The Accurate Reloading Forums
is the 375 ruger case long enough???
29 January 2007, 02:24
boom stickis the 375 ruger case long enough???
the only way to maximize the ruger case is to long load a 423...kinda like the taylor...to get close to 400@ 2400 you had to run high preasure and load it long...question is is the ruger brass too short??? another reason why the a.r. carts are a better platform being 2.65"
another question is can you get around steve hornadys patent by making the case longer???
as jeffeosso said the ruger case will be great for 375 on down but imagine a 8x68 version of the ruger case!
can and do we want to at a.r. want to patent a 2.65" .532 casehead brass??? you could use 375 ruger reamers to make the longer version and get another 7 or 8% case volume. it would realy max out that design and no need to run excessive preasures... you could do .375 300 gr @ 2500 fps in the mid 40's preasure wise. now that would be a great improvement...handloaders wont need pixie dust to make it shine.
the 375 ruger is great...the 2.65 version would be great + 8%

29 January 2007, 02:35
onefunzr2Yes, by all means possible, run right out and patent it.
29 January 2007, 03:28
vapodogquote:
another question is can you get around steve hornadys patent by making the case longer???
If I was building it for myself only.....I wouldn't give a shit about Steve Hornady!!!!!
If I was building them and advertizing them as a business.....it might be a different deal.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
29 January 2007, 03:46
ireload2What patent?
Is there anthing new on the .375 Ruger that has not been around since 1888?
29 January 2007, 03:55
vapodogquote:
Originally posted by ireload2:
What patent?
Is there anthing new on the .375 Ruger that has not been around since 1888?
ordinarily I'd agree.....but don't tell that to Jamison!
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
29 January 2007, 04:03
vapodogquote:
question is is the ruger brass too short??
Boomy,
The controlling factor may in fact be magazine length and not case length.
the bullet can only be seated to the length allowed by the magazine....the rest must be in the case!
The very small amount of chamber volume gained by longer brass may in fact be negligible.
One can push the 400 grain from the 416 Taylor at the 2,300 given some guts!
416 Taylor:
400 Hornady roundnose IMR IMR-4320 64.0 2,243
Remarks: average group size (inches): 1.00
400 Hornady roundnose IMR IMR-4320 68.0 2,301
Remarks: average group size (inches): 0.87; good load
400 Hornady roundnose IMR IMR-4320 69.0 2,343
He should be fully able to do the same from a 404 (.423) Ruger case.......and do we need a lot more?
May I forecast a plains game load of 2,600 with a 350 grain Woodleigh soft!???.....
Now, that's darn serious zebra medicine one would imagine.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
29 January 2007, 05:33
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by ireload2:
What patent?
Is there anthing new on the .375 Ruger that has not been around since 1888?
yep... a 532 casehead and rim, no belet, at 60+KPSI.. which, off course, was unattainable is a repeatable way, then
29 January 2007, 05:45
boom stickif someone were to produce longer brass i am sure they would want to "protect it"
yes if one were to "go big" there would be negligable gains i have conceeded....but 375 on down would be different. a 338 2.65" case on the .532 casehead would be significant gains.