THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    What will a 7 mag do that a 270 won't?
Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What will a 7 mag do that a 270 won't?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Switch it around, What will the 270 do that the 7 Maqg can not do?


Shoot 90gr bullets for killing Prairie dogs!
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
sorry for my ignorance by i can tell for sure 7x64 is better cartidge than 270,i have them both but brenneke is better
 
Posts: 139 | Location: Canada | Registered: 08 May 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of PaulH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TEUTONIC:
sorry for my ignorance by i can tell for sure 7x64 is better cartidge than 270,i have them both but brenneke is better


Seconded...Good Man.
 
Posts: 218 | Location: Liquid Sunshine State | Registered: 12 November 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Inside 250 yards it doesn't matter much.
Outside 250 yards will the 7mm mag be a better choice in my opinion.
Most people buying a 7mm mag are not good enough shots to shoot at distances close to 250 yards or longer, so they would be better off buying a 270 in my opinion.
If they want something more hard hitting than a 270 and with nicer recoil than a 7 mm mag for use out to 250 yards, then they should get a 30-06 or even a 9.3x62Smiler
 
Posts: 461 | Location: Norway | Registered: 11 November 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Trax:
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
What will a 7 mag do that a 270 won't?..

one could ask the same about .30/06 vs 308mag,.. .338/06 vs 338win...etc,etc,


+1


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by carpetman1:
The 7MM mag will burn more powder. I did a quick look and with some powders you could use 70 grains. I didn't see any .270 loads using that amount. That is very important. Using 70 grains, you would get exactly 100 rounds out of a pound of powder. You buy bullets and primers by the 100's. You would not have all the nuisances and hazzards of having some left over powder. If you use several types powders and eliminated all those partial cans you would gain enough space for another rifle. Get a 30-06 as Fjold suggested.


That's silly, rugman. You just pour all those left over powder bits into a big jar, still well when when full and start all over. shocker


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11143 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Just to throw another log on the fire, why not ask, what can the .270 do that the 7-08 can't? And the 7-08 made its rep on its own without gallons and gallons of glorifying ink from a high dollar gun writer. Smiler


I concluded my speech by telling them that I was done with politics for the present, and they might all go to hell, and I would go to Texas. -- Davy Crockett 11AUG1935
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Camden, TN & Round Rock TX | Registered: 24 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Trax:
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
The 7mm Mag really comes into it's own with 160g and 175g bullets. Original spec for the 7mm Rem Mag was a 175g bullet at 3000 fps. That's equivilant in power to a 300 Win Mag.....


... tu2

...but Boomstick would rather settle for .30/06 power, on bear.


Haven't seen any mention of African game here yet, but I had tremendous luck in RSA back in 2005 with my 7 mag and 160 A Frames. Several one shot kills out to 350 meters. That is an incredible combination up to and including big kudu and gemsbok. I would even hunt eland with it, although I would prefer my .375 H&H for that. I would not use a .270 on eland, although I'd bet some diehards would and have.

I've killed a busload of whitetails with a .25-06. You don't need a .270 for white tail.
 
Posts: 11729 | Location: Florida | Registered: 25 October 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Bottom line: the 7 mag is more powerful and thats all there is to it other than it comes in a more bulky, heavier, and requires a longer barrel to beat the .270 and its only balistic advantage is with 175 gr. bullets..much like the differnce in a .308 and 30-06, its there but most folks ain't counting..

That is why I have always leaned to the 270 in a light 22" barrel fwt. gun..Its my choice of the trade off.

Now if you want to get down and dirty then consider the olf 30-06 it will do anything the 7 mag will do but in a fwt short tubed rifle.
The 06 is king, always has been and looks like it always will be. It earned that right in the hunting fields not on some internet blog. sofa


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42320 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BigNate
posted Hide Post
I like the 7mm RM quite a bit.... with 160gr or heavier bullets.

We have a .270 in the house. Kindof like having an extra kid around when it's time to eat. No big deal. It was a gift. The .270W is very similar to the .25-06 in performance on game, and the .270 makes good brass for the .25-06.

I could do without both really. Id rebarrel my 7 mag but wouldn't be bothered by trading the .270 away, or selling it for scope money.
 
Posts: 2376 | Location: Idaho Panhandle | Registered: 27 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
What will a 7 mag do that a 270 won't?

homer Depends who's pulling the trigger? Coolroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fjold:
Why own either when the 30.06 will do anything either of those two will?


That's my boy right there!! I love the 270 (have a few) and like the 7 Mag (have one) but i'm always finding myself reaching for the 06! My Canadian friends tell me I have a hang up on metrics!! Go figure. killpc
 
Posts: 969 | Registered: 13 October 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
boils down to personal likes.
 
Posts: 1096 | Location: UNITED STATES of AMERTCA | Registered: 29 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 44magLeo
posted Hide Post
Make your shoulder hurt.
Leo


The only way to know if you can do a thing is to do it.
 
Posts: 317 | Location: Lebanon NY | Registered: 08 February 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote::TerrenceEason
new member
Posted 29 November 2011 20:59 Hide Post
Just to throw another log on the fire, why not ask, what can the .270 do that the 7-08 can't? And the 7-08 made its rep on its own without gallons and gallons of glorifying ink from a high dollar gun writer.

+1 Wink my 7MM-08 can do what the .270 can
my .260 rem. can do what the 25-06 can and then some
 
Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vines:
quote::TerrenceEason
new member
Posted 29 November 2011 20:59 Hide Post
Just to throw another log on the fire, why not ask, what can the .270 do that the 7-08 can't? And the 7-08 made its rep on its own without gallons and gallons of glorifying ink from a high dollar gun writer.

+1 Wink my 7MM-08 can do what the .270 can
my .260 rem. can do what the 25-06 can and then some


A 270 will shoot flatter, and hit harder than a 7mm-08 (150g Partition at 2900 plus fps), and also can be used for varmints shooting 90g Sierra HP BTs at 3400 fps. Other than than, not much.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4807 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of friarmeier
posted Hide Post
quote:
And the 7-08 made its rep on its own without gallons and gallons of glorifying ink from a high dollar gun writer.


Seriously?

Consider for a moment the context of 1925: name another high-intensity sporting cartridge suitable for big game; you have the .30-06, and...Bueler, Bueler, Bueler...?

There wasn't another. Oh, sure, there was the "Super 30" (.300 H & H), but how many Americans had the $$ for that ammo? There were the .25's like the Bob & the Savage, but they topped out on deer. I suppose you could argue that there were the early Brittish 7mm hot-rods and a few obscure wildcats, but the operative word there is "obscure", and "wildcat".

Simply put, from 1925 to about 1958, there just wasn't another cart that could shoot an appropriately heavy bullet as flat as the .270. And forget about "energy", or "two-holes", or any of the other modern-day desireables which we now hold sancrosanct. In those days, the only thing most sportsman were concerned with was the question, "Can I hit it at 400 yards?"

Really, until the advent of the .300 Win Mag, what else was there that shot as flat or hit as hard?

As to the original post: give me a 7 mag, a .270, a 7-08, or a 30-06, and anything inside 300 yards is dead. I'm not good enough to shoot much past 300, but I suppose from 300-450 a 7 mag has a theorectical advantage over the others.

Lastly: since there now are any number of mid-bore bullets that assure full (if not "out the other side") penetration on even moose & elk, I don't think that the big 7 has an advantage even out to 450 yards. After all, if the bullet ends up underneath the hide on the far side of the animal, you probably won't have far to track!

friar

p.s. You could add the ROY carts, of course, but even his .257 WBY doesn't come out until about WWII, and his .300 shortly after, no?


Our liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain.
 
Posts: 1222 | Location: A place once called heaven | Registered: 11 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by friarmeier:
quote:
And the 7-08 made its rep on its own without gallons and gallons of glorifying ink from a high dollar gun writer.


Seriously?

Consider for a moment the context of 1925: name another high-intensity sporting cartridge suitable for big game; you have the .30-06, and...Bueler, Bueler, Bueler...?

There wasn't another. Oh, sure, there was the "Super 30" (.300 H & H), but how many Americans had the $$ for that ammo? There were the .25's like the Bob & the Savage, but they topped out on deer. I suppose you could argue that there were the early Brittish 7mm hot-rods and a few obscure wildcats, but the operative word there is "obscure", and "wildcat".

Simply put, from 1925 to about 1958, there just wasn't another cart that could shoot an appropriately heavy bullet as flat as the .270. And forget about "energy", or "two-holes", or any of the other modern-day desireables which we now hold sancrosanct. In those days, the only thing most sportsman were concerned with was the question, "Can I hit it at 400 yards?"

Really, until the advent of the .300 Win Mag, what else was there that shot as flat or hit as hard?

As to the original post: give me a 7 mag, a .270, a 7-08, or a 30-06, and anything inside 300 yards is dead. I'm not good enough to shoot much past 300, but I suppose from 300-450 a 7 mag has a theorectical advantage over the others.

Lastly: since there now are any number of mid-bore bullets that assure full (if not "out the other side") penetration on even moose & elk, I don't think that the big 7 has an advantage even out to 450 yards. After all, if the bullet ends up underneath the hide on the far side of the animal, you probably won't have far to track!

friar

p.s. You could add the ROY carts, of course, but even his .257 WBY doesn't come out until about WWII, and his .300 shortly after, no?

Wow.....I'd sure like to hear one if the Friar's sermons.....I can hear it now..."Praise the lord and pass the .270 ammo" dancing


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of friarmeier
posted Hide Post
I'm on fire, brother, and the heathen I will convert! flame

In my rapture, admittedly, I did forget about 2 pre-war carts that are still pretty good: 7x57 & 6.5x55. With iron sights, inside 200 yards, one was well equipped.

But the modern era begins, practically speaking, with the advent of the .270 WCF. Tis' the season!

friar


Our liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain.
 
Posts: 1222 | Location: A place once called heaven | Registered: 11 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
The new 6.8 SPC bullets make the 270 even better.


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
I almost rechambered my 270 WCF to 270 Weatherby in the late 70s, but when I found a load for my 270 that would give me 3000 fps with a 150g Nosler Partition, I just didn't see the need.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4807 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 505ED
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TEUTONIC:
sorry for my ignorance by i can tell for sure 7x64 is better cartidge than 270,i have them both but brenneke is better


I agree!!! the 7x64 is a great cart. I shot one for 5 years before I went to a 7mm mAG--AND really dont know how much I gained.

My wife shoots a blaser R93 in a "7x64" as her big game rifle. She took her 257 wby barrel to africa this year and after shooting her Kudu-wished she would have taken her 7mm. The 156 grain oryx bullet does it all for her.

Ed


DRSS Member
 
Posts: 2289 | Location: Texas | Registered: 02 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jpat
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
The new 6.8 SPC bullets make the 270 even better.


Sounds like you had your mind made up. Why bother asking a question that that was intended to create a pissing contest. You like the .270, I don't. I like the 7mmRemMag, it seems you don't. No big deal in my eyes. Asking a question that you have formulated an opinion on already is a waste of time. JMHO
 
Posts: 447 | Location: NH | Registered: 09 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
I like them both, but then am fine with blondes, brunettes and redheads too ...

Smiler


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4807 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
I just asked myself the question and came up with the conclusion there was not much to be gained with the 7mag over the 270. I have always not cared for the 7mag or the 270 but chose the 06. I came to the conclusion the 06 is overkill for most hunting in the America's minus moose and brown bear. I started to think about what could be as flexible and flatter shooting and came to the 270. It seemed to be a do all cart with less recoil so I figured I would ask the experts here. What I learned it the 7 mag has a faster twist barrel in general for heavy bullets but that's about it.
quote:
Originally posted by Jpat:
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
The new 6.8 SPC bullets make the 270 even better.


Sounds like you had your mind made up. Why bother asking a question that that was intended to create a pissing contest. You like the .270, I don't. I like the 7mmRemMag, it seems you don't. No big deal in my eyes. Asking a question that you have formulated an opinion on already is a waste of time. JMHO


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
With practical .270 mid to light weight bullets in both cartridges there will be no significant difference. The advantage of the much larger case is its ability to push heavier bullets at higher speeds than the .270; that translates to greater effect on largish game at extended ranges.
 
Posts: 1615 | Location: South Western North Carolina | Registered: 16 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Just get yourself a 6.5x55 and either reload, buy european made ammo or the Hornady SuperformanceSmiler
 
Posts: 461 | Location: Norway | Registered: 11 November 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
This post just highlights the terrible bore gap that exists between the .270 caliber and .the 7mm. We've all said it before and I guess we need to keep saying ittill somebody listens, we MUST have a cartridge that shoots .2805" diameter bullets. It wouldn't matter if it was designated the .279 caliber or the 6.9mm just as long as we have it. The present cartridge gap is too big. Any game light enough for the .270 is too light to shoot with the 7mm. Any animal heavy enough for the 7mm is too heavy for the .270. I, for one, am getting tired of walking into the deer woods with two rifles slung on my back so I can be prepared for both the fork horn deer and the four-pointer, whichever one comes my way. The .279 would fill that gap and be a true one gun for all North American game (minus the big bears of course). I know that a .279 caliber would require manufacture and availability of appropriately sized bore brushes and cleaning rods but the effort is justified. On the other hand, a new caliber could be very exciting to read about in gun magazines. Instead of the same old .270 vs 7mm articles we could enjoy reading twice as many .270 vs .279 and 6.9mm vs 7mm articles. And finally, it will give us justification to acquire that sorely need firearm to fill the last remaining empty space in our gun racks. So, come on guys, get off the .270 vs 7mm thing and lets write all the gun makers to get that new .2805" cartridge under development.




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
6.9-06 or 6.9-08? Smiler


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
As I said earlier there is ONE thing that the 270, or the 7x64, or my favourite the 280 will ALL do that the 7mm RM won't...and that is take an extra cartridge in the magazine.

Important here in the UK when out "on the hill" as it is one cartridge extra in a place where I can find it instead of looking in a pouch or pocket.

Also in Europe it is one cartridge more (two actually in my 280 built on a Nazi 98K = 5 in magazine plus 1 in the chamber) immediately ready, when shooting at driven boar. Certainly beats fiddling when your 7mm RM (or .300 WM) has fired its four shots!
 
Posts: 6824 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
175 grn bullet at 2800fps
 
Posts: 157 | Location: N.E. Victoria Australia | Registered: 19 March 2007Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PaulH:
quote:
Originally posted by TEUTONIC:
sorry for my ignorance by i can tell for sure 7x64 is better cartidge than 270,i have them both but brenneke is better


Seconded...Good Man.

agreed .. passed with distinction.. i strongly prefer hunting with my 7x64 than my 270 .. for no logical reason whatsoever..

but, to answer boomies question, what will a 7mag do? kick a bit more, shoot a slightly heaver bullet.. and that's about it


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40233 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by enfieldspares:
ONE thing that the 270...will... do that the 7mm RM won't...and that is take an extra cartridge in the magazine.
Excellent point.




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The 7mm Magnum was developed by Les Bowman as the most gun that we can shoot well. That cartridges with more recoil cause many to flinch.

The 270 Win. is good they say and similar to the 7mm Mag. Its just that if you can shoot the 7mm RM well then you have more range than a 270.

Another takeback is that the 7mm RM rifles tend to weigh a little more. In some cases this is not a problem.


Get the 'power' or optic that your eye likes instead of what someone else says.

When we go to the doctor they ask us what lens we like!

Do that with your optics.
 
Posts: 980 | Registered: 16 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:

ONE thing that the 270...will... do that the 7mm RM won't...and that is take an extra cartridge in the magazine.
Excellent point.[/QUOTE]

IF i can't complete the deed with the magazine capacity of an 7mmRMag bolt rifle, then its my act I need to sharpen up, rather than the need to have an extra .270win round to make up for my personal shortcomings.
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal30 1906
posted Hide Post
quote:
In a model 70 it will hold down 5 in the magazine and 1 in the chamber, I own both and shoot the 160 or 175 grainers in the 7Mag
but I do like the magazine capacity of 5 down vs 3.




Already quoted by me But.... I was suggesting more along the lines of what a .270 will do that a 7mm wont.
I am glad to see that others see the wisdom in it, Because in the field crazy things can happen Buck fever Roll Eyes


Cal301906




If it cant be Grown it has to be Mined! Devoted member of Newmont mining company Underground Mine rescue team. Carlin East,Deep Star ,Leeville,Deep Post ,Chukar and now Exodus Where next? Pete Bajo to train newbies on long hole stoping and proper blasting techniques.
Back to Exodus mine again learning teaching and operating autonomous loaders in the underground. Bringing everyday life to most individuals 8' at a time!
 
Posts: 3090 | Location: Northern Nevada & Northern Idaho | Registered: 09 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
IF i can't complete the deed with the magazine capacity of an 7mmRMag bolt rifle, then its my act I need to sharpen up, rather than the need to have an extra .270win round to make up for my personal shortcomings.


There is some difference between some styles of hunting here in Britain and Europe than in the US.

On "the hill" in Scotland it may be that the stalker has to take three or four beasts in quick succession from a herd of deer.

A 3+1 rifle just simply won't be up to the task...with the "insurance" of a follow up shot.

When you shoot driven wild boar I can assure you that every extra cartridge is welcomed!

If you get two, three or four in quick sucession then there just isn't time to reload.

For stalking into a single beast or shooting from a stand then that's different but here in Britain and Europe some things are different.
 
Posts: 6824 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
I've never hunted wild boar in Europe but would love to! I think I'd take my 500 Jeffery with some 570g TSX's though 3 down and 1 up should be plenty.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4807 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
What will a 7 mag do that a 270 won't?
Seems to me the 270 is all around superior.


IMO the .270 is right in the range of "perfect" deer cartrdiges; low recoil, enough bullet to reliably exit on deer-sized animals, flat trajectory, etc.

The 7mag is kind of an in-between cartridge; it works on deer but its a bit more than you really need, but on bigger animals it works but it's just a bit less than a lot of us feel comfortable with.

Between the two, I'd pick...neither! I have a .30-06 that can handle any hunting task I'd want to use a .270 or a 7mm Rem mag for.
 
Posts: 641 | Location: SW Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: 10 October 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Times were hard, you could buy a milsup 30-06 for $4 or $5 bucks, a foreign made one in a metric calibre even cheaper. Not too many people were interested in shelling out big bucks for a 30-06 in what was really a slicked up '03 action. So Win took a page from the car folks, let's bring out a NEW model in a different calibre and hire a bunch of rag writers to tell how great it is. It worked then and it is still working now. With cars and rifles.


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    What will a 7 mag do that a 270 won't?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia