THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM PISTOL SHOOTING FORUM


Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Penetration 7.62x25
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of SGraves155
posted
Anybody experiment with comparing penetration between 7.62x25fmj and .357 mag and .44 mag? If the 7.62 out-penetrates the biggies, seems like it should be a good shoulder-holster weapon in grizzly country when a CNS close-range shot is required.


Steve
"He wins the most, who honour saves. Success is not the test." Ryan
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Stalin
Tanzania 06
Argentina08
Argentina
Australia06
Argentina 07
Namibia
Arnhemland10
Belize2011
Moz04
Moz 09
 
Posts: 8100 | Location: NW Arkansas | Registered: 09 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hmm- I have an amusing story regarding this. We had a lad from Second Chance arrive in Zim and try and sell our government a bunch of bullet proof vests for our local SWAT team. Charlie Haley was asked to test the vest and several of us from other "interested agencies" went along to be entertained.

Second Chance rep- "this vest will stop .357 armour piercing yada yada"

Charlie- Will it stop a tokarev?

Rep- Of cource it will- it will even stop the hardest .44 mag.

So Charlie hung the vest over a chair in the lab and returned carrying a .44 mag and a standard tok.

First he fired the .44 with a soft point. The vest held it and the chair fell over.

Then he fired the tok. Bullet went through both sides of the vest, the chair in between and buried it'self in the wall. to this day there is a picture of a S&W M59 covering an unseemly hole in the lab wall...

Rep (with tears in his eyes) ...but ...but - I have got to demonstrate that vest in Zambia and malawi and now it has a hole in it....

As most of the scum we were dealing with had either a tok or a makarov- we didn't buy any vests.

NB- the ammo used for the test was russian military stuff with a steel jacket. The chinese and Korean stuff we tried later with a guilding metal jacket was much less penetrative.
 
Posts: 3026 | Location: Zimbabwe | Registered: 23 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
its true that the 7.62x25 will out penetrate most anything else, but for a defense round on a grizz I'd want something alot bigger. penetration is one thing, force is another.
 
Posts: 13466 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of D Humbarger
posted Hide Post
quote:
it should be a good shoulder-holster weapon in grizzly country when a CNS close-range shot is required.


Might be ok in a SMG. Big Grin



Doug Humbarger
NRA Life member
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72'73.
Yankee Station

Try to look unimportant. Your enemy might be low on ammo.
 
Posts: 8351 | Location: Jennings Louisiana, Arkansas by way of Alabama by way of South Carloina by way of County Antrim Irland by way of Lanarkshire Scotland. | Registered: 02 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of The Metalsmith
posted Hide Post
Hah! Butchloc is absolutely right. I grew up in Kodiak alaska before I joined the Corps. We've got some biggies up there alright! Anyways the 7.62x25 is phenomenal as far as penetration qualities, no doubt about it. However it punches a fairly small hole and the energy transfer is minimal compared to a 300 grain hard cast lead bullet out of a .44 mag or a heavily loaded .45 Colt. I'd much rather smack it hard and make it think twice than take my chances and try to weave a string through a needle's eye!


"Molotov Cocktails don't leave fingerprints"
-Dr. Ski
 
Posts: 579 | Location: Astoria, Oregon | Registered: 24 June 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia