Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
When did .452 become .5 the legend of the 45 just keeps getting bigger | |||
|
One of Us |
There is a 50 ACP now... Jim "Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid" John Wayne | |||
|
One of Us |
This! | |||
|
One of Us |
there is one simple fact that you cannot avoid. Larger diameter bullets create a larger wound channel with more tissue damage and subsequently quicker blood loss to incapacitate an assailant. The factor that has changed in bullet development (and only in the past 2-3 years) is refined hollow point development that prevents/reduces incomplete expansion due to clogging by clothing fibers, drywall, etc. There are very few 'one shot' kills in the FBI shooting data that is released each year. Bullet placement in self defense is still the primary factor in determining how quickly a threat is neutralized. However, all factors being equal, if you are shooting at close distances (less than 7 yards) at an assailant amped up on drugs, you want the most bang for your buck. Until you have mastered the technique known as 'getting off the "X"', you would be wise to shoot the largest caliber you can control adequately. Never underestimate the ability of the bad guy to inflict damage to you regardless of the weapon you carry. | |||
|
One of Us |
I have personally seen the results of both calibers MANY TIMES in my time as a police officer in NY and IMO "Dead is Dead". I have seen both rounds fail as well. Once, I had a conversation with a guy (while waiting for an Ambulance) who had just been shot in the right nipple with a 44 magnum...he was in pretty bad shape but he was still capable of returning fire if his magazine wasn't empty. He lost a lung but survived. I have no problem carrying a 9 or 45. With good bullets I don't think it makes a bit of difference. ggruber, this reply is not directed at you | |||
|
one of us |
There is no magic bullet. .452 is minimum 45 size. It is hard for a 9mm to go from .355 to .452. The 45 will always be a bigger hole. I like the 180 grain Federal 44 magnum for social work myself. | |||
|
One of Us |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by buckeyeshooter: [QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm: A younger friend of mine today told me that .45 acp was antiquated. He said in the last few years technology had followed the 9 and with all the new personal defense technology...there was no valid reason for a .45 over a 9. I assume he ment in projectiles. Your friends train of thought is flawed. True that bullet technology has advanced greatly making the 9mm a much more effective round...but technology has done the same for the 45 as well, making it even more efficient. I'll say it again, with good bullets I saw no difference between the two | |||
|
one of us |
The Army itself even admits the 9mm is lacking. Army wants more stopping power. I am carrying a subcompact 9mm with 147's because it can be concealed. | |||
|
One of Us |
Big Nate, the army is limited to using FMJ bullets...if they were allowed to use modern hollow points, i think they would have a different opinion. FWIW, I would definitely not carry 147's in a compact pistol. With that short barrel those heavy bullets are going really slow, i would bet 800 or so fps, and you are not going to get much or even any expansion. Before I left SWAT, we did a narcotics search warrant where my fellow team member who was first in the door fired one round from his glock and hit the suspect in the chest.he did go down but we had to struggle to secure him to render first aid. While waiting for the ambulance he told us that he thought we shot him with a rubber bullet. Later at the hospital we learned that the bullet penetrated a lung and exited with zero expansion. If he chose to, he could have returned fire or even fought us physically. Shortly thereafter, we switched over to 115gr +P+ hollow points and the next shooting was fatal. Just my 2cents of course! | |||
|
One of Us |
Wait until you need a. It more penetration and that 115 grain +P+ will most likely not reach the vitails. Just as the 115 grain +P that the FBI used in the 80's failed to provide enough penetration. With a proper bullet the 45 give an adequate amount of penetration with a good wnd channel. _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
You're absolutely right but dead is dead Im not suggesting that a 9 is better than a 45 since i have seen first-hand the aftermath of both in action. In my experience using modern bullets, i dont see a difference between the two....of course this is my own opinion based on my experiences on the street. For myself, i split the difference and carry a Glock 23 40cal with 165gr Speer hollowpoints. If im not carrying my Glock i am carrying my HK P7 with 124gr Speers | |||
|
One of Us |
I agree to a point. It all depends on the circumstances of each encounter. I have shot enough game with both to come to the conclusion that there is most definitely a difference. Not a day light and dark difference, but a difference none the less. Nothing trumps shot placement and this fact is indisputable. _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
For military use one must compare standard 9mm Ball FMJ performance with .45ACP Ball FMJ performance. Neither Ball FMJ ammo is going to expand. Penetration depth about the same: If the .45 had tumbled it too would have had areas of large temporary cavity. But look at both temporary and permanent cavities before the tumbling started. You will see 15cm (~6") where the .45 not only created a larger permanent cavity but where the .45 created a much greater diameter temporary cavity. The temporary cavity created by the stable 9mm bullet is approx .6" diameter or about 1/4 square inches in cross sectional area. The temporary cavity created by the stable .45 bullet is about 1.5" diameter or about 1-3/4 square inches in cross sectional area. No matter how you slice it, the .45 FMJ makes a much bigger hole than 9mm FMJ. . | |||
|
One of Us |
JW, I never shot a game animal with either caliber but I DID put a few of those +P+ 115gr 9mm's into several people over the years who wished me dead and I can tell you that dead is dead and inadequate penetration wasn't an issue for any of them. You have to see (autopsy)the devastation good HP bullets cause to human flesh. Gelatin is a good test but cant duplicate the real thing. Again this isn't directed at you but I think that it is splitting hairs to think that there is a difference between 9mm and 45 especially at arms length distance where most encounters occur | |||
|
one of us |
I'm not going to get into a 9m/m vs 45 arguement. Back in the day, I shot one of my 9m/m reloads into the sidewall of a 10.00x20(10 ply) truck tire and found the bullet inside the tire, perfectly mushroomed about the size of a nickle. this was a max load of Unique and a 115gr. Hornady HP. And before someone chimes in with a truck tire ain't flesh, i'll agree, just never made a comparison. I own both calibers so i'm not leaning one way or the other. Stepchild NRA Life Member | |||
|
One of Us |
Here the final words of what the FBI had to say in their report on "Handgun Wounding Factors and Effectiveness". Go to the links to read the whole thing.
. | |||
|
One of Us |
This is exactly the conclusion that I arrived after decades of taking game with a handgun. The less than optimal angles and shooting through cover (car doors, etc) will require more penetration. _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
It sounds like you are very confident with your hardware and I don't doubt your findings at all. True that an animal isn't a human but I would assume that a bullet would have similar performance on a human and a deer sized animal....both are made of skin, flesh, bone, and blood so I would definitely put allot of weight on what you are reporting. Im no expert, whatever that means but I put my 2 Cents in anyway | |||
|
One of Us |
Let me say that I am extremely pleased that you survived your encounter. An extremely stressful situation to be sure. _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
Thanks.....had a few of them. You cant believe how jacked up you get and in 2 seconds its over. Better him laying there than us. | |||
|
one of us |
No expert here either but a combat veteran and definately have an opinion. I'm not a huge fan of the 9mm and have seen plenty humans take several rounds with less than the desired effect. Ball ammo sucks ass. The thing is even with ball ammo the .45ACP has a greater effect. No question. For personal defense it is a series of compromizes. Using a gun thats small enough to conceal limits your choices. More so in the summer. Finding ammo that's effective in a short barreled small handgun is the next compromize. I'm using a Sig P938 for it's size and funtion. My choice would be a 1911 or Sig 220 SAO, both to big to hide easily. My choice of bullet weight had less to do with it's mass as it's function and expansion. In a short barrel the 147's will be slow and will penetrate, but they expand better than some others reviewed in the test. My ideal choice may be 124's of a different make, but I tested 115's and was unimpressed. They expand quickly but don't penetrate as much. They were pointless against harder shielded targets, like behind winshields and doors. A .40 in a P938 would be great IMHO. I like the .40 S&W and see little difference between it and the .45ACP. Though I've not personally seen any actual use on humans. PS. From the FBI report quoted above,"Choosing a bullet because of relatively shallow penetration will seriously compromise weapon effectiveness, and needlessly endanger the lives of the law enforcement officers using it. No law enforcement officer has lost his life because a bullet over penetrated his adversary, and virtually none have ever been sued for hitting an innocent bystander through an adversary. On the other hand, tragically large numbers of officers have been killed because their bullets did not penetrate deeply enough." | |||
|
One of Us |
Good post BigNate. There is definitely a shift to the 124gr 9mm from the 115gr here in NY in police depts. the NY State Police is using the 45 GAP and I hear that they like it. NYPD went over to the 124's as well. I am retired 6 years now and since then the 40SW has become more popular here but like you I have never seen a DOA with it yet. I am using the 165gr in my Glock 23 and it is a handful to shoot! As a combat vet you must have seen allot of bad shit....I'm happy that you made it back to Idaho! | |||
|
one of us |
I'm in the process of loading some 9m/m's with 90gr. Sierra HP's In Sierras's 5th edition manual they show 5gr of Bullseye driving a 90gr HP 1250FPS and it's also shown as their accuracy load. And there are 4 powders that will drive the 90's up to 1400, I'd sure hate to stop one of them! To me, it's not how big the entrance hole is but tissue destruction is usually what counts. Stepchild NRA Life Member | |||
|
one of us |
As long as one gets enough penetration with it. | |||
|
one of us |
Stepchild - I think you'll find the 90 to lack enough penetration. Up close with a target that isn't protected it may be great. But any armor, shielding, even heavy clothing I think it will lack enough penetration to end a fight quick enough. The FBI report was done a while back, but they continue to accumulate data. Many LEO Dept have switched ammo and calibers several times as technology has changed. Thankfully they are reacting to change rather than accept under performance. The FBI thought the 10mm was the Bee's Knees, the over-penetration in a public venue was the reason for change. Not due to it being ineffective. | |||
|
one of us |
Nate, You may be right about the penetration, I just happen to have a box here and thought i'd try them. I thought a foot or so of wet newspaper should tell me what I need to know. Stepchild NRA Life Member | |||
|
One of Us |
Don't forget the FBI also needed a semi-auto with a much smaller grip to accommodate their smaller stature agents. Jim "Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid" John Wayne | |||
|
new member |
Rambo (who rarely posts in these threads) chimes in and recommends a .22 LR. Considering your obvious "vast combat experience" can you offer us mortals a recommendation for a .22 carry piece? I'm thinking for the dudes who roll it "old school" maybe a Ruger Single Six and for the more modern types something like a Ruger Mark II or a Browning Woodsman. The Single Six would definitely be better and look cooler in a "quick draw" scenario. On a more serious note leaving the keyboard commandos and their Sig Mosquitoes behind the .45 ACP with modern loads is brutally effective (always has been really but now more so than ever with the advancements of the past few decades in projectile design). In my experience I would choose it every time over just about anything lesser as far as auto pistols go. It absolutley hammers the bad guys. | |||
|
One of Us |
This is a 230 grain 45 caliber XTP shown next to a 40 caliber XTP. The 45 bullets was fired from a 45 Super at 1100 plus FPS. The 40 caliber 180 grain XTP was fired from a 10mm at 1300 plus FPS. Note the difference in the expanded size of the two bullets. _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
One of Us |
WOW! Just wow! A new poster with a reading comprehension deficiency! Amazing! Where do they come from? Oh, yeah, "Harm's Way". And a great tactical handle with a wonderful avatar. And he's so profound he feels it worthwhile to include one of his own quotes in his signature line. I'd welcome you to AR as a new member, but I really don't think it's gonna work out for you. Mike ______________ DSC DRSS (again) SCI Life NRA Life Sables Life Mzuri IPHA "To be a Marine is enough." | |||
|
One of Us |
This should be fun | |||
|
new member |
Well what do you recommend then, Blood and Guts? Maybe a Sig Mosquito or a Walther TPH? Which ammo do you pop em with? I'm thinking Stingers or maybe Remington Yellow Jackets because you've made it clear in this thread you're not a ball ammo type of guy. | |||
|
One of Us |
Who are you referring to Iceman? | |||
|
new member |
I was responding to KittenHunter who posted just before you did, that was in no way directed at you. Sorry for the confusion. | |||
|
One of Us |
| |||
|
new member |
On popcorn, butter is always better. | |||
|
one of us |
Don't forget that what got this all going was the FBI trying to cover up for their poor tactical and shooting performance. Then trying to blame 1 bullet for all their screw ups. Some thing like 115 rounds fired by them with only a few hits. | |||
|
One of Us |
That is BS the ammo did not penetrate deeply enough and that is a fact. You need to read this forensic report on the shoot out. [URL=http://s33.photobucket.com/user/jwp475/media/ForensicReport.jpg.html] [/URL _____________________________________________________ A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. - Winston Churchill | |||
|
one of us |
Read it and other reports many times the 9mm silver tip preformed just like it was suppose to. Still doesn't account for the piss poor tactics of the FBI and their Piss poor hit ratio. The FBI is and was trying to cover up their piss poor performance on one bullet. There is no guarantee even if that one bullet would have enter and destroyed the heart that the person shot couldn't have kept on fighting. AS we all seen with many types of critter shot that continue on with their insides turned to mush. All one has to do is read a few Medal of Honor reports to just see what a very motivate person can do when wounded even fatally. | |||
|
new member |
Indeed. LionHunter...aka..Mike Nice...World-class liar and fraud. Rich Kayser...aka Idaho Sharpshooter...pathological liar and nutjob. What motivates you two to make up such ridiculous tales and make such fools of yourselves? | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia