THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Re: The ultimate lightwieght hunting rifle
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: The ultimate lightwieght hunting rifle
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
What kind of deer hunting?

Jeff
 
Posts: 784 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 18 December 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I am on a quest to find the lightest and most affordable bolt action rifle for hunting deer. Any suggestions or information would be much appreciated. I'm looking for factory or custom btw
 
Posts: 73 | Registered: 16 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I don't know about "ultimate" but take a look @ the Rem. M700Titanium. It's available in SA, LA & SAUM. Hard to beat for $900+. I may get one in .300SAUM.
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The Ruger light weight in the all weather is very light about 6 pounds or so.I like the all weather Rugers alot .I have 2 in 338 win mag both are very accurate.The regular all Weather is about $450 .I have not seen what light weight all weather goes for.
 
Posts: 2543 | Registered: 21 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have a Weatherby Ultra Light Weight in .280 Rem. With a 2.5-8X, a light nylon sling and four rds of 150 partitions it weighs an ounce under 7 pounds. Its functioned flawlessly for the three years I've had it and its sub MOA accurate out to 200 yds. May be sub MOA farther out but NOT with these old eyes behind that scope.

Have you ever shot or carried a light weight?? One can go TOO light. At least thats my opinion. I have handled some real lightweights and they kicked too much and just didn't "hang" right for me. They were in a phrase; tough to shoot well. then again thats me, you may love a 5 pound rifle.

Another thought would be the Remington titanium but the few I have seen didn't shoot very well. Could be luck of the draw and they got lemons.

Or.....what about one of the new Kimber bolt guns? A buddy has one in 7mm-08 and it shoots darned well.

Let us know what you end up doing.

FN in MT
 
Posts: 950 | Location: Cascade, Montana USA | Registered: 11 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Lightest you can go and very accurate is New Ultra Light Arms. They are customs and I will have one one day. Go for about 2500 dollars. But light (4.75lbs and very accurate. I like the new Kimbers. Very accurate also for around 900 dollars. For me and my pocket, I got a medallion in 308Win. Its pretty light, pretty accurate.
 
Posts: 459 | Location: Finksburg, MD | Registered: 20 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
Check CDNN for a Colt Ultralight
Savage 116 Sierra
New Ultralight Arms
Rifles, Inc.
Weatherby Ultralight
 
Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In the most affordable category I would take a look at the Remington Model 7. I have shot several in 308, 2 243's and a 6mm. All have been very accurate to 300 yards.
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
New Ultra Light arms is hard to pass if you can afford them,

I have one in 30-06,recoil is brisk but very managable,I have never notice the recoil when hunting.



www.newultralight.com

I was very Happy with my Weatherby Ultra Light also,



[ www.weatherby.com ]





.These two rifles had the best balance and handling characteristics of all the Light weight rifles I have owned or used.



Good luck,



Charlie
 
Posts: 87 | Location: Australia | Registered: 24 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
the Encore is a very interesting option, as it carries about a pound lighter than it is. I think in stainless, with a synthetic stock, they are a flat 6 pounds in the std 24 inch hunting bbl. I have 20 rifles and the Encore in 270 or 243 is the best carrying gun I own.

It is only 1 inch longer than my CZ 527 Carbine with 18.5 inch bbl in 7.62X39, but what a dfference in power and range!! If you went with a 308, you could cut the bbl to 20 inches and have a 34 inch sporter and save enough weight to cover a small 4X scope.
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Afton, VA | Registered: 31 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of POP
posted Hide Post
Maybe not the ultimate but affordable. Kimber Montana 8400!
 
Posts: 3865 | Location: Cheyenne, WYOMING, USA | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

...the lightest and most affordable bolt action rifle for hunting deer. ...




Hey Shiloh, Do you happen to have a "weight and price" in mind as your MAX Billfold Loads? That would help narrow the field a bit.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
<allen day>
posted
I agree with the New Ultralight Arms recommendation as a first-choice for a super lightweight hunting rifle.



But if that's not affordable, I'd go with Frank's Weatherby Mark V Ultra Lightweight. These are great rifles, and extremely well-made. A lot of gun for the money, and they feel really good at the shoulder as well.



AD
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Savage 10fc Sierra .308 win weighs in at 6lbs. mine shoots sub minute at 100yds. it is more capable than i am. the factory trigger(not the new accu....)worked down to a crisp 3lbs. i think it might have gone lower but why push it?
GOOD LUCK and GOOD SHOOTING!!!!
 
Posts: 34 | Location: sebring,fl | Registered: 11 June 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The Kimber 84M's that I have really satisfy me. But to each his own. The Weatherby Ultra Light is a cool looking rifle with that those deep flutes in the barrel. However the ones I have seen come with colored plastic stocks only. They don't have a good safety or CRF either.



I like the fact that they made in the USA.



There are other lightweights. The Ruger Ultra Light is very pretty but I have not seen one that shot very well yet. As a woods carbine it should be just fine and they don't cost much either.



I see no point in spending thousands on guns like the NULA's.



Here is a 84M in 260 Rem. They go less than seven pounds with a scope.



 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I believe the lightest rifle is built by Kifaru.What about an Encore? What do they weigh?
 
Posts: 310 | Location: middle tennesse | Registered: 05 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Are you going to do much shooting from the bench? If so I'd exercise a little caution. I have a Browning
Micro-medalion in .308Win. It weighs exactly 6.0 lbs., and has a pencil thin 20" barrel. It has quite the
unpleasant kick to it. It was a cute little rifle but the front end now looks like it was used for fungo
practice from jumping out of the cradle of my rest. I pretty much tamed it with a Pachmyer Decelerator
pad, but it's still unpleasant. For a once or twice a year deer usage it's okay, but most of us shoot a lot
more from the range than that. I'd either get a rifle that kicks less or one that weighs about 7.5lbs. with
the scope, and a 22" barrel. The accuracy would probably be better as well. Just an opinion. Best wishes.

Cal - Montreal
 
Posts: 1866 | Location: Montreal, Canada | Registered: 01 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Are you going to do much shooting from the bench? If so I'd exercise a little caution. I have a Browning
Micro-medalion in .308Win. It weighs exactly 6.0 lbs., and has a pencil thin 20" barrel. It has quite the
unpleasant kick to it. It was a cute little rifle but the front end now looks like it was used for fungo
practice from jumping out of the cradle of my rest. I pretty much tamed it with a Pachmyer Decelerator
pad, but it's still unpleasant. For a once or twice a year deer usage it's okay, but most of us shoot a lot
more from the range than that. I'd either get a rifle that kicks less or one that weighs about 7.5lbs. with
the scope, and a 22" barrel. The accuracy would probably be better as well. Just an opinion. Best wishes.

Cal - Montreal




Don't use the damn bench when you go to the range.

How many times do you get to have a bench when hunting?

Get your load development done from the bench (if you must), and spend the rest of your range days shooting from the positions you will use in the field, whatever those may be.
 
Posts: 2206 | Location: USA | Registered: 31 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
How about a Kimber chambered in .308 win. 150 partitons @ 2900 fps= 2800 ft/lbs. What more horsepower do u need for whitetails? Think about it could be the best whitetail cartridge ever made. And accurate as hell
 
Posts: 121 | Location: Central VA | Registered: 13 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TrackersNZ
posted Hide Post
Does anyone know how many rounds the Kimber Montana 8400 in .325 WSM chambers.
On the Kimber website it says 5, yet all the other Kimber Montana 8400 WSM's only hold 3.
Is this a late develoment since introducing the .325WSM or is it an error on the Kimber Website?
Someone got one of these, and can tell me for sure?


...."At some point in every man's life he should own a Sako rifle and a John Deere tractor....it just doesn't get any better...."
 
Posts: 630 | Location: Hawera, Taranaki, New Zealand | Registered: 17 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For an off-the-shelf deer rifle, I would go with a Remington in 7mm08. You could get a Model 7, Model 700 Mountain Rifle or the best of the lot a 700 Titanium. 7mm08 has "deer rifle" written all over it. It is a short action and will get about 2800fps with 140gr bullets. Plenty flat and strong enough for any deer. Put a Leupy VX-II 2-7 or VX-III 2.5-8 on top.

The 2800fps is from my REM 600 that I rebarelled to 7mm08 with a featherwieght 20" SS barrel. I put a very trim walnut stock on it. It is light, accurate and seems to point itself.

BTW: It is a capable elk rifle with the right bullet too...
 
Posts: 79 | Location: Northwest Atlanta | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
stirThe Stevens mod. 200 in .243, 7-08, or even .308. Light and you can still have it for $280.00 and they are accurate. Sophisticates suck when they over look the obvious. hammeringroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of richj
posted Hide Post
How about a Blaser at 6.6 lbs.

Rich
 
Posts: 6519 | Location: NY, NY | Registered: 28 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
stirThe Stevens mod. 200 in .243, 7-08, or even .308. Light and you can still have it for $280.00 and they are accurate. Sophisticates suck when they over look the obvious. hammeringroger


good one bartsche! animal

if i had a bigger budget the kimber synthetic stainless would get my vote.


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27614 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Shiloh:
I am on a quest to find the lightest and most affordable bolt action rifle for hunting deer. Any suggestions or information would be much appreciated. I'm looking for factory or custom btw


The Stevens 200 is the ultimate most affordable lightweight hunting rifle.

I have four of them, 223 Ackley, 243, 7mm-08 and 300 Win Mag. Bought the first one, the 300, just to see what the fuss was all about.

All will shoot under an inch. All, but one, will regularly shoot half minute groups at 200 meters with handloads. The 223AI does that fireforming with cheap Wall Mart Winchester White box hunting ammo.

All hover just around six pounds. The short actions are a bit less, while the 300 weighs four ounces more.

Is that ultimate enough for the regular working stiff who can't spend two or three grand on a rifle? Big Grin

Ted


Why not just do it!
 
Posts: 8 | Location: Yukon Territory, Canada | Registered: 23 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Since I just bought one-a Kimber 84M Montana in 308Win.It's a great shooter w/ a nice trigger.I like it so much I'm going to get an 8400 Montana in 338 Win. when they become available.I highly recommend the Kimbers.
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Maryland's Eastern Shore | Registered: 12 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In a light weight (6 lbs or less) deer rifle I highly reccommend the 7mm08. I now own two, a browning micro medallion and ruger compact. Both are nice rifles for all around use and are easy to shoot. The ruger in particular is the most accurate out of the box rifle I've ever seen. It shoots bullet hole on bullet hole from day one at 50 yards and 1 inch groups at 100 yards.


"shoot quick but take your time"
 
Posts: 451 | Location: drummond island MI USA | Registered: 03 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Weatherby has some light rifles out. I know this guy that has a bad back and we were deer hunting in Albama. He had a Weatherby 257 Mag. He said that was a light rifle for him cause of his back.
 
Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
I was thinking (still?) of doing an ultralight 376 steyr in a "conventional" look.

would start with a ruger shot action, tiniest barrel I could get at 22 to 24 ", dale christenson carbon fiber stock, minimal light recoilpad, and a very light 4 or 6 power scope.

could be 7# loaded!!!

load it with barnes 235X or TSX around 2700, and have the ultimate packing rifle...

jeffe


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40026 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
what about the tikka T3 Lite, they state that it is only 6lbs and 3 oz?
 
Posts: 233 | Location: hickadory, alabama USA | Registered: 28 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
stirJust my humble observation but it seems that many of you are not putting most affordable into the equation. The target::: LIGHT, SHOOTS ACCURATLY, COSTS LESS. And that still is the Stevens 200. moonroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
I have an old Remington 600 in .308 with a 3x9x32 scope that goes 6 pounds. Lightest gun I have found.
 
Posts: 5723 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
for deer my daughters little 6mm win. mod 70 featherlight handels and shoots great .after glass bedding will shoot .5in@ 100 yds
Wayles
 
Posts: 57 | Location: western nebraska | Registered: 04 February 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of prof242
posted Hide Post
Bartsche: Your a man after my own heart. Got one of the Stevens 200s for my #3 grandson. It seems light (could be made even lighter by an owner), is very accurate (less than 1" 3-shot groups), the trigger can be adjusted (just not as good as a Rem 700), and its CHEAP! With the Stevens, you can put more money in better optics and still have an accurate rifle.
One other attribute is easy changing of barrels. Had a couple extra in the basement that I'm giving him so he'll have a varmint rifle, antelope/deer rifle, and and an elk rifle all in one.
Something that most people ignore when going to a light rifle is that scope mounts and scopes can get heavy and easily add a half-pound and more in weight. A Weaver base and GOOD aluminum rings will save 6 oz over some of the steel mounts. A Leupold compact scope can also save over a half-pound by itself!
There also comes a time when a light rifle can become too light and not "hang" properly when shooting.
Guess I've gotten a little long-winded. Roll Eyes


.395 Family Member
DRSS, po' boy member
Political correctness is nothing but liberal enforced censorship
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
Eekerwent out aftershooting today to buy three more Stevsns mod. 200s. Found out that one store in a weeks time jumped the price from $280.00 to $300.00. Another outfit went from $298.00 to $329.00. Took a trip to another place about 18 miles from where I was only to find out they went out of business CRYBABY Maybe someone is trying to tell me I got too many rifles! Who knows maybe they're right. Frownerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To many rifle ?

How is that posible ?
...tj3006


freedom1st
 
Posts: 2450 | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by buckeyeshooter:
I have an old Remington 600 in .308 with a 3x9x32 scope that goes 6 pounds. Lightest gun I have found.


Yep I have a few of those Remington Mohawks they are a pretty hard little gun to beat. If you keep your eyes open they come at a pretty reasonalbe price. Mine have been reworked a little and both come in very near 7 pounds scoped.
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Not sure the price, but they don't get any lighter than 3 3/4 lbs! Ugly as sin, though.

http://www.kifaru.net/ramblrif.htm
 
Posts: 1508 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 09 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The Kimbers are almost perfect. I say almost, I waited patiently until they came out with the new long action. I loved the 8400 but did not want a WSM but rather a 300 Win. Mag. Finally they became available and damned if they didn't put 26 inch barrels on the magnums. Man, you can't win, its like they get it almost perfect and say, "No, lets screw it up somehow, just a little!!" I might just give in and get the 300 with a 26 incher, but if I'm going to tote that long of barrel, I'll just carry my Weatherby, it needs 26.
 
Posts: 1332 | Location: Western NC | Registered: 08 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have 3 Weatherby ULs....one in 338-06, one ine 280 and one in 25-06. All of them have Zeiss 3x9's and all of them weigh (loaded) at 6.25# or less...the 25-06 actually is less than 6#. The 338-06 has a bigger barrel contour. All of the rifles shoot 1/2-3/4 MOA at 200 yds. All have the soft recoil pad so that recoil is not an issue even when the 280 is loaded to 7mm mag territory and the 338-06 is loaded with 210 Noslers at 2850 fps.
I know they're a few bucks more than some of the others, but they are SWEET.
My $.02.

Gary
 
Posts: 1970 | Location: NE Georgia, USA | Registered: 21 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Re: The ultimate lightwieght hunting rifle

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia