THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Testing an Echols Rifle
 Login/Join
 
Moderator
posted Hide Post
vigillinus-
I totally agree with you about 'glass stocked rifles being the most practical for real world hunting in all conditions. The purists love to argue this but I've satisfied myself about the advantages of fiberglass/kevlar for a hunting rifle stock, so I don't waste my money on wood any longer.
I was just making the point that it is not possible to properly compare a wooden stocked rifle with a 'glass stocked rifle, regardless of who made them.
 
Posts: 1148 | Location: The Hunting Fields | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, if nothing else has been accomplished on this thread, I’m sure it will take top honors for August’s most viewed topic! Smiler
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stubblejumper:
quote:
In other words, from what I understood, even though they had reliable function from the other rifles, they might not always be 100% reliable, 100% of the time- something that they felt that the Legend would provide.


No product no matter how perfectly it is made will perform perfectly 100% of the time.Take the space shuttles for instance.There have been failures despite the most rigorous quality control and very extensive testing.However a rifle built by a skilled gunsmith will usually be as close to 100% reliable as one can expect.Spending more money to have a better known gunsmith build the rifle may make the product visually more appealing,but it will not necessarily improve the reliability of the rifle.


Totally agree in theory...but, I don’t think I would use the Space Shuttle as an example of something that was designed well.

I can put up with a rifle that malfunctions once in awhile...as long as that malfunction doesn’t include blowing up in my face! Smiler
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
<allen day>
posted
I agree with John 100%. I admire and love fine wood, and I'd never criticize anyone who preferred to hunt with wood, but from here on out, I'm hunting with fiberglass-stock rifles only. It's just one less thing I have to worry about in an age when hunting is very expensive, and certain opportunities come along just one time.

Traditional custom rifles have, in general, gradually gotten better and better since WWII. The detail work, quality, and general workmanship has improved over time, but to the point now that many custom rifles have lost their functionality, and for a lot of reasons.

But to site a specific example, extreme detail work has made the rifles increasingly and prohibitively expensive, and has made them highly vulnerable to hard use. And because of this, some of the gunwriters have really backed away from their long-time support of the traditional side of the custom rifle industry, and so have many clients who are more hunters than art collectors.

In hunting camps around the world, fiberglass-stocked semi-custom and custom rifles are increasingly the dress of the day. Some of the hunters carrying these rifles might have a safe full of fine, expensive, artfully-executed wood-stocked rifles in their collections back home, and with more on order, but when it comes time to pull one out of the safe to take hunting, they're grabbingly 'glass. This isn't universal, but the trend is increasing, and more so every year.

And this is how D'Arcy's 'Legend' rifle was born. It came at the request of one of his clients who asked Echols if it was possible for him to come up with a fiberglass-stocked rifle that featured all of the quality and functional features of his 'Classic' rifle, but without the wood stock.

Not hide-bound by tradition and open to the idea, but not finding the quality of components he wanted to employ, D'Arcy contacted McMillan for starters. He then carved out a model stock to his own pattern, complete with hand checkering, then had McMillan reproduce in 'glass. That stock has served as the foundation of the entire 'Legend' program.

I remember meeting D'Arcy for the first time when the NRA convention was in Seattle, which must have been around 1986. He was my age, and I was impressed with his work and his intellect, but we didn't do any business at the time because I couldn't afford to! Then in the late 1990s, one of my friends came back from the SCI convention and raved about the work of D'Arcy Echols. He flatly stated that he thought Echols did the best work, and that he'd love to own one of his rifles. A couple of years later, Echols unveiled the 'Legend', and this same friend ordered two of them on the spot. A year later, I was in Echols' booth at SCI with my wife, and ordered one in 375 H&H for myself. And so it's gone.....

AD
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In line with what Allen stated, I have a friend who is the original owner of a BEAUTIFUL 1963 split widow Corvette that looks like he drove it out of the showroom yesterday...but don’t for one minute think he drives that sucker to work everyday!
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by allen day:
Bigbull, some custom rifles are expensive, and they never do work right and are never made right by the gunmaker. This is much more common than you might think. How some of this expensive junk gets sent out to trusting clients is beyond me, but it happens. I could write a long magazine article sighting examples that I've experienced myself, as have some of my friends. Here's one example:

Some eleven years ago, I hired a recommended craftsman, a "dangerous game rifles specialist", to build a custom 416 Rem. Mag. on a Model 70 action. I visited his shop, looked over completed rifles, picked out wood, etc. He told me to send him a Model 70 Classic 375 H&H as the foundation. I asked about getting one in 416 Rem. Mag., but he said one in 375 H&H was good enough..........

In due course, the completed rifle arrived, and at first glance it looked very pretty. But I couldn't help but notice that the open sights were canted on the barrel. Then I opened the action and noticed that he had extended the magazine box via cutting and welding (and guesswork), but used the same magazine follower, and there has about a half-inch gap between the front of the follower and the front of the box, which I knew straight-away would create problems. So I stuffed the magazine full, cycled the action, and that SOB wouldn't feed worth shinola. I took a Model 70 416 follower out of my friend's factory M70 416 to test, and this change helped, but it still didn't feed nearly well enough for Africa, and I had a 21-day safari less than six months away.

So I called the gunmaker, complained loud and long, and he told me to send him the rifle. When I received it back, it fed even WORSE than before, the open sights were still canted, only this time some of the screws were buggered. Totally enraged, I decided to get going on another rifle and sort out the situation with this very pretty piece of junk after I got back from Africa.

So I found a Model 70 Classic in 458 Win. Mag. and took it to a very good local gunsmith to rebuild into a real-world DG rifle. This time I had what I thought was a winner, and this 458 fed perfectly, and shot extremely well. I put 260 rounds though it at the range without a hitch before my safari. It sounds like all should have worked out just fine, and it sort of did -- up to a point. In Africa, that 458 hammered a zebra, a buffalo, and a hippo. But after that hippo hit the ground, I worked the bolt hard and fast for a reload -- and the rifle went off! It slam-fired because my good riflesmith back home set the triggerpull too light. It worked great at the range, but when worked fast during an in-your-face DG situation, its true nature managed to reveal itself, and we got it to slam-fire twice more!!

This kind of BS, amature-built junk (the 416) would NEVER get let out of Echols' shop, ever, nor would a rifle be let out with a too-light trigger that could cause problems. You talk about price, well hey, baby, let's just make a habit of stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime why don't we? What's your safety and the value of your hunting investment worth, anyway? You can purchase health and life insurance policies alright, but if a buffalo catches up to you because you rifle mucks up at high-noon, you'll STILL be crippled or maimed or dead! Just ask Keith Atcheson's wife, who was beat-up and hospitalized by a buffalo last year if that is not all too true. Your money or your life, take your pick! Not to mention the fact that many hunting trips are increasingly EXPENSIVE (price 21 days in Tanzania, for example!). Why take a rifle that isn't 100%? Reverse-economy simply doesn't make sense.........

Yesterday my wife and I met up with Steve, who is one of our members here at AR and just a wonderful guy and dedicated hunter who we really enjoy and respect. This was at a Portland SCI chapter meeting and BBQ. Steve pointed out to me one of our chapter members who was badly beaten up by a buffalo just five years ago and who struggled with recovery for a long time, and right away I thought of my friend Bob Fontana who was killed by a buffalo just last year. These were not rifle-related episodes, but nevertheless, it is prudent to do everything possible to ensure that the rifle you carry is 100% reliable, and I mean ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT! It's the greatest single piece of life insurance you can possibly take out, and it's a 'policy' that you only have to purchase ONE time!

My current 416 Rem. Mag. is Echols-built and feeds so perfectly (solids, softs -- you name it) that you might as well be working the action empty, plus it SHOOTS, far better than you'd think a 416 could. What price should be set on that kind of insurance? There are certain things in this world that transend price, and giving your business to some good ol' boy gunsmith near home, patronizing the 'Mickey Mouse Club', thus purchasing because you saw it on the Disney Channel or the ODL Network where it was endorsed by a celebrity hunter, a special closeout at Sportsman's Warehouse, or because the cosmetically-gratifying work resembles that of a circa 1925 Rigby doesn't necessarily cut it. No matter what, the proof will be in the performance.

I learned this the hard way: When it comes to real-use hunting rifles, appearances can be totally deceiving. Pretty is as pretty DOES, every time.........

AD


I am considering a few custom rifle builders now and this advice really hits home.
 
Posts: 164 | Registered: 02 August 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
This has been an interesting thread with lots of interesting opinions. But meanwhile this man has continued doing what he does so well, and making less per hour than your Toyota mechanic, while turning out Bentleys.











With a few Land Rovers thrown in for good measure



Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4210 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Phil, great photos! Do you own one? If so, what cartridge and specs?
 
Posts: 164 | Registered: 02 August 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
Hunter, I don't own an Echols rifle but he did send me a rifle to use for a full season in order to get my input. I have been to his shop on a number of occasions and took those photos.

The bottom rifle is mine, It originated from an idea D'Arcy had to test all the claims of durability of different coatings. I had an old pre-64 M-70 action with a stainless steel 9.3x62 bbl. It has not gone through D'Arcy's entire tuning, machining and fitness regime so it doesn't have the pedigree to wear his label. He just installed one of his Edge stocks and then had each of the metal pieces either blued or coated by a different process in order that he can actually see which ones hold up the best. I don't know which is which, my job is just to abuse them all equally.
Due to it's light weight,power, portability and the handling it has become my everyday carrying rifle. I still carry my 458 though when guiding fall bear hunters though!


Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4210 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia