THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  The Political Forum    Sec. Hegseth text confidential War plans to a report w Atlantic
Page 1 2 3 4 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Sec. Hegseth text confidential War plans to a report w Atlantic Login/Join 
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
The issue has become one of this President and his GOP not holding this neophyte (at best) national security team accountable.


"neophyte"

remember all that executive experience g.washington had at being potus?

remember when stolen valor walz, who NEVER spent ONE second in combat, was selected as VEEP?

yeah,

remember all that experience h.clinton had in politics in general, and sec-state in specific?

or b.obama, who didn't even complete his single term as senator
both were ONE TERM senators, and both ran for (one made it) for potus, and received MILLIONS of votes?

mebbe realizing that "neophyte" (you know that means WITHOUT experience, right) argument is weaker than jobama's debate performance?

oh, 11 years of service .. hardly a "neophyte "


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42896 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Remember trump who was never elected to ANYTHING becoming your nominee? Not even qualified to be a dog catcher.
 
Posts: 16881 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 10 April 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
But Wait! There's More!!

quote:
Several days after top national security officials accidentally included a reporter in a Signal chat about bombing Houthi sites in Yemen, a Pentagon-wide advisory warned against using the messaging app, even for unclassified information.

"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and obtained by NPR.


The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are "targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."

Moreover, a memo in 2023, obtained by NPR, warned of using Signal for any nonpublic official information.


Link


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11597 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
The issue has become one of this President and his GOP not holding this neophyte (at best) national security team accountable.


"neophyte"

remember all that executive experience g.washington had at being potus?

remember when stolen valor walz, who NEVER spent ONE second in combat, was selected as VEEP?

yeah,

remember all that experience h.clinton had in politics in general, and sec-state in specific?

or b.obama, who didn't even complete his single term as senator
both were ONE TERM senators, and both ran for (one made it) for potus, and received MILLIONS of votes?

mebbe realizing that "neophyte" (you know that means WITHOUT experience, right) argument is weaker than jobama's debate performance?

oh, 11 years of service .. hardly a "neophyte "


Neophyte.

I am bring generous with that word. Otherwise, they are arogrant enough to bring this type of behavior was acceptable.

There is no defending this. Nothing in that 11 years was training to operate and run these high government security agencies. He had no business bring confirmed. I said at the time the man and unfit. Well, here we are with a U.S. Security asset using the equivalent of text to discuss details of U.S. battle plans while being in Russia.

Neophyte, Amateur, Stupid, Reckless, Dangerous, Derelict, Willful, and that is being generous.


Those who provided actual battle information could not have been removed fast enough. Yet, here we are. I do mot blame President Ttump for not knowing when this happened. I blame him for not removing these fools. Yes, fools. The second it was confirmed.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What if --- they did it intentionally?

And --- if so, why not Fox?


*************
“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” George Orwell, 1984
https://www.google.com/search?...sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

Degenerate 1:2
2 Then Trump said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay on your behalf."

Degenerate 1:3
3 "My Kingdom come, My will be done."

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

O.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr.

"Be careful. When a democracy is sick, fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health." - Albert Camus


 
Posts: 24592 | Location: Rural | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
11 years is the line that makes one an absolute neophyte?

just to turn the mirror around --

how long have you been a prosecutor? It's an honest question

11 years - more years officially than obama or hillary had in an official role in politics

would you call hillary an neophyte and unfit for sec-state, or obama being unfit for being potus?

recall that potus is the boss of all of these roles--


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42896 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
11 years is the line that makes one an absolute neophyte?


Hummm.

Did it take that long for Trump to exploit his base?

Some neophytes are primed already and never advance.


*************
“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” George Orwell, 1984
https://www.google.com/search?...sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

Degenerate 1:2
2 Then Trump said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay on your behalf."

Degenerate 1:3
3 "My Kingdom come, My will be done."

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

O.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr.

"Be careful. When a democracy is sick, fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health." - Albert Camus


 
Posts: 24592 | Location: Rural | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
His 11 years of service apparently did not prepare him adequately to head a government agency. This was very basic do not do. He and most of the heads of this Administration’s security leadership are found on this group text.

When you nominate and confirm people based on how well of a tv hack they are, this is what you get.

Let us take your observation thst in running high US federal security departments that Sec. Hegseth having spent 12 years obtaining the rank of Lt. Col., then his behavior is one of arrogance. Thst he deliberately with full wisdom ignored rules designed to keep American institutions and service personnel safe. That is worse.

Sec. Hegseth is more a risk proven by these texts to front line troops than the trans service members he mocked.

However, you are free to continue to attempt to provide rhetorical rebuttal to deflect from his malfeasance.

The entire security team that provided information on that chat should be removed. Yet, here we are w a President that does not care, and men with no professional honor.
We get the government we vote for.

This is a continuance of Sec, Hegseth’s bad character from his interactions w the women in his life, his drinking, his public treatment of folks he attacks as political scapegoats, his mismanagement of veteran charity organizations.

The problem is not he sent it to a person who had no business having this information. The problem is this information was discussed by these people in the manner that it was discussed. We are lucky only a journalist got it. Then, true to form, instead of taking responsibility these people and this president want to attack the poor citizen who was sent the information.

However, instead of addressing the above, please continue to make the argument that these persons’ poor performance was not due to their lack of high security, major government experience.

The people’s business, governance, is hard. It becomes more difficult when you are blinded by arrogance.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
for some it is way easier to find the good in all actions done by trump and the trumps than the good in the past then pretend they do not support him or his administration ...

the mirror might already have broken for some ...
 
Posts: 3513 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
His 11 years of service apparently did not prepare him adequately to head a government agency. This was very basic do not do. He and most of the heads of this Administration’s security leadership are found on this group text.

When you nominate and confirm people based on how well of a tv hack they are, this is what you get.


let's try it again
how many years being a CEO did
bill gates
steve jobs
woz
jeff bezos
sam altman
zaucherburg
larry page
sergey brin
jack dorsey
a zillion other startup ceos

time served only seems to matter in a union


but, back to the prior -- do you think hillary and obama were grossly unqualified neophytes?


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42896 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
going by years of experience, joe biden should have been the best potus ever --


see how that measurement doesn't work?


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42896 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
He was much better than President Trump.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
He was much better than President Trump.


that wasn't my statement -- going by years of experience, biden had more political experience, going into office, than like the last 6 presidents together --


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42896 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
...
However, you are free to continue to attempt to provide rhetorical rebuttal to deflect from his malfeasance.
...


show me where i "deflected" -- i merely question you calling 11 years a neophyte, and provided examples of others, literally one with the exact same level of cabinet power, and then the potus with less - i guess you aren't going to answer my other questions --

that is actually deflection, bubba..


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 42896 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Whoa, now it’s the journalists fault! Roll Eyes

Trump and his henchmen are nothing but noble and squeaky clean, the sleazebag so-called journalist must have hacked into them! Eeker

Considering that MAGAts are paragons of truth and virtue, and completely entitled to make up the rules as they go, you just KNOW it’s his fault. In addition, the very dignified and highly ethical POTUS is personally slagging him and calling him names, so that clinches it.
 
Posts: 6619 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hegseth has 11 years of disjointed total military service but never commanded anything bigger than a platoon.

He's not remotely qualified to be SecDef.


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11597 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
His 11 years of service apparently did not prepare him adequately to head a government agency. This was very basic do not do. He and most of the heads of this Administration’s security leadership are found on this group text.

When you nominate and confirm people based on how well of a tv hack they are, this is what you get.

Let us take your observation thst in running high US federal security departments that Sec. Hegseth having spent 12 years obtaining the rank of Lt. Col., then his behavior is one of arrogance. Thst he deliberately with full wisdom ignored rules designed to keep American institutions and service personnel safe. That is worse.

Sec. Hegseth is more a risk proven by these texts to front line troops than the trans service members he mocked.

However, you are free to continue to attempt to provide rhetorical rebuttal to deflect from his malfeasance.

The entire security team that provided information on that chat should be removed. Yet, here we are w a President that does not care, and men with no professional honor.
We get the government we vote for.

This is a continuance of Sec, Hegseth’s bad character from his interactions w the women in his life, his drinking, his public treatment of folks he attacks as political scapegoats, his mismanagement of veteran charity organizations.

The problem is not he sent it to a person who had no business having this information. The problem is this information was discussed by these people in the manner that it was discussed. We are lucky only a journalist got it. Then, true to form, instead of taking responsibility these people and this president want to attack the poor citizen who was sent the information.

However, instead of addressing the above, please continue to make the argument that these persons’ poor performance was not due to their lack of high security, major government experience.

The people’s business, governance, is hard. It becomes more difficult when you are blinded by arrogance.


I could be mistaken but I don't believe he ever got above Major. Very few ever make Lieutenant Colonel (outside of technical specialists, usually with PhDs) without both time as a Commander at the Company level and Staff at a Battalion level, generally S-1, S-2, S-3 or S-4. Hegseth's only Staff assignment appears to be Civil Affairs, which promotion boards tend to frown on.


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11597 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
NSA warned about Signal a month ago:

Link


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11597 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hegseth’s qualifications were vetted by Fox News. What could be wrong with that?

And he's a proven Trump loyalist.


*************
“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” George Orwell, 1984
https://www.google.com/search?...sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Degenerate 1:1
1 Then Trump said, "Let Us re-make a Nation in MY Image, after My likeness, to rule over everything in the Nation, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it".

Degenerate 1:2
2 Then Trump said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay on your behalf."

Degenerate 1:3
3 "My Kingdom come, My will be done."

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

O.J. Trump aka Trumpism's Founding Farter, aka Farter Martyr.

"Be careful. When a democracy is sick, fascism comes to its bedside, but it is not to inquire about its health." - Albert Camus


 
Posts: 24592 | Location: Rural | Registered: 17 February 2017Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Lets talk about experience.
4 star general Austin secretly went to the hospital. Dep Sec Hicks was on vacation in PR and was not notified. Biden was not told for 3 days.
Heym, Jeffi, did you call for him to resign? I did.
Where did the experience show up in Austins case? It did not, at all.
Austin case could have been more egregious than Hegseth's. One op jeopardized or every op jeopardized in Austins case.
They should both have resigned. But this BS is about TDS, not the best interest and security of the country via a top rate Sec of defense. We have not had one of those from the current and past administrations from the looks.
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You won’t find me defend that. That is irrelevant to this situation and now.

We have seen how these men and the President have responded to this. They are attacking the poor gut who they sent the information to. A guy who has done more to protect this information than the agency heads tasked with protecting it.

The original sin was discussing this on an open, free text app, with one standing in Russia.

The response has been a damning, continuation of that sin.

I know what did not happen last Administration. This basic failure.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
His 11 years of service apparently did not prepare him adequately to head a government agency. This was very basic do not do. He and most of the heads of this Administration’s security leadership are found on this group text.

When you nominate and confirm people based on how well of a tv hack they are, this is what you get.

Let us take your observation thst in running high US federal security departments that Sec. Hegseth having spent 12 years obtaining the rank of Lt. Col., then his behavior is one of arrogance. Thst he deliberately with full wisdom ignored rules designed to keep American institutions and service personnel safe. That is worse.

Sec. Hegseth is more a risk proven by these texts to front line troops than the trans service members he mocked.

However, you are free to continue to attempt to provide rhetorical rebuttal to deflect from his malfeasance.

The entire security team that provided information on that chat should be removed. Yet, here we are w a President that does not care, and men with no professional honor.
We get the government we vote for.

This is a continuance of Sec, Hegseth’s bad character from his interactions w the women in his life, his drinking, his public treatment of folks he attacks as political scapegoats, his mismanagement of veteran charity organizations.

The problem is not he sent it to a person who had no business having this information. The problem is this information was discussed by these people in the manner that it was discussed. We are lucky only a journalist got it. Then, true to form, instead of taking responsibility these people and this president want to attack the poor citizen who was sent the information.

However, instead of addressing the above, please continue to make the argument that these persons’ poor performance was not due to their lack of high security, major government experience.

The people’s business, governance, is hard. It becomes more difficult when you are blinded by arrogance.


I could be mistaken but I don't believe he ever got above Major. Very few ever make Lieutenant Colonel (outside of technical specialists, usually with PhDs) without both time as a Commander at the Company level and Staff at a Battalion level, generally S-1, S-2, S-3 or S-4. Hegseth's only Staff assignment appears to be Civil Affairs, which promotion boards tend to frown on.


You are correct r. He obtained the rank of major.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The original sin with Austin, They wouldnt even discuss it. Heym, you have been ranting it's in-experience. How much more experience than a 4 star who fucked up. How does experience fit in his failure, as that is your top complaint?
 
Posts: 8185 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
Hegseth’s comments about the recipient when confronted with this were pathetic. He doesn’t have the balls to admit a mistake and just insults the reporter who received the information.

The man is no better than Trump.
 
Posts: 7942 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
I definitely have little respect for a man who lacks to cajones to simply own up to a mistake. The MAGAts love to talk about personal responsibility but display very little themselves.


Mike
 
Posts: 22773 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
How can any, Lowe classes, civil servers be expected to follow these rules, to be held accountable when the department heads can so disregard.

The journalist did not heck these devices. These chuckle heads sent the information to him.

The President has failed us by not dismissing these men.

It looks like the Senate will not just ignore it. Regardless of what they can actually do about.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by theback40:
The original sin with Austin, They wouldnt even discuss it. Heym, you have been ranting it's in-experience. How much more experience than a 4 star who fucked up. How does experience fit in his failure, as that is your top complaint?


Gen. Austin has nothing to do with this.

The major end these administrative heads do not have the character or basic intelligence to do the job.

I would blot defend Gen. Austin, nor will o excuse this because of him. That I do believe is worse.

The deal w Gen. Austin and HRC, in part, is why Trump got elected. Well, here President Trump had the opportunity to correct. He has chosen to protect.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Trump’s folks are just doing what they complain about the workforce at large doing… working remotely.

The app is a way to work remotely, and as anyone with basic computer knowledge knows there is no such thing as a guaranteed absolutely secure computer system.

To me, the fact that politicians on both sides are so eager to find a way to do things around the various record acts makes me wonder if either all politicians are doing things they shouldn’t or the record rules might be too all encompassing. One point for the latter is how the average person is getting fed up with all of their data being stored and used.

In any case, it is hypocritical of team Trump to do these remote meetings while demanding folks return to offices.

I do think that Hegseth was set up here. His subordinate who let this reporter in either is too damn dumb to hold the job, or is willfully compromising security, or remotely I suppose possible, the reporter hacked in by taking advantage of the guy who was not that bright.

Frankly, with all the comments on Hegseth, while I’m not impressed with him, the post of Secretary of Defense is SUPPOSED to be a civilian in control of the military apparatus. The generals and the system are supposed to be there to lend their expertise and let them and POTUS make the decision.

Our senior military leaders have been too busy dealing with imposed political policies as that’s how you get promoted at the flag ranks… getting the politicians to think you are a true believer and their guy in a soldier suit. I don’t see how that is going to change given civilian control of the military, but most of these folks are doing it because they believe in defending the country.
 
Posts: 12010 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Your first sentence is ridiculous. The two situations are not synonymous as the Senate hearings have pointed out.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JudgeG
posted Hide Post
Waltz has taken complete blame. He created the authorized recipients list. Apparently he used contact data provided to him by a third party that had been compromised by someone (unknown person to date). Instead of the communication going to the designated party, the address had been intentionally changed to Goldberg, an “ends justifies the means” opponent of all things Trump. (If Goldberg wasn’t a part of the intentional address change but only a recipient, he’s actually not acted too badly this time.) Some trusted minion shouldn’t have been trusted. He/she wanted to create a crisis and was willing to put our pilots at risk. Forensic Information Tech folks are searching for the culprit. God help them if they’re caught.



quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
How can any, Lowe classes, civil servers be expected to follow these rules, to be held accountable when the department heads can so disregard.

The journalist did not heck these devices. These chuckle heads sent the information to him.

The President has failed us by not dismissing these men.

It looks like the Senate will not just ignore it. Regardless of what they can actually do about.
[/QUOTE]


JudgeG ... just counting time 'til I am again finding balm in Gilead chilled out somewhere in the Selous.
 
Posts: 8005 | Location: GA | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
He has not taken responsibility. He has routinely attacked the reporter he called “scum” and a “loser.” He will take responsibility the day he resigns and apologizes.

The President should fire him two days ago.

Please note the quotes.

Everyone of them that provided information need to be gone.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JudgeG
posted Hide Post
You must really respect Waltz, then.

quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
I definitely have little respect for a man who lacks to cajones to simply own up to a mistake. The MAGAts love to talk about personal responsibility but display very little themselves.


JudgeG ... just counting time 'til I am again finding balm in Gilead chilled out somewhere in the Selous.
 
Posts: 8005 | Location: GA | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JudgeG
posted Hide Post
Goldberg is exactly as Waltz described. Waltz’s comments on Goldberg explained why Waltz would have never had his address.

Have you even taken the time to listen to Waltz’s q&a as to his blame-taking. He was given numerous opportunities to blame someone else and refuses to do so.

quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
He has not taken responsibility. He has routinely attacked the reporter he called “scum” and a “loser.” He will take responsibility the day he resigns and apologizes.

The President should fire him two days ago.

Please note the quotes.

Everyone of them that provided information need to be gone.


JudgeG ... just counting time 'til I am again finding balm in Gilead chilled out somewhere in the Selous.
 
Posts: 8005 | Location: GA | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The only losers and s Tim are they that attacked him for their malfeasance in texting this information on an open text app and adding him.

None of these chuckleheads have or will take responsibility. The President is not going to hold them accountable.

I am glad the Senate is taking the matter seriously.

This is number 5ish in why this Administration is a mistake. The midterms are coming.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JudgeG:
You must really respect Waltz, then.

quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
I definitely have little respect for a man who lacks to cajones to simply own up to a mistake. The MAGAts love to talk about personal responsibility but display very little themselves.


Not really. And I blame them all. There are two issues here. One is having the wrong person on the list. Sounds like Waltz is blaming that on some unnamed conspirator who was trying to sabotage the effort. Two is using an unsecure platform for the communications. Waltz is guilty of both. Everyone else on the thread is guilty of not standing up and saying, why in the hell are we using a unsecure platform for these communications. Makes you wonder what else they have been using Signal to communicate on. Collectively looks like a Three Stooges episode. Like I say, elect a clown, expect a circus.


Mike
 
Posts: 22773 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JudgeG:
Waltz has taken complete blame. He created the authorized recipients list. Apparently he used contact data provided to him by a third party that had been compromised by someone (unknown person to date). Instead of the communication going to the designated party, the address had been intentionally changed to Goldberg, an “ends justifies the means” opponent of all things Trump. (If Goldberg wasn’t a part of the intentional address change but only a recipient, he’s actually not acted too badly this time.) Some trusted minion shouldn’t have been trusted. He/she wanted to create a crisis and was willing to put our pilots at risk. Forensic Information Tech folks are searching for the culprit. God help them if they’re caught.



quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
How can any, Lowe classes, civil servers be expected to follow these rules, to be held accountable when the department heads can so disregard.

The journalist did not heck these devices. These chuckle heads sent the information to him.

The President has failed us by not dismissing these men.

It looks like the Senate will not just ignore it. Regardless of what they can actually do about.




Putting our pilots at risk? Were the Houthis actually in on it too? HTF would they even know until the bombs hit them? Unless the info was leaked in which case there is a more serious issue.

BTW since when is a bombing mission a war? What were the plans for war? BTW I'm not in ANY WAY supporting the Signal chat bunch.


Give me a home where the buffalo roam and I'll show you a house full of buffalo shit.
 
Posts: 2335 | Location: IOWA | Registered: 27 October 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JudgeG
posted Hide Post
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg12ewv7xyo

Waltz’s interview above.

Pilots at risk? The Biden administration has made sure Houthis have semi-sophisticated AAA and SAMS paid for by Iran. The mission went amazingly well. Goldberg, God bless him this one time, even though he had some information that could have compromised the mission, didn’t do so (at least to an effective extent).

Democrats do have a history of causing the deaths of our pilots, though. The Johnson administration (McNamara) got target data to Hanoi with specificity sufficient that SAMS and AAA was moved almost daily to scheduled targets. Good men are dead because of that traitorous bastard.

Posters here that suffer from TDS, as usual, defaulted to the worst scenario. Look at the title to the thread. Claims Hegseth was drunk, etc. Jumping to a prejudged conclusion
isn’t always easy to jump out of.


JudgeG ... just counting time 'til I am again finding balm in Gilead chilled out somewhere in the Selous.
 
Posts: 8005 | Location: GA | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No apology, no consequences, and no accountability.

You know this is wrong and resignations are the least that should happen.

They do not have to be in on you. As a lawyer you break confidentiality, does it matter your client knew? No.


These people places on an open, unsecured app they were told not to use specific US battle plans while one of them stood in Russia.

You are sufficiently intelligent to know the da r this information was not a red on means nothing.

I never said it was s war. It is an act of war. What it is, is an active military operation whereupon U.S. front line servicemen are at risk.

Sec. Hegseth and the rest have proven more dangerous to our front line servicemen men than a trans person being in the military. The ranting sod Hegseth against them are shallow.

That statement says it is not our fault we violated our rules. It is the fault of the person we told accidentally for telling on us.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JudgeG:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg12ewv7xyo

Waltz’s interview above.

Pilots at risk? The Biden administration has made sure Houthis have semi-sophisticated AAA and SAMS paid for by Iran. The mission went amazingly well. Goldberg, God bless him this one time, even though he had some information that could have compromised the mission, didn’t do so (at least to an effective extent).

Democrats do have a history of causing the deaths of our pilots, though. The Johnson administration (McNamara) got target data to Hanoi with specificity sufficient that SAMS and AAA was moved almost daily to scheduled targets. Good men are dead because of that traitorous bastard.


There was no more risk inherent in this mission than there was in previous missions. The only increased risk would come from the Houthis being a participant in the chat or the mission leaked to them shortly thereafter by a "deepstater." I guess that the Israelis were able to pull it off ok.


Give me a home where the buffalo roam and I'll show you a house full of buffalo shit.
 
Posts: 2335 | Location: IOWA | Registered: 27 October 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
no risk of leaks with russia you are the new buddy of putin ... if it was not for the risks of soldiers that might have been hilarious ...
 
Posts: 3513 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. | Registered: 21 May 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  The Political Forum    Sec. Hegseth text confidential War plans to a report w Atlantic

Copyright December 1997-2025 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia