Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
J.D. - I also prefer wood stocks for my hunting rifles. But about 4 or 5 composite stocked ones have sneaked into the vault and taken up residence there too. Just as long as they don't mate with the Walnut ones and produce sterile hybrids I'm okay with that. I do believe,though, that it is just as possible to make pieces of gun art using composition stocks as it is with wood. I see it sort of like other kinds of art on my walls...some are watercolour, some are oils, but all are art. (I have no acrylics on the walls though. No matter how artistic they may be, they are not my bag.) One other point...composite stocks are not always lighter than wood stocks, even if the same external dimensions and basic design. (I know you knew that and didn't waste space mentioning it.) I have several McMillan stocked rifles I bought used which are among the heaviest rifles I own. Don't know what the cores are filled with, don't much care, but those suckers ARE weighty. One of them just happens to be a McSwirly switch barrel Remington in .22-250, .257 Roberts, 7x57, 7mm/08, and .308 Win. It doesn't get used much. Too heavy, too ugly to my eyes, and the stock is too straight to be a great offhand rifle. But too much fun to putz with at the range to just throw away. And like I said....I'm with you on greatly preferring wood stocked hunters, so I use them instead most of the time, even at the range. | |||
|
One of Us |
Black is good. But for sweet boys, it's like the little black party dress, for special occasions. And black is boring for every day wear. Color is the thing, at least to match the shoes and purse. Too bad walnut comes in one basic color, with varying streaks. If only walnut came in lavender, orange, green, blue, shades. Perhaps bubbas could appreciate that too. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Composite stocks are great---have a safe and a half full but the ” McSwirly’s are not for me. The non competition stocks are all painted with black marine epoxy—forgot what it is called but it is tough as nails (Micky’s, Manners, SG&Y and H&S). Be careful when talking about “wood” stocks---world records have been set with them you know. Am in the process of stocking some of very accurate sporters with various species of wood. Got to be careful when making blanket statements about wood stocked rifles not shooting worth a shi#$ because it really shows that you are in fact talking out of your azz. Something that you seem to enjoy doing frequently LOL. | |||
|
One of Us |
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Cletus, I don't take offhand shots at game, plain and simple. 99% of my hunting is open country- none of those guns have sights on them either. The stalker style stock just doesn't balance as well in sticks as does one with a longer fore end. Now if I were hog hunting and didn't give a shit where I shot em- that's a different story. FWIW I haven't bought a synthetic stocked rifle in about 7 years. In fact I only have 3, a .270 Win, .300 Win and 340 Wby and the last 7-8 guns I've bought/ordered have all been wooden stocked, but in the American Hunter style if you will for those very reasons. PS Speedy was one of the smiths who helped me out a while back..... There are two types of people in the world: those that get things done and those who make excuses. There are no others. | |||
|
one of us |
You are using allot of your "wrong tokens" today. That chip is a chip in the Gel Coat. What in the world do you think is under McMillan paint? | |||
|
One of Us |
So, the orange is gel coat? The McMillan blank that I have that's set up for paint is black primed. What's under it? From the little peek I can see, from a chip that looks very much like the one on your stock, it's something bright blue, but doesn't appear to be gel coat. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
My McMillan's have been black. Boss Hoss, I believe you have Polane on yours. Nasty stuff, but very tough. Butch | |||
|
One of Us |
Butch---yes thanks!!!!!!! That is some tough stuff!!!!! | |||
|
One of Us |
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I love my McSwirly ZG47 30-06 more than my four times the cost wooden customs. I like the look, the feel and the performance. I also like my remington 'semi-custom' painted McMillan rifles. There is something very satisfying about ordering bits assembling and coming up with a great product with no more than ordering. The quality of inlet on an off the peg McMillan is generaly better than a lot of 'customs' and I'll take quality of engineering over looks every day. | |||
|
One of Us |
You must have used the wrong stockmaker if you glass stocks are inletted better. I do have some hunting rifles in glass stocks, but they have black Polane and not McSwirley. Just not my taste. Butch | |||
|
One of Us |
The inletting on a McMillan anticipates glass bedding, with minimal fitting beforehand by the gunsmith. I finally looked up Polane to figure out what it is. Now I know it's a two component polyurethane paint. http://www.designoctaves.com/pdfs/sherwin.pdf Tough as Polane may be, it certainly ain't tougher than a McSwirley, which has a gel coat finish. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelcoat Black may be tasteful to some, but it's so boring to me. Besides, the gel coat finish is ready to go with no further work. Just bed the barreled action in and take her to the range. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Nothing but choices, eh? | |||
|
One of Us |
McSwirleys have been appreciated a long time. Even Shakespeare wrote about them: "Age cannot wither her, nor custom stale her infinite variety." - William Shakespeare KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Guess it depends on the Smith. Mine prefers to inlet them himself. Just depends on who is doing the work and what level of precision he or she requires. This is a pic of one of mine in work last winter. Additionally, the plastic feel of the Swirly feels cheap to me. | |||
|
One of Us |
So, paint feels more expensive? Maybe you are just paying more. I can't imagine how the concept of more precision works out in the real world. Perhaps like more cow bell? Besides, pay for precise inletting, glass bed it, then paint the stock anyway. The only possible difference is the paint covers a sliver less bedding compound. That makes complete sense to me. It's my understand of the correct process and outcome, of first importance, is to not get the barreled action in a bind. As I understand it, this is generally accomplished with somewhat generous inletting, then back filled (for lack of a better term) with bedding compound. The work I've seen done on McSwirleys is so close in the visable areas, that one has to look hard to see the bedding compound, and it's generally close to the color of the gel coat anyway. On painted stocks, like yours, 1/4" of bedding compound wouldn't show, being covered with paint. I suggest that it's all in your head. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
It is obvious you are not into accuracy but to each his own. I don't really think you would want to put one of your rifles up against any of mine for fit and finish in and out of the stock. | |||
|
One of Us |
I don't agree with your first sentence - about accuracy. I have no idea where you come up with that one. But, I might agree with your second sentence. Maybe. The rifles in the following pictures are so accurate that I can't shoot them to their full potential. I have shot less than an inch groups with each of them, but I can't so that with any rifle every day. They will cluster five shots, if I'm having a really good day. The 30-06 is my first real custom Mauser. The Ruger is a 9.3x338, the two Winchesters are 338WM and 375 H&H. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Here are some pictures of the inletting on a stock that hasn't been bedded. It's just dropped into the stock to see how it fits, just as it came from McMillan. It's ready to go to the 'smith for bedding. I won't use it before. Also, I'll have some kind of metal coating done so it matches the stainless barrel with the action. ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
God Kabluewy, you are just inviting BH to drag out pictures of his 12" prosthesis dong, sure to be more manly, expensive and handsome than whatever you possess. You keep wrestling with him you'll surely be covered in mud. | |||
|
One of Us |
Ain't that the truth. Oh well, that's better than cursing at each other, or showing pictures of our scars or tatoos. There's an old saying or quote, which I'll modify a little for this post: "Never wrestle with a Hoss; you'll just get muddy, and besides the Hoss likes it." That last bunch of pictures was just to show the inletting for drop-in, and let others decide if it's "precision" enough for its purpose. I figured that I needed to do a good job with the pictures, because I'm in for it now. I'm sure my little sony camera is no match for a professional photographer. Gawd, I just hope the onslaught isn't with pictures of Wallnutt. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Look here Homos4me dont you have some Coopers to go look at? | |||
|
One of Us |
I have a few Mcmillans and also some nice wood rifles too. Accuracy is there -or not- in both types. On mountain hunts however I feel better with plastic but I like wood in Africa, plastic does not feel right there. Admit it is mostly esoteric. | |||
|
one of us |
I actually like McMillan stocks also. Just get a kick at the mouth foamers knocking wood. Kabluey, no offense but your pictures sorta backfired. You could hide a popsicle stick in the gaps ______________________ Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. | |||
|
One of Us |
No offense taken. They were posted for others to form, or confirm, their own opinions. Rather than just talk about it, pictures represent facts better than words, or so I thought. I suppose you have demonstrated that pictures representing facts can be distorted just as easily as words. No offense intended. I have to presume the gaps you are talking about are those along the barrel channel, since there are no others of significance. They are not the thickness of a popsicle, but instead the thickness of a strip of plastic tape, which was wraped around the barrel before planting the barreled action into the soft bedding compound. The resultant gap along the barrel channel, when the tape is removed, is entirely intentional, and is for the purpose of free-floating the barrel. The gap at the forend tip, under the barrel, is also intentional. Your popsicle comment is an exaggeration. If I have misunderstood what you are seeing in the pictures, please clarify, so we can talk about the same thing. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
one of us |
What appears to be a gap must be the epoxy which is a different color than the stock appearing to be a gap. Not that it matters to me, on a fiberglass stock. For a synthetic stock I like a plain old olive colored stock or black. I too will glass these. The Swirly patterns just make me ill, a personal preference. If I were into the benchrest thing my stocks would be painted some wild candy apple red color with modest pin striping. On wood, most probably like the beauty. Each piece is a unique piece of mother natures splendor. I'm in that camp. I also like crafting my own. Seemless inletting is always my goal (don't always make it,yet) epoxy means I failed. Crafting lines that are pleasant to the eye yet functional is also challenging. It is art and craft rolled into one. Taking the rifles I stock into the field brings me much more pleasure than an off the shelf McMillan and glassing it in. If I were a richer man I'd also have a safe full of rifles built by those at the top of the field just because I appreciate their talent. In the end one can have a rifle that he has a deep investment in emotionally that is just as functional as a Rem 700 with a re-barrel glassed into a McMillan. Is it needed to go hunting and enjoy it, of course not. I just like wood, I have blanks hanging in my shop that likely will never see a chisel or rasp in my life time, I just like them like other may like a water color hanging in their family room. ______________________ Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. | |||
|
One of Us |
That's pretty interesting, dempsey. Once - just once - I owned a rifle with a custom carved walnut stock. The blank must have been expensive, judging from the prices I see. The layout, color, figure, etc. was super good. I bought it off gunbroker for a really good price, because it had an obvious flaw in the metal work. It was made on one of the Sears FN actions with the odd hole spacing, and someone botched the drilling of the third hole in the rear bridge so it would take std FN bases. I had the ugly hole fixed and the whole barreled action reblued. The extra hole dissappeared. I learned several things from owning that rifle for a while. That was the first rifle that I had the priviledge of inspecting the inletting, and checkering done by a really skilled craftsman. I was amazing to me that someone would and could inlet by hand with such close tolerences. There wasn't a flaw anywhere. There was no bedding compound. The barrel channel, action area, recoil lug, tang, all perfectly fitted by hand. The checkering was also flawless. Additionally, I learned that sometimes the wood is flawless, but the metal work has some flaws. apparantly whoever made it spent a great deal of effort to get the wood right, but screwed up in some ways with the metal. I think the extra hole, which was not centered and the threads were buggered, was not the work ot the original gunsmith. It was too inconsistant. The original blueing was an issue too. There was some seepage of the blueing salts out of the threads of the barrel, and it was creeping rust. That's partially why I had it reblued entirely. So, it was apparant to me that this is an example of a rifle made with form more important than function. It was an attempt at art, that had flaws, and didn't function properly either. So the maker failed on two accounts. I never even shot it. I'm relatively sure the tight fit in the barrel channel would nave effected accuracy. I just couldn't stand the thought of dents and dings on that rifle, so I listed it on GB for double what I paid for it, and showcased the wood. I listed it at a starting bid and a buy me now price. It sold in two days for the buy me now price. I used the money to buy a CZ 550 in 7x57, NIB, old style walnut stock, and a scope, Burris rings, and had the rifle bedded and tweeked, and had money left over to buy several other rifles. I like the CZ 550 much better. I'll take function over form. One thing I try to not do is develope a "deep investment in emotionally" as you call it, into a rifle. It ain't prudent. I try to keep it a hobby, that's all, and everything has a market value. It's the things they do, and the places and things I do with them. The object itself holds my interest secondarily. I also like putting it together from parts. Even though I need a real gunsmith for assembly, I enjoy gathering parts, and I like the testing the assembly, and handloading. Regarding walnut blanks, I really dislike them. There's too much to dream about there, and too long of time and expense to get there. I try to avoid the instant gratification thingy, but a walnut blank takes too much patience for me. I'll spend my money getting the metal right, and take a drop-in stock, and bedding. KB ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ | |||
|
One of Us |
Basically I agree pretty much with the sentiments of the paragrphs above, selected from Dempsey's post . The McSwirly patterns don't make me ill, but I don't much care for them compared to nicely fitted and grained wood. The McSwirleys do have at least one great advantage to me, though. Apparently they sometimes don't "wear well" with SOME of their owners. As a result I have been able to buy several of them (and the rifles they are/were on) for almost a song...and I am a poor singer indeed in my old age. The last Remington I bought with all the different switch barrels cost me about $450 in total. Usually, I've re-stocked the ones I bought at give-away prices, but with this one I use it little except for testing ammo components, so haven't bothered. It is a good test mule from the bench, as the barrels are almost all Schneiders and nicely accurate with good componenets. AND, I also see Kabluewy's point about the composites' usefulness when it comes to easy fitting and accuracy. Not referring to only McMillans, but even to standard Remington factory composite stocks, they can do VERY well for easy, close assembly and accuracy. Case in point...I have/had a .404 Barnes Supreme (full length .375 H&H case blown out and opened to take .411" bullets) on a Model 700 action. Was going to a benchrest shoot in Eugene one weekend and wanted to take it to a gunsmith who I knew would be at the match. So I wouldn't forget it, I laid it on the back deck between the hatchback and the rear bumper of my car. Figured when I put my match rifles in the car, I would be sure to notice it and take it with me. Had already taken it out of the stock and the scope off, so there was only the blued action, barrel, recoil lug, and trigger. Turns out I left for the match about 5:30 a.m. and it was raining and still very dark in my garage so I DIDN'T notice the barrreled action and DIDN'T put it inside the car!! Took off down the very windy, hilly, river road from my hosuse toward the Interstate, 7 miles away. About 5 miles along, I remembered the rifle (barreled action). I stopped, searched the inside of the car...no such gun. Thought maybe I had inadvertantly left it in the garage OR that it had obviuously fallen off the back bumper going around one of the curves. Drove slowly home. Checked the road and the garage. No rifle. There had been several cars and trucks along the road by then (maybe 3 or 4). Figured one of their occupants must have seen the rifle in the road and grabbed it. Started dejectedly back to the match. About 3 miles from home, on a particularly sharp 20 MPH curve...there is my rifle! In the exact middle of the road, and obviously run over by all three of the vehicles...the road is narrow enough that with the rifle in the middle of the road, none of them could have missed hitting it if they tried. Picked the rifle up. Very bad road rash on the muzzle and crown. Ditto the recoil lug. Trigger fingerpiece was scrubbed completely off, as was the safety. So was one Weaver scope base. Couldn't immediately tell if the barrel was bent or not. There was very mild road rash (cosmetic damage only) on the bolt hood (cocking piece cover/flange). Had a spare trigger, a spare sight base, spare recoil lug, and a spare safety. Called up "Goforth" in the lt Lake City area and found he had a brand new 7 m/m Weatherby Mag "take-off" barrel for $50. Bought it. I believe it was he who also had a new take-off black composite Remington stock for the Model 700 magnum profile barrel. Bought it for another $50. Yanked the road-rash .404 barrel off, put on the "new" 7 m/m Weatherby barrel and the composite Remington stock. Mounted a spare 3-9 scope. Replaced all the other damaged parts. Assembled a load with middle of the loading book pressure and velocity loads. Cranked the scope up to 9-X and took it to the range to test fire and accuracy check. Would you believe that rifle shoots 5-shot 100 yard groups right at half an inch with that very first load (H-4831 & 162 gr. Hornady Match bullets)? Well, I didn't at first either, but it does so regularly. That stock is un-bedded and untouched by me other than screwing it to the barreled action and holding it to shoot. Well, though I might have gotten that lucky fit of rifle, barrel, and stock with an unbedded factory wood take-off stock, somehow, I doubt it. That is not a beautiful rifle physically, but somehow I love it! I'll probably never bother to recrown and reblue the .404 barrel, and may never put it back on the action. I've already sold the old stock which was inletted for it. Life sure is a circus some days. All you can do is smile and go with the flow. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia