Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Anders, Good on you for booking that hunt. I am looking really hard in doing the same in 2012, economy permitting. I was in your same situation on a dall sheep hunt. I opted to trade up to a Z-5 BT, for just the same reasons. It's an expensive hunt, and I want all the variables on my side. That scope is a dream. First, it has very fine reticle lines, It makes it easy to aim small at 500 meters. The old swarovski had chunkier crosshairs, which covered the entire bull eye at that distance. The thin crosshairs are a great advantage. The ballistic turret works as advertised too. Swarovski has a computer you log into to figure the settings. You put in the caliber, speed, BC, and altitude! You can then enter your first datum point at any distance you like, 100 meters or 400. Then it will tell you how many clicks past that for your next distance, etc. So you can set your rifle to zero at 250, 350, 400, and 500 if you wish. It paid off when my ram skylined at 446 yards. Just set the turret halfway between 400 and 500, and let one fly. Game over. You want to keep the 30-06, no problem. I chose to take my 300 rum, only because it is point blank out to 250. It is set up out to 600, which should be enough for the marco. You may want to look into trading or selling your S/B, the new scope may be not that much more. And +1 on practice, practice, practice. Good luck! "You only gotta do one thing well to make it in this world" - J Joplin | |||
|
one of us |
Stig, I'm located in Telemark, but thanks a lot Jack, the reticle on my S&B is quite thick, and that's my main concern regarding this scope. I will try a target knob that's avail and see how it works. I still have a lot of time practising and working out things. But I'm like you. I really want all variables on my side. Reading and adjusting for wind is another of my concerns. But normally, as I understand, the weather is quite stable with little wind. With my luck though it will be a gusting and changing wind througout the hunt Anders Hunting and fishing DVDs from Mossing & Stubberud Media: www.jaktogfiskedvd.no ..and my blog at: http://andersmossing.blogspot.com | |||
|
One of Us |
| |||
|
one of us |
No kidding. | |||
|
One of Us |
| |||
|
one of us |
Plaster's spiel has an error. He says his "Quick Fix" method states that at a 45 degree one should take the distance and multiply by the distance by .7. He then goes on to say for a 500 yard you should hold 450 yards. Actually, the math would be 350 yards, but in reality a hold closer to 400 is right (I used .509 BC at 2650 zeroed at 200). Thankfully, the one thing that neither of these stories quoted is the "hold for the horizontal distance to the target." That rule is simply incorrect, and will result in rather large errors at long range. How many writers have you seen regurgitate this? Boddington, Van Zwoll, the list goes on and on... They are all fond of saying a "bullet is only affected by gravity over the horizontal distance to the target." Bullshit. It takes longer for a bullet to fly to a target at 700 yards at a 45 degree angle than it will to go 490 yards over flat ground. Think about this: in order for the horizontal distance theory to be true, time of flight would have to be the same. That bullet still has to fly through 700 yards of air, and that will result in a longer TOF than a bullet traveling 490 yards. Now, will it strike high? Yes, but not as high the horizontal theory would predict. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia