THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM LONG RANGE SHOOTING FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Long Range Shooting    What are you favorite LONG RANGE hunting bullets?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: MS Hitman
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What are you favorite LONG RANGE hunting bullets?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
What are your favorite LONG RANGE hunting bullets? Especially those you've successfully used to kill big game with at ~750 yds and beyond.

I'm particularly interested in ...

25 caliber

7mm caliber

.308 caliber

.338 caliber

Thanks ahead of time for your input.

AIU
 
Posts: 3720 | Registered: 03 March 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
25 calibre: I like the 115BT for roos...they are quite amazing. They set up fast even at very long range; but I run them very hot so the velocity is up there. I hit a roo at 1450 and the thing just rolled over dead.

7mm: 168 Berger Hunting or the 162 A-Max which is more frangible.

308: I've only used the 208 A-Max out of a 300 RUM...and 180 Scirocco's

338: I have used the 210 Scirocco in my 338 RUM for shots out to 650. A friend uses the 300 Berger out of a 338 Lapua for roo busting.
 
Posts: 15784 | Location: Australia and Saint Germain en Laye | Registered: 30 December 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My choices are the same as Blair's except I don't have a .338
 
Posts: 518 | Registered: 28 November 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've used the 200gr Accubond in the 300 RUM with complete satisfaction out to 1180 yards. Muzzle velocity was 3250 out of a 30" barrel and expansion was excellent on both an elk at 850 and a mule deer at 1180.


Shoot straight, shoot often.
Matt
 
Posts: 1169 | Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 19 July 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
That 300 RUM of yours works! tu2
 
Posts: 15784 | Location: Australia and Saint Germain en Laye | Registered: 30 December 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
.284 berger 180 grain.
 
Posts: 1946 | Registered: 16 January 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
Picture of Grenadier
posted Hide Post
quote:
Especially those you've successfully used to kill big game with at ~750 yds and beyond.
That rules me out! rotflmo




.
 
Posts: 10900 | Location: North of the Columbia | Registered: 28 April 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I’ve been reading Brian Litz lately, and he’s convinced me that when it comes to killing big game at very long range – say 1000 yds +/- 500 yds – that 1) shot placement into the vitals trumps other measures of terminal ballistics, 2) also, all else being equal, a higher impact velocity will be more lethal than a lower impact velocity, and finally 3) that terminal bullet performance is intimately connected to external ballistic performance.

Thus, higher BC bullets at higher impact velocities are best, because they are more inherently accurate at very long range; because, they are more immune to drop and wind deflection and have a longer "dead space", making it easier to hit the vitals at the highest possible velocity.

That being said, it would appear that VLD bullets, such as those provided by Berger hunting bullets and Nosler LR Accubonds, are the bullets of choice. But, this doesn’t mean other bullets won’t work, it’s just that the odds are better with the high BC bullets fired at relatively high velocity.

I'm going with the Berger VLDs and Nosler LR Accubonds.
 
Posts: 3720 | Registered: 03 March 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've never shot any animal bigger than a roo at ranges over 750 yards. But we do get to shoot a lot of them and the one salient thing I've noticed is that generally they drop to the shot easier than at close range when they are disturbed by the muzzle blast etc. It must be a lack of adrenaline.

High BC bullets kill better? As long as they set up quickly and are frangible. The high BC makes life a lot easier when it comes to doping the wind; this the only tangible advantage I can see.
 
Posts: 15784 | Location: Australia and Saint Germain en Laye | Registered: 30 December 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ackley Improved User:
I’ve been reading Brian Litz lately, and he’s convinced me that when it comes to killing big game at very long range – say 1000 yds +/- 500 yds – that 1) shot placement into the vitals trumps other measures of terminal ballistics, 2) also, all else being equal, a higher impact velocity will be more lethal than a lower impact velocity, and finally 3) that terminal bullet performance is intimately connected to external ballistic performance.

Thus, higher BC bullets at higher impact velocities are best, because they are more inherently accurate at very long range; because, they are more immune to drop and wind deflection and have a longer "dead space", making it easier to hit the vitals at the highest possible velocity.

That being said, it would appear that VLD bullets, such as those provided by Berger hunting bullets and Nosler LR Accubonds, are the bullets of choice. But, this doesn’t mean other bullets won’t work, it’s just that the odds are better with the high BC bullets fired at relatively high velocity.

I'm going with the Berger VLDs and Nosler LR Accubonds.


I have a ton of respect for Brian Litz; he is the most knowledgeable when it comes to ballistics, but I don't think he has shot much game at long range. Frankly, if I were you I would be worried about the bullet holding up at close range as much as it not performing at long range. I once shot a sheep at 15 yards - topped a ridge on a stalk and there he was.

I think Blair's observations are salient; high BC would have nothing to do with terminal ballistics, to say nothing of construction. I might be dead wrong, but one reason the Nosler LR bullets are difficult to get to shoot is the boattail is solid, whereas the Berger is lead. Bullets with more weight forward are more difficult to get to shoot accurately, but the Nosler on paper would seem to offer better terminal ballistics. You need all three: BC, accuracy, and terminal ballistics. IMO, you pick two of the three and compromise on the third.


Don't Ever Book a Hunt with Jeff Blair
http://forums.accuratereloadin...821061151#2821061151

 
Posts: 7570 | Location: Arizona and off grid in CO | Registered: 28 July 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
one of us
posted Hide Post
That's pretty much why I've stuck with the 200gr accubond. The BC is more than respectable, and it is a damned good performer on game. Expansion on an elk at 850 that was centered vertically and 6" behind the shoulder provided a 2" exit and a 40 yard blood trail. Terminal performance was very good. On a large mule deer at 1180, I was able to pick the heart out of the cavity with no knife work as the top of it was gone on a broadside shot. I have seen a a couple deer taken with the 7mm Bergers, and while they do work, they're a little explosive for my taste out of the 7 RUM even at extended ranges. That is only my take on it with only a couple examples I was present to witness. I did not see anything wounded, one deer at 750 was shot a second time, but the first one would have done it, the buck was still standing and got another 180 berger....we didn't get much meat off that front half.


Shoot straight, shoot often.
Matt
 
Posts: 1169 | Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 19 July 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
"high BC would have nothing to do with terminal ballistics, to say nothing of construction. I might be dead wrong, but one reason the Nosler LR bullets are difficult to get to shoot is the boattail is solid, whereas the Berger is lead. Bullets with more weight forward are more difficult to get to shoot accurately, but the Nosler on paper would seem to offer better terminal ballistics. You need all three: BC, accuracy, and terminal ballistics. IMO, you pick two of the three and compromise on the third".


Much better expressed than I could; and an interesting point about the solid base on the ABLR and it's effect on accuracy. tu2

If you are fairly certain than your shots will be in excess of 300 yards I would go with the Berger. If you might get closer shots then the ABLR.

Has anyone had any experience with the Barnes LRX? A friend of mine had a 264 WM varminter which loved the 120gr TTSX......they seemed to work well out to ranges of 400-500 yards but he couldn't hit anything much beyond that range, so I can't vouch for them at extreme ranges.......though their construction would lead you to believe that they would be too "hard".
 
Posts: 15784 | Location: Australia and Saint Germain en Laye | Registered: 30 December 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by matt salm:
That's pretty much why I've stuck with the 200gr accubond. The BC is more than respectable, and it is a damned good performer on game. Expansion on an elk at 850 that was centered vertically and 6" behind the shoulder provided a 2" exit and a 40 yard blood trail. Terminal performance was very good. On a large mule deer at 1180, I was able to pick the heart out of the cavity with no knife work as the top of it was gone on a broadside shot. I have seen a a couple deer taken with the 7mm Bergers, and while they do work, they're a little explosive for my taste out of the 7 RUM even at extended ranges. That is only my take on it with only a couple examples I was present to witness. I did not see anything wounded, one deer at 750 was shot a second time, but the first one would have done it, the buck was still standing and got another 180 berger....we didn't get much meat off that front half.


EXACTLY WHAT MATT SAID!
Been there, done that.

I'll add that everyone likes to talk about the "long" shot but way more often than not we experience the "short" shot were a bullets of proper construction are appreciated.

There, my 2 cents for free,
Zeke
 
Posts: 2270 | Registered: 27 October 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
One of Us
posted Hide Post
So Zeke, do you prefer the standard AB or the ABLR?
 
Posts: 15784 | Location: Australia and Saint Germain en Laye | Registered: 30 December 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
one of us
posted Hide Post
Good luck. I have spent 3 months trying to find ABLR in .30 cal. Out of stock and not available for backorder. I was planning to shoot them in Kyrgy this fall but may have to use Berger's because of availability.

Ski+3
 
Posts: 858 | Location: Kalispell, MT | Registered: 01 January 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Long Range Shooting    What are you favorite LONG RANGE hunting bullets?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia