THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Bud Lite goes woke...... Login/Join 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Abortion is always a rationalization.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21790 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DuggaBoye:
quote:
So do you order scrambled chickens for breakfast?


and
there you go-
proving my point about slippery slope

killing no longer matters

ONLY the verbiage matters


You have no problem with killing, you have told us that. A non viable fetus is not a human. These things are best left to the woman to decide, not you.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21790 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
These things are best left to the woman to decide


So, are you opposed to the SCOTUS decision to gut Row v Wade?


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21790 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


24 weeks according to the NIH:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...th%20GA%3C25%20weeks.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DuggaBoye:
and
you care ,
because?
Wink


Frankly it doesn’t matter to me but I strongly suspect you think it makes you look more erudite- it doesn’t. And, of course, you didn’t answer the question…… Roll Eyes


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13598 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
These things are best left to the woman to decide


So, are you opposed to the SCOTUS decision to gut Row v Wade?


Correct
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
These things are best left to the woman to decide


So, are you opposed to the SCOTUS decision to gut Row v Wade?


Correct


Hummm. Thanks


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21790 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by DuggaBoye:
and
you care ,
because?
Wink


Frankly it doesn’t matter to me but I strongly suspect you think it makes you look more erudite- it doesn’t. And, of course, you didn’t answer the question…… Roll Eyes


another preumptive ass-

you type your way,
i’ll type mine


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4594 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


24 weeks according to the NIH:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...th%20GA%3C25%20weeks.


Well, I disagree. Viability is determined from the moment of conception. Other factors may play into it, but given the natural course, viability is certain. Time, such as 24 weeks is arbitrary.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21790 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


24 weeks according to the NIH:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...th%20GA%3C25%20weeks.


Well, I disagree. Viability is determined from the moment of conception. Other factors may play into it, but given the natural course, viability is certain. Time, such as 24 weeks is arbitrary.


So how does a fetus at say 12 weeks survive outside the womb? It does not, therefore it is not considered viable.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
quote:
These things are best left to the woman to decide, - -.


And-
if and when she smothers the 1 month old-

that somehow you see as remarkably different-

yet,the fetus and the 1 month old are both totally dependent upon her (or at least someone)


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4594 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


24 weeks according to the NIH:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...th%20GA%3C25%20weeks.


Well, I disagree. Viability is determined from the moment of conception. Other factors may play into it, but given the natural course, viability is certain. Time, such as 24 weeks is arbitrary.


Try putting a zygote in a Petri dish and see how long it survives…


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13598 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


24 weeks according to the NIH:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...th%20GA%3C25%20weeks.


Well, I disagree. Viability is determined from the moment of conception. Other factors may play into it, but given the natural course, viability is certain. Time, such as 24 weeks is arbitrary.


Try putting a zygote in a Petri dish and see how long it survives…


Oh there you go with science again......
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
quote:
24 weeks according to the NIH:


and
i personally know 20 weekers that are now nearly adults


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4594 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


Well, for what it’s worth, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Nursing, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Public Health Physicians, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Nurse-Midwives, American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society, American Medical Women’s Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, Council of University Chairs of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality, North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, National Medical Association, National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women’s Health, Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Society of Family Planning, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Society of OB/GYN Hospitalists, all agree that it is the first point in pregnancy at which fetal life can be medically sustained outside the pregnant person’s body. Generally 23 to 24 weeks by medical consensus. But what in the hell do they know.


Mike
 
Posts: 21861 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
So how does a fetus at say 12 weeks survive outside the womb? It does not, therefore it is not considered viable.


Apparently that's the key argument.

So, let's reduce it to viability.

Is a newborn viable without milk?

Is the unborn viable without the womb?

It's a matter of timing and need. It's the same critter, different stages of development.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21790 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
quote:
Try putting a zygote in a Petri dish and see how long it survives


Dr D
how long will you survive if locked up with only a petri dish?


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4594 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
How would you treat gender dysphoria?

Feel free to consult with our veterinarian.


As previously mentioned several times, the Vet has a fairly good handle on biology and physiology, but anyway,....

Were it me in my house with my two step kids and daughter, I would "treat" gender dysphoria with love and compassion, truck loads of caution and so to speak conservatism, with generous helpings of education and sought out wisdom.

Meaning, immediate should be obviously continued care for the child. Consideration and recognition of their feelings with some accomodations like wardrobe and activities, i.e., if they now think their a boy I'm not going to force pink skirts, if they think they're now a girl I'm not going to force boys sports teams. If switching bathrooms and lockerrooms is suddenly an issue I know a couple meetings with school staff could make for accomodations like unisex or their own bathroom, private dressing rooms and the like. It would be outrageous for me or any other family of a 12 year old boy to suddenly insist he be called Shirley and he's the new girls volleyball team star player.

I would advise mine or any kid that just because they feel it's now time for this 180 reversal of any kind doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the world is and so all their change will have to come incrementally, slowly, in baby steps. If you want to grow your hair out, that's fine, no, we're not scheduling sex change surgery this summer before school starts.

Finally, yeah, for now Daddy does know best. I take full responsibility for my kids, their triumphs are my fault, their failures are entirely my fault. I bear sole responsibility for my offsprings travels down the path to adulthood and it's my job to keep them on that path and minimize the stubbed toes so they can make progress on the path. On the way to adulthood exploration off the path is limited.

Especially considering our history, modern parents should see plainly that children need guidelines, parameters, boundaries. "Youth" isn't a meadow of endless pleasures and distractions to prance thru and the two adults that made that kid should be, can be best suited to guide on the "Straight and Narrow".


Scott that was well thought out and well written. I agree 100% with everything you wrote except about their success and their failures....

We all have different strengths and failures...you show a lot of strength.
 
Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DuggaBoye
posted Hide Post
good night, Gracie
(collectively)


DuggaBoye-O
NRA-Life
Whittington-Life
TSRA-Life
DRSS
DSC
HSC
SCI
 
Posts: 4594 | Location: TX | Registered: 03 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm's judgment is skewed by his religion and politics.


. . . in spades.


Everyones judgement is skewed by their beliefs and politics.
We shouldn't make that the detriment of others without first recognising our own.


But most of us believe in keeping our beliefs at home and allowing others to live a life consistent with their own beliefs, not Lane though, he knows what is best for everyone.


Yeah....that's why we have drag queen story hour and a same sex couple on every television add and sitcom......

.
 
Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm's judgment is skewed by his religion and politics.


. . . in spades.


Everyones judgement is skewed by their beliefs and politics.
We shouldn't make that the detriment of others without first recognising our own.


But most of us believe in keeping our beliefs at home and allowing others to live a life consistent with their own beliefs, not Lane though, he knows what is best for everyone.


Yeah....that's why we have drag queen story hour and a same sex couple on every television add and sitcom......

.


Were you forced to attend story hour or watch one of those sit coms?
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
quote:
Show me in the New Testament where Jesus or the Apostle books continue to Old Testament condemnation on gay marriage/union.


Here's four.

Romans 1:26–27:

"For this reason [viz. idolatry], God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for even their females exchanged the natural use for that which is contrary to nature, and likewise also the males, having left the natural use of the female, were inflamed by their lust for one another, males with males, committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was fitting for their error."

1 Corinthians 6:9-10:

"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind"

1 Timothy 1:9-10:

"Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine"

JUde 1:7:

"Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire."

Now, since you brought religion into the conversation, you make the common mistake that Jesus and the New Testament, discarded the Old Testament.
This isn't at all true. They built upon the Jewish Law and traditions.

You seem to uphold the validity of transgenderism based on establishing truth through consensus.
Enough people believe it's OK so everybody has to accept it as OK. (?)
I'd submit that more Americans believe that Jesus Christ is Lord and the Son of God than believe that a man can attain female status just by desire or through body modification.
So, where does that leave us? The majority wins?
Of course, you guys would have none of that.


Simply outstanding!
 
Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
How would you treat gender dysphoria?

Feel free to consult with our veterinarian.


As previously mentioned several times, the Vet has a fairly good handle on biology and physiology, but anyway,....

Were it me in my house with my two step kids and daughter, I would "treat" gender dysphoria with love and compassion, truck loads of caution and so to speak conservatism, with generous helpings of education and sought out wisdom.

Meaning, immediate should be obviously continued care for the child. Consideration and recognition of their feelings with some accomodations like wardrobe and activities, i.e., if they now think their a boy I'm not going to force pink skirts, if they think they're now a girl I'm not going to force boys sports teams. If switching bathrooms and lockerrooms is suddenly an issue I know a couple meetings with school staff could make for accomodations like unisex or their own bathroom, private dressing rooms and the like. It would be outrageous for me or any other family of a 12 year old boy to suddenly insist he be called Shirley and he's the new girls volleyball team star player.

I would advise mine or any kid that just because they feel it's now time for this 180 reversal of any kind doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the world is and so all their change will have to come incrementally, slowly, in baby steps. If you want to grow your hair out, that's fine, no, we're not scheduling sex change surgery this summer before school starts.

Finally, yeah, for now Daddy does know best. I take full responsibility for my kids, their triumphs are my fault, their failures are entirely my fault. I bear sole responsibility for my offsprings travels down the path to adulthood and it's my job to keep them on that path and minimize the stubbed toes so they can make progress on the path. On the way to adulthood exploration off the path is limited.

Especially considering our history, modern parents should see plainly that children need guidelines, parameters, boundaries. "Youth" isn't a meadow of endless pleasures and distractions to prance thru and the two adults that made that kid should be, can be best suited to guide on the "Straight and Narrow".


Scott that was well thought out and well written. I agree 100% with everything you wrote except about their success and their failures....

We all have different strengths and failures...you show a lot of strength.


I didn't see that post previously.

But WOW. Scott, you are special.


*************
Real conservatives aren't radicalized. Thus "radicalized conservative" is an oxymoron. Yet there are many radicalized republicans.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Per my far-right friend: "reality sucks"

D.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr. Qualifications: flatulence - mental, oral and anal.



 
Posts: 21790 | Location: Depends on the Season | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
Hypocrisy here, no?

Lane pushes traditional Christian values and you push modern social conformism.

You both are doing the same act, and you are both convinced you are right.

Both sides have some serious flaws, especially when being enforced by zealots.

quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm's judgment is skewed by his religion and politics.


. . . in spades.


Everyones judgement is skewed by their beliefs and politics.
We shouldn't make that the detriment of others without first recognising our own.


But most of us believe in keeping our beliefs at home and allowing others to live a life consistent with their own beliefs, not Lane though, he knows what is best for everyone.


The only thing I'm pushing is equal and fair treatment for everybody and taking the position that all or even a significant number of transgender people are pedophiles or have pedophilic tendencies or that they want to normalize pedophilia is bullshit.

All of this goes to the statement I made the other day: transgender issues have replaced abortion for the far right whackos.



Ive genuinely missed where this was said. Can you save me the effort of reading through it all to find that statement?

What I have seen outside this forum is that there is a small group that is aligning itself with the lbgtq community that do wish to normalise such. Elon Musk made a point yesterday of banning such a person from Twitter and saying not here, never here.


I dong care if a,man wants to wear a dress and pretend he's a woman, just keep it out of my face and away from my children.....

.
 
Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
Hypocrisy here, no?

Lane pushes traditional Christian values and you push modern social conformism.

You both are doing the same act, and you are both convinced you are right.

Both sides have some serious flaws, especially when being enforced by zealots.

quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm's judgment is skewed by his religion and politics.


. . . in spades.


Everyones judgement is skewed by their beliefs and politics.
We shouldn't make that the detriment of others without first recognising our own.


But most of us believe in keeping our beliefs at home and allowing others to live a life consistent with their own beliefs, not Lane though, he knows what is best for everyone.


Actually, no. My premise is pretty much always the same, mind your own damn business. Something that is a foreign concept to Lane. I couldn't care less how he worships, or what he does in the privacy of his home. The same cannot be said for Lane, in this very thread he happily admitted to wanting to bring Jesus to everyone, whether they want it or not. Hardly the same Dr. Butler and I think you can see the difference as well.


Mind your own damn business......hmmm...... Privacy of you own home.......hmmm.......

Did you daughter get bumped off the varsity girls swim team by a guy? Did that guy wanting to be a,woman keep it in privacy of its own home??!!

Has your daughter been in the locker room shower with a guy wanting to be a woman????? Did that guy keep it in his own home?????

Christians need to keep it in their own home......not the mentally deranged? They need to be mainstream, right?

Hypocrisy runs rampant on the left.......
 
Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
Libertarian? Really?

Libertarians do not advocate for religion brought to you via the Government, that is what fundamentalists do.

From the libertarian party website: "as Libertarians, we all fundamentally respect each other’s rights to worship and live our lives as we choose and to make sure the government stays out of it."

https://www.lp.org/what-religion-are-libertarians/


That is not you Lane, you repeatedly advocate for using the Government to cram Christianity down the throats of the unwilling.

Just be honest about your positions, there is nothing Libertarian about them.


Exactly what part of Christianity do I advocate government to cram down anyone’s throat? coffee


Have you forgotten the School prayer discussion that you started? That would be a prime example.....

A lot of schools “want” prayer. They should be “allowed” to have them IF they choose — no mandate. I know, a very libertarian way of seeing things. Wink

Your position on abortion would be another.

My position on abortion is supported by my faith…but…I have seen 60-90 day fetuses struggle to live and evade death. They are the most innocent and voiceless life form on earth. I abhor killing them. They don’t want to be killed.

How we are willing to treat this most innocent and helpless human life says a lot about our society. Giving them a voice is NOTHING but good.


My views on abortion are based upon facts. Murder is murder, forcible stopping a humans heart from beating is murder. Then throw faith on top of that????? Its murder of the defenseless.

I know, I know lefties want no personal responsibility, hedonism is their goal......
 
Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Except according to the Old Testament until the fetus reaches a certain development, it is not murder.

The fetus is not a life. Causing a miscarriage alone Carries only a fine to the husband. Of course, we see the property rights of the man at play.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12178933/

https://religionnews.com/2020/...-say-about-abortion/

Argue the versus; not me.
 
Posts: 12608 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
I think calling abortion murder, taking the position that abortion should be banned outright, etc. are usually shouted the loudest by those that have never found themselves in a situation where their child or wife was raped and impregnated, a niece was the victim of incest, a family member was told their fetus had some serious, incurable defect, etc. They have never had any skin in the game yet they pontificate that a one size fits all answer is appropriate. You have to wonder if they ever found themselves in the situation how would they feel to be told, tough luck you have no choice your wife or daughter is going to have to carry that bastard’s child to term, you are going to just have to find a way to cope with an incurable defect that leaves your child a vegetable, etc. My guess is many would still be screaming just screaming about the injustice of the result.


Mike
 
Posts: 21861 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
So how does a fetus at say 12 weeks survive outside the womb? It does not, therefore it is not considered viable.


Apparently that's the key argument.

So, let's reduce it to viability.

Is a newborn viable without milk?

Is the unborn viable without the womb?

It's a matter of timing and need. It's the same critter, different stages of development.


Sophistry at its best. How any angels can dance on the head of a pin?? coffee


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13598 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
quote:
A non viable fetus is not a human.


So what is a viable fetus?


Well, for what it’s worth, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Nursing, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Public Health Physicians, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Nurse-Midwives, American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society, American Medical Women’s Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, Council of University Chairs of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality, North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, National Medical Association, National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women’s Health, Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Society of Family Planning, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Society of OB/GYN Hospitalists, all agree that it is the first point in pregnancy at which fetal life can be medically sustained outside the pregnant person’s body. Generally 23 to 24 weeks by medical consensus. But what in the hell do they know.


Don’t confuse laymen with consensus medical opinion. It’s like teaching a pig to dance. Frustrates you and bores the pig….. shame


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13598 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Always these topics become all or nothing.

Thats the politics of an easy answer and having everything your way.

There has been some really good information amongst all that in tis thread. Im a libertarian and so I fall back on its a womens right to choose. However some of Dr Butlers info actually has me tempering that slightly.

ME Id suggest that the consensus you posted from the medical community is a good point to start.

I still beleive abortion should be legal, but Also that the govt should be putting its effort into ensuring that any woman can not get to the position of needing an abortion without fully being aware of better alternatives such as safe sex, contraception etc. Because there really is an option available/suitble for almost every situation.
When you think about it, any need for an abortion is a failure of our society.
 
Posts: 4833 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Mind your own damn business......hmmm...... Privacy of you own home.......hmmm.......

Did you daughter get bumped off the varsity girls swim team by a guy? Did that guy wanting to be a,woman keep it in privacy of its own home??!!

Has your daughter been in the locker room shower with a guy wanting to be a woman????? Did that guy keep it in his own home?????

Christians need to keep it in their own home......not the mentally deranged? They need to be mainstream, right?

Hypocrisy runs rampant on the left.......


You're not making sense. Please explain what the transgenderism issue has to do with abortion.

Usually your posts about the hypocrisy of the left can easily be flipped around to show the hypocrisy of the right. Not here--because you make no sense.

No one is trying to impose transgenderism on Christians. But Christians are trying to impose their morality on others. The abortion issue is a prime example. You insist that women be brood mares, yet you squawk about paying taxes to support the offspring. Talk about hypocrites--Christians take first place!
 
Posts: 7022 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
Just absolutely the worst topic ever.

I'll go out on a limb and suggest that most of us here are feminists, I certainly am.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminism

Id think no one here wants to or likes to see their daughters or other female loved ones discriminated against. But our daughters and female loved ones were once zygotes, fetuses.

I plan for, work for and hope for my daughters unequivocal success and triumph in every situation and moment.

I could imagine that allowing or planning for a loved ones abortion is to plan for failure on my part. What a nightmare.
 
Posts: 9633 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
Hypocrisy here, no?

Lane pushes traditional Christian values and you push modern social conformism.

You both are doing the same act, and you are both convinced you are right.

Both sides have some serious flaws, especially when being enforced by zealots.

quote:
Originally posted by skb:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm's judgment is skewed by his religion and politics.


. . . in spades.


Everyones judgement is skewed by their beliefs and politics.
We shouldn't make that the detriment of others without first recognising our own.


But most of us believe in keeping our beliefs at home and allowing others to live a life consistent with their own beliefs, not Lane though, he knows what is best for everyone.


Actually, no. My premise is pretty much always the same, mind your own damn business. Something that is a foreign concept to Lane. I couldn't care less how he worships, or what he does in the privacy of his home. The same cannot be said for Lane, in this very thread he happily admitted to wanting to bring Jesus to everyone, whether they want it or not. Hardly the same Dr. Butler and I think you can see the difference as well.


Mind your own damn business......hmmm...... Privacy of you own home.......hmmm.......

Did you daughter get bumped off the varsity girls swim team by a guy? Did that guy wanting to be a,woman keep it in privacy of its own home??!!

Has your daughter been in the locker room shower with a guy wanting to be a woman????? Did that guy keep it in his own home?????

Christians need to keep it in their own home......not the mentally deranged? They need to be mainstream, right?

Hypocrisy runs rampant on the left.......


You seem to be doing well spouting off your hypocrisy. You wanting control over someone and the actions they take is hardly the same as tranny want to be left alone.

I will say it again, why don't you mind your own damn business and worry about you and your family instead of what somebody else does in their home?

Anybody who does not agree with your far right agenda is labeled a lefty.

Those damn hedonists anyway. What is your issue with them? Did they not invite your old uptight ass to the party? Poor you.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
I think calling abortion murder, taking the position that abortion should be banned outright, etc. are usually shouted the loudest by those that have never found themselves in a situation where their child or wife was raped and impregnated, a niece was the victim of incest, a family member was told their fetus had some serious, incurable defect, etc. They have never had any skin in the game yet they pontificate that a one size fits all answer is appropriate. You have to wonder if they ever found themselves in the situation how would they feel to be told, tough luck you have no choice your wife or daughter is going to have to carry that bastard’s child to term, you are going to just have to find a way to cope with an incurable defect that leaves your child a vegetable, etc. My guess is many would still be screaming just screaming about the injustice of the result.


No skin in the game, exactly. A bunch of old men who do not have to deal with the issue of an unwanted pregnancy.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
When you think about it, any need for an abortion is a failure of our society.


Exactly!!!!

.
 
Posts: 42463 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
quote:
When you think about it, any need for an abortion is a failure of our society.


Exactly!!!!

.


If you look around a bit you will notice that humans are prone to failure.

Additionally, even our very best birth control has a failure rate of 1-2%, multiply that across the number of sexually active people in a country of 330 million people and you end up with quite a few unintended pregnancies. There are 46 million women in this country of reproductive age that use BC of some form, at a 1% failure rate that 460,000 unintended pregnancies in a year.
 
Posts: 3770 | Location: Boulder Colorado | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
And the Faction has moved to attacking birth control access.

They have obtained rulings in Texas, and have a vocal supporter in Justice Thomas on the S. Ct.

They ignore the 50 years of precedent such judicial activism is breaking.
 
Posts: 12608 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
One of the docs can step in here but,...
I dont think skb's math is correct.
BC has a 1-2% failure rate per intercourse, not 1-2% flat out numbers of women.
 
Posts: 7437 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: