THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
470NE vs 416 rigby Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I am looking forward to another Buffalo hunt in acouple of years. I inhereted both a Krieghoff 470 double and a Rugar 416 rigby from my brother. I know that both will work, hell my 375 H&H did fine on my first Buff, but I am curious as to how these compare. In the end I'll shoot them both and pick the one that I shoot best, but any input is welcome.

Thanks
TerryR
 
Posts: 1903 | Location: Greensburg, Pa. | Registered: 09 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
damn...i would go with the Krieghoff 470 just to be different...

this will answer your question beer


http://www.krieghoff.com/pages/downloads/Duckworth470NitroSafMag.pdf


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27626 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If you will be hunting open country, then the bolt gun with a scope may serve you better.

But personally, and this is just me, if I cannot get close enough to a buff to use iron sights, then the buffalo is at a sufficient distance that the 'dangerous' part of dangerous game is no longer applicable.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TomFromTheShade
posted Hide Post
If I owned a double 470NE there is NO other gun that I would hunt with for Cape buff. It may not be the best choice out of every caliber on earth, but its a damn fine choice!


- TomFromTheShade -

Make it a point in life to leave this world a little better off than it was before you came into it.
 
Posts: 81 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: 25 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
I sure do like the sounds of the double rifle. Big Grin


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Too me the choice would depend on what I wanted out of the buffalo hunt. If I was in Masailand looking for a Roland Watd big boy, I would chose the scope sighted 416. The big boy may be too far or on the other side of a cow herd and reguire a difficult shot. The scoped bolt rifle would be a definite advantage here. If I was hunting the thick jess of Zimbabwe and was just looking for any good hard bossed bull the 470 double would get the nod.

46H&H
 
Posts: 5686 | Location: Nampa, Idaho | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I would take both and let one of the trackers carry one. That way you are prepared either way, plus it is always prudent to have a backup rifle.
 
Posts: 1361 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 07 February 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Any of them (.375, .416, .470) will crumple a buff with a properly placed shot.

The .416 Rigby gives you more versatility in terms of the variety of game and distances it can handle.

An iron-sighted .470 is much more limited for general hunting, but the one I'd want in a pinch on charging buff.


 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TerryR:
I am looking forward to another Buffalo hunt in acouple of years. I inhereted both a Krieghoff 470 double and a Rugar 416 rigby from my brother. I know that both will work, hell my 375 H&H did fine on my first Buff, but I am curious as to how these compare. In the end I'll shoot them both and pick the one that I shoot best, but any input is welcome.

Thanks
TerryR




Well take the Krieghoff DR in 500/416 N.E.!

I am interested in this rifle, too...
 
Posts: 276 | Registered: 28 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I go along with MHC_TX. Since I now have both a double .500 NE and a .416 Rigby, I will have a tracker carry the Rigby on my next trip.

Consider it. I don't know if you were thinking this or not but if you are concerned about not having a 'plainsgame' rifle, think about loading 370 gr. North Fork bullets with H4831SC in the Rigby at 2500 + fps. It will shoot plenty flat and dead is dead. The bullet works for buff and anything else, but it will exit.

Yes, they are similar in caliber but I feel like one is a sledgehammer, the other is a 5lb. mallet. Both are hard hitters; one just hits harder.

Good luck with your "dilemma".

Cheers,

Sam
 
Posts: 702 | Location: Lenoir. N.C. | Registered: 18 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
For buff and elephant the 470 double would be my pick.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by N E 450 No2:
For buff and elephant the 470 double would be my pick.


I agree! The 470 would be my pick for Buffalo hunting, as well. In fact, almost any double would be my pick for hunting Buffalo. I'd have JJ install some QD scope mounts on the 470,if it doesn't already have them, and carry a small scope already zeroed in, in a belt pouch, in case a really complex shot was needed. I'd take the 375 H&H for my back-up rifle, and leave it in the Bakki, till needed. The scope would negate the need for the tracker to carry the other rifle, and there would be no chance of getting the wrong ammo, in the excitement. beer


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Clem
posted Hide Post
sell the wife, kids and house then bring both the 416 and 470. shoot one buff with each.
 
Posts: 1292 | Location: I'm right here! | Registered: 01 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Clem
You a genius

TerryR
 
Posts: 1903 | Location: Greensburg, Pa. | Registered: 09 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ozhunter
posted Hide Post
Last week I nailed a Buff in the Zambezi Jesse with my 470NE, but I think a scoped 416, 404 or 450/400 is a much better option for a first shot at buffalo most of the time, no mater what range is. My PH cringed when the open sighted double came out, saying that more f ups occur with this set up than any other. He soon found that I could use it well, thanks to about 100 rounds of use.
Many oportunities were lost not having a scope, many times there were three Dagga Boys in thick Jesse Bush at less than twenty meters, but it takes time with Bino's to work them out, to much time with shifting winds.
BUTT.. if you get familiar with shooting a O,S Double and dont mind missing a few oportunities,then open sighted Doubles can be great fun and a joy to carry, providing no more than 11.5LBS, Also they feel good when you bump into a angry Lyon or Ele.
Cheers,
Adam C.
 
Posts: 5886 | Location: Sydney,Australia  | Registered: 03 July 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia