THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    45-70 remington/spartan gunworks into 450 nitro express???

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
45-70 remington/spartan gunworks into 450 nitro express???
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted
what about this one??? can it be done??? should it be done??? ahhh...dare to dream


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27615 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Probably not. A quick look at "Load from A Disk" shows even with the mildest loads, you'd be over standard .45-70 pressures. Perhaps with BP it might be ok????


Hubert
 
Posts: 432 | Location: Baytown, TX | Registered: 07 November 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
450 #2 is about the same pressure as the45/70 max load, but the bolt thrust would be higher..

bs.. it's a 7# gun.. not even a recoil junky will hot rod it much

jeffe


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40053 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
do you think it realy would have a problem with say up to 32,000 or 35,000 cup??? i think it's a c.y.a.(cover your ass) warning


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27615 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ElCaballero
posted Hide Post
I think that this was discussed in great length before. I will recap it as I remember it. This little idea struck me as a fun project also.

I think the the general feeling was that it was safely possible as this action is used for a 30-06 chambering also. However the weight of the rifle seemed to make most say that it was not worth it unless you just liked painfull recoil.

The main problem that I see with this project is getting one of these rifles to begin with.


As a general rule, people are nuts!
spinksranch.com
 
Posts: 2095 | Location: Missouri, USA | Registered: 02 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rusty
posted Hide Post
I beleive that PWN375 of this forum coverted his 45/70 Pedersoli hammer double rifle into a 450#2 NE. It seemed to shoot well and required no re-regulation.
He did describe the recoil of the light rifle as "Brisk"!


Rusty
We Band of Brothers!
DRSS, NRA & SCI Life Member

"I am rejoiced at my fate. Do not be uneasy about me, for I am with my friends."
----- David Crockett in his last letter (to his children), January 9th, 1836
"I will never forsake Texas and her cause. I am her son." ----- Jose Antonio Navarro, from Mexican Prison in 1841
"for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320-“. . .It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”
 
Posts: 9797 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 21 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
what about this one??? can it be done??? should it be done??? ahhh...dare to dream


As long as your ammo doesn't develop over 28K PSI! My feeling is that the "action" would not be the problem, but rather the thickness of the barrel walls. There's a lot more meat in a .30/'06 barrel of the same O.D. as their .45/70 tubes. In addition, the big fat case head of the .45/70 places the stress on a much larger area.


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
do you think it realy would have a problem with say up to 32,000 or 35,000 cup??? i think it's a c.y.a.(cover your ass) warning


Try it and see! Then report your findings...... beer


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
For the price I would just use one in 45-70 as it is. The gun does not have ejectors and it's going to kick like heck even in 45-70.

I see it as a real fun gun that might need a better pad and trigger work.


Join the NRA
 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
Here's the calculation for thrust against the face comparing the 45/70 to the 30.06.

45-70 (.608 Rim) .302*.302*3.14159*28,000psi = 8,022 Lbs force of thrust

30.06 (.473 Rim) .2365*.2365*3.14159*60,000psi = 10,542 Lbs force of thrust

You should be able to load the 45-70 to 36,000+psi to get the same thrust as the 30.06 on the breechface.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12762 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fjold:
Here's the calculation for thrust against the face comparing the 45/70 to the 30.06.

45-70 (.608 Rim) .302*.302*3.14159*28,000psi = 8,022 Lbs force of thrust

30.06 (.473 Rim) .2365*.2365*3.14159*60,000psi = 10,542 Lbs force of thrust

You should be able to load the 45-70 to 36,000+psi to get the same thrust as the 30.06 on the breechface.


Yes! BUT my concern is not the thrust on the breech face so much as the thickness (and composition of the steel) in the chamber walls - the question is, "is the chamber strong enough for that pressure level using a case of the diameter of the .45/70??


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
is it a better idea to make the 30-06 one into a 375 or 411 hawk???


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27615 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TC1
posted Hide Post
I was in Walmart yesterday and saw some Sparton single shot shotguns. It may not be too long before the double rifles come out. My biggest concern after owning a Baikal stagecoach gun is the triggers, They were so bad it took all the fun out of playing with it. Literally a 1/2" of creep in the back trigger! I plan on looking at a 45/70 when they hit the store shelves, But I wouldn't order one sight unseen.

Terry


--------------------------------------------

Well, other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
 
Posts: 6315 | Location: Mississippi | Registered: 18 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
even a blak powder one in 450 n.e. would be aaaaaawwwweeeesome


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27615 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BwanaCole
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
is it a better idea to make the 30-06 one into a 375 or 411 hawk???


What would it take to make a .30-06 baikal into a hawk .375?? Is it just a matter of reaming out the bores like a .338 or would it require much more serious machining?? Confused Please edjamakate me!

I picked up the baikal .30-06 cheap and don't plan on changing it anytime soon but I kinda like the idea of a .375 built on .30-06 brass!


H. Cole Stage III, FRGS
ISC(PJ), USN (Ret)



"You do not have a right to an opinion. An opinion should be the result of careful thought, not an excuse for it."

Harlan Ellison

" War is God's way to teach Americans geography." Ambrose Bierce
 
Posts: 378 | Registered: 28 September 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The biggest disadvanatge to rechambering either the 06 or 45-70 is the thickness of the barrels.
The 06 might have enough wall thickness left to be rebored up to .338 but the 45-70, forget it.
I measured the wall thickness at the muzzle and it was approximately .045! After 2 shots from each barrel it was to hot to hold.


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BwanaCole
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Snowwolfe:
The biggest disadvanatge to rechambering either the 06 or 45-70 is the thickness of the barrels.
The 06 might have enough wall thickness left to be rebored up to .338 but the 45-70, forget it.
I measured the wall thickness at the muzzle and it was approximately .045! After 2 shots from each barrel it was to hot to hold.


PM sent to you!

Cheers,


H. Cole Stage III, FRGS
ISC(PJ), USN (Ret)



"You do not have a right to an opinion. An opinion should be the result of careful thought, not an excuse for it."

Harlan Ellison

" War is God's way to teach Americans geography." Ambrose Bierce
 
Posts: 378 | Registered: 28 September 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It would be very simple to rechamber to the 45-120 (aka 45-3 1/4). You can headspace on the rim recess, and dies are reasonable priced.

Rich

I am building a SS in this cartridge
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
the gun is too light for using 450 NE loads ... even for ME....

gentlemen, I've had the 45/70 .. its too light to do this with


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40053 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BwanaCole
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
the gun is too light for using 450 NE loads ... even for ME....

gentlemen, I've had the 45/70 .. its too light to do this with


Thats what I thought as well. It led me to thinking (dangerous idea, I know!) that the ought-six bored out, using the ought-six brass would be a much better idea. I twoul leave all the barrel thickness around the brass intact.


H. Cole Stage III, FRGS
ISC(PJ), USN (Ret)



"You do not have a right to an opinion. An opinion should be the result of careful thought, not an excuse for it."

Harlan Ellison

" War is God's way to teach Americans geography." Ambrose Bierce
 
Posts: 378 | Registered: 28 September 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    45-70 remington/spartan gunworks into 450 nitro express???

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia