High load density
Many say they look for “high” load density when selecting a powder
What do you consider “high”; is 89-90% high enough?
Jim
fur, feathers, & meat in the freezer
"Pass it on to your kids"
02 July 2010, 23:47
jeffeossopersonally, i like 90% in rifle cases .. the closer to full the better, if safe loads .. YMMV
03 July 2010, 00:15
Antelope SniperYep, I agree with Jeff. I like to shoot compressed loads when ever possible.
03 July 2010, 02:01
fredj338I have no problem w/ 100% load density. Some of my best loads are slightly compressed.
03 July 2010, 18:33
Hot CoreI too like the Slowest Powder that provides the highest SAFE MAX velocity. And I find they are normally slightly Compressed Loads in my rifles.
That way you tend to get a more even Burn Rate which translates into better Accuracy.
Best of luck to you.
05 July 2010, 15:32
Mke / Txquote:
Originally posted by Abob:
Many say they look for “high” load density when selecting a powder
What do you consider “high”; is 89-90% high enough?
For me it depends. Several times I have found loads which were around the 75% range which shot really well. One such load was 46.5grs of IMR 3031 in a .270. Very low recoil, decent velocity, and one hole accurate.
The same rifle also likes a case full up to the neck of Ramshot hunter, very accurate, right at 3100fps, but there is a big difference in recoil.
For most cases I load which are based off the .308 or similar, I don't mind using the fsater type powders which result in a little shake in the case. For the bigger ones I look for loads which will get me up to at least the shoulder or base of the neck. Not that they have historically been more accurate for me, but I generally have been able to get a higher velocity from them before peaking out on pressure.