THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM ALASKA HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
thoughts on the 416taylor
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I planned on sending my 338 to get rebored to a 458 but the barrel is a little to thin, the smith said he could do a 416 taylor no problem. Any thoughts on this round? what are the ballistics like and does anybody hunt with this round and would you feel comfortable with it with the bears...one more ? will the recoil be close to a 458 or what..thanks
 
Posts: 201 | Location: S.E. Alaska | Registered: 25 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I had one on a tang safety Ruger 77 and a 21" #5 douglas stainless barrel.

Ballistics were ~2750 with a 300 X and 2350 with a 400 Hornady.

At the time I built it the 416 Remington didn't exist, otherwise there is no reason not to just go to the Remington cartridge.

Recoil with the 300 gr load is not much more than a heavy 338 250 grain load or a 375 HH, assuming equal rifle weights of course.

For some reason the 416 taylor seems to be catching on again, Lee makes off-the-shelf dies and A&B make pre-chambered barrels.
 
Posts: 344 | Registered: 28 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of waterrat
posted Hide Post
I'd planned to rebarrel a 300win mag to the Taylor after corresponding with Andy Runyon and reading every artical on earth with Taylor goodies. Andy had high regards for the Taylor and that was good enough for me then- A fellow I was guiding on a moose hunt said he could turn the 300 into a 425express very easily. He left for home with mine as well and in a couple of months it showed up as an Express. I'm using 350X's as the've got plenty of poop and are a little easier to control than 400's. A 416 Taylor would be a sweet rig for brown bear.


I tend to use more than enough gun
 
Posts: 1415 | Location: lake iliamna alaska | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BW
posted Hide Post
I've got a 416 Taylor. I've shot one black bear (170 yards) with a North Fork 370gr bullet. It dropped right away (shoulder shot.)

I backed up a friend shooting a smallish (7ft) brownie. His Fail Safe (from a 338WM) penetrated from head to tail, and the bear would have died very quickly with that shot. But, my friend had asked me to put in a follow up shot if the bear didn't drop immediately. It didn't, so I did. It dropped then. Smiler

It's a good cartridge. I can only get 2400fps by using the slightly lighter bullet. My barrel is 23 inches long.


Brian
 
Posts: 778 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
IF you don't mine reloading it is a good round.

I built mine on a Ruger stainless MKII with a 25 in douglas barrel.

I get 2650 with a 300 gr bullet and a easy 2450 with a 350 gr bullet.

It well take care of anything walking.
 
Posts: 19846 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MuskegMan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by p dog shooter:
IF you don't mine reloading it is a good round.

I built mine on a Ruger stainless MKII with a 25 in douglas barrel.

I get 2650 with a 300 gr bullet and a easy 2450 with a 350 gr bullet.

It well take care of anything walking.


With 4,650 ft-lbs of energy, animals will tremble before you and beg for mercy!!!!

Wonder what you could do with that 400 gr partition?

I know I'd be looking pretty smug with that big ol' brownie rattling his teeth in front of me.

Wink

MM


 
Posts: 2097 | Location: S.E. Alaska | Registered: 18 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
With 4,650 ft-lbs of energy, animals will tremble before you and beg for mercy!!!!

Wonder what you could do with that 400 gr partition?

I know I'd be looking pretty smug with that big ol' brownie rattling his teeth in front of me.


Muskegman

The only over kill I have seen is when there is nothing useful left of the animal you shot. IE body shot rabbits with a 06 or so.

Don't quite understand where you are going with this.
 
Posts: 19846 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MuskegMan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by p dog shooter:
Don't quite understand where you are going with this.


I'm not going anywhere. Where did you think I was going?

I'm from Alaska. I have a 375 Taylor. I shoot 300 gr at 2,600 fps for a paltry 4,500 ft-lbs.

I have absolutely no problem shooting a 100 lb Blacktail doe with this rifle. Did it this past fall. Now a .460 Wby . . . that's where I draw the line on overkill.

animal

rotflmo

MM


 
Posts: 2097 | Location: S.E. Alaska | Registered: 18 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Grizzinater

Well the 416 would more than do the job on bears. But I'm wonder why a 416 Taylor over a 416 Remington. I can see no real ballistic difference. The Taylor’s brass costs $43 for 20 cases and $126 for dies from RCBS. In comparison the 416 Remington 100 cases for $39.99 and a sets of the same RCBS dies for $42.99. I know you can readily find 416 Remington premium loads probably harder to find 416 Taylor. An example in comparison of cost follows. Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Remington Magnum 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 $99.99 Federal Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Rigby 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Bear Claw Box of 20 147.99 So for a rifle that is pretty much the same as a 416 Remington I'd find it hard to justify the extra cost and extra effort to find components or ammo for the Taylor. Both guns push the 400 Gr. bullet just over 2400 fps.
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jay Johnson:
Grizzinater

Well the 416 would more than do the job on bears. But I'm wonder why a 416 Taylor over a 416 Remington. I can see no real ballistic difference. The Taylor’s brass costs $43 for 20 cases and $126 for dies from RCBS. In comparison the 416 Remington 100 cases for $39.99 and a sets of the same RCBS dies for $42.99. I know you can readily find 416 Remington premium loads probably harder to find 416 Taylor. An example in comparison of cost follows. Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Remington Magnum 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 $99.99 Federal Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Taylor 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Bear Claw Box of 20 can't find. So for a rifle that is pretty much the same as a 416 Remington I'd find it hard to justify the extra cost and extra effort to find components or ammo for the Taylor. Both guns push the 400 Gr. bullet just over 2400 fps.
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jay Johnson:
quote:
Originally posted by Jay Johnson:
Grizzinater

Well the 416 would more than do the job on bears. But I'm wonder why a 416 Taylor over a 416 Remington. I can see no real ballistic difference. The Taylor’s brass costs $43 for 20 cases and $126 for dies from RCBS. In comparison the 416 Remington 100 cases for $39.99 and a sets of the same RCBS dies for $42.99. I know you can readily find 416 Remington premium loads probably harder to find 416 Taylor. An example in comparison of cost follows. Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Remington Magnum 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 $99.99 Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Taylor 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Bear Claw Box of 20 can't find. So for a rifle that is pretty much the same as a 416 Remington I'd find it hard to justify the extra cost and extra effort to find components or ammo for the Taylor. Both guns push the 400 Gr. bullet just over 2400 fps.
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jay Johnson:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jay Johnson:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jay Johnson:
Grizzinater

Well the 416 would more than do the job on bears. But I'm wonder why a 416 Taylor over a 416 Remington. I can see no real ballistic difference. The Taylor’s brass costs $43 for 20 cases and $126 for dies from RCBS. In comparison the 416 Remington 100 cases for $39.99 and a sets of the same RCBS dies for $42.99. I know you can readily find 416 Remington premium loads probably harder to find 416 Taylor. An example in comparison of cost follows. Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Remington Magnum 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 $99.99 Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Taylor 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 can't find. So for a rifle that is pretty much the same as a 416 Remington I'd find it hard to justify the extra cost and extra effort to find components or ammo for the Taylor. Both guns push the 400 Gr. bullet just over 2400 fps.
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Grizzinater

Well the 416 would more than do the job on bears. But I'm wonder why a 416 Taylor over a 416 Remington. I can see no real ballistic difference. The Taylor’s brass costs $43 for 20 cases and $126 for dies from RCBS. In comparison the 416 Remington 100 cases for $39.99 and a sets of the same RCBS dies for $42.99. I know you can readily find 416 Remington premium loads probably harder to find 416 Taylor. An example in comparison of cost follows. Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Remington Magnum 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 $99.99 Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Taylor 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 can't find. So for a rifle that is pretty much the same as a 416 Remington I'd find it hard to justify the extra cost and extra effort to find components or ammo for the Taylor. Both guns push the 400 Gr. bullet just over 2400 fps.[/QUOTE]
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Double duh
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jay Johnson:
Grizzinater

Well the 416 would more than do the job on bears. But I'm wonder why a 416 Taylor over a 416 Remington. I can see no real ballistic difference. The Taylor’s brass costs $43 for 20 cases and $126 for dies from RCBS. In comparison the 416 Remington 100 cases for $39.99 and a sets of the same RCBS dies for $42.99. I know you can readily find 416 Remington premium loads probably harder to find 416 Taylor. An example in comparison of cost follows. Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Remington Magnum 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Sledgehammer Box of 20 $99.99 Federal Premium Cape-Shok Ammunition 416 Rigby 400 Grain Trophy Bonded Bear Claw Box of 20 147.99 So for a rifle that is pretty much the same as a 416 Remington I'd find it hard to justify the extra cost and extra effort to find components or ammo for the Taylor. Both guns push the 400 Gr. bullet just over 2400 fps.



only reason I can see is if you have a 98 action or a Ruger 77 that can't be easily modified (or you don't want to modify) to take the full length magnums. The remington will outrun the taylor by 150-200 fps.

Taylor components aren't bad, LEE dies for $25, Hornady's for $57, and 338 Win mag brass for $33/100
 
Posts: 344 | Registered: 28 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
IMHO, the main reason for doing the Taylor is due to the action involved. The Taylor will fit nicely, where the Rem will prob take some major lengthening to work.

Also, there's a chance you may be able to get 4 down with the Taylor.

I'm looking at doing the Taylor on a LH Daly Mauser action.
 
Posts: 470 | Location: Mountains of Southern New Mexico | Registered: 24 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BW
posted Hide Post
quote:
Wonder what you could do with that 400 gr partition?


My rifle grouped'em like a shotgun. Frowner


Brian
 
Posts: 778 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
BW that is another very good point. Proven handloads are the only thing I would use on dangerous game. Factory ammo is just too much of an unkown in my opinion even premium ammo.
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Paul H
posted Hide Post
Taht or our new wildcat the 416 AR would be the ticket. I'd likely opt for a 350 gr X or 370 gr Northfork at about 2500 fps, recoil on par with a 375 H&H, and a big ol hole Big Grin


__________________________________________________
The AR series of rounds, ridding the world of 7mm rem mags, one gun at a time.
 
Posts: 7213 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
paul...i'd say 2600fps Big Grin

its the best/cheapest thing you can get in a win mag action gunsmile


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27620 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If you want a .458 just rebarrel using a pac nor barrel would not be much deraer than at any rate, you won't have the wild cat issues and there would be no flies on a 400 gr barnes x bullet or 400 gr woodleigh protected point which would give you slightly better velocity than the taylor round due to better expansion ratio I think.

On the Other hand Ruger should legitimise the .416 Taylor in there stainless synthetic MK11.................I reckon it would sell like hot cakes as would the .458 winnie in the same gun.
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've a .416 Taylor on the old style Ruger M-77, 24in Douglas barrel that I had Magna Ported, my .300 win mag kicks harder than the .416. I've taken many a blacktail with it, couple of moose and one bear. I use 400gr Swift, Kodiak and Hornady bullets, 2350-2400 fps, 5400fbs at the muzzel. Out to 200yds, with a rest, I'm grouping in 3 in or so...good enough for me...It's a bit much for climbing large hills with (so wouldn't ever think of taking it on a sheep hunt Smiler ) I just really like the gun and it's served me well. Good luck with your project.

John


If it doesn't kill ya, it'll only make you stronger!
 
Posts: 116 | Location: Juneau, Alaska, U.S.A. | Registered: 25 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by grizzinater:
I planned on sending my 338 to get rebored to a 458 but the barrel is a little to thin, the smith said he could do a 416 taylor no problem. Any thoughts on this round? what are the ballistics like and does anybody hunt with this round and would you feel comfortable with it with the bears...one more ? will the recoil be close to a 458 or what..thanks


Grizz,
Who are you having to do the reboring? Mind telling me the cost?


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6661 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
snowolf, i sent it to delta gun shop in washington and it will be a little over 300 i beleive. i have seen his work before and it is amazing. I am thinking of sending one of my winchester m70stainless in 375 to get rebored to 458lott. i know alot of people think you should just get it rebarreled but its neat how it looks just like a factory gun..
 
Posts: 201 | Location: S.E. Alaska | Registered: 25 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree. Reboring seems to be a lost art. Does this shop have a web site?


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6661 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I like the 416 Rem mag.The brass is pretty cheap and not that hatd to get.The 458 win mag brass is getting harder to find.Its only made on special runs.Cabelas has a mamna ported 416 Taylor built on the old Ruger 77 action.Its $1200 I think.It would cost more than that to have one built.I love the old tang safety better than the new one.I thought about a 416 ultra mag but I think 375 ultra mag brass will disapear pretty soon.If you dont mind necking up 338 brass then it might not be so bad.I just hate making brass.I have a 375 jdj and hate making brass for it.Eveytime I mess up a case I say why am I doing this.I wish Ruger had made more than 12 of the 416 Taylors that they made.
 
Posts: 2543 | Registered: 21 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When you guys form 416 Taylor brass do you go up from 338 or down from 458?


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6661 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Go down from 458 it is realy easy> I tried the up from 338 it is a lot harder and one ruins a lot more casings.
 
Posts: 19846 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
dgr416 I did mine on a stainless MKII with a new douglas barrel ans leupold 1.75x6 a after market trigger I have 1200 into. But I did the stock and trigger work myself.
 
Posts: 19846 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 201 | Location: S.E. Alaska | Registered: 25 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by grizzinater:
I planned on sending my 338 to get rebored to a 458 but the barrel is a little to thin, the smith said he could do a 416 taylor no problem. Any thoughts on this round? what are the ballistics like and does anybody hunt with this round and would you feel comfortable with it with the bears...one more ? will the recoil be close to a 458 or what..thanks


You've probably had your answers and all allready and, though I'm late posting, will respond anyway Smiler



Mauser 98 416 Taylor
400grn Hornady @2350fps
range: 16'
penetration: over 51"
result: see picture

best,
bhtr
 
Posts: 223 | Location: Soldotna, Alaska | Registered: 29 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
bearhuntr, for some reason the pic didnt come up. WAS this on a bb, got any more details. thanks appriciate it.
 
Posts: 201 | Location: S.E. Alaska | Registered: 25 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BW
posted Hide Post
Hmm... seems my old website still works. So it may help...

416 Taylor webpage


Brian
 
Posts: 778 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 23 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Many thanks BW. For some dumb reason I could not get the geocities pages to come up earlier. I'm hitting "print" as we speak.

DB
 
Posts: 1370 | Location: Home but going back. | Registered: 15 December 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia