fact the mother was forced to make a decision on hours so representation in custody of the Feds.

It amazes me how the Texas contingent, all of you, line up to give the Executive power it does not constitutionally hold. The law, the courts, folks constitutional rights be damned.

M Shy: The father was actively trying to get into court. They is why their is a court case.

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Bertram:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by 300shooter:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Would you support not allowing the little girl to remain with her mother and sister?

Her father is here dirtbag!

Little girl belongs with her momma and sisters. Her momma wanted her…enough said.

Deporting US citizens is simply disgusting...just like Trump. What a POS.

Would you strip her away from her mother and her sisters?

Why deport the mother??

Isn’t a US citizen allowed to sponsor her family to become citizens?

No excuse whatsoever for this.

Deporting criminals is great!

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Well, that and a harder read of the posted articles, changes everything
The mother was not married to the father..

Father had not been present in child's life, in the least

Since unmarried to each other, mother had sole custody

NBC article states father began attempts to gain custody

Mother was sole custodian and father was unknown to child

Side note, father couldn't be bothered to travel an unknown distance(not even his name is given, nor location nor background) and tried to nominate and unknown to child 3rd party as his "agent"

So, father had no custody, has chosen by action not to assert parental rights, and is unknown to the child

And the mother had sole custody

And some folks wanted to strip the child from her mother, create new rights for an unmarried absent father, traumatized the child and go against the sole custodian THE MOTHERs wishes, just to satisfy their own selfish wishes.

There appears to be only a genetic, not familial relationship between father and child AND the father was content with the situation

I'll stick with my first post on the matter...

Allow me to restate

Momma's baby, poppa's maybe

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Yeah, the fact this Regime keeps doing this is more proof it needs to stop.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
There is no maybe. The father in Louisiana enjoys a presumption of custody. That only a Court of competent jurisdiction can find is rebutted.

The child has a right to that legal status as the father’s child. The father dies. That is the law.

These rights were violated. The Executive’s officers cannot destroy that so a hearing. A mother given a few moments to make such a decision without counsel and being told you are going away is unconscionable.


I know Jtex. That is hard for you to understand. We do not expect you to think too hard on it.

JudgeG ... just counting time 'til I am again finding balm in Gilead chilled out somewhere in the Selous.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Okay. Here you go.. the biggest difference is that the father is also a dad and nearly the same age daughter stayed with dad

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/05...-daughter-intl-latam

As I recall, anytime a citizen is arrested, there is an automatic family separation, should a child be present with the suspect

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Judge, you might do a quick spell check on that post

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Unless ONE party, a single mother with no contact with the father, signs and volunteers to leave with her child. Or the other, actually married couple, where there was no "deportation of a us citizen "

Updated facts alter presumption, and we are past the point where rational people should read past the headline