quote:

Originally posted by nute:
...not to many people would stick around whilst their partner has been repeatedly cheating ...

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by nute:
...not to many people would stick around whilst their partner has been repeatedly cheating ...

It's not like she didn't have hints, he publicly had his first wife and mistress (later second wife) at the same ski resort and made sure the tabloids knew it, then cheated on his second wife with Malaria, spent a LOT of time with Jeffrey Epstein (who claimed he introduced them) then banged Stormy and the Playboy model while married to the Slovenian rental.

She only apparently got upset when the evidence hit the courtroom in New York.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
So, is it, or is it not, okay talk mad sh!t about someone you don't knows wife? Not getting a clear message on this one

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
. . . trying to figure out ways to avoid sleeping with trump.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
So, is it, or is it not, okay talk mad sh!t about someone you don't knows wife? Not getting a clear message on this one

I realize the distinction between a private citizen and someone who has voluntarily become a public figure is too subtle for you, perhaps you can get a sixth-grader to explain it to you.

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
So, is it, or is it not, okay talk mad sh!t about someone you don't knows wife? Not getting a clear message on this one

I realize the distinction between a private citizen and someone who has voluntarily become a public figure is too subtle for you, perhaps you can get a sixth-grader to explain it to you.

I think he was referring to President Obama’s wife, the one they call ‘Mike’, who they feel is a man or possibly a ‘gorilla in high heels’. You know - the one who earned a couple of law degrees, wrote her own speeches and actually did establish health and education projects.

Mind you, critical issues like eenternet boolying weren’t yet as severe or in need of resolution as they are now.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
So, is it, or is it not, okay talk mad sh!t about someone you don't knows wife? Not getting a clear message on this one

I realize the distinction between a private citizen and someone who has voluntarily become a public figure is too subtle for you, perhaps you can get a sixth-grader to explain it to you.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
So, is it, or is it not, okay talk mad sh!t about someone you don't knows wife? Not getting a clear message on this one

I realize the distinction between a private citizen and someone who has voluntarily become a public figure is too subtle for you, perhaps you can get a sixth-grader to explain it to you.

I think he was referring to President Obama’s wife, the one they call ‘Mike’, who they feel is a man or possibly a ‘gorilla in high heels’. You know - the one who earned a couple of law degrees, wrote her own speeches and actually did establish health and education projects.

Mind you, critical issues like eenternet boolying weren’t yet as severe or in need of resolution as they are now.

When somebody has as little grasp on what he's talking about as Jeffeosso does it can be quite difficult for others to discern what he's yammering about. Generally, ignoring him works best.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

See, this is an example of being thin-skinned.

If you don't like what somebody says, and they're being insulting, and you don't want to stoop to their level...

IGNORE THEM!

Ignoring them is the most devastating response, as they are probably insulting you to get your attention.

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

See, this is an example of being thin-skinned.

If you don't like what somebody says, and they're being insulting, and you don't want to stoop to their level...

IGNORE THEM!

Ignoring them is the most devastating response, as they are probably insulting you to get your attention.

It has nothing to do with being "thin skinned".
It's just an honest observation of what has become of the ARPF in the last few years.
It is abundantly clear that there is a wide spectrum of differing opinions here and it is also abundantly clear that there is a cadre of usual members whom are licking their chops to pile on any contrarian view.
Maybe all you guys have is each other, dunno...
Anyway, it's so overt that I believe that we've seen entire threads where you guys just banter back and forth with each other with the usual anti Trump, anti conservative cackling WITHOUT any posts from the conservative folks here - talk about an echo chamber.
You may think that you are in the majority in your politics and if judged by post count you guys could be forgiven for thinking that, but I assure you, most AR members take one look at the drivel on the ARPF and simply choose to avoid the lunacy. Sort of let the kids have the sand pit.

As to the notion that "IGNORE THEM" is the solution, well, tell me what is accomplished in that other than somebody gets to take their ball and go home?

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

See, this is an example of being thin-skinned.

If you don't like what somebody says, and they're being insulting, and you don't want to stoop to their level...

IGNORE THEM!

Ignoring them is the most devastating response, as they are probably insulting you to get your attention.

It has nothing to do with being "thin skinned".
It's just an honest observation of what has become of the ARPF in the last few years.
It is abundantly clear that there is a wide spectrum of differing opinions here and it is also abundantly clear that there is a cadre of usual members whom are licking their chops to pile on any contrarian view.
Maybe all you guys have is each other, dunno...
Anyway, it's so overt that I believe that we've seen entire threads where you guys just banter back and forth with each other with the usual anti Trump, anti conservative cackling WITHOUT any posts from the conservative folks here - talk about an echo chamber.
You may think that you are in the majority in your politics and if judged by post count you guys could be forgiven for thinking that, but I assure you, most AR members take one look at the drivel on the ARPF and simply choose to avoid the lunacy. Sort of let the kids have the sand pit.

As to the notion that "IGNORE THEM" is the solution, well, tell me what is accomplished in that other than somebody gets to take their ball and go home?

Ironic considering the Title and first post of the thread.

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
“I keep losing arguments, so destroy the forum!”

What a petulant little pussy ..

Just have another shot of Fukemol and watch the world keep turning. Tuck Frump.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
How is Lavaca suppose to respond?

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
How is Lavaca suppose to respond?

. . . one suggestion would be to just not start asinine threads. Just a thought.

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
I think Trump is a petulant little pussy!

He refused to serve his country!

I have absolutely, positively, no respect for that petulant little pussy!

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
How is Lavaca suppose to respond?

. . . one suggestion would be to just not start asinine threads. Just a thought.

You actually condone calling another man a "petulant little pussy?"

Regardless of who, or whatever reason, I would never resort to that.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
I think Trump is a petulant little pussy!

He refused to serve his country!

I have absolutely, positively, no respect for that petulant little pussy!

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:

quote:

Originally posted by buffybr:
I visit AR just about every day, but I rarely go to the Political forum.

AR is a great hunting and shooting Forum, but the majority of the posters on the Political forum constantly praise and support the American political party that hates and wants to do away with our right to own guns, and they constantly bash our political party that supports our right to own guns.

…and yet here you are, expressing that if your political position is not endorsed the forum should be silenced. How very MAGAty of you.
It might come as a shock, but non-Trumpites hunt and shoot too, and in equal or greater numbers judging by what I see here.

From my unasked perspective, It isn't our political position you're attacking.

It is personal. You seem to wish to destroy a person who simply see's things through a different prism. (you in the collective)

Example - I saw someone in here call Dogcat a cunt. Ross is one of the most respected member of this forum. there is no room for that kind of insult. Regardless of anyones position.

Most in here simply desire a far left, progressive echo chamber.

I came looking for "robust debate" But was met with such acidic remarks, I just decided to not participate, which is our option.

I don't wan't to see it shut down either. It reminds me if what the other side thinks.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
How is Lavaca suppose to respond?

. . . one suggestion would be to just not start asinine threads. Just a thought.

You actually condone calling another man a "petulant little pussy?"

Regardless of who, or whatever reason, I would never resort to that.

quote:

Originally posted by lavaca:
For me, I'm boycotting the PF because it's dominated by liberal idiots. I'd ask anyone with any sense to do the same. If we all do that, it will become a lot less entertaining when the only participants are liberals patting themselves on the back.

quote:

Originally posted by lavaca:
For me, I'm boycotting the PF because it's dominated by liberal idiots. I'd ask anyone with any sense to do the same. If we all do that, it will become a lot less entertaining when the only participants are liberals patting themselves on the back.

quote:

Originally posted by lavaca:
For me, I'm boycotting the PF because it's dominated by liberal idiots. I'd ask anyone with any sense to do the same. If we all do that, it will become a lot less entertaining when the only participants are liberals patting themselves on the back.

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I suppose you could make a placard reading “Boycott ARPF! The Liberals never let me win an argument!”, and then march back and forth in front of your computer.

Might work.

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
As the Eagles have said “you can check out anytime. But you can never leave!”