Not Canada, Alberta

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNkHnEzzC7A

i might add my 2 cents on this ... this is a project that is not there yet lol and second alberta with bc, saskatchewan and ontario are working on pipelines that might come before that one lol and in the same time it is always strange to me to hear from a maga supporter that you want our oil while in the same time your dear president explains everywhere they do not need canada products lol ... let s do the tariffs of 35% on that oil and see how it goes lol

I would not take anything she says or proposes too seriously.

According to the Alberta government, the project has been terminated.

So, no.

https://www.alberta.ca/keystone-xl-pipeline-project

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
According to the Alberta government, the project has been terminated.

So, no.

https://www.alberta.ca/keystone-xl-pipeline-project

wrong project, the youtube article explains it -- it was abandoned, Keystone XL, by TC energy, in 2021 ---

fun fact, a high school friend of mine was a big deal planner for Keystone XL, until june of 21 --

many things can be true at once --

here's a visual aid for understanding that there's "a few" pipelines and projects

https://www.reuters.com/sustai...ine-port-2025-06-11/

Reuters reads Alberta is looking for private sector to move oil to West Canada due to tariff situation.

British Columbia is resisting that move.

https://www.biv.com/news/resou...thern-coast-11012924

Again, the Alberta government does not confirm.


https://www.aer.ca/data-and-pe...astructure/pipelines

Everything I read and your video does not say, is what you are looking at is Keystone XL which was revived only to die.

https://pipexch.com/alberta-ot...e-pipeline-projects/

Your project might be this one which was built w no state funds according to this.

https://www.worldpipelines.com...atural-gas-pipeline/

However, it does not read like it.


Alberta’s premier also said this month Alberta needs a new pipeline bc of the tariff situation affecting export to the U.S.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I1qY7IgwQPY

I really think your project was Keystone XL that was on again until this tariff situation got out of hand.


I cannot find any source for your video.

you might turn on closed captions -

Yes, it's a private sector move - NOT keystone XL ... the "private sector" part is the KEY --

you good?

THE ORANGE MAGA FUCKWIT is turning America into the West’s Nigeria

that's not how oil works.

it's probably the only thing that moves freely around the planet in and out of many countries at the same time.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:


you might turn on closed captions -

Yes, it's a private sector move - NOT keystone XL ... the "private sector" part is the KEY --

you good?

here you go, with time stamps
One former TransCanada executive who
0:40
oversaw Energy East and the failed
0:41
Keystone XL pipeline believes expanding
0:44
current infrastructure such as
0:45
Enbridge's mainline is more feasible.

2:30 The project will link Alberta's
2:33
oil sands to refineries in the American
2:36
Midwest, breaking free from bottlenecks
2:39
created by past rejections like Keystone
2:42
XL. That was a great choice. And this

Crickets.. but what did I expect?

BTW, not "my" project. I have a broad investment portfolio, but nothing in speculative pipelines in a country resistant to pipelines.

Again, I cannot verify your video through any state or secondary source. I did find a private sector announcement as presented above.

Find us a written source. I’ve looked.

So, private sector would not be Alberta as your title indicates.

Awww.. cute, honey, now crayfish on your multiple incorrect assertions that this is keystone XL

Just like "my project", this is not "my video" that is a false assertion, that you have been corrected. But the chip on your shoulder and agenda wont allow you to say "oppsie, I was mistaken"

Oh, I called my friend at TC energy... while not verbatim, the answer was "this is not our project. I have no idea if this is a SPV that could have several large companies "

You can look up spv on any financial literacy site. Good luck

The REPORTER of this action owns the content. You could always post a comment or DM them with your questions. But you have no actual concern on the project, you want to believe you are always correct. You have been corrected, repeatedly, just like IGA egg prices, you continue to be bullheaded and not evaluate "new data", even when its an egg dripping down your face, honey

Yeah, again. I have provided everything I can find in this issue. Mine support your video.

Reading is getting hard for all Texans.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Yeah, again. I have provided everything I can find in this issue. Mine support your video.

Reading is getting hard for all Texans.

I didnt realize you were from Texas... I gave you the transcript, honey... reading must be hard when not in cornporn

I am still waiting for a written supportive source. I’ve looked and found nothing.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
I am still waiting for a written supportive source. I’ve looked and found nothing.

yeah yeah .. still waiting for you OPSIE for demanding it was keystone XL --

just own it, honey, you were DEAD wrong

as of today even in dream there is not such a project coming from alberta to usa ... as there is a big push for an interior one that is more important to us than you lol

Still no confirmation brought to us by Texas Contingent member.

Folks from Canada say no.

The Alberta government does not say this exists.

Either put up or shut up. However, you will just keep ranting unresponsive.

At this point it appears to be a proposal and nothing more. Don't look for it to be transporting oil tomorrow.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

Either put up or shut up. However, you will just keep ranting unresponsive.

My exact thiughts when you kept ranting on, after being proven it wasn't keystone XL...

And, oh my, if its just a pipe dream, the it doubly isn't KXL

So, per your advice.. PUOSU

All you are being asked is to provide us with a written confirming source.

That is it.

No one can confirm your video.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
According to the Alberta government, the project has been terminated.

So, no.

https://www.alberta.ca/keystone-xl-pipeline-project

This one. Which the video confirms isnt KXL

Own your mistake

We have went through this.

I believe listed more projects the XL. I fine with it not being XL, but I can find no source that supports your video. I have even use tried a project I think it could be, but no one buy your video says to what extent. A bunch of pipelines out of Alberta have been cancelled if you would read.

The only source that references your potential video that I can find does not state where the pipeline is going.

You can keep going, all we have asked for is a source confirming your video.

I have looked and found none. You have done nothing.

So, I’ll listen to the Canadians on this issue.