One of Us

| where do you live? what kind of performance are you looking for? is 50 or 75 fps worth it to you? |
| Posts: 27674 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us

| looks like you have a twin... i would not discourage anyone to follow their dreams...if it will float yer boat go for it...to max out that boltface in a non wildcat go 9,3x66 |
| Posts: 27674 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| I have an 06 Improved. I can't really say that it makes that much difference in a hunting rifle but I agree with Boom, if you want it go for it. I would never discourage wildcatting or improving. Just make sure the gunsmith you choose REALLY knows what an Ackley Improved chamber is and the correct way to ream it. Some of them do not. ray
Arizona Mountains
|
| Posts: 1560 | Location: Arizona Mountains | Registered: 11 October 2004 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us

| My old Rem 700 w/ 22" Mag-na-ported barrel could only get 2750 fps w/ 180's; and I know how to safely push the envelope. Had it rebarrel w/ a 26" Lilja and can hit 3050 fps with Reloader 25. It's enough velocity increase that I'm 1) going to get the 24 year old hardened recoil pad replaced and 2) the scope is kissing me between the eyes enough to swell, not cut. I'm in magnum territory. What barrel length is your? |
| |
One of Us

| I have a mentor right here on AR; Ackley Improved User. His assistance has been most helpful, intuitive and on the money. Once I opened my mind to his advice, it just made sense. I'm talking about using slower than traditional powder such as Rel 25, IMR 7828, etc. |
| |
One of Us

| quote: Originally posted by rem788: The factory length is 22". I am also considering getting it rechambered to the 30-338 Winchester. Dont know if I'm throwing money away I have a 7mag that will do the same thing.But it sounds like you gained quite a bit with a 26" barrel.
At 22" barrel, you don't gain much with an improoved chamber - as GSSP is quite correct about, slower powder is the key with the .30-06AI. Even more so with the .30-338 Win. At that barrel length, keep it as it is.
Bent Fossdal Reiso 5685 Uggdal Norway
|
| |
One of Us

| |
| Posts: 27674 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| You didn't reveal what part of the world you're from, but if the left coast of the US is nearby, then http://www.z-hat.com/ does many AI rebarrel jobs. If nearer the right coast, then here is where I had my .223Rem AI and .338-06AI guns made: http://rwhart.com/ |
| Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us

| About 30 years ago, I had my .30-06 re-chambered to .30 Gibbs. The gunsmith used a 40 deg Ackley reamer and cut it to the Gibbs depth. To fireform cases, I have to expand the neck to .35 cal., then start the new shoulder with the Gibbs size die. I chronographed 180 gr NP's at 2990 fps. Its worked great for over 2 dozen elk, 2 moose and a mtn goat.
NRA Endowment Life Member
|
| Posts: 1655 | Location: Boz Angeles, MT | Registered: 14 February 2006 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| That 300 Hawk is a fine choice. And I sometimes kick myself over not doing enough homework about my .338 build. I didn't belong to AR then, and didn't know the Hawk lineup existed. If I knew then what I know now, I would have had my barrel chambered for the .338 Hawk. Like someone else already said, maximize the '06 case.
Fred Zeglin wanted too many $$$ to rechamber mine to the Hawk.
I am not sure about using factory cartridges in the .300 Hawk. You can with the AI version. That is my saving grace with the .338-06AI. I can use factory ammo without headspace worries. |
| Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Fred shut down the shop for a week. He might just be catching up on business. Don't worry it'll be delt with. He posts here from time to time. A nice guy. |
| Posts: 3785 | Location: B.C. Canada | Registered: 08 November 2005 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by buffybr: About 30 years ago, I had my .30-06 re-chambered to .30 Gibbs. The gunsmith used a 40 deg Ackley reamer and cut it to the Gibbs depth. To fireform cases, I have to expand the neck to .35 cal., then start the new shoulder with the Gibbs size die. I chronographed 180 gr NP's at 2990 fps. Its worked great for over 2 dozen elk, 2 moose and a mtn goat.
You have a variation of the 30 Gibbs. The Gibbs had a 27 degree shoulder. Yours is still a pretty good cartridge, obviously.  Ray
Arizona Mountains
|
| Posts: 1560 | Location: Arizona Mountains | Registered: 11 October 2004 | 
IP
|
|
one of us

| quote: The gunsmith used a 40 deg Ackley reamer and cut it to the Gibbs depth.
Just curious how you keep from having a chamber with a to large a head dia by taking a AI reamer that is tapered and running it the extra depth needed to make a Gibbs? I have seen the Gibbs shoulder called everything from 27-35. The most common and the one published in the reprinted articles is 35. Since his data was detroyed after his death everything might be a guess.
As usual just my $.02 Paul K
|
| |
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by ramrod340:Just curious how you keep from having a chamber with a to large a head dia by taking a AI reamer that is tapered and running it the extra depth needed to make a Gibbs?
I have seen the Gibbs shoulder called everything from 27-35. The most common and the one published in the reprinted articles is 35. Since his data was detroyed after his death everything might be a guess.
Ramrod You make a good point about the oversize base. But if you have a reamer with a tight butt, running it in that extra .200" will give you a chamber that is OK with a lot of brass that tends to be big in the base to start with. I have made a 240 Gibbs using a 244 Ackley reamer that way. I know, the Ackley has a 40 degree shoulder whereas the Gibbs has a 35 degree, so it's not really a Gibbs. Most of the 30 Gibbs cartridges I have seen have the 27 degree shoulder and most of the drawings likewise. But Gibbs are like Ackleys - not all the same. It seems that all except the 30 do have 35 degree shoulders though. Ray
Arizona Mountains
|
| Posts: 1560 | Location: Arizona Mountains | Registered: 11 October 2004 | 
IP
|
|
new member
| Rem 788. This is just a suggestion, but why not rechamber to a 308 Norma Mag? This will shoot with if not better then the 300 win. There is always someone selling brass on ebay, and if you get in a pickel for ammo. You can buy off the shelf. It's really a flat shooting round, that will stop elk in there tracks in your country where 300yrds is not uncommon. |
| Posts: 24 | Location: Elk Country Idaho | Registered: 17 December 2005 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by rem788: Thanks Elk the 308 Norma is a great round, but have 7mm Rem Mag that shoots 1000 yds. This is more of a project to tinker with. Right now i'm still kinda up in the air on what i'm going to do. I like the ballistics of the 30-338 and of the 6.5-284. I really would like the 6.5 for the high bc's of the bullets and have something pleasant to shoot on the bench and have a decent long range lope and yote gun. Like i say this is a project to tinker with and have some thinking to do on what i need this gun to be. I appreciate all the input from everyone.
Thank You,
GINO
I shoot a 30-338 mag and 6.5x284 both are great calibers. If looking for a LR antlope or varmit rifle the 6.5x284 would be a better caliber. I use the 30-338 for elk and deer and with Nosler,Hornady,Norma and Laupa making 6.5x284 brass or just necking down 284 you has a pretty good selection. well good luck
VFW
|
| |