THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM EUROPEAN HUNTING FORUMS


Moderators: Pete E
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Interesting Brown Bear Sweden
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
While the research is interesting, I have trouble with the assumption of the cause.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43518365


ALASKA is a "HARD COUNTRY for OLDMEN". (But if you live it wide'ass open, balls'to the wall, the pedal floored, full throttle, it is a delightful place, to finally just sit-back and savor those memories while sipping Tequila).
 
Posts: 311 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 23 March 2021Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Therefore, the observed change in female reproductive behaviour could be the result of the increasing hunting pressure in the population."

Just more BS science.
 
Posts: 19673 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There is absolutely no scholarship in that article. The hypothesis is speculative at best without a path forward. No reasoned alternatives given. Nothing but poorly shrouded anti hunting drivel. Wou love to see the published study and peer reviewed comments.
 
Posts: 1188 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: 04 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Hannay
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 723 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 27 November 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kda55:
There is absolutely no scholarship in that article. The hypothesis is speculative at best without a path forward. No reasoned alternatives given. Nothing but poorly shrouded anti hunting drivel. Wou love to see the published study and peer reviewed comments.


Reminds me of the claims that by selectively harvesting large sheep rams we are promoting smaller horn size.

Grizz


When the horse has been eliminated, human life may be extended an average of five or more years.
James R. Doolitle

I think they've been misunderstood. Timothy Tredwell
 
Posts: 1677 | Location: Central Alberta, Canada | Registered: 20 July 2019Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
that said it all empirical evidences lol ... but thank you for the post. we had the same kind from the same university trying to do a dtudy on the hunt of grizzly brars they complained about the non supportive attitude of hunters and hunter assiociation to find out they were anti-bear hunting ...
 
Posts: 1887 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Kanec
posted Hide Post
These analysis show you how science thinks and how wrong they can be… of course IMHO
 
Posts: 201 | Location: Heart of Europe where East meets the West | Registered: 19 January 2023Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
With the number of only 62 females from 1987-2015, 0-11cubs/year.

Other possible explanations:

The cub doesn`t move from hher mother because she cant find an own home area because its already filled.
The mother has not get pregnant because her body need an extra year to feed.

Also 30-40% of the killing of bears are done by Swedish EPA in protective hunts/kills to save reindeers, they dont care if it is a mother with cubs at all its just 2-3bears to shoot. Its only ordinary hunters who have to follow the hunting law.
 
Posts: 3611 | Location: Sweden | Registered: 02 May 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia