THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM DOUBLE RIFLES FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Double Rifles    Question for non double rifle owners
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Question for non double rifle owners
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by N E 450 No2:
Question:
What calibre and what price would entice you to buy a double rifle?


None and zero. I've needed to wear eyeglasses my whole life and so cannot focus on 3 planes. I would need any DR to be equipped with a riflescope. I have looked at scope sighted doubles here and I just don't think they look...what's the word? Svelte? Kinda dorky. I value form as well as function. Also, you can buy a nice 2 barrel shotgun for $2k but not a rifle. The WOW factor for a DR is too pricey. I'd rather use the money for trophy fees.

Hey, you asked.
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Will
posted Hide Post
There is still hope. The older I get the better my eyes are getting!

Even with the front sight blurry, a rifle can still be shot pretty accurately, at fairly close ranges anyway.


-------------------------------
Will Stewart / Once you've been amongst them, there is no such thing as too much gun.
---------------------------------------
and, God Bless John Wayne.

NRA Benefactor Member, GOA, N.A.G.R.
_________________________

"Elephant and Elephant Guns" $99 shipped
“Hunting Africa's Dangerous Game" $20 shipped.

red.dirt.elephant@gmail.com
_________________________

Hoping to wind up where elephant hunters go.
 
Posts: 19378 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
500NE,sidelocks,exposed hammers,very nice wood, no engraving and 5k or under. R.



 
Posts: 1049 | Location: Cut-n-Shoot, Texas USA | Registered: 15 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Dave
Strangely enough I have discovered the following.
Take a well handling bolt rifle, and a well handling double, both with iron sights, then mount a scope on each of them, due to the "geometry" of the double rifle its handling is less effected by the scope than the bolt rifle.
I have found that a properly scoped double rifle handles better than a properly scoped bolt rifle.

Europoeans have been scoping 9,3x74R doubles for years so for most people a 9,3 with a scope is "acceptable".

I have found a scoped double such a great hunting rifle that I scoped my British 450/400 3 1/4". After using it in Zim this Oct Nov, my wife used it too, I am now a firm believer that all 450/400, and 500/416's should be scoped.

After all most people scope a 404/416 bolt rifle.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Will

quote:
Regret not. There are few reasons to have a double other than to play with.

Bring on the hate mail!


True, you did not say DR's "sucked". And you are certainly under no obligation to provide any rationale for your belief that "there are few reasons to have a double rifle other than to play with". But, you have to admit that you are unequivocal in your statement. That, combined with other comments you have made on this forum could give people the impression that you have a less than glowing opinion regarding the use of double rifles for anytihng but play - i.e., they suck for hunting DG.

They may not do it for you, but for me and many others here they work very well for hunting; better for a number of folks than bolt rifles.


SCI Life Member
DSC Life Member
 
Posts: 2018 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 20 May 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Will
posted Hide Post
Jim,

i am of the OPINION that a double rifle is quite the necessity in a close range charge where the first shot fails to drop or turn the animal or in the case of two aninals charging where it could only be hoped that the two shots turn or drop the required number of critters.

I have never faced a multiple animal charge and have no desire to do so. But I have faced a charge when the first shot didn't work and the ele kept on acomin'. Before I could get off the second shot my son-in-law shot and turned the elephant.

I am a big chicken. With a double, there is nothing quite so assuring as having that second shot immediately available.

But in a multiple animal charge I would rather bet the farm on a bolt for its sheer firepower.


-------------------------------
Will Stewart / Once you've been amongst them, there is no such thing as too much gun.
---------------------------------------
and, God Bless John Wayne.

NRA Benefactor Member, GOA, N.A.G.R.
_________________________

"Elephant and Elephant Guns" $99 shipped
“Hunting Africa's Dangerous Game" $20 shipped.

red.dirt.elephant@gmail.com
_________________________

Hoping to wind up where elephant hunters go.
 
Posts: 19378 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Alberta Canuck:
quote:
Originally posted by 400 Nitro Express:
quote:
Originally posted by Alberta Canuck:
1.- .450/.400 3-1/4" (I know, I know, everyone wants the 3"case. Except me...larger capacity means same ballistics at less pressure IF the correct powder is used)


Nope. Both were loaded with the same load - 60 grains Cordite and a 400 grain bullet. This resulted in 2125 fps at 16 tons for the 3" and 2150 fps at 16.5 tons for the 3 1/4". The same charge produces less pressure and velocity from the 3" - because the 3" case has MORE capacity than the 3 1/4" case.
-----------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."



You may well be correct on the capacity issue. I am writing from memory and it has been just over 30 years since I sold the last of my .450/.400s. I DO know that my .450/400 3-1/4" WR gave every sign of less pressure than my 3" Greener did and, for me, was a much better working gun. As they were of different makes, perhaps that was because the Westley Richards was a better quality gun than the Greener, I don't know for sure about that.

It is also possible some other variations came into play. Just as there were many differnt actual bore sizes in both the .404 Jeffery and the .470 Nitro, there may have been some chamber issues, such as throating, which came into play when firing pressures were the concern.

Whether Kynoch put the same weight of cordite in each one MIGHT not be a thoroughly reliable indicator of case capacity. There is also the question of WHICH cordite was loaded in each. Saying a cartridge is loaded with cordite is a lot like saying one is loaded with "stick" powder. That may be true, but what is the energy content and burning speed of the cordite with which it is loaded? There were many different formulations of cordite, just as there are in stick powders.

Not saying that is the case in the instance you cite, but it could be. Just out of curiosity, have you ever actually measured the content of the two cases, taken from the same time frame of manufacture, using either water or a ball powder? (Some of the early 3-1/4" cases were quite thin; I don't know if any of the early 3" ones were too, or not.) If you have, what did you find? (Would like to add the info to my files.)

Anyway, as I'm sure you are aware, what is commonly referred to as Cordite was a "cord" type powder, made primarily of what we'd call nitro-glycerine, nitro-cellulose, and vaseline. The nitro-glycerine content reportedly ranged from 60% or slightly more by weight in very early cordite, to less than 20% in some of the later versions. The cordites with less nitro-glycerine were often trade-named by such monikers as Axite, Modite, etc., but they were also still called Cordite by most.


I've actually used quite a bit of Cordite in my reloading of various English big bores, and still have some. I got mine from pulling down a case of Kynoch .416 Rigby ammo which had over time developed season splits in the necks.

I sure wouldn't use 60 grains of MY cordite from the Rigby cartridges in either length of .450/.400. My max would be about 55 grains. I tried 60 grains weight of it, and it was TOO HOT for my rifles. I guess I should really say for my BRASS...didn't harm the rifles, but was rough as a cob on brass.

Doesn't matter much in the long run, but for me, based on my previous experiences with the two rounds, I'd still opt for a .450/.400 3-1/4" as my first choice if I was going to buy a new economy double rifle. My experience was more pleasant with it than with the 3".

Obviously, that is just my preference. Everyone else is assuredly welcome to their own.


Yes, throating variations could definitely have been present. Nothing seems to have been consistent. I can show you .450/.400 3" doubles from the SAME MAKER, made a year apart, one is .408" groove diameter, the other is .411". I've run into rifles from the same maker in the same caliber with very different throat dimensions.

Yes, there were different forms of Cordite, but not that many. There were Cordite Mk 1, Cordite MD, Moddite, Axite, and Cordite SC. Moddite (Eley's version of flat strip) died with the roll-up into Explosives Trades Ltd in 1918, and Axite (Kynoch's flat strip) wasn't loaded in the larger bores after WWII. SC was a solventless naval artillery propellant developed after the battlecruiser's disasters with flash at Jutland, and was never used in small arms. Post-WWII, I believe Kynoch used only MD in the flanged nitros.

No, I don't think it has anything to do with one being loaded with a different kind of Cordite from the other. Yes, I did check water capacity of both many years ago, but I don't remember what the numbers were now. The 3" is slightly larger. The length to shoulder of the 3" is .10" longer, and diameter at the shoulder is greater. The 3" has much less body taper than the 3 1/4". The result is that the 3 1/4" produces higher pressure with the same standard load. Modern CIP standards still reflect this - 2800 BAR for the 3" and 2950 BAR for the 3 1/4".

I've pulled apart samples from several post-war batches of both cartridges. They all held right on 60 grains of Cordite. I've done quite a bit of the same myself and I think that what you may have encountered was a difference in caps. I never messed with the corrosive Kynoch caps, but their non-corrosive caps were not as hot as the RWS Berdan caps. Likewise, Federal 215 are hotter than the RWS. There's quite a difference between the Kynoch n/c and the RWS.
------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
 
Posts: 1742 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
2k


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27614 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Will:

I'm not sure what your problems are, other than possibly jealousy.

And bring nothing to the table in your incessant rants against me. It is quite humorous. It is akin to a first year law student telling Justice Scalia how to do his job.

Have a nice day.


Will, your experience level as a hunter has never been brought into question.

Rather, the fact that you are an arrogant dick head.

You are proof that all it takes to be an "experienced" tourist hunter is money.

You have a nice day too, sir..

PS

keep up your little one liners they do make you look like a long stem eye donor desperately in search of a purpose in life.



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Buliwyf:
450 No.2,

Excellent topic.

1. Quality brass is my sensitive point. My vision of a double is that of a close range stopping rifle. Therefore, I would prefer a .500 Nitro because it is the same frame size as .470 Nitro. However, I am concerned about quality brass avalibilty for the .500 NE.

2. I am concerned about rim thickness consistency and impact on handloading, so I like the .450 NE No.2 because of it's .080" rim thickness, which I believe to be the thickest of the NE's. However, I am concerened about quality brass availability for the .450 No.2.

3. I would prefer not to have a double chambered in a bolt action cartridge, but maybe I should re-consider this point? i.e. .375 H&H, .416 Rigby, .458 Win Mag.

4. The .470 Nitro has Norma backstopping the brass which leads me to believe the .470 is my best bet.

5. I prefer the feel and balance of the pre-war British. I appreciate the modern doubles, probably more accurate than pre-war, but I am a rifleman that values balance.

6. I don't want to create a problem for myself trying to assemble components and accuracy problems just to own a double.

7. Would prefer not to scope a double but might need to so unsure about mounting challenges?

8. The rifle must be a "working" rifle. I want to use it in the bush.

Any feedback appreciated.


Buliwyf,

My choice for a working double is Searcy. However just last week I missed a chance on an Army Navy 450/3.25 that was in ugly cosmetic shape but functionally very nice for $6500 USD.

If you must have a British gun keep looking they are out there at "decent" prices from time to time.

Also I believe that Searcy is making a slimmer round action gun at some time in the future. That might be a possibility as well.

The .500 NE is a fine caliber for your intended purpose. Components for the .500 are generally very easy to come by.

I do not know that you'll be able to find a rifle that 100% meets your requirements in a .500 NE.

The .500 is definitely a step up from the .450-.470 class rifles where stopping power is concerned.


Good luck.



 
Posts: 5210 | Registered: 23 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
An affordable Holland & Holland Royal in .500 Nitro Express would pretty much do it for me. Wink


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13742 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Will,

Now I get it. Thanks thumb


SCI Life Member
DSC Life Member
 
Posts: 2018 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 20 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
What caliber would I want im not really sure.
450#2, 470, 577 dont really know. Will I own one in a few years probably. I think 2-3 grand would be plenty enough for any working double rifle.
But are they WAY WAY WAY OVERPRICED heck yeah. Although within a few years even though they are overpriced I will have one because I want one.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Lots of unrealistic expectations. From a historical perspective, entry level double rifles of decent quality have NEVER been as cheap as they are today. The Chapuis UGEX is a fantastic deal. You simply can't build one worth having for less money. Yet some still think entry level DRs are "WAY, WAY, WAY OVERPRICED". Some will never get it.
--------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
 
Posts: 1742 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill C
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by N E 450 No2:
Question: What calibre and what price would entice you to buy a double rifle?
I fell into lust with the Heym PH in .470 at the DSC show, but my better judgment says that I should start out and hunt with a good, used Merkel (which also felt nice) in that $7500 price range. Of course, I don't always listen to my better judgment! Big Grin
 
Posts: 3153 | Location: PA | Registered: 02 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kudu4u
posted Hide Post
DR Folks,
I am enjoying and learning a lot from this thread. I do not own a DR yet...but I'm trying to educate myself on them. What would be a good caliber for a DG hunt with enough range for the occasional outstanding PG that you just can't pass up? I have used my .416 Rem Mag Rem. 700 KS on cape buff and handle the recoil fairly well. Thanks so much in advance. My future plans BTW are leopard/sable/and anything else I might could afford in the future.


"In these days of mouth-foaming Disneyism......"--- Capstick
Don't blame the hunters for what the poachers do!---me

Benefactor Member NRA
 
Posts: 477 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 13 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
400 NE,

Is the Chapuis UGEX offered in .470 NE?
 
Posts: 2627 | Location: Where the pine trees touch the sky | Registered: 06 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Kudu4u,

The .500/416 NE sounds like the ticket for you. 400 grain, .416 caliber @ 2300 fps.
 
Posts: 2627 | Location: Where the pine trees touch the sky | Registered: 06 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of mouse93
posted Hide Post
.450/400 NE for 1/2 price of a buffalo hunt
 
Posts: 2035 | Location: Slovenia | Registered: 28 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jimatcat
posted Hide Post
buliwyf... according to the catalogue that dale nygard sent, the 470 ne , 416 rigby, 300 win and 375 h&h are availble in AGEX Brousse, AGEX jungle, and AGEX Savanne, different grades, features...


go big or go home ........

DSC-- Life Member
NRA--Life member
DRSS--9.3x74 r Chapuis
 
Posts: 2844 | Location: dividing my time between san angelo and victoria texas.......... USA | Registered: 26 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 400 Nitro Express:
Lots of unrealistic expectations. From a historical perspective, entry level double rifles of decent quality have NEVER been as cheap as they are today. The Chapuis UGEX is a fantastic deal. You simply can't build one worth having for less money. Yet some still think entry level DRs are "WAY, WAY, WAY OVERPRICED". Some will never get it.
--------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Yes double rifles are WAY WAY WAY OVERPRICED. and I stand by that statement as it is not Rocket Science to see it or figure it out. Not to get in a pissing match about how much double rifles are worth but it doesnt take much common sense to know they are overpriced. Will I buy one in a few years probably.
You can buy new cars for not much more than that, that have a lot more metal and a heck of a lot more moving parts for about the same price. Heck for the price of some of the higher priced doubles you can build a new house and furnish it, heck in the area you can build a fairly big house for the price of some of the more expensive doubles. And then people sit there and try to tell me they are not overpriced what a croc of sh*t. thumbdown thumbdown thumbdown thumbdown
Do I think double rifles are pretty yes, do I want to hunt dangerous game in Africa with a double rifle yes, will I yes, or they overpriced heck yes. Is a double being overpriced going to stop me from buying one no.
There are lots of things overpriced in this world though not just double rifles.
No 90% of the expectations on this thread are not unrealtistic at all they are common sense and yes I get it perfectly.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Jarrod:

You are utterly clueless.
--------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
 
Posts: 1742 | Location: Texas | Registered: 10 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 400 Nitro Express:
Jarrod:

You are utterly clueless.
--------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Uh yeah I am. Oh wait let me guess market value, supply and demand, price them high so that the average Joe can't afford them bla bla bla.
Oh yeah also let me guess I will get this speech about how many man hours it takes to build a double etc. etc. Whatever you want to say they are still WAY overpriced and anyone with half a brain could see it.
But as I said before I still like them and I still plan to buy one. that being said there is no reason why there a working double rifle cannot be built for a heck of a lot less than what they are, no reason whatsoever.
I am not going to argue this with you as it will be a useless argument. Let's argue about something else like which caliber we like best
or what is the best rate of twist stir
400nitro have a good one.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'd guess the Blaser Co. is making DR's the cheapest

way that it can be done for a big bore caliber. Ugly

as can be. Multi decade reliability, who knows? I

hope to buy a U.K. built vintage dbl rifle myself.

History, character and just done right.



Jack

OH GOD! {Seriously, we need the help.}

 
Posts: 2791 | Location: USA - East Coast | Registered: 10 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 400 Nitro Express:
Nope. Both were loaded with the same load - 60 grains Cordite and a 400 grain bullet. This resulted in 2125 fps at 16 tons for the 3" and 2150 fps at 16.5 tons for the 3 1/4". The same charge produces less pressure and velocity from the 3" - because the 3" case has MORE capacity than the 3 1/4" case.."



quote:
You may well be correct on the capacity issue. I am writing from memory and it has been just over 30 years since I sold the last of my .450/.400s. I DO know that my .450/400 3-1/4" WR gave every sign of less pressure than my 3" Greener did and, for me, was a much better working gun.

As they were of different makes, perhaps that was...."




quote:
There's quite a difference between the Kynoch n/c and the RWS.



When I was saying my WR in 3-1/4" gave obvious signs of less pressure than the Greener in 3", I was referring to the use of FACTORY Kynoch ammo in both guns. Why that was true, I can't say, but it was true. Again, I conjecture it may have been a result of the throating of the two different rifles by two different manufacturers. Here, of course, I am talking about working results in my two specific guns, not results in pressure barrels at the ammunition factories.

Anyway, I still would NOT use 60 grains of the cordite I have on hand, in either of MY guns. Not often, not occasionally, not ever. Factory ammo, I couldn't control content back then, but my handloads, I sure can now, and do.

If I had the time to go back and check my files, I believe there a couple of other kinds of cordite you may not have covered in your listing, but am not certain of that. Seems to me there were at least three different cordites used in the .303 British military rounds alone. Anyway, not worth the considerable trouble to do so at the moment, to be honest. Have too many other things to do.

BTW, just for info on a slightly different tangent, I still have some Kynoch ammo loaded in the 60's which does not contain Cordite or other English propellant at all. It is clearly labelled "Assembled in England of Swedish components", using a "glue on" sticker on the outside of the very thin Kynoch brown paper wrapper around each 50 rounds (10 5-round boxes).


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What would entice me to buy one right now is not even possible much less realistic. I couldn't even afford a Remington right now. In 4 days I'm leaving for training in preparation for Afghanistan in May. I'm hoping that I'll be able to save enough to get a Chapuis if I can find one in the 4-5K range (maybe another group buy in '08?). 9.3x74 will be the most likely choice since it doesn't seem very realistic to be able to find a 450/400, 450, or 470 in that price range. If I decide to reenlist while I'm in Afghanistan and take advantage of the generous, tax-free bonuses I may be able to get both (9.3 & 400, 450, or 470) if I can get the big bore for around 10K (or less). Or get the 9.3 and MAYBE go to Africa!!!

They are expensive. I won't say overpriced but they certainly are expensive, especially when you can't afford one. I don't have a problem with paying the prices that they're going for if I had the expendable funds for one. The possibility of getting one for less than 2K is not very realistic from what I've seen in my research unless you get one of the Valmet/Tikka guns which I don't think are very pleasing aestetically. If someone could make a good SxS cheaper than Chapuis (which is the cheapest I've seen NEW) then they would certainly appeal to a lot of people. An exact lowest target price is hard to pin down IMO from MY perspective. The lower they're priced the more people they will appeal to. If someone can do it cheaper then by all means jump on it. Do the best you can and get them as low as possible and be happy with that. There will always be those that will complain that they're too expensive. You could give it to 'em for free and there would still be someone that would complain. It's all very relative. If one can afford to pay 15-20K then something in the 10K range is a bargain. But for the rest of us it's just something to dream about.
 
Posts: 144 | Location: Boiling Springs, SC, USA | Registered: 14 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Hog Killer
posted Hide Post
Bloodnativ, take care in Afganistan thumb.

sofa No sleeping in class before you shipout. Big Grin

Thank you for your service, salute

Keith


IGNORE YOUR RIGHTS AND THEY'LL GO AWAY!!!
------------------------------------
We Band of Bubbas & STC Hunting Club, The Whomper Club
 
Posts: 4553 | Location: Walker Co.,Texas | Registered: 05 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 577NitroExpress
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hog Killer:
Bloodnativ, take care in Afganistan thumb.

sofa No sleeping in class before you shipout. Big Grin

Thank you for your service, salute

Keith


Ditto Keith!!!!!


577NitroExpress
Double Rifle Shooters Society
Francotte .470 Nitro Express




If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming...

 
Posts: 2789 | Location: Bucks County, Pennsylvania | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rusty
posted Hide Post
So Jarrod,
How much did you pay for your last custom bolt action rifle?

Ever price a new Square Bridge Mauser action?

Doubles too expensive?. . . .Oh, Please!


Rusty
We Band of Brothers!
DRSS, NRA & SCI Life Member

"I am rejoiced at my fate. Do not be uneasy about me, for I am with my friends."
----- David Crockett in his last letter (to his children), January 9th, 1836
"I will never forsake Texas and her cause. I am her son." ----- Jose Antonio Navarro, from Mexican Prison in 1841
"for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320-“. . .It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”
 
Posts: 9797 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 21 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
quote:
Originally posted by 400 Nitro Express:
Jarrod:

You are utterly clueless.
--------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Uh yeah I am. Oh wait let me guess market value, supply and demand, price them high so that the average Joe can't afford them bla bla bla.
Oh yeah also let me guess I will get this speech about how many man hours it takes to build a double etc. etc. Whatever you want to say they are still WAY overpriced and anyone with half a brain could see it.
But as I said before I still like them and I still plan to buy one. that being said there is no reason why there a working double rifle cannot be built for a heck of a lot less than what they are, no reason whatsoever.
I am not going to argue this with you as it will be a useless argument. Let's argue about something else like which caliber we like best
or what is the best rate of twist stir
400nitro have a good one.


Jarrod, if the price is the only thing different between a good bolt rifle, and a double rifle, and the price is not justified, then there must be a large profit being made on double rifles! That said, and since the price should be no more than a RemChester bolt rifle,
how come Remington, winchester, and savage are not makeing double rifles by the carload for shipment to Wall-Mart, and K-Mart?

Rather than bother you for the answer, I'll simply tell you the reason they are not, and that is because there aren't a dozen people in the USA firearms industry who have the skill to build a double rifle that would be worth owning. Hell, they can't even build a simple bolt rifle that doesn't need to be sent back to the factory a dozen times before it's right! boohoo


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rusty:
So Jarrod,
How much did you pay for your last custom bolt action rifle?

Ever price a new Square Bridge Mauser action?

Doubles too expensive?. . . .Oh, Please!


All of you please pay a little closer attention to my posts. I said that in a few years I WILL buy a double rifle. That still doesn't mean they are not overpriced. A lot of custom bolt rifles are way overpriced also. Just because someone will pay a certain price for something does not mean it is not technically overpriced.
The only place that doubles are actually really needed are in charge situations in Africa aganinst Elephants etc. but even then they are not truly needed as thousands of charges have been stopped successfully with a bolt rifle. A double for the most part is like a Harley they are mostly just a novelty item, a status symbol so to speak.
Harley's are not needed, expensive multi-million dollar paintings are not needed, yacht's are not needed, house boats are not needed, 100,000 dollar cars are not needed. I guarantee you if people would refuse to pay it the price of double rifles would be a lot less than they are now.
Just because a custom gunmaker charges you 10 grand for a reworked model 70 does not make it worth it value wise, same goes for a double, or a half million dollar painting or whatever, but it doesn't make it technically worth it as far as what you are getting for your money. All it means is someone has the money and will buy it.
Now please read my post a little closer. I SAID THAT I STILL PLANNED ON BUYING ONE IN A FEW YEARS REGARDLESS.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jarrod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MacD37:
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
quote:
Originally posted by 400 Nitro Express:
Jarrod:

You are utterly clueless.
--------------------------------------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Uh yeah I am. Oh wait let me guess market value, supply and demand, price them high so that the average Joe can't afford them bla bla bla.
Oh yeah also let me guess I will get this speech about how many man hours it takes to build a double etc. etc. Whatever you want to say they are still WAY overpriced and anyone with half a brain could see it.
But as I said before I still like them and I still plan to buy one. that being said there is no reason why there a working double rifle cannot be built for a heck of a lot less than what they are, no reason whatsoever.
I am not going to argue this with you as it will be a useless argument. Let's argue about something else like which caliber we like best
or what is the best rate of twist stir
400nitro have a good one.


Jarrod, if the price is the only thing different between a good bolt rifle, and a double rifle, and the price is not justified, then there must be a large profit being made on double rifles! That said, and since the price should be no more than a RemChester bolt rifle,
how come Remington, winchester, and savage are not makeing double rifles by the carload for shipment to Wall-Mart, and K-Mart?

Rather than bother you for the answer, I'll simply tell you the reason they are not, and that is because there aren't a dozen people in the USA firearms industry who have the skill to build a double rifle that would be worth owning. Hell, they can't even build a simple bolt rifle that doesn't need to be sent back to the factory a dozen times before it's right! boohoo


No I NEVER said that they shouldn't cost more than a remchester, savage, tikka or __________ insert name should cost. But as much more as they do cost they should not period.
You know it's funny very very few people I know ever have any of the problems that everyone seems to mention on these forums with the run of the mill Model 70's, remchesters etc. etc. Of course im sure a lot of that is due in part to most people sensible people don't complain if their rifle doesn't have any problems it is they bad you hear about on places like this. I've heard plenty of issues with double rifles on this forum alone.
As far as their not being that many skilled workers that could make a double rifle. That is hog wash as they could be taught just like any other skill or trade. It is just simply not the dream of most people when they grow up to be a skilled double rifle maker. Most of them want to own a business, or sell real estate, or be a mechanic, or work for some big corporation, or play pro sports or whatever. Go out here to high schools or colleges or just where people that age hang out and ask them what their dreams are. I would bet very few of them will say I want to be a skilled double rifle maker. Most of them wouldn't know the difference by looking in double rifle and a double barrel shotgun. But if enough people wanted to be double rifle builders people could be taught, like they have been for generations for those that do build them.


"Science only goes so far then God takes over."
 
Posts: 3504 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 07 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I want one, like everyone else. That does NOT mean that they aren't horribly overpriced for what you get. Explain, if you will, why any DR with basic engraving and decent wood costs over $10K, and the answer is because there is this thing called "Snob Appeal" and too many people like to let the rest of the population know how much money they have to spend on toys. Everyone will know, instantly, that you are a serious horse's ass if you carry around a Halliburton briefcase with $100,000 in cash in it. Pack a quality DR around in a hardcase...now that's taste and style. Owning a DR puts you waaaay out front in the "Dick Measuring Contest", as does driving a Ferrari. It's about money and being ostentatious in your displays of wealth in lieu of tasteful. It's ALL about money and a substitute for Viagra. These are the same type of guy that pays somebody to build him a custom Harley, with a 40' motorhome and 24' travel trailer..all painted in matching swoopy designs, so he can trailer to within 50 miles of Sturgis and then ride the last 45 minutes in while woofing about the adventure of the open road. You can pick him out of the crowd...he's got the old lady twenty years his junior with silicone tits. Status man, and the pursuit of it.

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of packrattusnongratus
posted Hide Post
Wink Thanks Rich! Well said. beer Packy
 
Posts: 2140 | Registered: 28 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rusty
posted Hide Post
Jarrod,
Yes, I read your posts. Yes, I understand you plan to buy a double some day.

I just think that the statement of double rifles being "over priced" not the case at all.

Yes they cost more. As I have said before, the nice thing about double rifles is that they come RTS (Ready To Shoot). You don't need to spend a lot of money and time to trick one out!

Considering this and the time and craftmanship it takes to put one together, I think they are within reason. Or to say, not over priced!
Just my opine!


Rusty
We Band of Brothers!
DRSS, NRA & SCI Life Member

"I am rejoiced at my fate. Do not be uneasy about me, for I am with my friends."
----- David Crockett in his last letter (to his children), January 9th, 1836
"I will never forsake Texas and her cause. I am her son." ----- Jose Antonio Navarro, from Mexican Prison in 1841
"for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320-“. . .It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”
 
Posts: 9797 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 21 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jarrod:
As far as their not being that many skilled workers that could make a double rifle. That is hog wash as they could be taught just like any other skill or trade.


But the fact is, they haven't been tought, and there are few here who could teach them! Wink


quote:
It is just simply not the dream of most people when they grow up to be a skilled double rifle maker. Most of them want to own a business, or sell real estate, or be a mechanic, or work for some big corporation, or play pro sports or whatever.


And it is the same in areas where double rifles are made. The diference is, there you have a history in double rifle makeing, that is 300 yrs old, and hand made rifle makeing is a respected trade!

quote:
Go out here to high schools or colleges or just where people that age hang out and ask them what their dreams are. I would bet very few of them will say I want to be a skilled double rifle maker. Most of them wouldn't know the difference by looking in double rifle and a double barrel shotgun.


You are correct in this instance, because you can go to most high schools in the USA,and there wouldn't be 10% of the studants that knows one end of a rifle from the other, and the ones that do know a little, they got their knowledge from Gangster movies, with AK47s as the only rifle they recognize, and they think the proper way to hold a pistol is side ways.



quote:
But if enough people wanted to be double rifle builders people could be taught, like they have been for generations for those that do build them.


My point exactly! The fact is the trade is tought by a father to his son, in a family apprenticeship, from a very young age. In the USA, even well known gun makers do not understand the process, and the best machinest in the world doesn't necessarily have the skill to build a good working double rifle, that is a fact, not an opinion. Stop and think, if the double rifle could be made intirely on a machine, which it can't, think what they would cost then at the cost of machine time, at the skilled labor costs in the USA!

Jerrod, you seem to have more than a modicom of intelegence, but that doesn't help you here, for you evidently do not understand the process any better than the high school kids you use as an example of the knowledge of firearms in the USA! I'm afraid the Disneyfacation, and pusification of our youth started 50 yrs ago,with DR, Spock, and that translates to 50, and 60 yr old people, today, who have no clue! So, how are they to teach the up, and coming, especially since they themselves have been tought that firearms are something to be avoided, by the teachers, and the "know nothing" media!

Admittedly, the dressed up doubles, and those with big time names, are over priced, and those are the ones people buy simply for the snobb factor, but the working doubles are not over priced,, and if made in the USA would cost at least 1/3 more, simply because of the cost of the rare skilled labor involved! The double rifle is the only new rifle you can buy that is worth more ten yrs down the road than when you bought it new!


Be well! beer


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
NE 450, No.2:

This is a "fun" question that we all can answer as if we would be setting out tomorrow. (In my case, I hope that's true because I'm really too old to want to face charging DG!) Smiler Let me dispose of the "price" question quickly. I really don't think it enters into the discussion (barring, of course, exquisite scroll work and a price above $150,000 {US} and in that event the rifle belongs in a display or a museum) The caliber I believe I would use would be a 470 NE. I had the pleasant experience of shooting my PH's 470 double about a dozen times (at paper I hasten to say) and was astonished at how well I could handle the rifle. I could even imagine myself shooting at a charging elephant with it. (No, I never had the experience) What I'm trying to say in a longwinded fashion is that I felt as confident with it as with my 375 H&H. Like the 375 I never felt a "kick" but rather a "push". Sure, it was a real "push" but it didn't jolt my back teeth - like a 7mm Rem. Mag did to me once on a range. I knew then that I could fire that second shot from a 470 NE in a bad situation -and isn't that what we are talking about? Smiler
 
Posts: 619 | Location: The Empire State | Registered: 14 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
I want one, like everyone else. That does NOT mean that they aren't horribly overpriced for what you get. Explain, if you will, why any DR with basic engraving and decent wood costs over $10K, and the answer is because there is this thing called "Snob Appeal" and too many people like to let the rest of the population know how much money they have to spend on toys. Everyone will know, instantly, that you are a serious horse's ass if you carry around a Halliburton briefcase with $100,000 in cash in it. Pack a quality DR around in a hardcase...now that's taste and style. Owning a DR puts you waaaay out front in the "Dick Measuring Contest", as does driving a Ferrari. It's about money and being ostentatious in your displays of wealth in lieu of tasteful. It's ALL about money and a substitute for Viagra. These are the same type of guy that pays somebody to build him a custom Harley, with a 40' motorhome and 24' travel trailer..all painted in matching swoopy designs, so he can trailer to within 50 miles of Sturgis and then ride the last 45 minutes in while woofing about the adventure of the open road. You can pick him out of the crowd...he's got the old lady twenty years his junior with silicone tits. Status man, and the pursuit of it.

Rich
DRSS


With a post like that, and you are calling someone else a SNOB!
jumping jumping


One other thing, HARLEY DAVIDSON, and DOUBLE RIFLE don't belong in the same post, or even in the same web site. Big Grin


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kudu4u
posted Hide Post
Buliwyf and Mouse93 thanks for your replies to my question on recommended DR caliber. I will study the .500/416 NE and .450/400 NE closely.


"In these days of mouth-foaming Disneyism......"--- Capstick
Don't blame the hunters for what the poachers do!---me

Benefactor Member NRA
 
Posts: 477 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 13 July 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Spring
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Buliwyf:

5. I prefer the feel and balance of the pre-war British. I appreciate the modern doubles, probably more accurate than pre-war, but I am a rifleman that values balance.


This is a common thought expressed by those that love the old doubles. I've long wondered how much of that thought process was a way to justify the romance of a classic old gun that would be hard to duplicate by a new gun just out of a box.
Nevertheless, my question remains, is there really a difference in the feel and fit of an older gun vs the newer designs? Does a new H&H feel different than an old one or are we just comparing a Searcy/Chapuis style with something English?
Are the newer guns bulkier because of today's legal environment or are we comparing more affordable new guns with sleeker designs from a century ago? Aren't some of the newer guns still made using the slim designs of yesteryear?
 
Posts: 1445 | Location: Bronwood, GA | Registered: 10 June 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Double Rifles    Question for non double rifle owners

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia