THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM LEVER ACTION RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
.357 vs .44?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Steve E.
posted Hide Post
I think we could quote the old hot rodders saying on this one,
'there is no replacement for displacement'.


Steve E..........


NRA Patron Life Member
GOA Life Member
North American Hunting Club Life Member
USAF Veteran
 
Posts: 1839 | Location: Semo | Registered: 31 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Arminius
posted Hide Post
"Leverguns in 357 Mag are about the most fun you can have with your pants on. Although a 44-40 comes close."

Smiler

Not from me ... look it up at Paco Kelly´s Leverguns Forums.

Hermann


formerly, before software update, known as "aHunter", lost 1000 posts in a minute
 
Posts: 339 | Location: Middle Europe | Registered: 10 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Buglemintoday
posted Hide Post
I like my Winchester .357 Lever Rifle. I wouldn't mind buying another in .44 Mag....and a Marlin .22 lever rifle....and a Marlin .45/70 Smiler


"Let me start off with two words: Made in America"
 
Posts: 3326 | Location: Permian Basin | Registered: 16 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Donald Nelson:
quote:
Originally posted by jimatcat:
you guys may be shooting the rifles wrong... the cresent buttplate is designed to fit your arm, where a flat buttplate is supposed to go closer into your shoulder...try moving the cresent out on your arm, and change your feet... it may help, i know it did for me...


This statement is exactly correct. Move that butt down between your shoulder and bicep. I don't know why they did it on big bores but the old squirrel rifles were that way because it worked better for shooting up into a tree especially if you are sitting.



Both above statements are correct. It also helps to "lock" the rifle in the firing position, when shooting rapid fire at bandits... BOOM tu2


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If the poster is concidering Marlin M94 rifles, please be advised that many of the 44 mags are quite inaccurate with cast bullets. The one I had would shoot jacketed bullets quite well, but was wildly inaccurate with cast. It went down the road.
 
Posts: 126 | Location: nothern ca | Registered: 29 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
quote:
If the poster is concidering Marlin M94 rifles, please be advised that many of the 44 mags are quite inaccurate with cast bullets. The one I had would shoot jacketed bullets quite well, but was wildly inaccurate with cast. It went down the road.


The problem is "Many", but Not ALL. I shoot 245 grain cast Keith Style bullets out of my 1894 Marlin and am extremely happy with the results. Not saying that individual rifles can't be or aren't finicky about the bullets they shoot best, but one aspect I have discovered over the years and this is true of most rifles, regardless the action type.

With handloads, too many folks are prone to loading the shells too hot. Instead of starting at the low end of the powder charges listed and checking to see how the gun reacts as the step ups in velocity are reached, they will start at or near the maximum loadings listed, not realizing that they are or maybe pushing a particular style/design/type of bullet too fast for the rifling of that particular gun. JMO, however I have noticed that all my rifles tend to have their best accuracy at the lower to mid level loadings.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of z1r
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by L. Rivard:
If the poster is concidering Marlin M94 rifles, please be advised that many of the 44 mags are quite inaccurate with cast bullets. The one I had would shoot jacketed bullets quite well, but was wildly inaccurate with cast. It went down the road.


Not when you match the bullet to the bore. I found that a relatively hard bullet of proper size, which for mine was .431". YMMV.




Aut vincere aut mori
 
Posts: 4869 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 07 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've been loading .38 Spl. for about 30-odd years, and having built up a profuse supply I decided a rifle in .357/.38 would make sense. I picked up a Rossi M92- and I wasn't disappointed. My standard .38 load (4.5 grains of Unique, 158 cast) chronos right at 1000 FPS- which for me makes it a perfect substitute for .22RF. Quite, cheap, and shoots straight enough out to 100 yards or so.

I had a Rossi some years ago in .44-40, and the .357 shoots a lot straighter. I think the .44-40 had a much slower rifling twist. Don't know what the twist in the .44 Mag is, but if it's 1:38" like the .44 WCF was, the .357's going to have an advantage as the range gets longer.

Porosonik.

Chrono-ed some Remington factory 125JHP through it the other day. 2100FPS+. Seems like enough to get the job done on smaller deer, given proper shot placement and range limitations- but a JFP would probably be a better choice for that sort of thing.


Vetting voters= racist. Vetting gun buyers= not racist. Got it?
 
Posts: 407 | Registered: 03 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'd like to have a lever 44mag but stomping around the farm where the shot could be 25-200 yards my dad's hand-me-down marlin in 35 rem does the job for everything, 357 size 200gr projectile but with a sledge hammer charge. BTW: holding my dad's gun he bought new right after his honeymoon in 57'..... priceless
 
Posts: 59 | Location: Southern Maryland | Registered: 26 January 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Elmer Keith once told me that "I can always load a 44 down to 357 power levels..."
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Or to state it another way:

"Big guns can be loaded down to little gun levels, but little guns will always be little guns."
 
Posts: 4748 | Location: TX | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by L. Rivard:
If the poster is concidering Marlin M94 rifles, please be advised that many of the 44 mags are quite inaccurate with cast bullets. The one I had would shoot jacketed bullets quite well, but was wildly inaccurate with cast. It went down the road.


There are two styles of rifling in Marlin rifles: "micro groove" and "Ballard," generally speaking, the micro groove ones don't shoot cast bullets very well, unless you use a really hard alloy and keep the velocity on the low side. The Ballard rifle almost always shoots cast just fine. My 1894 has the Ballard type rifling, and it will put ten rounds of 240 gr SWC into 2-3" at 100 yards. All if the 1894s now have the Ballard rifling. I'm not sure which older ones were micro groove.
 
Posts: 641 | Location: SW Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: 10 October 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Go big or go home!!!! BOOM
http://www.bighornarmory.com/
 
Posts: 4372 | Location: NE Wisconsin | Registered: 31 March 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of The Dane
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PAPI:
How about a " Lever Action Shotgun " ... ?
http://coyotecap.com/index.html

A. Shot for Small Game.
B. Slugs for defensive purposes.
C. A source for decent Ammo should be no problem.
D. It's still a " Lever Action ".. tu2

PAPI
fishing



The 1887 Winchester comes to mind. Copied today by Norinco.
 
Posts: 1102 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 15 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of The Dane
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by L. Rivard:
If the poster is concidering Marlin M94 rifles, please be advised that many of the 44 mags are quite inaccurate with cast bullets. The one I had would shoot jacketed bullets quite well, but was wildly inaccurate with cast. It went down the road.


My 1972 shoots cast to the same poi as jacketed and with the same accurasy.
Boolit fit is the key!
One thing to ponder though is: The Marlin 94 has a 1:38" twist and does not stabilise more than 265-270gr bullets.
 
Posts: 1102 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 15 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of The Dane
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kjjm4:
quote:
Originally posted by L. Rivard:
If the poster is concidering Marlin M94 rifles, please be advised that many of the 44 mags are quite inaccurate with cast bullets. The one I had would shoot jacketed bullets quite well, but was wildly inaccurate with cast. It went down the road.


There are two styles of rifling in Marlin rifles: "micro groove" and "Ballard," generally speaking, the micro groove ones don't shoot cast bullets very well, unless you use a really hard alloy and keep the velocity on the low side. The Ballard rifle almost always shoots cast just fine. My 1894 has the Ballard type rifling, and it will put ten rounds of 240 gr SWC into 2-3" at 100 yards. All if the 1894s now have the Ballard rifling. I'm not sure which older ones were micro groove.


Mine is a 12 micro groove and shoots cast just fine.

http://www.marlinowners.com/fo...-dimensions-doc1.pdf
 
Posts: 1102 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 15 October 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia