THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Mulie taken at 493 yards with a 6.5 Grendel M4 Carbine.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Mulie taken at 493 yards with a 6.5 Grendel M4 Carbine.
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gracedog:
Well, then, take the next shot at an even more ridiculous range, then maybe the animal will still be alive when you walk up to it, then you can fix a bayonet to the rifle, and REALLY go military wanna-be on it!

yuck


Hey SMACK!

I'm not doubting your ability or your brother's, whomever made the shot.

Since you feel the need to post your "credentials" to prove you knew what you were doing, I have some too. PM me if you feel like it and I'll fill you in. Let's just say I've done well with shotguns and rifles in competition. I shoot more rounds in a week than most "wanna-bees" do in their life.

493 yards is a chipshot for anyone who shoots as much as you. My suggestion was about caliber/ballistics choice. I would have no issue at all with the shot if it was made with an adequate caliber/velocity and there's plenty of 6.5's that fit the bill.

I know sometimes happen a way you don't plan, and that's fine. I've been there. I'm glad it worked out. I hope you didn't "plan" on taking such a long shot with a round that
barely delivers enough energy for a kill on that sized GAME ANIMAL. Varmints are another issue.

Post some antler pics! He looks nice!
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of SMACK!!!!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
quote:
Originally posted by Gracedog:
Well, then, take the next shot at an even more ridiculous range, then maybe the animal will still be alive when you walk up to it, then you can fix a bayonet to the rifle, and REALLY go military wanna-be on it!

yuck


Hey SMACK!

I'm not doubting your ability or your brother's, whomever made the shot.

Since you feel the need to post your "credentials" to prove you knew what you were doing, I have some too. PM me if you feel like it and I'll fill you in. Let's just say I've done well with shotguns and rifles in competition. I shoot more rounds in a week than most "wanna-bees" do in their life.

493 yards is a chipshot for anyone who shoots as much as you. My suggestion was about caliber/ballistics choice. I would have no issue at all with the shot if it was made with an adequate caliber/velocity and there's plenty of 6.5's that fit the bill.

I know sometimes happen a way you don't plan, and that's fine. I've been there. I'm glad it worked out. I hope you didn't "plan" on taking such a long shot with a round that
barely delivers enough energy for a kill on that sized GAME ANIMAL. Varmints are another issue.

Post some antler pics! He looks nice!



There were several long range rifles there when my brother took the shot that were more than capable of leveling that buck at that distance. My brother built the rifle and shot it to accomplish what he did, take a mulie at distance and prove his point that I don't need some super cannon of a caliber to do what he just did, Point well taken bro! SHOT PLACEMENT! Holes kill things. Thanks JWP475! In a discussion with you I realized that velocity wasn't everything and my theory of the bullet needed to stop in the animal so that every bit of energy was soaked up by it was not correct, Holes kills stuff and a hole in and a hole out is better than just one hole in.


--------------------------------------------

Nothing like a trail of blood to find your way back home.
 
Posts: 778 | Location: North Central Washington | Registered: 02 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of SMACK!!!!
posted Hide Post
I guess Mark Larue, owner of "Larue Tactical" and a guy definatly in the "Know how" is as crazy as my brother. He took a Elk through and through at 405 yards with one shot using the 6.5 Grendel.I from experience consider a mature bull elk much stouter than a mature Mulie.

Here is a link to Marks post on AR-15.com

http://www.ar15.com/forums/top...=219&t=164444&page=2


--------------------------------------------

Nothing like a trail of blood to find your way back home.
 
Posts: 778 | Location: North Central Washington | Registered: 02 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Flippy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SMACK!!!!:
Funny thing is, the first picture/group bellow was fired from a completely factory Rem700 ADL synthetic(319.00) with a cheap Buckridge 4-16x50 scope(80.00) This is a truck rifle I use for coyotes, go figure. All the money we put into quality equipment and the bastard child rifle shoots right with the customs at a fraction of the cost. Gotta love it!
Yes you do.

Nice hunting, and shooting BTW.
 
Posts: 1700 | Location: Lurking somewhere around SpringTucky Oregon | Registered: 18 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nothing new in this thread. Guy makes a good shot, everything works like it's supposed to, and folks who can't believe such a shot can't be done tell us it's irresponsible. Only if you are not practiced enough. My experience favors bullet construction and placement more than ME. After an 18 year affair with numerous magnums, I have sold the last one and am now shooting a .270. Shots on elk, with favorable conditions, to 600 yards are fine with me. I do practice though, at ranges well beyond this. Now everyone knows Wink you can't kill elk with a lowly .270, except we've been using them around here since the round was invented and it has long been a favorite. So to you sir, Good Job, Good Shooting, and thanks for a good story.
 
Posts: 866 | Location: Western CO | Registered: 19 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah, I guess the Grendel was overkill for the muley.

Your next ballistics experiment should be with the .17 HMR. Someone on the small calibers forum smoked a Bison at 296....huge exit!
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of SMACK!!!!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
Yeah, I guess the Grendel was overkill for the muley.

Your next ballistics experiment should be with the .17 HMR. Someone on the reloading forum smoked a Bison at 296....huge exit!


I figure if a 5.56 Nato cartridge is good enough for a terrorist at any given distance then a 6.5 Grendel and a 120gr Ballistic Tip is sure good enough for a Mulie at 493 yards but then again most in their right minds have more respect for the Mulie.

Im very impressed with the Buffalo being taken with the 17 HMR, he must have accounted for spin drift and the rotation of the earth during the bullets flight time to target. horse


--------------------------------------------

Nothing like a trail of blood to find your way back home.
 
Posts: 778 | Location: North Central Washington | Registered: 02 July 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
You know, the guy going round-n-round in this thread and calling the chosen round -- the round that killed the muley, by the way -- inadequate is the same person who elected to take a shot on a coyote at a range where his 70 grain bullet was traveling just over 1300 fps, a velocity at which I can assure you the projectile did not expand.

He muffed the shot, hit the coyote in the arse and wounded it.

And now he's on the pulpit preaching about someone else's shot -- a shot that resulted in a clean kill, I might add. Hmmm... Roll Eyes


Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9452 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I knew you'd show up bt! Hahahaha!

Coyotes at 934 yards are like terrorists and steel plates; it doesn't matter where you hit 'em, it counts as a kill.

You know the story well enough not to leave out the details like the coyote was anchored and finished anyway. Hardly "muffed"! Convenient for you huh?

It seems one of the seafires shot one at around 700 with a .223 as well. Honorable mention at least?

BTW SMACK! Thanks for your service!
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
The Grendel is a bit puny for mule deer at that range IMO. 2200fps at the muzzle?

Energy at that range is around 600 ftlbs.

Might want to keep the shots under 150 yards, or just use it for coyotes...

With a 120 grain bullet at 2200 fps the energy (at least according to my ballistics calculator) is about 435 ft-lb and with a 200 yard sight-in the hold over would be about 90" or about 8'....FWIW


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
quote:
Originally posted by Gracedog:
Well, then, take the next shot at an even more ridiculous range, then maybe the animal will still be alive when you walk up to it, then you can fix a bayonet to the rifle, and REALLY go military wanna-be on it!

yuck


The Deer was taken cleanly and the bullet exitred. It is rather obvious to most that the round was certanly capable and plenty. A 338 Laupa would not have killed him any DEADER, now would it?

Hey SMACK!

I'm not doubting your ability or your brother's, whomever made the shot.

Since you feel the need to post your "credentials" to prove you knew what you were doing, I have some too. PM me if you feel like it and I'll fill you in. Let's just say I've done well with shotguns and rifles in competition. I shoot more rounds in a week than most "wanna-bees" do in their life.

493 yards is a chipshot for anyone who shoots as much as you. My suggestion was about caliber/ballistics choice. I would have no issue at all with the shot if it was made with an adequate caliber/velocity and there's plenty of 6.5's that fit the bill.

I know sometimes happen a way you don't plan, and that's fine. I've been there. I'm glad it worked out. I hope you didn't "plan" on taking such a long shot with a round that
barely delivers enough energy for a kill on that sized GAME ANIMAL. Varmints are another issue.

Post some antler pics! He looks nice!


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
quote:
Originally posted by Gracedog:
Well, then, take the next shot at an even more ridiculous range, then maybe the animal will still be alive when you walk up to it, then you can fix a bayonet to the rifle, and REALLY go military wanna-be on it!

yuck



Hey SMACK!

I'm not doubting your ability or your brother's, whomever made the shot.

Since you feel the need to post your "credentials" to prove you knew what you were doing, I have some too. PM me if you feel like it and I'll fill you in. Let's just say I've done well with shotguns and rifles in competition. I shoot more rounds in a week than most "wanna-bees" do in their life.

493 yards is a chipshot for anyone who shoots as much as you. My suggestion was about caliber/ballistics choice. I would have no issue at all with the shot if it was made with an adequate caliber/velocity and there's plenty of 6.5's that fit the bill.

I know sometimes happen a way you don't plan, and that's fine. I've been there. I'm glad it worked out. I hope you didn't "plan" on taking such a long shot with a round that
barely delivers enough energy for a kill on that sized GAME ANIMAL. Varmints are another issue.

Post some antler pics! He looks nice!



The Deer was taken cleanly and the bullet exited. It is rather obvious to most that the round was certanly capable and plenty. A 338 Laupa would not have killed him any DEADER, now would it?


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bobby Tomek:
You know, the guy going round-n-round in this thread and calling the chosen round -- the round that killed the muley, by the way -- inadequate is the same person who elected to take a shot on a coyote at a range where his 70 grain bullet was traveling just over 1300 fps, a velocity at which I can assure you the projectile did not expand.

He muffed the shot, hit the coyote in the arse and wounded it.

And now he's on the pulpit preaching about someone else's shot -- a shot that resulted in a clean kill, I might add. Hmmm... Roll Eyes



Exactly hes has no room to be talking. Double standard extreme he is


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Wow!

I didn't realize I had a pulpit!
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So anything that does the job is "adequate"?
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
So anything that does the job is "adequate"?



If it does the job, then it is obviously adequate. That's a no brainer


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
So anything that does the job is "adequate"?

IMO it's the 4th standard deviation occurrence.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
...I guarantee the bullet didn't expand...



Take a look at Nosler's site to see what "the non-expanding" bullet would look like! animal

http://www.nosler.com/Bullets/...tic-Tip-Varmint.aspx

I would think you'd know better bt. You've posted some good pics of bullets and impact velocities.



Actually, you're right! I pulled it out of the dog with my fingers and reloaded it! animal
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
I once shot a prairie dog at a (paced off) 523 long paces.....(I'm 6'-1") using a .223 Rem and a 50 grain TNT.....

Bullet went through the prairie dog like a .22 short.....in and out and absolutely no more destruction than a .223 hole in and a .223 hole out.....killed the prairie dog....

Once I had the hold over right, I could have hit a dozen of them.....and I'd have wagered more than half would have crawled down holes and died down there.

I'd be remiss to call the .223 Rem a 500 yard prairie dog gun!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
quote:
...I guarantee the bullet didn't expand...



Take a look at Nosler's site to see what "the non-expanding" bullet would look like! animal

http://www.nosler.com/Bullets/...tic-Tip-Varmint.aspx

I would think you'd know better bt. You've posted some good pics of bullets and impact velocities.



Actually, you're right! I pulled it out of the dog with my fingers and reloaded it! animal



You assume all advertisments are true and factual? Bullets in animals do not always perform as advertised and since BT has tested many I'd say that he is rather qualified to make that call


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
bt more of an authority than Nosler on its own bullets?

What a laugher!

There goes any credibility you may have had.
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
bt more of an authority than Nosler on its own bullets?

What a laugher!

There goes any credibility you may have had.


Why do you always seem to be stirring the pot?



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DesertRam:
quote:
Originally posted by Snellstrom:
And here we go!
The last four posters condemning some one elses action, please leave the guy alone and congratulate him on a nice buck and obviously a nice shot.
I will, congrats SMACK! Nice buck and good shootin'
Some won't agree with your actions but I say good shootin'.
Tell the other spoil sports to "F" off. They do this sort of thing in about every post these days.


A few days ago there was a post asking why there were fewer hunting reports this year - I believe you just struck on the reason why. If you post a hunt report here (and elsewhere for that matter), it's virtually guarunteed that someone will come along and denigrate you, your animal, your shot, or your equipment in some fashion. It's like we can no longer be happy for our fellow hunters when they're successful. If "we" don't agree with every facet of their hunt, "we" lambast them, often on a personal level. The prevalence of personal attacks have certainly increased my reluctance to post anything about my personal hunts. I don't think I've put up a picture in a couple years, despite participating in a variety of hunts that I thought were very enjoyable and successful. It's a shame, because I really like seeing others' successful hunts.

Nice buck, nice shot. Just because others wouldn't make the shot (I'm in the category) or couldn't make the shot (I'm probably in that category too Big Grin), don't let them drag you or your buddy down and lessen your enjoyment of the hunt. Be responsible, be ethical, know your limitations, obey the law, and have a good time.


Very well said.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
whitworth,

I'm bored and it's fun to stir the pot!
I like to cook.
And joust with guys who have a warped idea of ballistics!
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
bt more of an authority than Nosler on its own bullets?

What a laugher!

There goes any credibility you may have had.




Bullets are often shown with perfect expansion a lower velocities by thier makers. Vapodogs, results below are typicl of many. Many bullets from makers do not expand as advertised on game with real world results.

The best way to know whomn has zero credibility is to look in the mirror as your knowledge base and experience is limited to google



quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
I once shot a prairie dog at a (paced off) 523 long paces.....(I'm 6'-1") using a .223 Rem and a 50 grain TNT.....

Bullet went through the prairie dog like a .22 short.....in and out and absolutely no more destruction than a .223 hole in and a .223 hole out.....killed the prairie dog....

Once I had the hold over right, I could have hit a dozen of them.....and I'd have wagered more than half would have crawled down holes and died down there.

I'd be remiss to call the .223 Rem a 500 yard prairie dog gun!


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
whitworth,

I'm bored and it's fun to stir the pot!
I like to cook.
And joust with guys who have a warped idea of ballistics!


Warped idea of ballistics? Believing in ME is about as warped as it gets.......



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
whitworth,

I'm bored and it's fun to stir the pot!
I like to cook.

And joust with guys who have a warped idea of ballistics!




Calling a round that worked perfectly "inadequate" is definately wrarped


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jwp475:
Calling a round that worked perfectly "inadequate" is definately wrarped

Calling a 4th standard deviation occurrence normal
is warped IMO.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted Hide Post
Everyone knows a long shot can go wrong ..but in this case it didnt.

So congrats!!

My longest shot I made was 360 yards on a Sitka Blacktail with a 300 win mag and 180 grain Ballistic tip bullets. I raked the ribcage and the bullet never entered the chest allowing the deer to escape until my buddy found it trotting along at 150 yards and neck shot it with a 340 wby. So I guess some could say my 300 winny combo is no good for 360 yards. rotflmo

To me a boiler room shot and pass through is good in my book any time.


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
How do you "rake a rib cage"?

Deer facing to or away and the shot down the side?
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hey jwp475c3po,

Just got back from the mirror.

You're right. I feel like such a rube!

You know, to be thinking of larger caliber rifles with heavy for caliber bullets with lots of energy and big BC's to minimize wind drift for shooting big game like mule deer and elk!

I can't believe I wasted all that time, $, & effort!

And now I've learned in this thread that all you need to kill 800 to 1000 pound game animals at 400 yards is this really economical tacticool cartridge.

Thanks for setting me straight!

I'd use my p-dog and coyote rigs, but they're probably overkill for such feeble animals because of the velocity. At least you've given me a good reason to get rid of some unnecessary stuff and start a new project.
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted Hide Post
I hit the deer at the last rib (exactly where I wanted) and the deer was quartering away. The bullet followed the ribcage and under the shoulder to stop on the hide at the point of the shoulder. Got about 24" of penetration just outside of the chest not in it :P.


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RMiller:
I hit the deer at the last rib (exactly where I wanted) and the deer was quartering away. The bullet followed the ribcage and under the shoulder to stop on the hide at the point of the shoulder. Got about 24" of penetration just outside of the chest not in it :P.



Weird!
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bobby Tomek:

"He muffed the shot, hit the coyote in the arse and wounded it...


The internet and guys on the forums are funny.

Where else can a shot on a coyote at about 1000 yards where the difference in the hit was from the "X" ring to the "10" ring be perceived as "muffed"? Ha!

Even the guy who won the F class Nationals shot "10's"!

Hilarious!

R
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Smack - That's some pretty impressive shooting. No need to prove to anyone that you're a good shot. Continue doing what you're doing. Have fun and be well.
 
Posts: 265 | Registered: 11 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
quote:
Originally posted by jwp475:
Calling a round that worked perfectly "inadequate" is definately wrarped

Calling a 4th standard deviation occurrence normal
is warped IMO.




Your proof on the 4th standard deviation is???


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
Hey jwp475c3po,

Just got back from the mirror.

You're right. I feel like such a rube!

You know, to be thinking of larger caliber rifles with heavy for caliber bullets with lots of energy and big BC's to minimize wind drift for shooting big game like mule deer and elk!

I can't believe I wasted all that time, $, & effort!

And now I've learned in this thread that all you need to kill 800 to 1000 pound game animals at 400 yards is this really economical tacticool cartridge.

Thanks for setting me straight!

I'd use my p-dog and coyote rigs, but they're probably overkill for such feeble animals because of the velocity. At least you've given me a good reason to get rid of some unnecessary stuff and start a new project.



You should be since 493 is not long range. Long range doesn't start untill about 600 yards. 493 yards is medium range


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hey bt!

Just checked out your "ancient bow+ modern adventure=my first archery deer" thread!

I had to take you off of "ignore" to try to see the photos that you posted of your recurve that you had been shooting strung backwards animal!!!

When I took you off I was disappointed to see that you had conveniently removed all the pics Confused

Can you please post them here or revive the thread? I'm sure folks will be interested since you're an authority on so many hunting and shooting topics!
animal jumping animal rotflmo rotflmo jumping
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 3427 | Registered: 05 August 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Brain1
posted Hide Post
If it were me, I wouldn't go around admitting in public I could only get 493 yards from a deer. Lazy hunting.


You can borrow money, but you can't borrow time. Don't wait, go now.
Savannah Safaris Namibia
Otjitambi Trails & Safaris
DRSS
NRA
SCI
DSC
TSRA
TMPA
 
Posts: 1270 | Location: Bridgeport, Tx | Registered: 20 May 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Hunting  Hop To Forums  American Big Game Hunting    Mulie taken at 493 yards with a 6.5 Grendel M4 Carbine.

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia