I've posted links and quotes from the actual Mueller report here in the past, and won't repeat myself just to expose lies about it.

Here's what Wiki has to say about Part 1 of the report:

The report states that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was illegal and occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion",[10][11][12] and was welcomed by the Trump campaign as it expected to benefit from such efforts.[13][14][15] It also identified multiple links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies,[16] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[4] Mueller later stated that his investigation's findings of Russian interference "deserves the attention of every American".

Can either of you two legal geniuses show me a conviction of a crime that had a single solitary iota of substance to do with the 2016 election?

The Russian Collusion narrative was the biggest hoax ever perpetrated onto the American people.

The Mueller investigation was a huge waste of money that garnered zilch.

And Jeff Sessions was a spineless worm for recusing himself. Paxton and Bondi are not.

Anyone who bought into Russian Collusion narrative was gullible at best. Those who still defend it are either morons or lefty hacks.

Stone and Manafort. One had Trump pardon him, though you maintain the Trump campaign had little to do w him. The other had his sentence commuted by Trump. He is still convicted.

In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President. Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.

Flynn would have went form, but for the Executive Branch interfering. I do remember he pled guilty.

This is not some crazy, alt right Teitrrr group, but for those the cannot read books.
https://www.acslaw.org/wp-cont...-Highlights.7.19.pdf

Some more prosecutions:

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Pol...be/story?id=61219489

Rick Gates going down to Muller comes to mind.
Gates pleaded guilty in Washington, D.C. in February 2018 on counts of conspiracy against the United States and lying to federal prosecutors. Conspiracy against the U.S. government involved Russian contacts at. That is pretty heavy.

You are a joke.

Russia interference was real. You are lying.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:


Can either of you two legal geniuses show me a conviction of a crime that had a single solitary iota of substance to do with the 2016 election?

The Russian Collusion narrative was the biggest hoax ever perpetrated onto the American people.

The Mueller investigation was a huge waste of money that garnered zilch.

And Jeff Sessions was a spineless worm for recusing himself. Paxton and Bondi are not.

Anyone who bought into Russian Collusion narrative was gullible at best. Those who still defend it are either morons or lefty hacks.

Your mere unsupported declarations are meaningless, and don't alter the facts.

The cult's tentacles have snared you.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Stone and Manafort. One had Trump pardon him, though you maintain the Trump campaign had little to do w him. The other had his sentence commuted by Trump. He is still convicted.

In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President. Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.

Flynn would have went form, but for the Executive Branch interfering. I do remember he pled guilty.

This is not some crazy, alt right Teitrrr group, but for those the cannot read books.
https://www.acslaw.org/wp-cont...-Highlights.7.19.pdf

Some more prosecutions:

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Pol...be/story?id=61219489

Rick Gates going down to Muller comes to mind.
Gates pleaded guilty in Washington, D.C. in February 2018 on counts of conspiracy against the United States and lying to federal prosecutors. Conspiracy against the U.S. government involved Russian contacts at. That is pretty heavy.

You are a joke.

Russia interference was real. You are lying.

You are uneducable. As my uncle used to tell me: “It’s not a sin to be ignorant but there is no grace in remaining that way.”

Russia has interfered in every election we have had since the 1950s.

None of the convictions pursued on Gates and Manafort had anything to do with Trump or even the election itself. Roger Stone was charged with a series of process crimes having to do with questioning over Assange.

The Mueller Report found nothing nefarious on Trump and nothing unusual on the election. It was a waste of money. Mueller served as nothing more than a political hack for the Clinton Family.

Matt Taibbi did a wonderful job of investigative reporting on it and documented it in his Twitter Files thread. Mollie Hemingway at The Federalist and Catherine Herridge previously of CBS followed up on it.

The joke is on you.

You asked for convictions, you were given convictions.

Note, your response does not refute my post.

You are just trying to mislead and lie.

Muller found significant Russian interference

You can read the summary above since the actual Muller report is too complicated for you.

You are simply a lier trying to intentionally mislead folks.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
You asked for convictions, you were given convictions.

Note, your response does not refute my post.

You are just trying to mislead and lie.

Muller found significant Russian interference

You can read the summary above since the actual Muller report is too complicated for you.

You are simply a lier trying to intentionally mislead folks.

nah, man -- mueller found multiple points of contact, not "significant Russian interference" - as, to me, "significant Russian interference" means a change in outcomes, rather than buying ads, having bot armies, and "trolls" in social media ..

let's be clear, super PACs have WAY WAY WAY WAY more "significant" impact that the russian botarmy

I asked for even one conviction for anything to do the election or Russian collusion from Mueller. There were none.

Let me repeat — NONE.

Absolutely NOTHING meaningful came from Mueller’s investigation — NOTHING. It was a waste of my money.

Anyone who still defends the Russian Collusion Hoax is either a stooge or a lying left-wing partisan — you decide which.

but russia did pay bill clinton 1/2 a MILLION DOLLARS for a one hour speech and killary sold them uranium -- then killary/dns paid for the steele dossier, with multiple FISA violations, then they destroyed evidence in an federal investigation

but trump is the demon for having the nerve to talk to russians

there's that "fair and balanced" approach, approved by rachel madcow

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
but russia did pay bill clinton 1/2 a MILLION DOLLARS for a one hour speech and killary sold them uranium -- then killary/dns paid for the steele dossier, with multiple FISA violations, then they destroyed evidence in an federal investigation

but trump is the demon for having the nerve to talk to russians

there's that "fair and balanced" approach, approved by rachel madcow

So, it goes to show that lies repeated often...

But in most cases with many people it doesn't matter how much they are repeated. They were satisfying to start with - the belief in fiction thing.

https://www.politifact.com/fac...lintons-ties-russia/

Exaggerated post connects Clintons, Russia, uranium deal

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:


I asked for even one conviction for anything to do the election or Russian collusion from Mueller. There were none.

Let me repeat — NONE.

Absolutely NOTHING meaningful came from Mueller’s investigation — NOTHING. It was a waste of my money.

Anyone who still defends the Russian Collusion Hoax is either a stooge or a lying left-wing partisan — you decide which.

As I recall, in part the Mueller report said that it was up to the legislative branch to take appropriate action, which of course the "action" was basically a flipside narrative promotion.

There was plenty of evidence of collusion. As I recall "collusion" proof wasn't Mueller's goal nor the report. It was conspiracy, which is the word where sufficient evidence might be prosecutable.

There was evidence that the Wiki leaks, timing of the strategic leaks, was known by Trump through Stone. That's collusion. Being part of the hack, the transfer of the data and doled out leaks is conspiracy. Muller couldn't connect the dots.

And also, the quid pro quo of silence for pardons was a factor. To name two - Manafort and Stone.

So, basically, it's a lie that there was no collusion, and it's a distraction. Trump and Team did a good enough job to hide backdoor links, such as Patel, Prince, Stone and others, to thwart evidence sufficient for prosecution of crimes of conspiracy. That's my recollection of it.

So, believe what you want, fiction and all. I can't help that. But what I can do is not believe your fiction, which is vast and self-generating.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...fb0477ab42b918&ei=52

'I just said Ken Paxton': Witness repeats response as GOP senator 'malfunctions' during hearing
Story by Maya Boddie • 19h • 2 min read