THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What would be ultimate .338
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Cary Howard
posted
338 poll

Question:
If you were going to buy a .338 for hunting elk, or red stag at 300+ yards what would you buy?

Choices:
338 Win
338 RUM
340 Weatherby
338-378 Weatherby
338 Edge

 
 
Posts: 210 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 20 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
popcornFor silly long range shooting as for what you asked,( 300 +) the .338 RUM single shot Mod. 98, 30" barrel, deep throated for heaviest (longest) bullets , super muzzle break, Strong bi-pod, would be just about right.
Roll EyesHowever , you take to the woods with this type of creature you're really trying some stunt hunting. "Hunters" don't need ultra long range equipment, they try to get in close and do it right. stirroger beer


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
hammering popcorn horse old diggin


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
Here we go.......Warrior, get bussy


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
The obvious answer is the 338 Federal Smiler


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
None of the above; I like the new .338 norma mag.

Norma make Brass and Forster make dies. It has 5gr less capacity than the .338 lapua but you can seat long pills to the neck shoulder junction. It is inherently accurate and would be nice in a hunting style rig.
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
At what range does it cease to hunting and start to be guess where the animal will be in 1.5 seconds?


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Why do people act like 300 yards is so far? With today's equipment and a little practice any decent shooter should be able to take deer size animals at 300 yards. I would rather take a 300 yard shot off my bi pods than a 100 yard shot out of a tree stand like many hunters in my area do.

As for hunting skill, in some areas there are so many hunters sharing the same woods that it actually takes more skill to know the lay of the land and know where the deer will funnel and give the hunter a 300 yards shot than to try and stalk them and piss everyone in the woods off.


Molon Labe

New account for Jacobite
 
Posts: 631 | Location: SW. PA. | Registered: 03 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted:
Why do people act like 300 yards is so far? With today's equipment and a little practice any decent shooter should be able to take deer size animals at 300 yards.



As a person who has seen and hunted LOTS of different animals over the last 60+ years of carrying a rifle, I think that is simply incorrect.

A person should be able to hit a deer size TARGET easily at 300 yards, or triple that distance. Targets don't spend all their time on earth suddenly and unexpectedly moving, whether a lot or a little.

Deer and their kin DO. That's one way prey animals stay alive in a world of carnivorous predators.

It is moot as to which style of killing deer takes the most skill. That isn't the concern. The concern is that an unneccesary wounding shot on a living animal which may escape long enough to die a slow death in terrible agony is UNETHICAL.

IF a person is desparate for meat for his family, shots may need to be taken which otherwise would be totally unsporting. But, if the meat isn't deparately needed such shots, in my opinion, are irresponsible, juvenile stunts...possibly by a person who is also too lazy to do the job right.

I know that may not be a popular view in this day and age, but on this subject I don't give a tinker's God-Damn if it is popular or not.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Buglemintoday
posted Hide Post
.338 Win Mag Smiler


"Let me start off with two words: Made in America"
 
Posts: 3326 | Location: Permian Basin | Registered: 16 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Buglemintoday:
.338 Win Mag Smiler


Ditto. tu2


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Alberta Canuck:
quote:
Originally posted:
Why do people act like 300 yards is so far? With today's equipment and a little practice any decent shooter should be able to take deer size animals at 300 yards.



As a person who has seen and hunted LOTS of different animals over the last 60+ years of carrying a rifle, I think that is simply incorrect.

A person should be able to hit a deer size TARGET easily at 300 yards, or triple that distance. Targets don't spend all their time on earth suddenly and unexpectedly moving, whether a lot or a little.

Deer and their kin DO. That's one way prey animals stay alive in a world of carnivorous predators.

It is moot as to which style of killing deer takes the most skill. That isn't the concern. The concern is that an unneccesary wounding shot on a living animal which may escape long enough to die a slow death in terrible agony is UNETHICAL.

IF a person is desparate for meat for his family, shots may need to be taken which otherwise would be totally unsporting. But, if the meat isn't deparately needed such shots, in my opinion, are irresponsible, juvenile stunts...possibly by a person who is also too lazy to do the job right.

I know that may not be a popular view in this day and age, but on this subject I don't give a tinker's God-Damn if it is popular or not.


I would bet more deer are wounded and lost by hunters making a jump shot at a moving deer in close cover than those wounded and lost while being shot from 2-300 yards while feeding in a field.


Molon Labe

New account for Jacobite
 
Posts: 631 | Location: SW. PA. | Registered: 03 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Donald Nelson:
quote:
Originally posted by Alberta Canuck:
quote:
Originally posted:
Why do people act like 300 yards is so far? With today's equipment and a little practice any decent shooter should be able to take deer size animals at 300 yards.




As a person who has seen and hunted LOTS of different animals over the last 60+ years of carrying a rifle, I think that is simply incorrect.

A person should be able to hit a deer size TARGET easily at 300 yards, or triple that distance. Targets don't spend all their time on earth suddenly and unexpectedly moving, whether a lot or a little.

Deer and their kin DO. That's one way prey animals stay alive in a world of carnivorous predators.

It is moot as to which style of killing deer takes the most skill. That isn't the concern. The concern is that an unneccesary wounding shot on a living animal which may escape long enough to die a slow death in terrible agony is UNETHICAL.

IF a person is desparate for meat for his family, shots may need to be taken which otherwise would be totally unsporting. But, if the meat isn't deparately needed such shots, in my opinion, are irresponsible, juvenile stunts...possibly by a person who is also too lazy to do the job right.

I know that may not be a popular view in this day and age, but on this subject I don't give a tinker's God-Damn if it is popular or not.


I would bet more deer are wounded and lost by hunters making a jump shot at a moving deer in close cover than those wounded and lost while being shot from 2-300 yards while feeding in a field.



That may well be. I don't advocate taking ANY shot which may result in unnecessary pain and suffering for a not-dangerous animal.

For anyone other than a subsistance hunter, it is a GAME. To play the game ethically, I believe one should have to follow the rules. The rules, as I see them, include:

1. Don't take any shot which has a significant chance of causing needless pain and suffering.

2. Always use enough gun.

3. Work hard and regularly to improve one's skills in all aspects of The Game, including shooting, tracking, etc.

4. Be willing to accept having had the HUNT as one's one's only gain, if the Gods play it that way. One need not KILL to have had a successful and satisfying venture afield.

5. Do not take more than your legal share.

Doubtless, there are other rules as well, but I think those may be the basic ones.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Donald Nelson:
Why do people act like 300 yards is so far? With today's equipment and a little practice any decent shooter should be able to take deer size animals at 300 yards. I would rather take a 300 yard shot off my bi pods than a 100 yard shot out of a tree stand like many hunters in my area do.
Roll Eyes You certainly have the right to adopt varmint shooting technology to deer hunting.

As for hunting skill, in some areas there are so many hunters sharing the same woods that it actually takes more skill to know the lay of the land and know where the deer will funnel and give the hunter a 300 yards shot than to try and stalk them and piss everyone in the woods off.

Frowner Here , however , it seems that there might be some of those hunters between you and that deer. If not why not get closer? Than too we got a lot of hunters! Wahh!!! holycowroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
At what range does it cease to hunting and start to be guess where the animal will be in 1.5 seconds?


You saying people should not hunt with hand spears[or modern HV bullets] if it takes 1.5 seconds to reach the animal?

Surely advances in weaponry meant that one could more efficiently & effectively take game at distances further than one could with club,spear boomerang or arrow.
and as bullets,powders,steels,rifle design and sighting systems advanced further, those distances sensibly increased.
 
Posts: 9434 | Location: Here & There- | Registered: 14 May 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of thecanadian
posted Hide Post
Any 338 caliber will be potent on Elk out to 500yds, so to me it comes down to cost.
Based on cost of brass, I like the 338 Norma mag or the 338 Wyatt (338-416Rigby improved).


"though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."

---Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 1093 | Location: Eau Claire, WI | Registered: 20 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wstrnhuntr
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Donald Nelson:
Why do people act like 300 yards is so far?


Its not the 300 yds in the original post that gives me pause, its the 300+..

Plus what??

For 300 yds, none of the above, a 338-06. What I want to know is, why do people act like it is so hard to dope 10-12 inches of bullet drop??

bewildered
 
Posts: 10190 | Location: Tooele, Ut | Registered: 27 September 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
50 yards
300 FPS
Roughly .5 second
quote:
Originally posted by Trax:
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
At what range does it cease to hunting and start to be guess where the animal will be in 1.5 seconds?


You saying people should not hunt with hand spears[or modern HV bullets] if it takes 1.5 seconds to reach the animal?

Surely advances in weaponry meant that one could more efficiently & effectively take game at distances further than one could with club,spear boomerang or arrow.
and as bullets,powders,steels,rifle design and sighting systems advanced further, those distances sensibly increased.


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rub Line
posted Hide Post
.338 Win. archer


-----------------------------------------------------


Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. Proverbs 26-4


National Rifle Association Life Member

 
Posts: 1992 | Location: WI | Registered: 28 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I voted 338 Win Mag, only because I like it so much. I try and get closer than 300. The longest shot I have taken at deer is around 150 yards, and for that sort of hunting the 338 Win Mag is plenty.
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Australia | Registered: 11 August 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
popcornFor silly long range shooting as for what you asked,( 300 +) the .338 RUM single shot Mod. 98, 30" barrel, deep throated for heaviest (longest) bullets , super muzzle break, Strong bi-pod, would be just about right.
Roll EyesHowever , you take to the woods with this type of creature you're really trying some stunt hunting. "Hunters" don't need ultra long range equipment, they try to get in close and do it right. stirroger beer


what's a single shot Mod 98?
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hey Cary, No doubt the 338WinMag is a fine cartridge. With just a modicum of practice in one of todays rifles, just about anyone can shoot it and not be flinching. And it does well with a 24" barrel. Some folks even saw them off shorter than that, but it is probably so they can hear the report better. Wink

I've been fortunate enough to shoot all of them on your list, except the 338Edge. Of those, the 338RUMs were some of the most accurate factory rifles I've shot in the 338Cal. The barrels were long enough to provide plenty of Energy and those factory Muzzle Brakes really work well. If you can shoot a light weight 308Win without a Muzzle Brake, then a 338RUM with a Muzzle Brake will work just fine.

You will have a very Adequate Deer, Hog or Bear Cartridge with any on your list.
-----

Talk about old, someone help Bartsche to the bathroom so he will quit pissers in his own Wheaties. BOOM
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Core:
-----Talk about old, someone help Bartsche to the bathroom so he will quit pissers in his own Wheaties. BOOM

Golly! Now I'm humbled. CRYBABYroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Big Bore Fan
posted Hide Post
8,5x63
 
Posts: 824 | Location: Munich, Bavaria, thats near Germany | Registered: 23 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
Golly! Now I'm humbled. CRYBABYroger
rotflmo animal rotflmo
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
338 TCU is what you all need. Big Grin


DRSS
Kreighoff 470 NE
Valmet 412 30/06 & 9.3x74R
 
Posts: 1993 | Location: Denver | Registered: 31 May 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Dave Bush
posted Hide Post
I usually don't shoot stuff at 300 plus yards. Fact of the matter is there are a lot of 300 yard rifles in the hands of 100 yard riflemen. My current favorite is a little compact .338 Ruger Compact Magnum.. It will do all I need to do with a .338 and it is very handy. Michezl and Jeff got me on this light and handy thing and I wish I had tripped to this 20 years ago.


Dave
DRSS
Chapuis 9.3X74
Chapuis "Jungle" .375 FL
Krieghoff 500/.416 NE
Krieghoff 500 NE

"Git as close as y can laddie an then git ten yards closer"

"If the biggest, baddest animals on the planet are on the menu, and you'd rather pay a taxidermist than a mortician, consider the 500 NE as the last word in life insurance." Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading (8th Edition).
 
Posts: 3728 | Location: Midwest | Registered: 26 November 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The .338 Lapua and the .340 Wby has served my family of shooters (son-grandsons) well over the years. I have owned and shot, or shot for others, all those on the list except the Edge. We have taken many Deer, Elk and a Moose with them. With 225 grain bullets from Barnes XLC or X, 225 to 240 grain bullets from North Fork, 225 grain bullets from Swift A-Frame, the Lapua and Weatherby are awesome. Well over 3000 fps and pin point accuracy for those bullets mentioned will keep them in our hands for many years. Good shooting.


phurley
 
Posts: 2371 | Location: KY | Registered: 22 September 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Core:
Hey Cary, No doubt the 338WinMag is a fine cartridge. With just a modicum of practice in one of todays rifles, just about anyone can shoot it and not be flinching. And it does well with a 24" barrel. Some folks even saw them off shorter than that, but it is probably so they can hear the report better. Wink

I've been fortunate enough to shoot all of them on your list, except the 338Edge. Of those, the 338RUMs were some of the most accurate factory rifles I've shot in the 338Cal. The barrels were long enough to provide plenty of Energy and those factory Muzzle Brakes really work well. If you can shoot a light weight 308Win without a Muzzle Brake, then a 338RUM with a Muzzle Brake will work just fine.

You will have a very Adequate Deer, Hog or Bear Cartridge with any on your list.
-----

Talk about old, someone help Bartsche to the bathroom so he will quit pissers in his own Wheaties. BOOM


So you are afraid of the report of a short 338 Win Mag but glow about a braked 338 RUM.

You're an idiot.
 
Posts: 2659 | Location: Southwestern Alberta | Registered: 08 March 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Wstrnhuntr:
quote:
Originally posted by Donald Nelson:
Why do people act like 300 yards is so far?


Its not the 300 yds in the original post that gives me pause, its the 300+..

Plus what??

For 300 yds, none of the above, a 338-06. What I want to know is, why do people act like it is so hard to dope 10-12 inches of bullet drop??

bewildered


300+ still means less than 400 yards to me. So I have to agree I think the .338-06 would be a good choice. My .338-06 is PBR to 336 yards with a 200 grain Hornady bullet at 2880 fps on a 10" target, 309 yards if you drop to an 8" target. Holdover is aim top of the back on an elk at 400 yards.
 
Posts: 2242 | Registered: 09 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
300 yards should be a chipshot on a relatively still animal. Any high speed bullet will get there before the vitals are gone. To 500 yards or further, the bullet is going to get there very quick.

Out to 600 yards or so, the 338 Win Mag will do fantastic with reloads, and you can get factory ammo for it anywhere.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
.33WFC.. holycow


DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway
 
Posts: 2805 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For Elk, I shoot the .338 Win Mag.
If I was building a long shooter in .338, I'd consider the RUM.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rub Line
posted Hide Post
I've shot both the 338 WM and also the 338 RUM. I also have a friend that owns a 340 WBY. With my own experience, the bigger cases only offer an advantage when shooting heavy bullets (>250 gr). With bullets lighter than 250 grains, any gain in velocity are nominal and offset by added recoil and blast.

My 338 Win Mag gets an honest 3,000 fps out of a 27" barrel shooting 225 grain bullets. I'm getting 2700 fps out of 250 grain bullets. My load data is just below max loads listed in the Speer #12 manual.

With 225 grain bullets, the bigger cases will burn 20% more powder and give you much more muzzle blast and recoil. The main advantage, however, is how well the monster cases impress all of guys at the rifle range.

For me, less is more when it comes to the .338 and I honestly feel that the bigger cases deliver diminishing returns.


-----------------------------------------------------


Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. Proverbs 26-4


National Rifle Association Life Member

 
Posts: 1992 | Location: WI | Registered: 28 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Oldsarge
posted Hide Post
Well, I've only been hunting for about fifty-two years, but I've never taken a shot at a head of game at over 125 yards, myself . . .


Sarge

Holland's .375: One Planet, One Rifle . . . for one hundred years!
 
Posts: 2690 | Location: Lakewood, CA. USA | Registered: 07 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
338WM...every major manufacturer chambers rifles in this caliber, factory ammo is plentiful, handloading components are common, and it has taken everything in North America. Imitation in the form of faster 338s is the sincerest form of flattery...
 
Posts: 453 | Location: North Pole, Alaska | Registered: 28 April 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
338 AccRel...
375 ruger necked down to 338, and used at 338 winmag vels.. NIL recoil.

if used at 340 weatherby, then a bit more bite and boot


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40240 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 1324 | Location: Oregon rain forests | Registered: 30 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have owned 13 .338WM rifles since I bought my first in January, 1968 and now have 6, including that first P-64 Mod. 70. I have four of these, a Dakota 76 and a Classic sts, with some action mods.

I shoot 250s exclusively and get velocities ranging from 2725 to 2800, depending on bbl length, powder and specific bullet. I have LOTS of other rifles and I often wonder why I do not sell everything except my .338WMs, it just don't get no better for BC hunting.

I have shot .340Wea. rifles and loaded for and shot my buddy's .338RUM with it's 27" Lilja and frankly, I can't be bothered to own a rifle in either.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
< 300 yards:

338 RCM
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia