This letter was writen by an ex-South African living in the Uk.

We often try to understand why Africa has not prospered with

all the mineral wealth and available labour.



"I expect, like me, you are aware that there has never been a

prosperous black led country, but perhaps just blamed their "bad

luck", or whatever, for that un-contradictable fact.



Take Haiti as an example. Before the black slaves revolted and killed

all the whites and half castes Haiti had a GNP greater than most of

what is now the USA . It supplied 60% of all the sugar used in Europe .



Today it is a wasteland. Apparently if you Google Earth the place it

is a sere, brown colour compared to the neighbouring Dominican

Republic which is green and verdant.



Twice the USA has occupied Haiti , building roads, ports, hospitals and

schools while putting in a functional society,



The moment the Americans left they reverted to dictatorship, voodoo,

witchcraft, corruption and barbarism.



They did not stagnate, they regressed to the primitive savagery of

their forefathers



Since the 1960s, when the Congo expelled the Belgians this has been a

mirror of African regression , moving steadily southwards until the

example of Zimbabwe . Once a prosperous, well educated exporter of food

the population now eat rats to survive.



Will SA go the same way?



There are those optimists who say "No, we have such a strong economy,

such sophisticated infrastructure, such a talent pool, that we can

never sink".



My belief is that they have not considered the root cause of Africa 's

failure. A cause that is not spoken about as it is fearfully

politically incorrect, and probably illegal to speak about.



To speak about it causes recollections of Hitler's eugenics beliefs

and the horrors that followed.



That cause is the deficiencies of the black "mentality", for want of a

better word.



Are there differences between races, or is race just a meaningless

social construct? Until recently I believed all races were the same

under the skin variations, and that perceived differences were only

the result of cultural differences. I believed in a common and equal

humanity.



But things did not always ring true, observable anomalies were

inexplicable if all men are the same.



Why, under apartheid, did the Indians prosper, become doctors,

scientists, educators, merchants and professionals while the equally

oppressed black Africans remained hewers of wood?



Why are Jews more than 12 times more likely to be Nobel Prize

recipients than goyim? Why do they command the heights in academia,

the arts, business and science?



Why can black Africans run, jump and throw better than honkies, but

why, out of a billion of them, have they never invented a single thing

of any worth? Why have they ,collectively, contributed absolutely

nothing to the advancement of humanity. Nothing.



Well the physical thing, the running, throwing bit is easily and

uncontroversially answered. Simple, they (especially the Jamaicans)

are genetically better equipped in this regard. Their muscle fibres

are different and the typically have 15% more free testosterone than

other peoples. That does not explain the Jewish or East Asiatic

superiority in academics, science or any other meaningful sphere.

Surely it cannot be genetic? That is racism.



Unfortunately, racist or not, that is proven and a fact. Google it and

you will find that for over 70 years, in test after test, done by

dozens of university professors and Nobel laureates plus USA

government studies, Jews are the most intelligent of humans followed

by East Asians. Then come westerners then, trailing by a wide margin,

people of African descent.



I refer to I.Q. tests and the results of these . Jews come in at about

114 points, East Asians about 108, white Europeans 100, African

Americans (with their mixed ancestry) 85 and sub Saharan Africans a

lousy 70 odd.



Of course I.Q. tests have been attacked, especially by those who

perform badly at them, as one might expect them to do. Detractors

claim cultural bias, dysfunctional families, past oppression, poor

schooling and a host of other reasons for poor black performance, but

the professors defend their contention that I.Q. is largely an

inherited trait, that differences are inherent, built into a person's

inherited DNA.



For every argument attacking the validity of these tests they have a

host of results confirming their accuracy and typicality. Fascinating

stuff if you are interested in reading up on it.



The effect of high/low I.Q. has also been studied in depth, with

fairly predictable results. Low I.Q. individuals performed badly in

social class, family stability, income, educational levels,

illegitimate pregnancy, single parent families rate of prison

incarceration, rape, violent crime etc. etc. etc.



I.Q. measurement measures different facets of intelligence and mental

competence. Sadly it is in the absolutely vital sphere of cognitive

ability that blacks score worst.

This means they score abysmally in things like forward planning and
anticipating the consequences of

their actions.



It is this I.Q. (and testosterone) disparity that is blamed for the

fact that African Americans are 5 times more likely to be imprisoned

than white (including Hispanic) Americans, 9 times more likely than

Americans of Asiatic descent and 14 times more likely to be jailed

than Jewish Americans. All in line with I.Q. distributions.



Once imprisonment for violent crimes are computed the numbers become

stratospheric. These are American government collated statistics, so

pretty accurate.



Our government in SA do not, for obvious reasons, publish similar

stats, but a pound to a pinch of salt they are even more astounding.



So why the lecture on I.Q.?



Well for a start you must understand that our ruling party are voted

into power by a largely moronic plebiscite. I choose the word moronic

intentionally. If the cut off point for moronic is an I.Q. of 70, half

the voting population would be classified as such.



Only one in 40 black SAns achieves the average I.Q. of his white

fellow citizens. One in a hundred have the I.Q. to achieve university

entrance requirements. That is why only one in ten blacks pass our

dumbed down matric (with a pass percentage of 30% in many cases). One

in 6000 black grade one learners will pass matric with both Maths and

Science.



Simply put, they are bloody stupid, and they rule us. Furthermore

Zoooooma says they will rule us until the second coming. I believe

him.



This explains why the ANC have such idiots in their positions of power

and influence, the likes of Zuma, Malema President of ANC Youth League) ,

Khomphela and Cele (head of Police). They are, unfortunately, the best
they have!

Well they are the best blacks they have, All the critical positions
are held by Indians,

Coloureds or whites, something I am grateful for but which pisses Malema off
big

time .



Will this last? I doubt it. The black/white polarisation is growing

and the rhetoric is becoming more extreme. Listen to the pub or

workplace chatter, read the blogs and comments sections of the

newspapers and it becomes obvious. Whites are gatvol at the waste,

corruption and stupidity of the black elite. Blacks are demanding, as

their right, the wealth of the whites by means of redistribution of

assets. No matter that they have not worked for those assets, they

claim them as the spoils of war.



Just in the past week the Mayor of Pretoria, Malema and

Winnie have gone on record as blaming whites for sabotaging

redistribution and exploiting blacks. Malema calls out "Kill the boers

for they are rapists" to thunderous applause by university students

Four influential ANC opinion makers who are echoing the groundswell of

mutterings in the ghettoes. The natives are getting restless.



Mark my words.



Things are not going to improve. They cannot, there is no reason to

believe our slow slide into a failed state can be reversed with our

current regime, and there is no prospect whatsoever of there being a

change to governance based on meritocracy. Anyone who believes

otherwise, or that the ANC can mend their ways, is living in La La

Land. They do not have the intellect.



Like the proverbial frog in the slowly heating pot we have become

inured to the slow collapse of our hospitals, schools, courts, water

supplies, roads, civil service and service levels. They will become

totally dysfunctional shortly. Inevitably so. Those in charge do not

have the mental capacity to organise things.



Our economy and Rand is reliant on short term "hot" funds from

overseas that can flee at the touch of a computer button, and probably

will if our Rand weakens. Conversely we need a weaker Rand to

encourage exports.



6 million taxpayers support 12 million recipients of social grants,

and that figure is set to rise this year. The National Health

Insurance scheme will happen, no matter how unaffordable. That will

push our social grant costs up to four hundred billion Rand. Four

hundred billion Rand which produces absolutely no product. Inflation

is set to stay and worsen. The consequence of being the biggest

socialist state on earth. I do not believe the ANC has the intellect

to conceptualise how big a billion is, let alone 400 billion, or what

effect this will have on the economy.



You do not believe Malema's call to nationalise the mines? This guy

articulates what the hoi polloi are thinking, but the ANC leadership

will not say yet. The tactic is to set the bar high, then lower it and

the victims will sigh with relief and say it could have been worse. So

perhaps it will not be total nationalisation but rather 51%, a' la

Zim. Just look north for revelation, Zuma does.



Who would have believed that this country of Jan Smuts would ever be

headed by an unschooled, rape accused, adulterous, corrupt, sex

obsessed bigot like Zuma. Anything is possible with the ANC".



Summary.



You have few years left to enjoy what is left of the glorious SA

lifestyle, especially in the Cape , but understand it is not permanent.

The end could be sudden as the tipping point is reached, just as it

was sudden for those Zimbabwe , Zambian, Mozambican or Angolans whites. It

could, conceivably, be as bloody as the Hutu/Tutsi uprising when

primitive tribal bloodlust overcomes a thin veneer of inculcated

civilisation.



Enjoy it while you can, and enjoy it in the Cape where the population

mix is more favourable, but be aware that change is inevitable. Your

children must get a world class education, because they will not be

adults in SA.



Get assets stashed offshore, you and your children will need them there.

Amen!

Murphy: Left to it'self things will deteriorate from bad to worse.

I still do not see what good could come from letting the govornment of a country to a population that is over 95% illiterate.

An interesting rant, but sadly lacking in many facts, as well as perspective.

Much of food science in the United States was pioneered by an American black university professor in Alabama. Many patents in the U.S. are held or co-held by blacks.

Jews do better than "honkies" on intelligence tests as a result of their religion, not their genetics. The Jewish religion requires that individuals and their families try to glorify God by developing their bodies, spirits, and minds. Thus education has always been a priority in Jewish households. And educated people always do better on "IQ" tests. (That is one of the weaknesses of such tests...they are biased toward the formally educated and those with good reading skills.) And just in case you decide to lump me in with those who do not find IQ tests credible because "they did poorly" on them, the last time mine was measured it was over 150, so put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Will not go on, but culture is still a heavy-weight in how groups of people perform.

And this whole subject should be on the political forum.

I was waiting for a punchline...you have to be a moron (IQ 70) to not post this in the political forum.

the reason i posted this here is because the south african government is a joke..

Long post. Too bad you did not include any evidence to support your claims. I see you posted someone else's work without comment in the OP, so I assume that you accept the absurd claims without question.

Got any proof that there were no black doctors as you claim. They could not all be hewers of wood. Show us your proof of the 70 IQ you claim that group has. Were these results obtained by giving a standardized test to a person with a totally unrelated culture and education? I bet you would do well to achieve a moron level when taking an IQ test in Japan, China or in Yiddish.

The natives are getting restless? Treat anyone like crap for decades and you should expect this. Only a moron would expect less. I also think you posted it here because you think we are stupid enough to believe this racist rant.

Ranb

IIRC, the elevator was invented by a black man names Otis.
Paul B.

Even the Chinese will likely give up in Zimbabwe.
If the world lasts a few more years, the Communistic illiterate "Leaders" of SA will eventually get around to taking everything (or at least 51% of each thing) from the whites. They will make it as successful as Zim. Then they will "aks" the Chinese to come help. Should be interesting concerning all the mineral wealth there. I don't think the Global Elite will want to just hand it over to the Chinese.
This Thread should get moved to the ARPF.

quote:

Originally posted by Paul B:
IIRC, the elevator was invented by a black man names Otis.
Paul B.

Or Thomas Jefferson:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumbwaiter_(elevator)

or the Romans
http://inventors.about.com/lib...ntors/blelevator.htm

Elisha Graves Otis was not Black:
http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventors/otis.htm

But Otis Redding was
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nA18g_PwG0

It would be nice to see some effort by the original poster to provide some evidence to support his BS claims.

Ranb

quote:

Originally posted by ranb40:
It would be nice to see some effort by the original poster to provide some evidence to support his BS claims.

Ranb

I don't think there is much BS or much exaggeration there. Most of what he says can be Googled for references, and most folks who do any hunting in Africa are keenly aware of the disasters in the making in SA, and of what has transpired in Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and Tanzania. If you want to read about Race and Intelligence, you will likely have to get the studies of scholars that are published outside the MSM--- the MSM just doesn't publish what it doesn't want to be common knowledge. If you really want to see the studies, a small book called "Race, Evolution, and Behavior" by JP Rushton discusses many of the studies, including twins raised in different households, different races raised in different cultures, etc.

Yes, and Hitler's "scientests" published books full of racial bullshit about intelligence, and "innate characteristics", and "morals" too.

Surely there are disasters coming in Africa (and even in the industrialized European and North American locales too). But to swallow the hog-wash about it being genetically caused is absurdly ignorant. Note, I did NOT say "stupid". I said "ignorant. The two do NOT mean the same thing.

While looking that difference up, one should also look up the word "cabalist" and think about it a bit too. It refers to another area of profound ignorance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...cNU4&feature=related
"Kill the Boers"

“while the equally oppressed black Africans remained hewers of wood?” No black doctors? Evidence? Of course not, you just make it up.

“Take Haiti as an example. Before the black slaves revolted and killed all the whites and half castes” This is not hyperbole, it is a lie.

“Why have they, collectively, contributed absolutely nothing to the advancement of humanity.” Another lie. Blacks have contributed. Whole economies were built on their labor. There are numerous blacks that are doctors, lawyers and inventors. Why not post some evidence? Or was it made up like the above quotes (lies)?

“Simply put, they are bloody stupid, and they rule us.” Not as bloody stupid as those submitting to their rule then huh? What a dipshit!

F.C.Selous Stu is not only a racist, he is a very stupid racist.

Ranb

quote:

Originally posted by SGraves155:
I don't think there is much BS or much exaggeration there.

You are doing yourself a great disservice by believing any of that crap. Why be so blind? Why not make an effort to find out if what he claims is true? You really think all blacks are hewers of wood as he claims? That the slaves killed all of the whites in Haiti during the revolt? That blacks have absolutely contributed nothing to humanity? If you do then you are a stupid and irrelevant bastard.

Ranb

ranb,

Well, please enlighten us.
Kindly name all of the Great Cities, Inventions, and written languages invented by Native Black Africans in Africa before the arrival of the whites. Of course, you will have a difficult time, because there were no such constructions or inventions.

Many thousands of Whites were murdered in the Haitian Revolution. Those that managed to escape overseas were essentially the only whites who survived. Even today, Haiti is 95% Black, and 5% mulatto, with an occasional white whore or drug runner, plus decent missionaries risking their lives and freedom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution

https://www.cia.gov/library/pu...actbook/geos/ha.html

The differences between 1970's Salisbury and today's Harare, and between 1960's Lourenco Marques and today's Maputo is stunning. How do you account for it?
http://images.google.com/image...og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi


http://images.google.com/image...ures&spell=1&start=0

The few "original" peoples of South Africa when the whites got there were the San and the Khoikhoi. The San are bushmen who still prefer to stay away from civilization, the Khoikhoi herders, decimated mainly by european diseases, moved up into the area of what is now Namibia. The current Bantu/Zulu moved into SA from the northeast and Kwa-Zulu-Natal even later than the whites arrived.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_South_Africa


The writer of the letter quoted by the original poster had been living in a country where civilization was first introduced in the mid 1600's by the Dutch. From a primitive country with few inhabitants it was, over hundreds of years, turned into a wealthy modern country--capable of feeding and employing millions-- thru great effort on the part of the settlers and their descendants. All their time and effort, their lives, blood, sweat, and tears are now being taken from them by "majority rule"--and not only "taken", but taken and ruined. The number of murdered white farmers is absolutely frightening, and the MSM tries to keep the masses in the rest of the world ignorant of this. More than 3000 White Farmers have been murdered on their own property since 1994.

http://www.africancrisis.co.za/Article.php?ID=47276

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8602347.stm

And lastly, wiki on President Zuma:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Zuma
FC Selous Stu is correct that this guy and the rest of the SA Government is much worse than a bad joke.

PS, name-calling is a bad habit of Liberals in general. It's kind of like saying "Here's my sign" Have you actually ever spent any time in Sub-Saharan Africa? There are certainly intelligent, decent, Educated, Just, and kind Blacks in this world. But the situation in SA is what it is, and the victims are the whites. And those who attempt to paint it as anything other than the Great Injustice it is seem nothing less than evil to me, but perhaps some such are just themselves victims of ignorance and deception?

SGraves-- Great post. ranb40 until you have seen it in person it is hard to believe......

That is not how it works. You make the claim, and then you provide the evidence. Asking others to provide the evidence to support your claims is bad manners and stupid.

You supported the claim that “black Africans …..they ,collectively, contributed absolutely nothing to the advancement of humanity. Nothing.” Now you are shifting goal posts and asking me to provide evidence to disprove your claim. The above statement that you claim to agree with is a very broad statement that cannot be applied to any one group of people.

Where is your evidence that all of the whites were killed in Haiti? You have none of course, so you support an obvious lie instead. Are you now admitting that you are wrong?

Nowhere in your Wikipedia link does it support your claim that all the whites were killed in Haiti in the slave revolt. Try again.

I am name calling? What about you? You stoop to supporting the most outrageous lies I have ever seen on this website. You call an entire group of people wood hewers and noncontributory and fail to offer any evidence at all. This is not libel or name calling? Your hate does not belong here, go to Stormfront.com instead.

Ranb

quote:

Originally posted by JTEX:
SGraves-- Great post. ranb40 until you have seen it in person it is hard to believe......

Perhaps you have heard of the saying, "lay down with dogs, get up with fleas"? You are laying down with the filth of humanity who would have us condemn whole sections of humanity based on the color of their skin.

Ranb

It's easy to see from whence the real hatred, unjust accusations, and inability to comprehend or reason is coming. Typical Liberal.


Quote from ranb40:
Where is your evidence that all of the whites were killed in Haiti? You have none of course, so you support an obvious lie instead. Are you now admitting that you are wrong?

From "History of Haiti": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Haiti

"On January 1, 1804 Dessalines then declared independence, reclaiming the indigenous Taíno name of Haiti ("Land of Mountains") for the new nation. Most of the remaining French colonists fled ahead of the defeated French army, many migrating to Louisiana or Cuba. Unlike Toussaint, Dessalines showed little equanimity with regard to the whites. In a final act of retribution, the remaining French were slaughtered by Haitian military forces. Some 2,000 Frenchmen were massacred at Cap-Français, 900 in Port-au-Prince, and 400 at Jérémie. He issued a proclamation declaring, "we have repaid these cannibals, war for war, crime for crime, outrage for outrage."[11]"

There were, however, approximately 240 Poles who were allowed to stay permanently:

"One exception was a military force of Poles from the Polish Legions that had fought in Napoleon's army. Some of them refused to fight against blacks, supporting the principles of liberty; also, a few Poles (around 100) actually joined the rebels (Władysław Franciszek Jabłonowski was one of the Polish generals). Therefore, Poles were allowed to stay and were spared the fate of other whites. About 400 of the 5,280 Poles chose this option. Of the remainder, 700 returned to France and many were – after capitulation – forced to serve in British units. 160 Poles were later given permission to leave Haiti and were sent to France at Haitian expense. Today, descendants of those Poles who stayed are living in Casale and Fond Des Blancs."

-----
But they could not own property:


"Upon assuming power, General Dessalines authorized the Constitution of 1804. This constitution, in terms of social freedoms, called for:

1. Freedom of Religion (Under Toussaint, Catholicism had been declared the official state religion);
2. All citizens of Haiti, regardless of skin color, to be known as "Black" (this was an attempt to eliminate the multi-tiered racial hierarchy that had developed in Haiti, with full or near full-blooded Europeans at the top, various levels of light to brown skin in the middle, and dark skinned "Kongo" from Africa at the bottom).
3. White men were forbidden from possessing property or domain on Haitian soil. Should the French return to reimpose slavery, Article 5 of the constitution declared: "At the first shot of the warning gun, the towns shall be destroyed and the nation will rise in arms."[13]
The massacre of the whites is a fact. It is also a fact that the French Generals committed terrible atrocities of their own against the Blacks during the war.

IQ testing is all culturally dependent, and since only advanced "civilized" cultures even think of measuring it, it is really only a useful measurement in regards to living in a modern society. The Khoisan of Southern Africa are generally agreed to have the lowest measured "IQ"s. They have great difficulty functioning in a modern society--and they appear to be cognizant of that fact. Conversely, a 10 year old San left alone in the scrub would probably survive with no worries, whereas most University students would perish in a week. Their (the San) "Primitive Survival" IQ (if such could be measured outside of just surviving in the wild) would be very high, while most whites would be very low. That said, if ranb40 had had any intellectual integrity, he would have Googled "Khoisan IQ" and found that the original letter is correct regarding their measured IQ's.
However, putting the San, or Bantu, or anyone else who has not had the benefit of many previous family generations of living in the civilized world in positions of power in the civilized world, they will be very unlikely to function well. And that is the position in which South Africa, Zimbabwe, Namibia, and Mozambique find themselves. Peoples one or two generations removed from the Neolithic Stone Age should not suddenly be put in control of a modern nation and its civilized populations.


Behavior is also heavily linked to several hormonal levels, and the varying racial testosterone level and its effect on behavior has been well researched and documented, and is there on the web for anyone smart enough to find and understand the studies, thus excluding some posters here.

quote:

“Simply put, they are bloody stupid, and they rule us.” Not as bloody stupid as those submitting to their rule then huh? What a dipshit!

A classic!

Some have apparently forgotten, or are totally ignorant of, the long hard lonely struggle of the SADF against the Communists of the ANC and SWAPO. The ANC and SWAPO were being financed and provisioned by the Russians, Chinese, Cubans, et al. Meanwhile the rest of the world was embargoing the South Africans. The South Africans were forced into submission not by an unaided ANC, but by the Power that controlled most of the rest of the world. The result is the continuing degradation of the entire nation described in the letter.