Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Many say they look for “high” load density when selecting a powder What do you consider “high”; is 89-90% high enough? Jim fur, feathers, & meat in the freezer "Pass it on to your kids" | ||
|
Moderator |
personally, i like 90% in rifle cases .. the closer to full the better, if safe loads .. YMMV opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club Information on Ammoguide about the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR. 476AR, http://www.weaponsmith.com | |||
|
One of Us |
Yep, I agree with Jeff. I like to shoot compressed loads when ever possible. | |||
|
one of us |
I have no problem w/ 100% load density. Some of my best loads are slightly compressed. LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT! | |||
|
one of us |
I too like the Slowest Powder that provides the highest SAFE MAX velocity. And I find they are normally slightly Compressed Loads in my rifles. That way you tend to get a more even Burn Rate which translates into better Accuracy. Best of luck to you. | |||
|
One of Us |
For me it depends. Several times I have found loads which were around the 75% range which shot really well. One such load was 46.5grs of IMR 3031 in a .270. Very low recoil, decent velocity, and one hole accurate. The same rifle also likes a case full up to the neck of Ramshot hunter, very accurate, right at 3100fps, but there is a big difference in recoil. For most cases I load which are based off the .308 or similar, I don't mind using the fsater type powders which result in a little shake in the case. For the bigger ones I look for loads which will get me up to at least the shoulder or base of the neck. Not that they have historically been more accurate for me, but I generally have been able to get a higher velocity from them before peaking out on pressure. Mike / Tx | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia