But Mike
The bones of the arguement are identical.. words caused other people's violence

Steve

How cute!

Have you read Jtex's personal attacks of me over the last 5+ years?

What about Jeffeosso's personal attacks several times a day?

How about your own comments to me? particularly in your previous Avatar!

Oh, and you can try and refresh your memory going back 15 years to all the vile hate I endured from your personal friends who are no longer around on ARPF.

How about your might exalted leader Trump?

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:

quote:

Originally posted by buffybr:
I visit AR just about every day, but I rarely go to the Political forum.

AR is a great hunting and shooting Forum, but the majority of the posters on the Political forum constantly praise and support the American political party that hates and wants to do away with our right to own guns, and they constantly bash our political party that supports our right to own guns.

…and yet here you are, expressing that if your political position is not endorsed the forum should be silenced. How very MAGAty of you.
It might come as a shock, but non-Trumpites hunt and shoot too, and in equal or greater numbers judging by what I see here.

From my unasked perspective, It isn't our political position you're attacking.

It is personal. You seem to wish to destroy a person who simply see's things through a different prism. (you in the collective)

Example - I saw someone in here call Dogcat a cunt. Ross is one of the most respected member of this forum. there is no room for that kind of insult. Regardless of anyones position.

Most in here simply desire a far left, progressive echo chamber.

I came looking for "robust debate" But was met with such acidic remarks, I just decided to not participate, which is our option.

I don't wan't to see it shut down either. It reminds me if what the other side thinks.

quote:

Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:

quote:

Originally posted by buffybr:
I visit AR just about every day, but I rarely go to the Political forum.

AR is a great hunting and shooting Forum, but the majority of the posters on the Political forum constantly praise and support the American political party that hates and wants to do away with our right to own guns, and they constantly bash our political party that supports our right to own guns.

…and yet here you are, expressing that if your political position is not endorsed the forum should be silenced. How very MAGAty of you.
It might come as a shock, but non-Trumpites hunt and shoot too, and in equal or greater numbers judging by what I see here.

From my unasked perspective, It isn't our political position you're attacking.

It is personal. You seem to wish to destroy a person who simply see's things through a different prism. (you in the collective)

Example - I saw someone in here call Dogcat a cunt. Ross is one of the most respected member of this forum. there is no room for that kind of insult. Regardless of anyones position.

Most in here simply desire a far left, progressive echo chamber.

I came looking for "robust debate" But was met with such acidic remarks, I just decided to not participate, which is our option.

I don't wan't to see it shut down either. It reminds me if what the other side thinks.

So, Great and Wise Arbiter of All That's Good and Moral, how would you characterize an attack on someone's deceased wife?

Acceptable political debate?

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:

Since that time, the lefties by and large have become the instigators of personal attacks and bad behavior. Certainly not all of them are, and most of those who do are not always doing it, but it does happen more on the left. ...

Most of us would not be making the type of name calling comments in person, that’s for sure.

Doc,
totally agree - I don't recall a rightie calling me every name in the book, while there's a couple lefies that are somewhat freer with cursing a person out. Oh, I am not above the fray of insults (understatement) however, I don't swear in forums, and frankly, don't say a WORD here that I wouldn't say in a face to face situation, under the same conditions.

It's strange, I've even invited those screaming curse words like a 14 year old having just learned them, for a face to face. The ones that have agreed, we've had a civil, if strained, conversation, where we spoke and listened to each other - then there are the folks that think they can say anything they want from behind a keyboard - In no event do I think we changed each others minds -

but never have they decided to use those cursing behaviors in a face to face situation.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
So, nobody should be allowed to talk bad about him or hurt anybody else's feelings. What nonsense.

Mike, it's "your" side that says words are violence -

You're a lying piece of shit and a coward, if you said to my face what you said about my wife here I'd have a knife in your guts before you took your next breath.

Spare us your bullshit.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:

Since that time, the lefties by and large have become the instigators of personal attacks and bad behavior. Certainly not all of them are, and most of those who do are not always doing it, but it does happen more on the left. ...

Most of us would not be making the type of name calling comments in person, that’s for sure.

Doc,
totally agree - I don't recall a rightie calling me every name in the book, while there's a couple lefies that are somewhat freer with cursing a person out. Oh, I am not above the fray of insults (understatement) however, I don't swear in forums, and frankly, don't say a WORD here that I wouldn't say in a face to face situation, under the same conditions.

It's strange, I've even invited those screaming curse words like a 14 year old having just learned them, for a face to face. The ones that have agreed, we've had a civil, if strained, conversation, where we spoke and listened to each other - then there are the folks that think they can say anything they want from behind a keyboard - In no event do I think we changed each others minds -

but never have they decided to use those cursing behaviors in a face to face situation.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
So, nobody should be allowed to talk bad about him or hurt anybody else's feelings. What nonsense.

Mike, it's "your" side that says words are violence -

You're a lying piece of sh!t and a coward, if you said to my face what you said about my wife here I'd have a knife in your guts before you took your next breath.

Spare us your bullsh!t.

As I said then, I am sorry for your loss -

Do tell me, what you RECALL i may have said about your wife,,,
here's the link -- feel free to quote me in anything i said
https://forums.accuratereloadi...611028872#2611028872

Asking where someone is from is NOT an attack -

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:

Since that time, the lefties by and large have become the instigators of personal attacks and bad behavior. Certainly not all of them are, and most of those who do are not always doing it, but it does happen more on the left. ...

Most of us would not be making the type of name calling comments in person, that’s for sure.

Doc,
totally agree - I don't recall a rightie calling me every name in the book, while there's a couple lefies that are somewhat freer with cursing a person out. Oh, I am not above the fray of insults (understatement) however, I don't swear in forums, and frankly, don't say a WORD here that I wouldn't say in a face to face situation, under the same conditions.

It's strange, I've even invited those screaming curse words like a 14 year old having just learned them, for a face to face. The ones that have agreed, we've had a civil, if strained, conversation, where we spoke and listened to each other - then there are the folks that think they can say anything they want from behind a keyboard - In no event do I think we changed each others minds -

but never have they decided to use those cursing behaviors in a face to face situation.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
So, nobody should be allowed to talk bad about him or hurt anybody else's feelings. What nonsense.

Mike, it's "your" side that says words are violence -

You're a lying piece of sh!t and a coward, if you said to my face what you said about my wife here I'd have a knife in your guts before you took your next breath.

Spare us your bullsh!t.

As I said then, I am sorry for your loss -

Do tell me, what you RECALL i may have said about your wife,,,
here's the link -- feel free to quote me in anything i said
https://forums.accuratereloadi...611028872#2611028872

Asking where someone is from is NOT an attack -

In context you equated a woman who never did you harm, or knew you existed, to a Slovenian rental who credible people who knew her said worked as a whore ("escort" in polite company), who we've all seen her lesbian porn pictures, an illegal alien who didn't commit the common misdemeanor of entering without papers but affirmatively committed Fraud by claiming to have a degree the University cited said she didn't get, who Jeffrey Epstein, noted pedophile and pimp, claimed for years to have "introduced" to her future husband, which Trump never denied until he ran for office. Out of the blue you dragged another Poster's wife into a discussion that had nothing whatever to do with her; the fact that she had been dead for years was just the cherry on top of your scuminess.

You are beneath contempt.

Right wing nuts don't need to insult others here.

Trump is full swing at that!

There are some people on the Right with absolutely no moral character. They will stoop to the lowest of low levels to offend someone that disagrees with their sacred political views.

In the past my wife was brought into a similar conversation and insulted in ways unimaginable. Two of the GOP thugs then ganged up and started insulting my wife. Saeed may remember this.

Both those bullying vermin are no longer here.

jeffeosso is another one who loves to insult and bully. Not at all surprised at how low he can go.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:

Since that time, the lefties by and large have become the instigators of personal attacks and bad behavior. Certainly not all of them are, and most of those who do are not always doing it, but it does happen more on the left. ...

Most of us would not be making the type of name calling comments in person, that’s for sure.

Doc,
totally agree - I don't recall a rightie calling me every name in the book, while there's a couple lefies that are somewhat freer with cursing a person out. Oh, I am not above the fray of insults (understatement) however, I don't swear in forums, and frankly, don't say a WORD here that I wouldn't say in a face to face situation, under the same conditions.

It's strange, I've even invited those screaming curse words like a 14 year old having just learned them, for a face to face. The ones that have agreed, we've had a civil, if strained, conversation, where we spoke and listened to each other - then there are the folks that think they can say anything they want from behind a keyboard - In no event do I think we changed each others minds -

but never have they decided to use those cursing behaviors in a face to face situation.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
So, nobody should be allowed to talk bad about him or hurt anybody else's feelings. What nonsense.

Mike, it's "your" side that says words are violence -

You're a lying piece of sh!t and a coward, if you said to my face what you said about my wife here I'd have a knife in your guts before you took your next breath.

Spare us your bullsh!t.

As I said then, I am sorry for your loss -

Do tell me, what you RECALL i may have said about your wife,,,
here's the link -- feel free to quote me in anything i said
https://forums.accuratereloadi...611028872#2611028872

Asking where someone is from is NOT an attack -

In context you equated a woman who never did you harm, or knew you existed, to a Slovenian rental who credible people who knew her said worked as a whore ("escort" in polite company), who we've all seen her lesbian porn pictures, an illegal alien who didn't commit the common misdemeanor of entering without papers but affirmatively committed Fraud by claiming to have a degree the University cited said she didn't get, who Jeffrey Epstein, noted pedophile and pimp, claimed for years to have "introduced" to her future husband, which Trump never denied until he ran for office. Out of the blue you dragged another Poster's wife into a discussion that had nothing whatever to do with her; the fact that she had been dead for years was just the cherry on top of your scuminess.

You are beneath contempt.

I can see your perspective though i certainly didnt intend that to be harmful. Again, I am sorry for your loss

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:

Since that time, the lefties by and large have become the instigators of personal attacks and bad behavior. Certainly not all of them are, and most of those who do are not always doing it, but it does happen more on the left. ...

Most of us would not be making the type of name calling comments in person, that’s for sure.

Doc,
totally agree - I don't recall a rightie calling me every name in the book, while there's a couple lefies that are somewhat freer with cursing a person out. Oh, I am not above the fray of insults (understatement) however, I don't swear in forums, and frankly, don't say a WORD here that I wouldn't say in a face to face situation, under the same conditions.

It's strange, I've even invited those screaming curse words like a 14 year old having just learned them, for a face to face. The ones that have agreed, we've had a civil, if strained, conversation, where we spoke and listened to each other - then there are the folks that think they can say anything they want from behind a keyboard - In no event do I think we changed each others minds -

but never have they decided to use those cursing behaviors in a face to face situation.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
So, nobody should be allowed to talk bad about him or hurt anybody else's feelings. What nonsense.

Mike, it's "your" side that says words are violence -

You're a lying piece of sh!t and a coward, if you said to my face what you said about my wife here I'd have a knife in your guts before you took your next breath.

Spare us your bullsh!t.

As I said then, I am sorry for your loss -

Do tell me, what you RECALL i may have said about your wife,,,
here's the link -- feel free to quote me in anything i said
https://forums.accuratereloadi...611028872#2611028872

Asking where someone is from is NOT an attack -

In context you equated a woman who never did you harm, or knew you existed, to a Slovenian rental who credible people who knew her said worked as a whore ("escort" in polite company), who we've all seen her lesbian porn pictures, an illegal alien who didn't commit the common misdemeanor of entering without papers but affirmatively committed Fraud by claiming to have a degree the University cited said she didn't get, who Jeffrey Epstein, noted pedophile and pimp, claimed for years to have "introduced" to her future husband, which Trump never denied until he ran for office. Out of the blue you dragged another Poster's wife into a discussion that had nothing whatever to do with her; the fact that she had been dead for years was just the cherry on top of your scuminess.

You are beneath contempt.

I can you your perspective though i certainly didnt intend that to be harmful. Again, I am sorry for your loss

You got three words right; you are sorry.

quote:

Notice that there is a lot less conservative side posting than in the past. I think it has to do with folks not enjoying the insults and remembering that when their side played the same tactics they got banned.

So, your hypothesis is that Trump supporters (whom you mislabel "conservatives") are so thin-skinned they cannot endure an insult or two insults to make their point? Maybe. There IS a lot of whining from Trump on down through the layers of his lackeys that they are treated unfairly--like it's unfair to call a lie a lie.

I think your thin-skinned hypothesis is only partly right. The other part is that these Trump supporters can't make a reasoned, supportable case for defending their cult leader. Their knickers get twisted because someone calls them on it.

And then they blame a few insults. If they paid less attention to the insults than to those who try to engage them civilly, maybe they wouldn't feel so wounded.

I respect Lane's willingness to stand toe-to-toe and duke it out...even if he is wrong most of the time.

The Conservatives on this forum and id guess nationally are splintered. There's the MAGA folks, the ambivalent group and then me and mine, the no friggin Trump group. The same amount of conservatives participate here but there's no uniformity.

On the other hand, the Dems uniformly oppose all things GOP.

Mike Mitchell and I used to insult each other and then decided not to and that was the end of it. M.E. and I used to really go after it and then we didn't and now we're very friendly. Jtex and Doc Lane and I don't agree on everything and yet we seem to go along just fine.

Seems to me we all come and go as we please, participate as we see fit and mostly fly under the moderators radar.
I don't see the problem.

quote:

On the other hand, the Dems uniformly oppose all things GOP.

So long as it's clear that some of us mostly liberal forum members are not Dems who oppose everything GOP. Both parties have some good ideas, imho, and also some bullshit ideas. Right now, I think the Dems have more good ideas--their views on gun control not being one of them.

But I support the Dem candidate this election mainly because of who her opponent is.

quote:

Originally posted by Nakihunter:
There are some people on the Right with absolutely no moral character. They will stoop to the lowest of low levels to offend someone that disagrees with their sacred political views.

In the past my wife was brought into a similar conversation and insulted in ways unimaginable. Two of the GOP thugs then ganged up and started insulting my wife. Saeed may remember this.

Both those bullying vermin are no longer here.

jeffeosso is another one who loves to insult and bully. Not at all surprised at how low he can go.

Please enlighten me.

WHO on the left, in ANY government, has one iota of common sense?

There is an orphan post of mine stuck in the middle of the above discussion regarding an apparent insult that was made to a member's wife.

I just want to make clear that I had nothing to do with it.

I realize that many of you are of the older side of life and may not care.
But if I couldnt find a way to be civil to someone who doesnt have my views, I'd never get laid!

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
I realize that many of you are of the older side of life and may not care.
But if I couldnt find a way to be civil to someone who doesnt have my views, I'd never get laid!

Well keep looking, Sonny, with a bit of luck it’ll happen yet!

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Notice that there is a lot less conservative side posting than in the past. I think it has to do with folks not enjoying the insults and remembering that when their side played the same tactics they got banned.

So, your hypothesis is that Trump supporters (whom you mislabel "conservatives") are so thin-skinned they cannot endure an insult or two insults to make their point? Maybe. There IS a lot of whining from Trump on down through the layers of his lackeys that they are treated unfairly--like it's unfair to call a lie a lie.

I think your thin-skinned hypothesis is only partly right. The other part is that these Trump supporters can't make a reasoned, supportable case for defending their cult leader. Their knickers get twisted because someone calls them on it.

And then they blame a few insults. If they paid less attention to the insults than to those who try to engage them civilly, maybe they wouldn't feel so wounded.

Being called a Cunt, a Cocksucker or dumb motherfucker are not simple insults. They are fighting words.

When confronted one has two choices, fight (escalate) or retreat (leave the argument).

Myself, I've never made hollow threats or escalated an internet encounter. it is just too easy to walk away. After all, with very, very few exceptions, these are people I don't know and will never meet.

I'm only telling you why I (nobody else) don't visit much anymore. I can't speak for others.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
There is an orphan post of mine stuck in the middle of the above discussion regarding an apparent insult that was made to a member's wife.

I just want to make clear that I had nothing to do with it.

Mike,

You have never been of such low character as to insult someone's family member to try to defend a traitor.

A few years ago I would have bet heavily that no American was.

The getting laid part is easy, trying to get through that I am not long term relationship material is hard. Ever try telling a woman you dont feel love ,hate, grief, or any of those feelings they want? Just no wires connected in the brain for them. They like the muscle and the scars, and think they can change the rest.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
I respect Lane's willingness to stand toe-to-toe and duke it out...even if he is wrong most of the time.

Lane's point seems to be that the Democratic alternatives to voting Republican are crap.
I agree, just can't see wasting a vote that could go to a Libertarian with views closer to my own.

I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

I take it you think he would be comfortable doing the herding; that's the things about opinions, lots of folks have them.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

Mike -

You just said it yourself. He supports the Trump agenda. As do I for the most part.

Far more in agreement with Trumps, than with Harris.

I'll say it again, as a person and his character, I find him repugnant. But I don't need to like the president, I need him to just put America first, every time.

Like the border.

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

This...^^^^^^^^^^

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

To the best of my knowledge there are not, currently, either ovens or "showers" being used to get rid of "undesirables"; if you have information to the contrary I'm all ears.

We've seen the blind support for Trump and his attacks on lawful Haitian immigrants who are doing work they were asked to come and do, Trump's plans for "mass deportations" that would require what any intelligent person would recognize as concentration camps, calls for "denaturalization", stripping citizenship from those who DID follow all the Rules and come here "the right way" (it's unclear if Melania would be allowed to stay, although she clearly committed Fraud when she claimed a college degree she never earned on her citizenship application, leading to the "chain migration" Republicans deplore. Deporting her would likely be much cheaper than her pre-nup.)

Is forfeiture of citizenship for natural-born citizens who don't support Trump with sufficient enthusiasm up next? We know that ending the "birth-right" citizenship the Constitution grants is one of Trump's goals.

Since you clearly know little history go do a little reading on how Germany got to the ovens and showers stage, and see how much of it aligns with the Trump rhetoric Lane and the rest of the MAGAts support.

Do I think Lane (along with lots of MAGAts) could put on a black SS uniform? I would be entirely unsurprised to learn he has one that fits, complete with daggar, for purely "historical" reasons, of course.

Do I think he has committed any act that would earn him a rope at Nuremberg? I have not a single iota of evidence he has. None. Not even a hint.

Given the right circumstances do I think he has the arrogance and self-importance that would lead him to do so?

You bet your ass.

For a woman who has done absolutely nothing to you personally, Melania sure gets under your skin jeffi. Give up the hate, it will make your day go better.

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
For a woman who has done absolutely nothing to you personally, Melania sure gets under your skin jeffi. Give up the hate, it will make your day go better.

Malaria made herself a public figure by campaigning with and for the worst President in American history, and serves as a clear highlight of the hypocrisy endemic in the Republican Party, which preaches morality while lauding a former "escort", excoriates a porn star who exposed Trump's fraud while letting another desecrate the White House and destroy the Rose Garden, which professes to abhor illegal immigration while electing a man whose Slovenian rental wife got her citizenship under VERY shady circumstances. What "special ability" qualified her for a coveted "Einstein Visa", and when is that press conference to clear everything up that Trump promised?

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
For a woman who has done absolutely nothing to you personally, Melania sure gets under your skin jeffi. Give up the hate, it will make your day go better.

Hate?

Trump is super charging it!

And instead of focusing on Trump, it's Melania who gets you cranked.
If they get back in the WH, I'll make sure to bring up everytime I see her on TV. Give you something to vent about.

quote:

Originally posted by theback40:
And instead of focusing on Trump, it's Melania who gets you cranked.
If they get back in the WH, I'll make sure to bring up everytime I see her on TV. Give you something to vent about.

What makes you think she'll be there? She's not campaigning with her "husband", pretty-well unprecedented in American politics, and is rarely at Mar-A-Lago.

Trump has been more more affectionate with Laura Loomer in public in the last two weeks than he has with Malaria since his Fraud trial exposed everything.

With Barron in school in New York (why send him to such a hell-hole, it's been ruined by Democrats!) I don't think her apron strings will reach to Florida; word is she's ensconced at Trump Tower.

This has ALWAYS been the "long drop" keeping the other forums free of 'kak'. Like asking to have your own *starfish* shut down because it stinks so.

Someone's jealous because Donnie is tapping that ass!!!

[IMG][/IMG]

quote:

Originally posted by Huvius:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:
I'm not sure that I accept that Lane's view is, I am only voting for Trump because that is a vote against Harris. Listen to Lane's commentary here, I think Lane wholly supports the Trump agenda. His comments about Trump not being his choice, writing in other candidates, etc., candidly, when viewed against his positions on issues you cannot help but take such comments with a grain of salt. I do not think his vote is a vote against Harris, I think it is 100% a vote for Trump. I also think that is more than just a distinction without a difference.

I don't think Lane would be comfortable herding "undesirables" into the showers or ovens, but he'd do it.

I think he'd be quite comfortable keeping the tally if somebody else did the herding.

See, if you really believed that, you would want him dead or maybe do the killing yourself, right?
You’d be some sort of hero in your own mind.

This is what has destroyed the fun of the crater.
Used to be that you could join in, share your thoughts, exchange barbs and move on.
You just don’t seem to have the capacity for that style of exchange.

See, this is an example of being thin-skinned.

If you don't like what somebody says, and they're being insulting, and you don't want to stoop to their level...

IGNORE THEM!

Ignoring them is the most devastating response, as they are probably insulting you to get your attention.

quote:

Originally posted by regor's ghost:
Someone's jealous because Donnie is tapping that ass!!!

[IMG]

from Imgflip Meme Generator

[/IMG]

I wouldn't "tap" that with rental equipment.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by regor's ghost:
Someone's jealous because Donnie is tapping that ass!!!

[IMG]

from Imgflip Meme Generator

[/IMG]

I wouldn't "tap" that with rental equipment.

Ah yes, a Democrat................

...not to many people would stick around whilst their partner shows how little respect they have for them by repeatedly cheating ...