THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
9.3X62 or 9.3X64??
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted
As I bounce around the idea of a 9.3. Which do you guys suggest.

I have a MKX standard action, a nice stock blank waiting on a barrel. Would go with a Lothar Walther barrel. So you 9.3 experts. Which would you use and why.

While I don't really need it I have that empty 9.3 gap in the safe.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of boilerroom
posted Hide Post
Do you mean a lite weight barrel (LW)?

I know the barrel makers I looked at here only offer it in Med and up.


-------------------------------
Too many people........
 
Posts: 4326 | Location: Under the North Star! | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
Sorry I got lazy. Make that a Lothar Walther barrel.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Lothar Walther = LW

You need about .25 inch plus your major bore diameter, which puts your barrel at muzzel @ .616 ". That works out to a #3 Douglas contour.

Your choice of barrel is your dollars, so I ultimaletly ends up on who you like. I personally am going to use LW on my 9.3 as I have spoke many times with Woodie, he knows his stuff, and all the feedback I have is positive.
 
Posts: 1486 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 28 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of boilerroom
posted Hide Post
I see. Red Face

Great choice if you can afford it.


-------------------------------
Too many people........
 
Posts: 4326 | Location: Under the North Star! | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
LW, Lothar Walther.

The 9.3x62 is practically a screw on the barrel & go project. The 9.3x64 requires at a minimum, that you open up the boltface & extractor.




Aut vincere aut mori
 
Posts: 4865 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I prefer the 9.3x62 as the brass is easier to get in B.C. and the recoil is considerably less with 286 PTs. My current 9.3x62 is a gorgeous pre-war sporter with all the goodies and, although nearly 80 yrs. old, it shoots sub m.o.a.

I am going to get Bill to build me a light 9.3x62 on a Brno 21h action I have and a Bevan King barrel is my choice. Bevan tells me that he usually turns to Douglas contours, so, a No. 3 will do the trick and give me a light packing rifle for an ornery, old fart like me....suits the squarehead part of my Canuckian personality, too!
 
Posts: 1379 | Location: British Columbia | Registered: 02 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'd go with the 9.3x62. As zlr said, it's "practically a screw on the barrel & go project". If you need 9.3x64 ballistics, then simply use the .375 H&H. Much easier to get brass (and a rifle) for the .375 H&H than the 9.3x64 here in North America. And the .375 H&H is legal for dangerous game in all African safari countries that I'm aware of; the 9.3x64 may not be. (The 9.3x62 and 9.3x64 are DG legal in a few but not all, to the best of my knowledge.) Components for the 9.3x62 are no problem on this side of the pond, especially cases. I own both a 9.3x62 and a .375 H&H. I like them both. I like to think of the 9.3x62 as a ".36 Whelen" to put it into perspective for a North American hunter. I've used my 9.3x62 and .375 H&H on plains game in South Africa (but I've never hunted African dangerous game). They both worked great... no big surprise there.

My two cents...
-Bob F.
 
Posts: 3485 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 22 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
Thanks I knew I could count on you guys. In a senior moment I had completely forgot the 9.3X64 would require alteration of the bolt.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For me, Part of the beasuty of the 9,3x62 is that I can have a general purpose African Rifle that is pleasant to shoot and weighs only 7½lbs loaded. If you really like short barrels though then you need the extra case capacity of the 64' to achive safe performance. (I have a 23" and 24" barrels on my 9,3's)
 
Posts: 3026 | Location: Zimbabwe | Registered: 23 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of mouse93
posted Hide Post
9,3x62 thumb...me and some PH (EU) use 19,7" = 50 cm barrel on it (for tracking in stiff bush after bear or boar)...not sure about the energy numbers tho it gets job done
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Slovenia | Registered: 28 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BFaucett:
I'd go with the 9.3x62. As zlr said, it's "practically a screw on the barrel & go project". If you need 9.3x64 ballistics, then simply use the .375 H&H. Much easier to get brass (and a rifle) for the .375 H&H than the 9.3x64 here in North America. And the .375 H&H is legal for dangerous game in all African safari countries that I'm aware of; the 9.3x64 may not be. (The 9.3x62 and 9.3x64 are DG legal in a few but not all, to the best of my knowledge.) Components for the 9.3x62 are no problem on this side of the pond, especially cases. I own both a 9.3x62 and a .375 H&H. I like them both. I like to think of the 9.3x62 as a ".36 Whelen" to put it into perspective for a North American hunter. I've used my 9.3x62 and .375 H&H on plains game in South Africa (but I've never hunted African dangerous game). They both worked great... no big surprise there.

My two cents...
-Bob F.


I agree totally with the above.......you want power than the 9.3x62 just get the H&H for convenience.
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I like them both,I 've taken moose with the 64 and it was spectacular,I have never had trouble with getting 64 brass.Thar 286 nosler at 2600fps is devastating.
 
Posts: 39 | Location: Yukon,Canada | Registered: 21 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Both are great calibers, the 9.3x64 is more powerful but not by a lot....I had a couple of 9.3x64 and they are comparable to a .375 H&H..

Hard to say but both are easy conversions on standard actions..you may or may not have to open the bolt face for a 9.3x64, sometimes I have and other times I have not, its touch and go on that, but its such a small amount that it makes little difference...

I guess if pinned down, I like the 9.3x62, its such a nice caliber in a long barrel 26" gun...and it handles even the 320 gr. Woodleighs with a max load in that barrel length..

If I wanted a short barrel handy gun ( 20 to 22 inches) then I would opt for the 9.3x64 to keep the velocity up there where it needs to be for a 9.3 and heavy bullets...


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42210 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
@ Ray it's not necessary to take the 9,3x64 for short barrels. The 9,3x62 is doing a good job in a 20 inch barrel. Lots of European firearms manufacturers provide rifles with 20 inch barrels in 9,3x62 for a special kind of hunting (Drückjagd). The 9,3x62 is very popular today in Germany with short barrels. Amazingly the lost of velocity in a 20 inch barrel with the 9,3x62 is not so much one may expect!
 
Posts: 15 | Location: Germany | Registered: 24 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally Lots of European firearms manufacturers provide rifles with 20 inch barrels in 9,3x62 for a special kind of hunting (Drückjagd).


Fritz,
I see the above is from your first post, wewlcome to AR. What does Druckjagd mean?
Thanks.
 
Posts: 1374 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
<JOHAN>
posted
Oldun,

Drückjagd means driving of game towards guns; shooting-party. In Spain similar type of hunt is called monteria. In France it's called battue and in Sweden it's called drevjakt or klappjakt Smiler Smiler Smiler

Cheers
/JOHAN
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of boilerroom
posted Hide Post
You'd never guess what they call it here. bewildered


-------------------------------
Too many people........
 
Posts: 4326 | Location: Under the North Star! | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of boilerroom
posted Hide Post
RCBS has just moved their 9.3X62 dies from group D to group A. 1/2 the $$ thumb


-------------------------------
Too many people........
 
Posts: 4326 | Location: Under the North Star! | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
9,3 x 68!

download for less preasure at 62 speeds


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27614 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
As I bounce around the idea of a 9.3. Which do you guys suggest.

I have a MKX standard action, a nice stock blank waiting on a barrel. Would go with a Lothar Walther barrel. So you 9.3 experts. Which would you use and why.

While I don't really need it I have that empty 9.3 gap in the safe.



9.3x64 Brenneke

Dont let ray kid you the 9.3x64 rules..
Unless you want to have a 9.3x416... now that really rules ..and with the 9.3x416 its worth having boattails custom made .

Martin
 
Posts: 1557 | Location: Home of the original swage | Registered: 29 February 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia