quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

neither side has the high ground

Well, one side has indictments with 91 felony counts. How does that measure in high ground?

hmm, cute -- this is called "pivot AND move the goal posts" .. to bring us back to topic, johnson has ZERO indictments (you might read the difference between indictment and counts) --

say, of those 91 inditements, how many are for sedition or related crimes? I mean, I've only been calling for trump to face the same accounts in COURT for months---

hint -- what number comes before 1?

ZERO -- none - zippo - nada --

dang it, it hurts me to have to present facts-that-could-be-misread-as-protecting-trump-AND-johnson in the same post...

I'm just not taking your word for the facts. In responding to you quickly, I don't have time to fact check what you say.

And, I can infer lack of good intent/faith from anyone who tries to minimize the insurrection attempt.

If you really believe that the acts, however weak, regarding Trump's (and team) unconstitutional attempt to steal the election has parallels on the other "side", then your reality compass is broken too.

trump's, and others "in-power" attempt at an insurrection could be solved with a simple trial -

don't take my word for johnson's weak brief -

here's a link to it
https://www.supremecourt.gov/D...20--%20corrected.pdf

btw, if it's insurrection charges you are looking for, here's johnson and 125 more that could be charged -- bring em up on charges....

nevermind that there isn't a judge that wouldn't dismiss charges against amici (i think that's the conjugation of several amicus) as protected speech --

Literally your position is that YOU disagree with a persons right to free speech, that doesn't impact you IN ANY WAY, and you were totally unaware of for almost three years, is that they should be called insurrectionist --

nice..

but people who said the same EXACT things, to literally MILLIONS of people are better?

i mean, you must be in tiptop shape, after those mental gymnastics

Yea, after all we now know, voting for Trump is an act of insurrection. Even thinking about it too.

That's how a democratic republic flips to fascism.

No trial can resolve that. Fascists will just say the judicial system is broken and fix it favoring fascism.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
Yea, after all we now know, voting for Trump is an act of insurrection. Even thinking about it too.

That's how a democratic republic flips to fascism.

No trial can resolve that. Fascists will just say the judicial system is broken and fix it favoring fascism.

dah, tovarishch, when even thinking about voting for a candidate is considered an act of insurrection, that is exactly when a republic falls .. would it be easier for you to read in russian?
да, товарище, когда даже мысль о голосовании за кандидата считается актом мятежа, то есть именно республика падает

I was intentionally provoking you.

You are too easy.

But I do like arguing with you.

yeah, me too - weird, huh?

It's a compliment.

I refrain from arguing with ME these days as with even being armed with logic and fact…it is an exercise in futility.

But I will say I believe he is a good person with good heart and one which always remains civil.