THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
If you doubt the 458 WM Login/Join
 
one of us
posted Hide Post
Neva, ah say neva, try an convience a .458 Win user that he got screwed!! stir

He will spend an eternity trying to convience the no nothings of this world that the .458 Win is the best designed case since sliced white bread was invented!! jumping

Will, Will, your such a bad boy! stir stirring little bugger! beer


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42354 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
It seems to me that the thousands and thousands of satisfied 458 users are happily out using their rifles for what they were intended and the only ones constantly trying to convince folks of how anemic it is are those few who have bought into the hype that more velocity is always better in a 458 - but less is better in everything else.
How is it that a 400gr bullet from a 450-400 or 404 @ a claimed 2050fps can be so great ( Ross Seyfied told Dave Scovill that his original 450-400 Kynoch loads rarely reached 1900fps and the much vaunted 500 gr 470 Nitro loads from Kynoch seldom went much over 2000fps.) yet a 500 gr 458 bullet with greater SD @ 2000 or 2100 bounces off?
For all the guys who love the pounding they receive from more velocity and honestly believe what they are preaching why not just get a 460 Wby and be done with it. As Finn Aagaard said, a .458 500gr bullet @ 2000fps makes a bloody big hole in whatever it hits.
It works for me.


Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4224 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Robgunbuilder
posted Hide Post
I think we all know that these pressure measurements are based on relative standardization and will vary based on lots of things. Bullet resistance is a function of bullet metal composition, bearing surface area, number of grooves, twist rate, cut or button rifled grooves, smoothness of the barrel and probably ten other things like the throat freebore, etc. The numbers will allways be simply relative. With that said, when the load is predicted to be 76-99KPSI and is ataining unrealistic velocities it doesnt take a rocket scientist to realize this just isnt OK. I think everyone agrees about that including Will. I like the .458 win mag and for one agree that it will kill anything that walks this earth at 2050-2150fps. I've even made long throat versions and loaded bullets out to .25 longer than normal to attain higher velocities myself in a Ruger number one. However, no normal .458 win mag is going to hit 2250fps with the above stated bullet and powder with overpressure loads. -Rob


Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers to do incredibly stupid things- AH (1941)- Harry Reid (aka Smeagle) 2012
Nothing Up my sleeves but never without a plan and never ever without a surprise!
 
Posts: 6314 | Location: Las Vegas,NV | Registered: 10 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
Actually, I agree with you, but I get a little uptight when people start quoting QL numbers to 5 digits. I feel it's reliably accurate to the first digit, and sometimes it gets the 2nd one close as well.

Several labs, including Hodgdon, report .458s making 2150 with 500 gn while staying within pressure specs. That's been considered reliable big game performance for 100 years now.
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
60 years, asdf
ignore everything to the right of the comma in ql... it's just data, not significant digits


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40372 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of CCMDoc
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by asdf:
I get a little uptight when people start quoting QL numbers to 5 digits.


When something as trivial as "quoting QL numbers to 5 digits" in a thread on a forum about guns is enough to make you uptight, it is time to have a beer or three.


NRA Lifer; DSC Lifer; SCI member; DRSS; AR member since November 9 2003

Don't Save the best for last, the smile for later or the "Thanks" for tomorow
 
Posts: 3465 | Location: In the Shadow of Griffin&Howe | Registered: 24 November 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of asdf
posted Hide Post
quote:
60 years, asdf


The performance is that of the 450 NE, which was introduced in the late 1890s, so 100+ years.
 
Posts: 980 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 01 June 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
asdf,
fair enough


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40372 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia