Do try and keep up.

I'll post the latest often just to help out.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...8899fa1edd1706&ei=43

Garland on special counsel appointment ruling: ‘Do I look like someone who would make that basic mistake about the law?’
Story by Dan Berman and Hannah Rabinowitz, CNN • 17h • 2 min read

I think Cannon finally decided she wants the 5th Circuit to remove her from the case and chose this way to get it.

The appointment letter clearly cited the Attorney General's explicit authority to make the appointment.

The same authority to appoint Hur.

The Fifth Circuit isn't likely to remove her from the case, even if they reverse her ruling.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
The Fifth Circuit isn't likely to remove her from the case, even if they reverse her ruling.

They've already had to reverse her dumb ass on this case and weren't happy about it.

How do you let a Judge keep a case after she dismisses it for spurious reasons? Her bias is explicit.

https://youtu.be/1qjrnpUWJ18?si=AQ_0ShkBXQpzcXfc

Merrick Garland HITS BACK Against Judge Cannon

https://youtu.be/r8kruNgHB4s?si=NEU1n14kIUcje0Yo

https://youtu.be/iXInyn6lfrA?si=kkSq4CgoctVN4v16

Trump Slapped With SHOCKING Losses in Court

2 days ago

https://youtu.be/8iBksFnIt_4?si=IrkS77EgUON6rm4m

Alvin Bragg ------ Against Trump

https://youtu.be/A2GymYSjAKk?si=ft3svHYBoDigiz0b

Alvin Bragg STRIKES AGAIN With HUGE New Filing

5 days ago

https://youtu.be/4Cn-uK5ABj0?si=bHWo2v3iiAEZERG3

'Two vastly different universes' of facts: Manhattan DA urges judge not to overturn Trump verdict

5 days ago

https://youtu.be/v2lbuG61C8Y?si=QbzSHuL0De_zAQbN

The INSIDE STORY of Strzok and Page's HUGE Settlement

quote:

Originally posted by frankinthelaurels:
All this for a chance that the treasonous traitor would nominate her in case of a Supreme Court vacancy...amazing but not surprising.

She's already shown reason why she shouldn't be on SCOTUS.

quote:

Originally posted by ANTELOPEDUNDEE:

quote:

Originally posted by frankinthelaurels:
All this for a chance that the treasonous traitor would nominate her in case of a Supreme Court vacancy...amazing but not surprising.

She's already shown reason why she shouldn't be on SCOTUS.

Yes

Because following the law and the constitution is BAD.


Sorry her rulings hurt you fee fee’s.


I would have it look at her work as a whole and her ruling but just because she hurt your feeling with a ruling not a disbarment from the Court.


Facts don’t care about your feelings.

quote:

Originally posted by frankinthelaurels:
All this for a chance that the treasonous traitor would nominate her in case of a Supreme Court vacancy...amazing but not surprising.

Are you so blinded by your left wing master that you really believe this?

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by ANTELOPEDUNDEE:

quote:

Originally posted by frankinthelaurels:
All this for a chance that the treasonous traitor would nominate her in case of a Supreme Court vacancy...amazing but not surprising.

She's already shown reason why she shouldn't be on SCOTUS.

Yes

Because following the law and the constitution is BAD.


Sorry her rulings hurt you fee fee’s.


I would have it look at her work as a whole and her ruling but just because she hurt your feeling with a ruling not a disbarment from the Court.


Facts don’t care about your feelings.

She didn't hurt my fee fees any more than she hurt yours.

quote:

Originally posted by ANTELOPEDUNDEE:

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by ANTELOPEDUNDEE:

quote:

Originally posted by frankinthelaurels:
All this for a chance that the treasonous traitor would nominate her in case of a Supreme Court vacancy...amazing but not surprising.

She's already shown reason why she shouldn't be on SCOTUS.

Yes

Because following the law and the constitution is BAD.


Sorry her rulings hurt you fee fee’s.


I would have it look at her work as a whole and her ruling but just because she hurt your feeling with a ruling not a disbarment from the Court.


Facts don’t care about your feelings.

She didn't hurt my fee fees any more than she hurt yours.

You seem pretty but hurt about her decisions and somehow thing this translates into a USSC appointment.


Which line a lot of what your promulgate is absurd.


But hey if you tell the big lie long enough people will believe it.

quote:

But hey if you tell the big lie long enough people will believe it.

Trump proved that wrong.

It's not how long the Big Lie is told, it's how long true believers believe it.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

But hey if you tell the big lie long enough people will believe it.

Trump proved that wrong.

It's not how long the Big Lie is told, it's how long true believers believe it.

Have you ever noticed that all the left does is tell you how bad Trumpnia and how he will be come a dictator but they never manage to either build their candidate up nor promulgate ther policies and what they are going to do to make the country better.

That is truly expertise in Tue politics of personal destruction.

quote:

but they never manage to either build their candidate up nor promulgate ther policies and what they are going to do to make the country better.

Then you are not paying attention, preferring the Rightist's narratives.

quote:

Have you ever noticed that all the left does is tell you how bad Trumpnia and how he will be come a dictator but they never manage to either build their candidate up nor promulgate ther policies and what they are going to do to make the country better.

Are you saying the Dems aren't building up their candidate Harris?

Are you claiming that the Dems won't offer and approve their policy platform at the convention?

Earth to Haser...

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

but they never manage to either build their candidate up nor promulgate ther policies and what they are going to do to make the country better.

Then you are not paying attention, preferring the Rightist's narratives.

The right talks of making America better.


The left talks of getting trump because they have not given us any policies or roadmap to look at. It’s nothing but Orange Man Bad!!! Insurrection!!!! And so on and so on.


Do you not read the posting of the little commissars that report tl you???

I hope they never stop until he is in jail!

A career criminal all his life!

A MAGA CRIMINAL!

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
Do try and keep up.

I'll post the latest often just to help out.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...8899fa1edd1706&ei=43

Garland on special counsel appointment ruling: ‘Do I look like someone who would make that basic mistake about the law?’
Story by Dan Berman and Hannah Rabinowitz, CNN • 17h • 2 min read

No he is not. However, one Supreme Court Justice had already said the precedent the Special Counsel was appointed under is unconstitutional.

This S.Ct., has been very reckless and overturned more major precedents than any in our lifetimes. What is one more.

Judge Cannon just copied and pasted Justice Thomas concurrence where Justice Thomas brought up this issue.

In conclusion, Trump already has one vote. He just needs 4 more. The narrative will be in the general public mind and great critical thinkers that AG unconstitutionally empowered a Special Prosecutor to go Trump hunting. No, what that scenario is, is a reckless S. Ct., disregarded over 40 years of precedent that has long been relied upon by the Federal Courts and DOJ to throw Trump a life line. This assumes Trump gets 4 more votes.

Folks Right and Left had better recognize how much insulation the Head of the executive branch is on the verge of accumulating through a S. Ct., majority that refuses to follow caselaw anchored in the principle no branch and no man is superior.

Hey, maybe Trump won’t find 4 votes to overturn controlling precedent on appointment of Special Counsel. The trend has not been that way.

I have provided the controlling case previously.

I wonder if the Gov of NY will pardon Trump?

Thanks for clearing that up.

It's true that Justice Thomas gave Cannon the blueprint for her dismissal. That was his intent with his dissent opinion.

There are several "seed" cases making their way to SCOTUS. One for example of the ten-commandment thing out of OK and elsewhere. They want it to be challenged in court, appealed, etc. Texas is a hotbed for "bait" cases to run appeal all the way to SCOTUS.

This is all consistent with the coordinated game plans fomented for many years, even before Reagan, moral majority, etc. Federalist Society, Heritage Foundation, and many more rightist orgs are winning the culture and ideological war.

Trump tries to deny or whitewash it, but he a psycho liar and a slick con artist. The whole GOP is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...0124cb94fae65d&ei=10

Judge sets court date for Trump election interference case
Story by Naomi Lim, Washington Examiner • 5h • 2 min read

Former President Donald Trump's federal election interference case is back in action, with U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan setting a date for a status conference.

The D.C.-based federal judge has asked that attorneys for Trump and the government appear in court on Aug. 16 so they can prepare for the case to go to trial now that she has "regained jurisdiction" over United States v. Trump. Chutkan had paused proceedings last December pending Trump's appeals regarding presidential immunity.

"By August 9, 2024, the parties shall confer and file a status report that proposes, jointly to the extent possible, a schedule for pretrial proceedings moving forward," Chutkan wrote Saturday in a one-page order.
Trump is not required to be present on Aug. 16, she added.

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:

quote:

Have you ever noticed that all the left does is tell you how bad Trumpnia and how he will be come a dictator but they never manage to either build their candidate up nor promulgate ther policies and what they are going to do to make the country better.

Are you saying the Dems aren't building up their candidate Harris?

Are you claiming that the Dems won't offer and approve their policy platform at the convention?

Earth to Haser...

Not saying that at all

What I am saying is that they have been so busy denying their democratic constituents a choice while crowning a Queen that so far I haven’t seen any policy other than Trump bad and we are taking the guns.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Saeed:
I hope they never stop until he is in jail!

A career criminal all his life!

A MAGA CRIMINAL! [/QUOTE

Either choice is still better than a place that accepts man love Thursday with little boys.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
Thanks for clearing that up.

It's true that Justice Thomas gave Cannon the blueprint for her dismissal. That was his intent with his dissent opinion.

There are several "seed" cases making their way to SCOTUS. One for example of the ten-commandment thing out of OK and elsewhere. They want it to be challenged in court, appealed, etc. Texas is a hotbed for "bait" cases to run appeal all the way to SCOTUS.

This is all consistent with the coordinated game plans fomented for many years, even before Reagan, moral majority, etc. Federalist Society, Heritage Foundation, and many more rightist orgs are winning the culture and ideological war.

Trump tries to deny or whitewash it, but he a psycho liar and a slick con artist. The whole GOP is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

Well nothing in that post but school
Yard name calling.


Come on man we rely on you and one other for the blue it’s content here (the rest are just weak sauce).


Do better

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...0124cb94fae65d&ei=10

Judge sets court date for Trump election interference case
Story by Naomi Lim, Washington Examiner • 5h • 2 min read

Former President Donald Trump's federal election interference case is back in action, with U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan setting a date for a status conference.

The D.C.-based federal judge has asked that attorneys for Trump and the government appear in court on Aug. 16 so they can prepare for the case to go to trial now that she has "regained jurisdiction" over United States v. Trump. Chutkan had paused proceedings last December pending Trump's appeals regarding presidential immunity.

"By August 9, 2024, the parties shall confer and file a status report that proposes, jointly to the extent possible, a schedule for pretrial proceedings moving forward," Chutkan wrote Saturday in a one-page order.
Trump is not required to be present on Aug. 16, she added.

And because of that immunity decision it’s likely going nowhere. However because she’s a left winger and doing her masters bidding she will draw it all out through election season for the adverse publicity.


The left doesn’t even to try and hide it anymore.

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
Thanks for clearing that up.

It's true that Justice Thomas gave Cannon the blueprint for her dismissal. That was his intent with his dissent opinion.

There are several "seed" cases making their way to SCOTUS. One for example of the ten-commandment thing out of OK and elsewhere. They want it to be challenged in court, appealed, etc. Texas is a hotbed for "bait" cases to run appeal all the way to SCOTUS.

This is all consistent with the coordinated game plans fomented for many years, even before Reagan, moral majority, etc. Federalist Society, Heritage Foundation, and many more rightist orgs are winning the culture and ideological war.

Trump tries to deny or whitewash it, but he a psycho liar and a slick con artist. The whole GOP is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

Well nothing in that post but school
Yard name calling.


Come on man we rely on you and one other for the blue it’s content here (the rest are just weak sauce).


Do better

You know more than one thing at a time can be true, right?
Let's take this comment

quote:

Trump tries to deny or whitewash it, but he a psycho liar and a slick con artist. The whole GOP is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

and rewrite, with 100% equal truth

quote:

Biden tries to deny or whitewash it, but he's had two brain aneurysms and brain surgeries and is in profound mental decline. The whole DNC is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up, fall down, verbal gaff, or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

quote:

You know more than one thing at a time can be true, right?

I'm wondering if that's an example of doublethink? (1984)

That's holding two (or more in your case) contradictory ideas and believing both (or all) are true.

You are truly gifted with the doublethink, but at the same time you believe lies as well.

I use the word "gifted" in a kind way, but you know what I mean, given your extraordinary abilities with thought, words and syntax and all.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
I'm wondering if that's an example of doublethink?

That's holding two (or more in your case) contradictory ideas and believing both (or all) are true.

You are truly gifted with the doublethink, but at the same time you believe lies as well.

I use the word "gifted" in a kind way, but you know what I mean, given your extraordinary abilities with thought, words and syntax and all.

holy hyperbole batman --

which part of the second statement is untrue? Do you deny biden has had two aneurysms (documented fact) or that he's had two brain surgeries (documented fact) or that he's in profound mental decline (watch the debate for a concentrated series of examples) or are you denying that up-to-the-last-moment-before-he-pulled-out-of-the-campaign-that-the-dems-where-covering-for-him? (too many examples to bother to document) ..

OH OH OH, mr kotter, perhaps your are denying that the DNC members KNEW, or where covering up?

You know, you do, sometimes, pick the loser in a horse race, right? in this case, you picked a corpse to Win, not even place or show .. then the corpse failed to show up -

you get that, right? but you are just posted for the dopamine for responses? you get it?

Here's something new regarding investigations of Trump:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news...KE0?ocid=socialshare

'Revelatory bombshell': Secret probe of Trump, suspicious Egypt money shut down by Barr's DOJ: WaPo

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/0....html?smid=url-share

Alongside the Trump-Russia Inquiry, a Lesser-Known Look at Egyptian Influence
The Justice Department and special counsel Robert Mueller investigated whether a Trump adviser was part of an Egyptian plan, never proven, to funnel $10 million to the 2016 Trump campaign.

https://www.msnbc.com/morning-...m-egypt-216259653753

Report uncovers secret probe into whether Trump took money from Egypt

No.. not distractions on trump. You are claiming that two truths aren't true. Back it up or shut it up

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
[QUOTE]You know more than one thing at a time can be true, right?

I'm wondering if that's an example of doublethink? (1984)

That's holding two (or more in your case) contradictory ideas and believing both (or all) are true.

You are truly gifted with the doublethink, but at the same time you believe lies as well.

I use the word "gifted" in a kind way, but you know what I mean, given your extraordinary abilities with thought, words and syntax and all.[/QUOTE


Bless your little heart. ]

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
No.. not distractions on trump. You are claiming that two truths aren't true. Back it up or shut it up

He won’t because he can’t.


I think you are right about him getting a Dopamine hit every time he posts.


He up his post count and it makes him feel important.


You called it.

quote:

Originally posted by Hasher:

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

But hey if you tell the big lie long enough people will believe it.

Trump proved that wrong.

It's not how long the Big Lie is told, it's how long true believers believe it.

Have you ever noticed that all the left does is tell you how bad Trumpnia and how he will be come a dictator but they never manage to either build their candidate up nor promulgate ther policies and what they are going to do to make the country better.

That is truly expertise in Tue politics of personal destruction.

Yes! Yes I have!!!!

They got nothing, nothing at all......

quote:

quote:
and rewrite, with 100% equal truth

quote:

quote:
Biden tries to deny or whitewash it, but he's had two brain aneurysms and brain surgeries and is in profound mental decline. The whole DNC is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up, fall down, verbal gaff, or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

quote:

which part of the second statement is untrue? Do you deny biden has had two aneurysms (documented fact) or that he's had two brain surgeries (documented fact) or that he's in profound mental decline (watch the debate for a concentrated series of examples) or are you denying that up-to-the-last-moment-before-he-pulled-out-of-the-campaign-that-the-dems-where-covering-for-him? (too many examples to bother to document)

https://wapo.st/4ddwiRx

Biden once nearly died of an aneurysm. Risky surgery changed his life.
Decades ago, Biden’s condition was misdiagnosed as a pinched nerve. His survival helps explain the 81-year-old’s motivations today.

Joe Biden awoke suddenly in his hotel room, curled up on the floor and fully clothed, and felt an electric surge inside his head, “a rip of pain like I never felt before,” as he later recalled. It was 4:10 a.m. on a winter day in 1988 .

Although I didn't know, apparently it was common knowledge. He served for many years after the surgeries.

The part you are lying about starts after the word "yet" in your post.

And, you assert, "with 100% equal truth", that the surgeries many years ago are directly associated with his decline at age 81. You don't know that and his medical records do not affirm that. Quite the opposite, actually.

The part of my post that you copied and parodied is true, backed up by lots of evidence.

Do I need to bother to dig up Nancy and Joe saying he's sharp and ready to go? That they defended him till the end? Blatantly white washing biden gross (that means big or large) obvious decline?

Sir, look into life with both eyes open. Even if it gets you out of your comfort zone..

You know, there seems to be a tend about you not knowing the obvious. This is correctable.. stop reading hard left mediA. You don't have to go right, but stop believing the BS when your eyes tell you different

Heck, did you watch the debate? You don't even need to watch the whole thing, just buden walking in.. do you think he looks well? Joe doesn't

The article I posted above was from WaPo.

I wasn't aware of Biden's surgery years ago because it didn't matter in the context of today.

Nancy and Joe saying he's sharp and ready to go is not evidence of a cover up of the scale you claimed.

Yes, I watched the debate. What did that have anything to do with your claim about surgery back in 1988?

Below is my initial post to give context to my statement that you parodied, out of context. In the last paragraph I'm referring to project 2025.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
Thanks for clearing that up.

It's true that Justice Thomas gave Cannon the blueprint for her dismissal. That was his intent with his dissent opinion.

There are several "seed" cases making their way to SCOTUS. One for example of the ten-commandment thing out of OK and elsewhere. They want it to be challenged in court, appealed, etc. Texas is a hotbed for "bait" cases to run appeal all the way to SCOTUS.

This is all consistent with the coordinated game plans fomented for many years, even before Reagan, moral majority, etc. Federalist Society, Heritage Foundation, and many more rightist orgs are winning the culture and ideological war.

Trump tries to deny or whitewash it, but he a psycho liar and a slick con artist. The whole GOP is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:
Thanks for clearing that up.

It's true that Justice Thomas gave Cannon the blueprint for her dismissal. That was his intent with his dissent opinion.

There are several "seed" cases making their way to SCOTUS. One for example of the ten-commandment thing out of OK and elsewhere. They want it to be challenged in court, appealed, etc. Texas is a hotbed for "bait" cases to run appeal all the way to SCOTUS.

This is all consistent with the coordinated game plans fomented for many years, even before Reagan, moral majority, etc. Federalist Society, Heritage Foundation, and many more rightist orgs are winning the culture and ideological war.

Trump tries to deny or whitewash it, but he a psycho liar and a slick con artist. The whole GOP is on-board, yet try to keep it under the table. An occasional slip-up or dog whistle is a clue, except the clueless.

XXX means he’s put you back on ignore.

He does this to boost his post count.

Somehow he thinks poat count equates to importance.

You nor Jeffee are on ignore

The XXX is an attempt to lightly separate the stuff after the main post content.

For example: