One of Us
| No one's seen this before?
Don |
| | | Posts: 1087 | Location: Detroit MI | Registered: 28 March 2006 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| danged clever/never encountered such a device before |
| | |
One of Us
| Thing is the rest of the rifle doesn't seem to have the same workmanship so I figured this was a purchased part.
Don |
| | | Posts: 1087 | Location: Detroit MI | Registered: 28 March 2006 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I don't know but I need one for a rifle I have that gives light strikes (converted to cock-on-open). |
| | |
one of us
| Don,
I thought I had seen most of these conversions, but this is a new one for me. I usually welded up the cam in the bolt and recut for the cock on opening. Is this a new machined shroud with a longer threaded section?
Could you place this shroud next to a standard enfield rear shroud and photo for a better view? |
| | |
One of Us
| quote: I leave them cock on closing as that is actually a better system and was designed that way for a reason.
I agree 100%. I can't understand this "fetish" for cock on opening. I prefer a rifle where ALL the camming action on opening is used on the extraction of the fired case. |
| | | Posts: 6824 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by LesBrooks:
Don,
I thought I had seen most of these conversions, but this is a new one for me. I usually welded up the cam in the bolt and recut for the cock on opening. Is this a new machined shroud with a longer threaded section?
Could you place this shroud next to a standard enfield rear shroud and photo for a better view?
Les, I'll get so more pics later, but here is one I had on the computer already. It loks as there was just a groove cut in the factory shroud. Also looks as the original cocking piece was used too. Don   |
| | | Posts: 1087 | Location: Detroit MI | Registered: 28 March 2006 |
IP
|
|
