To be fair, he has said similar campaigning.

https://www.wfla.com/news/poli...rn-site-report-says/

Sssh, naki might hear you

Typical cowardly bully.

What is it with you stalking me everywhere.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Sssh, naki might hear you

see .. here he comes .. see, he heard you .. didn't even require a puppy treat

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
To be fair, he has said similar campaigning.

https://www.wfla.com/news/poli...rn-site-report-says/

Seems quintessentially Republican to me, a racist pervert who hides behind religion.

. . . wonder if his favorite Bible verse is “Two” Corinthians 3:17 like Trump?

Just another day in the party of god....

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...1X?ocid=BingNewsSerp

I wonder no one is talking about Trumps association with the guy who got assassinated in jail!

Oh, sorry, he KILLED himself

I hope P Diddy is on suicide watch.

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
I wonder no one is talking about Trumps association with the guy who got assassinated in jail!

Oh, sorry, he KILLED himself

Yeah, that guy…the guy Bill Barr’s dad hired despite having no applicable qualifications whatever…the guy who killed himself when all the cameras magically failed, the guards just happen go for coffee, he got his hands on the necessary, although forbidden materials, and the investigation was a shrug and a done deal.

That guy.

Trumps buddy, who argued with him over who got to take an underage girls virginity. The guy who boasted that he introduced Trump to Melanoma.

That guy.

Putin uses poisoned tea; Trumps operatives are less subtle.

I wonder why he was "thumping God" should be illegal.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
To be fair, he has said similar campaigning.

https://www.wfla.com/news/poli...rn-site-report-says/

What a creep. Hopefully, this will help tip NC Dem in November.

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
I wonder why he was "thumping God" should be illegal.

You never heard of God thumpers?

Maybe it is just a local colloquialism.

God thumpers are the more holly than the Pope,
hypocritical liars.
They use God for personal gain.

I haven't heard god thumper before, but Bible thumper many many times

I thought someone was beating on God

quote:

The Associated Press has not independently confirmed that Robinson wrote and posted the messages. CNN said it matched details of the account on the pornographic website forum to other online accounts held by Robinson by comparing usernames, a known email address and his full name.

And people wonder why good people don’t run for office.

This is what politics has come to.

Where is Nute to see that the AP posted something that could be untrue that defames the character of a man.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

The Associated Press has not independently confirmed that Robinson wrote and posted the messages. CNN said it matched details of the account on the pornographic website forum to other online accounts held by Robinson by comparing usernames, a known email address and his full name.

And people wonder why good people don’t run for office.

This is what politics has come to.

Where is Nute to see that the AP posted something that could be untrue that defames the character of a man.

CNN vetted it a hell of a lot better than FOX ever does.

>>>CNN said it matched details of the account on the pornographic website forum to other online accounts held by Robinson by comparing usernames, a known email address and his full name.

CNN reported that details discussed by the account holder matched Robinson’s age, length of marriage and other biographical information. It also compared figures of speech that came up frequently in his public Twitter profile that appeared in discussions by the account on the pornographic website.<<<<

https://apnews.com/article/nor...e38b9a83e3ce3ad4f4d2

But, you stick with the idea that this weirdo creep is a "good person."

Did I say he was a good person Mike?

I am just saying there is reasonable doubt here. If there is reasonable doubt I am not for crucifixion.

Many good men have a skeleton in the closet.

Until we get past defamation like the above article you will not get the best of the best to run for office.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Did I say he was a good person Mike?

I am just saying there is reasonable doubt here. If there is reasonable doubt I am not for crucifixion.

Many good men have a skeleton in the closet.

Until we get past defamation like the above article you will not get the best of the best to run for office.

The only reason you're calling this defamation is because the guy is a republican. Again, it looks like CNN vetted this story pretty well and given the salacious nature of it, I'm guessing due diligence was done before a decision was made to publish.

And, yes....the nature of your post clearly indicates you think this creep is a good guy.

. . . this whole, I support anyone with an (R) behind their name is starting to get a little tricky. Might try the alternative of focusing on the person and not the abbreviation. Just a thought.

Again, this man has said similar things in public.

There is no reasonable doubt.

There is not even a preponderance of the evidence.

He is just a bad person w bad ideas that will shake bad policy.

He is also going to lose and should.
Keep selections these far right non centrist candidates.
You are just helping Dems.

"Until we get past defamation like the above article you will not get the best of the best to run for office."

In Lane's little mind, the obvious truth is just defamation.

If you can support Trump despite everything the world knows about him you can support pond scum if it gets you a tax break and the pond scum hates the same people you do.

quote:

Originally posted by wymple:
"Until we get past defamation like the above article you will not get the best of the best to run for office."

In Lane's little mind, the obvious truth is just defamation.

There is no defamation here. There is honest reporting of a man who has said worse in public who speaks on gay people bring the problem while costing fetish porn sites.

You are the problem for supporting such as this.

The black Nazis pork lover
https://apnews.com/article/con...f097deba83305861b208

https://www.hrc.org/press-rele...f-anti-equality-hate

God sent a black Nazis porn watcher to fight gay people according to himself. Trans people are bad unless he gets to watch them have sex.

https://www.wral.com/amp/20779390/

Dr. Easter and this guy answering God’s not call.

Here is quotes of him quoting Hitler
https://newrepublic.com/post/1...inson-quoting-hitler

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
. . . this whole, I support anyone with an (R) behind their name is starting to get a little tricky. Might try the alternative of focusing on the person and not the abbreviation. Just a thought.

All (R)s are not good but they are all superior to any (D).

Support of the (D) agenda/platform is a litmus test for me on the kind of person they are…so yes I do focus on the person.

Sometimes (R) =

But Always (D) =

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
. . . this whole, I support anyone with an (R) behind their name is starting to get a little tricky. Might try the alternative of focusing on the person and not the abbreviation. Just a thought.

All (R)s are not good but they are all superior to any (D).

Support of the (D) agenda/platform is a litmus test for me on the kind of person they are…so yes I do focus on the person.

Sometimes (R) =

But Always (D) =

Let's face it and call this what it is. This position is a refuge/safe harbor for you. It saves you from having to defend the stupid shit that republicans say and do. Less taxing on your brain, less thinking, less trying to twist yourself into a pretzel about professing to be a Christian but supporting a man who lies every time he opens his mouth and cheats on his wife. If I was a Christian republican, I might do the same. But, I seriously fucking doubt it.

All Rs are not superior to all Ds as this candidate for Gov and Strunk demonstrates.

You are not good for the long term viability of the GOP.

I cannot support anyone who supports the Democratic Party. And (D)s always vote en bloc. Electing one is merely handing the enemy a box of ammunition.

We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

Do I need to name Gaetz and Tuberville and Taylor-Greene and Boebert and Abbott and DeSantis and Santos...

Character quit mattering to Republicans when Trump came down the escalator, when they switched from a Party to a cult.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

Not as much as the policy they support. Your a fast learner.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
. . . this whole, I support anyone with an (R) behind their name is starting to get a little tricky. Might try the alternative of focusing on the person and not the abbreviation. Just a thought.

All (R)s are not good but they are all superior to any (D).

Support of the (D) agenda/platform is a litmus test for me on the kind of person they are…so yes I do focus on the person.

Sometimes (R) =

But Always (D) =

. . . a mental crutch for the intellectually weak . . . same as straight ticket voting.

[PS Please do not bore us with a recitation of your CV, plenty of examples of academically successful folks (assuming that is the case to begin with) who lack common sense.]

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

Not as much as the policy they support. Your a fast learner.

Far Right hypocritical policy is causing folks not to vote GOP.

The problem is not that Trump and this guy are bad salesmen. The problem is the hate disguised as Christianity in the form of civil law they are selling.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
I cannot support anyone who supports the Democratic Party. And (D)s always vote en bloc. Electing one is merely handing the enemy a box of ammunition.

You and your vision of the GOP are repulsive. See this lt gov.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

Not as much as the policy they support. Your a fast learner.

Yep. It’s obvious that convicted criminal flim flam artists and philandering whore mongers are Ok with fine, upstanding Christians… Got it… Who would have thunk it, though.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

Not as much as the policy they support. Your a fast learner.

Yep. It’s obvious that convicted criminal flim flam artists and philandering whore mongers are Ok with fine, upstanding Christians… Got it… Who would have thunk it, though.

Just superior to Democrats.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

Not as much as the policy they support. Your a fast learner.

Yep. It’s obvious that convicted criminal flim flam artists and philandering whore mongers are Ok with fine, upstanding Christians… Got it… Who would have thunk it, though.

Just superior to Democrats.

In what possible way?

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
We have a 2 stage election for a reason. First stage to focus on the person. Second to focus on the doctrine.[/QUOTE

So obviously the person’s character doesn’t matter once the primaries are over? Got it….

Not as much as the policy they support. Your a fast learner.

Yep. It’s obvious that convicted criminal flim flam artists and philandering whore mongers are Ok with fine, upstanding Christians… Got it… Who would have thunk it, though.

Just superior to Democrats.

In what possible way?

All.