THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    How often is (bolt) action truing really necessary?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
How often is (bolt) action truing really necessary?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by craigster:
Hey Rick,

Did you ever think that they all can't be messed up but maybe something else is?


Rick? Think?

Naahhh.....

Why bother thinking when he KNOWS everything already?
 
Posts: 2629 | Registered: 21 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tiggertate:
Rick, the question is what is an acceptable tolerance, not is it "square". That's the crux of the issue.


I understand that, I’m asking wnat you guys use as a “ruler“ to make the determination that your receiver falls within the tolerances that you feel are adequate for your needs. Do you take measurements or do you just sit back and look at it and say: Well, everything looks pretty straight to me!

I will be the first to say that all rifles do not need to be totally blue-printed in order to have acceptable accuracy for hunting or even casual target shooting. But I am hearing people saying that even cleaning up and squaring the receiver face prior to installing a new barrel is a waste of time and money. That’s a ridiculous view in my opinion. Don’t you want a good solid fit for a new barrel no matter what you are going to use the rifle for and no matter what you expect in the way of accuracy?
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Here's the deal, unless you have 1 square surface from which to obtain the other critical measurements of the job i.e., shank length, bolt nose recess, extractor cuts, headspace etc., you will not know how far in, or, out the rest of the action is.

Whether the customer is spending under $100.00 (here we go... Big Grin), or, over $1000 for the barrel job, I firmly believe you do a disservice to the customer if you don't provide him with the best and most complete picture possible as to the health of the job.

Regardless of the price of the job, the first thing that I do is fit a mandrel in the bolt tunnel, dial the mandrel on centers, and square the face of the receiver. It takes very little to do this and it is covered in the cost of the job. From here, all other measurements are taken and the customer is informed. It is the customers decision where we go from here based on the most accurate information I supply.
 
Posts: 1374 | Registered: 06 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think its hilarious that a guy would trust a smith enough to barrel his rifle but doesn’t trust him enough to take his advise on what needs to be done to do the job properly.

They way some of you guys talk I’m not sure why you even bother to install a new barrel, hell, the old one still sends the bullet down range doesn’t it?
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rick 0311:
I have 17 actions right now, six of which are brand new in the box, and not a one of them had the receiver face, receiver threads, bolt face, locking lugs, etc, all square to the centerline of the receiver.

100% failure rate?

bewildered animal bewildered animal bewildered animal


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40240 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by craigster:
Hey Rick,

Did you ever think that they all can't be messed up but maybe something else is?


craigster, when your folks decide your old enough to have expensive tools maybe you can buy some dial indicators and a depth mic! Smiler

Call any gunsmithing shop that does barreling and action work (except for Mark Skaggs) or call the techline at Brownells and ask them how square factory actions are.

Or call the company that makes Brownells threaded mandrels and ask them how much slop they have to put in the threads of their mandrels so they will fit the majority of receivers.
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by Rick 0311:
I have 17 actions right now, six of which are brand new in the box, and not a one of them had the receiver face, receiver threads, bolt face, locking lugs, etc, all square to the centerline of the receiver.

100% failure rate?

bewildered animal bewildered animal bewildered animal


Well, jeffe...they are probably as square and in line as a stock coming off your duplicator, but I expect a bit tighter tolerances than you do I guess.

jumping
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cold Bore:
quote:
Originally posted by craigster:
Hey Rick,

Did you ever think that they all can't be messed up but maybe something else is?


Rick? Think?

Naahhh.....

Why bother thinking when he KNOWS everything already?


The
only thing Rick thinks is that he's an expert on everything and that his shit doesn't stink.
 
Posts: 8169 | Location: humboldt | Registered: 10 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rick 0311:
quote:
Originally posted by tiggertate:
Rick, the question is what is an acceptable tolerance, not is it "square". That's the crux of the issue.


I understand that, I’m asking wnat you guys use as a “ruler“ to make the determination that your receiver falls within the tolerances that you feel are adequate for your needs. Do you take measurements or do you just sit back and look at it and say: Well, everything looks pretty straight to me!

I will be the first to say that all rifles do not need to be totally blue-printed in order to have acceptable accuracy for hunting or even casual target shooting. But I am hearing people saying that even cleaning up and squaring the receiver face prior to installing a new barrel is a waste of time and money. That’s a ridiculous view in my opinion. Don’t you want a good solid fit for a new barrel no matter what you are going to use the rifle for and no matter what you expect in the way of accuracy?


I am ambivolous, I guess. The guy that does my barrels for me has had carte blanche to do what he thinks is necessary. I doubt that he's squared many but they all shoot well enough for me. That may be more a comment on my shooting than anything else but I got out of the "nth degree accuracy" rifles about 15 years ago and just mess with sporters now.

If I wanted another bull-barrel PD rifle I'd go for the whole enchilada.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11143 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
tiggertate,

Setting up a receiver and taking a slight facing cut to clean up and square up the face of the receiver prior to installing a new barrel is hardly something that is only done on “nth degree†accuracy rifles.
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
killpc

quote:
Originally posted by Rick 0311:
tiggertate,

Setting up a receiver and taking a slight facing cut to clean up and square up the face of the receiver prior to installing a new barrel is hardly something that is only done on “nth degree†accuracy rifles.


Yeah, but it's what YOU, Rick, stated is the PROPER method for installing a barrel Where you disingenious when you stated that this was the proper way to install a barrel? Perhaps there's more to it (like facing the bolt) that you over looked or hadn't heard of?


quote:
Originally posted by Rick 0311:

I consider squaring the receiver face an integral part of installing a new barrel (included in the price)...but that’s just me.


...
quote:
Originally posted by Rick 0311:
fireball168,

Assuming a pre threaded barrel, since that seems to be what Mr. Skaggs primarily installs. And also assuming that the receiver has come without a barrel that has to be removed. If not, then obviously the first step would be removing the old barrel.

1. Clean, inspect and take necessary measurements from the receiver. Check for excessive lug set back...remove ridge (if present) from top receiver locking lug face.

2. Square receiver face and primary torque shoulder. Lap bolt/receiver locking lugs.

3. Measure barrel shank/threads and make any necessary adjustmets based on measurements taken from receiver.

4. Finish chamber/install/headspace/crown/test fire.

I personally DO NOT consider any of these PROCEDURES to be “trick stuff†or things only reserved for BR or $5,000.00 rifles.

On a BR rifle the smith should strive for and hold much tighter toleances, but the PROCEDURES are the same.

By the way, using the GT receiver holding fixture to indicate the receiver does not require that you ream the bolt ways over size and install bushings on the bolt. It’s just a really slick fixture that will hold any and all receivers, independent of the receiver threads that may or may not be square to the centerline of the receiver, and allows you to quickly set/indicate the receiver for cutting/squaring operations.

Mr. Skaggs method (as he describes it) uses the receiver threads to indicate for the receiver facing/squaring cuts, and then uses the rear receiver bolt way to indicate for facing/squaring the primary torque shoulder. He does not indicate if he has taken the time to assure that the centerline of the rear bolt way and the receiver threads are in fact square to each other first.

In my opinion, if an rifle isn’t worthty or deserving of that basic treatment then it isn’t worthy or deserving of a new barrel in the first place.

As I have said earlier, if all you want is a new barrel screwed on your rifle and the chamber cut enough to allow the bolt to close on the proper headspace gauge, then don’t worry about any of this stuff.


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40240 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 9.3x62:
I guess I'd prefer a smith that would do if it needed doing and not do it if it was superfluous.
Hey 9.3x62, I'd say you can get that kind of service from some Smiths, but not all of them. The only way to find the right one is to talk to them, or get recommendations from people you trust. Cost is not always a true indicator of the results.

quote:
quote:
Well..., there is an excellent reason for that - there is NOTHING WRONG with the factory recoil lug.


So can I then presume that that there is nothing wrong with the squareness of my receiver or bolt face?
No, those are two separate things.

Even if the Receiver Face is not perfectly square, the Recoil Lug will snug up to it. And it can be bedded that way too.

Don't have an idea how far out of square it would have to be to create a stock problem. But a Termite Food stock would show the results of non-square Recoil Stress quicker than the excellent Synthetic Stocks.

And squareness also has to do with how easy it is to get the Sights to align with where you want the bullet to go. Irons were easier than scopes to get aligned until the Burris Signature Rings came along. Today you can have a Receiver that is out of square, mis-aligned Scope Base holes, and a skewed barrel, but still get the Scope to align.
---

Good quest for information on your part.

There are additional "Variables" that can also influence the decision(s) about how much work is needed. Your own shooting ability and how you develop your own Loads.

For example, I can't shoot as well as I could say 40 years ago. I have a number of factory rifles that have had nothing done to them other than Adjusting the Trigger and they do fine for me. But, I still do a bit of long distance shooting and I know the limiting factor is the Trigger Yanker, not the equipment.

If your shots will be inside 400yds, and you "Practice" at that distance, then a good old factory Remington, with the Trigger Adjusted will "typically" not need anything else except cleaning and properly prepared Loads.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Interesting thread (with the exception of some childish scatological references - where's the "Ignore" button?). I'm in the process of trying to decide how much gunsmith work to have done on a couple of new M70 SS action.

The very first thing I want done is to have the 'smith give me an evaluation of the action and recommended work based upon what I've explained I'm trying to do. These two actions look and feel good (very smooth) to me, but I have heard a lot of talk about poor USRAC quality towards the end, and I recognize my Mark 1 Eyeballs are not calibrated to the level necessary to determine quality - that's why I hire a 'smith(!), and I expect to pay for that evaluation.

If he says, "Hey, pretty good action," then we're good to go. If he mumbles something indeterminate, I'll send him another one and we'll do it again. I don't expect factory perfection (good thing), but I do want a reasonable baseline from which to start what will be a pretty expensive (for me) project.

Something I don't expect: cost effectiveness. When I put on a new barrel, or have an action smoothed, or lugs lapped, or trigger smoothed and safety timed, I'm not changing the rifles basic, cheap, ability to send bullets downrange. I'm changing only its character, and only a very few people will recognize the improvement. So what? I'm one of them.

Jaywalker
 
Posts: 1006 | Location: Texas | Registered: 30 December 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
My 2 cents. Why wouldn't you have it done, cost? Well it depends on your budget and the rifle you are working on. If you are just replacing a worn out barrel on old faithful, I probably would not have it done. If I were have a custom rifle built on a factory action, than absolutly I would have it done. Scientifically no action is perfectly true, if you continue to measure using greater and greater accuracy you will eventually find some degree of deviation. The factory assembled actions are just that and are put together by gun factory workers not gunsmiths. These features are never checked and the variation from gun to gun is going to be great. That is why many people want to use a custom built action (GMA, Hein, and others), that are machined from solid, built one at a time and leave the shop square and true as possible.
 
Posts: 18 | Location: Upper US | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
<9.3x62>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Core:
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Core:
Well..., there is an excellent reason for that - there is NOTHING WRONG with the factory recoil lug.


quote:
Originally posted by 9.3x62:
So can I then presume that that there is nothing wrong with the squareness of my receiver or bolt face?


No, those are two separate things.

Even if the Receiver Face is not perfectly square, the Recoil Lug will snug up to it. And it can be bedded that way too.



I think you missed my point. If the lug, essentially a washer, is out of flat or marred, warped or whatever from the original install or from factory milling, then snugging it up to a nice, freshly squared receiver is going to defeat, at least in part, any efforts made to square the action as a whole.

If we can expect receivers to need squaring, it seems reasonable that we can expect recoil lugs to potentially have meaningful imperfections as well (non uniform thickness); both are products of mass production and play important roles, in tandem, in the overall alignment of the action and bore. These potential issues with lugs have given rise to aftermarket lugs (even those of standard thickness), as well as smiths who advertise that they will surface true a factory lug if it is to be re-used (e.g., Mark Penrod does this).
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rick 0311:
tiggertate,

Setting up a receiver and taking a slight facing cut to clean up and square up the face of the receiver prior to installing a new barrel is hardly something that is only done on “nth degree†accuracy rifles.


I don't believe I said it was. You need a class in how to avoid words between the lines that don't exist. All I'm saying is based on a reasonbly large sample of bolt guns that I've watched/shot/owned/borrowed/loaned/pawned/unpawned the average receiver (what this thread is about) is good enough for less than nth degree purposes. Of course there are bad ones out there but how many as a percent of total production? That is the issue, not what are preferred gunsmithing practices.

But my experience is based on rebarreling more than buying a new action and starting from scratch. Every gun I rebarreled was shot (by me) in some other caliber first, sometimes for years. So I knew what the potential was or wasn't and if it shot well before, it was safe to say it would shoot well again without worrying about receivers and bolt faces.

The vast majority of bolt action rifles I've owned the last 35 years got down to between 1.0 and .5 MOA with the standard hobbyist tuning like bedding, floating and one or two crown jobs. I don't recall a single instance of being told I had a receiver so bad it needed work (other than messed up scope base holes or such). Maybe 5 out of a hundred would never shoot to an inch or inch and a half for reasons that could not be identified with the rifle assembled.

Based on that experience as a consumer I have to say that the average or even most receivers will work fine without the work 9.3 x 62 asked about.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11143 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 9.3x62:
I think you missed my point. If the lug, essentially a washer, is out of flat or marred, warped or whatever from the original install or from factory milling, then snugging it up to a nice, freshly squared receiver is going to defeat, at least in part, any efforts made to square the action as a whole.

If we can expect receivers to need squaring, it seems reasonable that we can expect recoil lugs to potentially have meaningful imperfections as well (non uniform thickness); both are products of mass production and play important roles, in tandem, in the overall alignment of the action and bore. These potential issues with lugs have given rise to aftermarket lugs (even those of standard thickness), as well as smiths who advertise that they will surface true a factory lug if it is to be re-used (e.g., Mark Penrod does this).
Hey 9.3x62, Actually I understood what you were asking.

The Remington Recoil Lug is a "Stamped" part and it is not "surface ground". But it doesn't matter.

The only way it could be damaged enough at the factory to matter is if it got an accidental double strike in the press.

It is as useless to go to a surface ground recoil lug on a hunting rifle used inside 400yds as it is to put a Jewel Trigger on it.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tiggertate:


I don't believe I said it was. You need a class in how to avoid words between the lines that don't exist.



tiggertate,

Good advice...I’ll do my best to follow it, and perhaps you‘ll do the same! beer
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
I'm dyslexic so sometimes I get it backwards.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11143 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I know the exact answer to this question, but I'm not going to tell anybody...........cause its a super secret. Smiler


Billy,

High in the shoulder

(we band of bubbas)
 
Posts: 1868 | Location: League City, Texas | Registered: 11 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I installed a new stainless barrel in 22-250 AI on a Win 70 today and took notes specifically to address this subject. Upon popping the barrel, I stripped and thoroughly cleaned the action, and went to taking measurements. The face of the receiver was out .008 with the bolt tunnel.

After lathe truing the face I measured the remaining points and noted that the bolt lug recesses were out a combined total of .003 between the two. The bolt face was pretty true and within .001. I dialed in the bolt body and indicated the bolt lugs separately and they were offset .002 from each other.

The bolt nose was off .005. I lathe trued it so that I could maintain a close fit between the bolt nose and the breech of the barrel which assures as much support to the case as physically possible. The factory barrel had the phony assed feed ramp looking bevel, that blown actions have come to know. Big Grin

After seating Brownells center loaded bolt lapping tool against the newly squared receiver face, it was a fairly simple matter to bring the bolt lugs and their recess into alignment. Other than a minor amount of lateral slop in the bolt body, this action was good to go.

It is my opinion, that this action was too far out of whack to let slide. The new barrel, a Lilja, deserved no less an effort to assure good results. The customer will be out with it this weekend and I will be awaiting his report.
 
Posts: 1374 | Registered: 06 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Does truing a reciever face

  • always
  • never
  • sometimes


require rebluing the reciever or is the cut face covered by the barrel shoulder.


Thanks, Rob
 
Posts: 1705 | Location: East Coast | Registered: 06 January 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Recoil Rob:
Does truing a reciever face

  • always
  • never
  • sometimes


require rebluing the reciever or is the cut face covered by the barrel shoulder.


Thanks, Rob


Usually, the truing of the receiver face is done at the time a new barrel is installed. Most of the time the complete job gets refinished if the barrel and receiver are of the same materials. Todays job involved a Stainless barrel and a Chrome Moly receiver. The customer will apply the appropriate cammo paint to hide everything on the 22-250 AI. Unless otherwise requested, a little Oxpho blue will cover what the barrels shoulder doesn't.
 
Posts: 1374 | Registered: 06 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by malm:
I installed a new stainless barrel in 22-250 AI on a Win 70 today and took notes specifically to address this subject. Upon popping the barrel, I stripped and thoroughly cleaned the action, and went to taking measurements. The face of the receiver was out .008 with the bolt tunnel.

After lathe truing the face I measured the remaining points and noted that the bolt lug recesses were out a combined total of .003 between the two. The bolt face was pretty true and within .001. I dialed in the bolt body and indicated the bolt lugs separately and they were offset .002 from each other.

The bolt nose was off .005. I lathe trued it so that I could maintain a close fit between the bolt nose and the breech of the barrel which assures as much support to the case as physically possible. The factory barrel had the phony assed feed ramp looking bevel, that blown actions have come to know. Big Grin

After seating Brownells center loaded bolt lapping tool against the newly squared receiver face, it was a fairly simple matter to bring the bolt lugs and their recess into alignment. Other than a minor amount of lateral slop in the bolt body, this action was good to go.

It is my opinion, that this action was too far out of whack to let slide. The new barrel, a Lilja, deserved no less an effort to assure good results. The customer will be out with it this weekend and I will be awaiting his report.



It’s nice to see that some smiths out there take some pride in their work, rather than just screwing a barrel on, head spacing it, and sending it out the door. beer
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I try to live by a saying my late father always used,If its worth doing,do it right the first time clap
 
Posts: 1605 | Location: Wa. State | Registered: 19 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I used to work on cars allot and I don’t recall assuming that only expensive cars or race cars required gapping the spark plugs when installing new ones. Every new spark plug I ever took out of the box had some amount of gap there...should I have assumed that because it looked “close†to the proper gap and because the car was only going to be driven by a “blue collar†guy back and forth to work that I didn’t need to check them and gap them properly?
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Gunsmithing    How often is (bolt) action truing really necessary?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia