THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
James Baker: Gun laws Republicans can support Login/Join 
One of Us
Picture of Kanec
posted Hide Post
Thing is, you cannot legislate human behavior and more restrictions you put in, more you put ordinary law abiding citizens at peril as criminals and nut cases without regard for human life find loopholes and ways around any additional laws, rules, red flags etc…
Deterrent works well whatever it may beAnd law abiding citizens are their own worst enemies if they let politicians dictate restrictions on them instead of punishing criminals the hardest way possible
 
Posts: 201 | Location: Heart of Europe where East meets the West | Registered: 19 January 2023Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Powell:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
For those that reject ideas like those proposed by Baker, what is your solution to the recurring mass shooting issue? Pray for better nuclear families and bury more victims until those prayers are answered? Reform our educational system and bury more victims until the decades pass for those efforts to come to fruition? Train up our elementary school children to be battlefield medics to try and save some of their classmates and bury the rest? What exactly do we do in the interim, pretend it is all going to get better because we want it to? Let’s hear your suggestions for the timely resolution of what is clearly a problem.

coffee


For schools…they must hardened by:
1) limited entry access
2) surveillance
3) armed guard presence at all times

For places like Allen…the mental illness aspect is the only hope. I agree with Baker in that paragraph.

The other things he proposed will do NOTHING to help with the problem and only erode freedoms.


I have never understood why all schools do not have a 10' perimeter fence with concertina wire on top with turnstyle entry gates.. Its just that simple.. We put fences around our businesses and powerplants and military bases - why not the schools??? Its that fucking simple!!!!


It you want immediate results…there^^^it is.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
. . . I see, another vote for the “do nothing” option and hope the mass shootings miraculously stop. Reminds me of the saying, wish in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up faster.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
It is the mentality of the shooter that kills. Sure that mentality might be drawn to a certain weapon but with held…they will adapt.

Caving to gun restrictions will never reverse if given in to…we will just loose more freedom drip drip drip until it is all gone.

Harden and start the mental health care.

Force doctors (sorry Dr. B) to start reporting these psychos! Most have been evaluated. If you are mentally ill…the 4473 should exclude you now.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Powell:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
For those that reject ideas like those proposed by Baker, what is your solution to the recurring mass shooting issue? Pray for better nuclear families and bury more victims until those prayers are answered? Reform our educational system and bury more victims until the decades pass for those efforts to come to fruition? Train up our elementary school children to be battlefield medics to try and save some of their classmates and bury the rest? What exactly do we do in the interim, pretend it is all going to get better because we want it to? Let’s hear your suggestions for the timely resolution of what is clearly a problem.

coffee


For schools…they must hardened by:
1) limited entry access
2) surveillance
3) armed guard presence at all times

For places like Allen…the mental illness aspect is the only hope. I agree with Baker in that paragraph.

The other things he proposed will do NOTHING to help with the problem and only erode freedoms.


I have never understood why all schools do not have a 10' perimeter fence with concertina wire on top with turnstyle entry gates.. Its just that simple.. We put fences around our businesses and powerplants and military bases - why not the schools??? Its that fucking simple!!!!


Maybe we can put bars on the windows and doors too. Turn elementary schools into mini-prisons or military installations. Maybe mine the parameters too. I know I always wanted my children to go school in a prison like setting. I guess to address shootings at malls, churches and bars, we should do the same thing. Brilliant!


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by skb:
I think the change in our gun culture is the last 20 years is sad, the embrace of all the tactical/military arms have zero to do with my interests as well as being a terrible look for the non shooting public to see. I'm almost 53, have been a hunter and shooter since I was old enough to walk and have never fired a .223 or AR in my life, nor do I have any desire to. If you care to notice, almost every single one of these shooters chooses a semi-auto of some type, usually an AR but sometimes a handgun. Increased scrutiny for the purchase of these items seems logical. Have you ever looked at the statistics on crime committed with class 3 items? Almost zero due to the difficulty of obtaining them, the level of vetting is far higher than that for purchasing a non class 3 firearm. Maybe we should look at everyone buying semi autos/AR type weapons a bit closer than those buying sporting arms. When was the last time you read about a bolt gun being used in a mass shooting? The Texas tower shooter in the 60's? There is a connection between these shootings and the guns they choose.


What? You don't do the "tacticool"? No Delta Force pants? No Seal Team 6 socks? Big Grin

I agree, the change in the gun culture is for the worse. We love war. We love the gear and the image and the idea of "bad ass". A few years ago I took a guy duck hunting for the first time and in several different ways he attempted to insert ideas of combat readiness. "I like to carry my weapon in Condition,....." "Don't you think a pistol grip shotgun would,......" "A tactical sling could,......" I told him plainly to do what he wants on his own time, but on my time we're going to hunt like gentlemen and sportsmen.

At Mass on Sundays we wish each other peace. Not very popular anymore. After 20 years of painful lessons in Afghanistan and Iraq, there's a burst of energy to rush over to Ukraine. Confused

I want my kid, really any kid to grow up dreaming about becoming a farmer or doctor, an architect or a teacher. Wouldn't it be wonderful to have a child grow up to be a composer or sculptor? Why aren't we as parents and a nation not prioritizing these things more than an AR?
 
Posts: 9654 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Kanec
posted Hide Post
Danger of some of you way of thinking is simply giving club in the hand of government and wield it with unprecedented and unopposed powers
More government wants to restrict, more you will see opposition and more you will see mayhem
excuses of criminal behavior got western societies in more trouble then anything else and governments just find another way to restrict personal freedoms as that is the only thing governments seem to be good at…Power over people is absolute and eternal addiction
 
Posts: 201 | Location: Heart of Europe where East meets the West | Registered: 19 January 2023Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Powell:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
For those that reject ideas like those proposed by Baker, what is your solution to the recurring mass shooting issue? Pray for better nuclear families and bury more victims until those prayers are answered? Reform our educational system and bury more victims until the decades pass for those efforts to come to fruition? Train up our elementary school children to be battlefield medics to try and save some of their classmates and bury the rest? What exactly do we do in the interim, pretend it is all going to get better because we want it to? Let’s hear your suggestions for the timely resolution of what is clearly a problem.

coffee


For schools…they must hardened by:
1) limited entry access
2) surveillance
3) armed guard presence at all times

For places like Allen…the mental illness aspect is the only hope. I agree with Baker in that paragraph.

The other things he proposed will do NOTHING to help with the problem and only erode freedoms.


I have never understood why all schools do not have a 10' perimeter fence with concertina wire on top with turnstyle entry gates.. Its just that simple.. We put fences around our businesses and powerplants and military bases - why not the schools??? Its that fucking simple!!!!


Maybe we can put bars on the windows and doors too. Turn elementary schools into mini-prisons or military installations. Maybe mine the parameters too. I know I always wanted my children to go school in a prison like setting. I guess to address shootings at malls, churches and bars, we should do the same thing. Brilliant!


Or I guess we can do nothing productive and just keep hoping it stops.

Of course I am sure if we just outlawed armor piercing bullets…it would stop.

The so-called logic that flows through this place boggles the mind. 2020


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
. . . what’s your solution or are you just a critic? I thought your Pappy said not to complain unless you have a proposed solution. Let’s hear it.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
For those that reject ideas like those proposed by Baker, what is your solution to the recurring mass shooting issue? Pray for better nuclear families and bury more victims until those prayers are answered? Reform our educational system and bury more victims until the decades pass for those efforts to come to fruition? Train up our elementary school children to be battlefield medics to try and save some of their classmates and bury the rest? What exactly do we do in the interim, pretend it is all going to get better because we want it to? Let’s hear your suggestions for the timely resolution of what is clearly a problem.

coffee


For schools…they must hardened by:
1) limited entry access
2) surveillance
3) armed guard presence at all times

For places like Allen…the mental illness aspect is the only hope. I agree with Baker in that paragraph.

The other things he proposed will do NOTHING to help with the problem and only erode freedoms.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
. . . and while we wait for the mental health efforts to bear fruit over the next decade, we just keep burying mass shooting victims, telling their families that our prayers are with them and generally lamenting the decline in civility in society. That’s comforting.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
We should all be careful of "let's do something, anything!" sentimentality. It leads to error and over-regulation.

A new law isn't justified unless there's some showing of effectiveness and a causal relationship to the problem--the problem being mass shootings.

I'd like the proponents of Baker's ideas to say which ones would prevent mass shootings, and how.
 
Posts: 7027 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
If you have an issue with young people using AR’s and semi-automatic pistols to commit mass shootings, are you seriously suggesting that those demographics do not suggest a means of helping to reduce such shootings?


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm sorry if I missed it, but which of Baker's proposals rely on demographics? Are you talking about some other proposal that only affects 18-20 year olds' Second Amendment rights?

Not that a comparison to the privilege to drive is apropos, but cutting down on the number of teenage drivers would reduce the number of traffic deaths.
 
Posts: 7027 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
Maybe we approach the issue from a different angle. Do you believe that mass shootings are an issue today? If so, do you believe that there are certain common characteristics of such shootings in terms of the types of weapons involved, the age of shooters, etc.? If you believe that mass shootings are an issue we need to address, and if you believe that such shootings seem to involve certain common elements, what is your proposed solution?


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
I'm sorry if I missed it, but which of Baker's proposals rely on demographics? Are you talking about some other proposal that only affects 18-20 year olds' Second Amendment rights?

Not that a comparison to the privilege to drive is apropos, but cutting down on the number of teenage drivers would reduce the number of traffic deaths.


KY did just that. When I was a teenager one could get a full license at 16. Now, you cannot get a full license until 17 after a year of driving on an intermediate license with limitations on where and when the driver can operate a vehicle. One can get the intermediate license after one has qualified and performex the learner’s permit requirements.

As for 18-20 year olds. I strongly support this, if only because juvenile Justice cases are not reported to the background check system. Most of those cases seek rehabilitation through social service like programs. Thus, eluding the background check reporting.

I would also expand the number of Misdemeanors that disqualifies one from being transferred or possessing firearms such as Wanton Endangerment and misdemeanor Child Abuse.

Now, I fully understand that such a legislative scheme may not survive analysis by the S. Ct. under the New York decision.

In the W. District of Kentucky the Fed law barring firearms from those adjudicated of Domestic Violence has been declared unconstitutional following the New York case. That case currently does not apply to the E. District of Kentucky.

A law that prevents the transfer of external box magazine feed, button release, semi automatic rifles to 18-20 year olds would have prevented this mass murder.

Uvalde elementary school shooting, May 24, 2022: A heavily armed 18-year-old spent over an hour in a fourth-grade classroom, killing 19 students and two adults, while law enforcement officers gathered outside.

The gunman started buying thousands of rounds of ammunition and two AR-15-style rifles after his 18th birthday, per the Texas Tribune.

Hardening schools and a well funded, well trained law enforcement presence would have also prevented Uvalde. I am all for funding both with new taxes on firearms and ammunition.
 
Posts: 12633 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
A law that prevents the transfer of external box magazine feed, button release, semi automatic rifles to 18-20 year olds would have prevented this mass murder.


I take issue with this statement. More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.

Or are you suggesting the urge to kill came from an inanimate object, like an evil demon-possessed AR?
 
Posts: 7027 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
If you believe that mass shootings are an issue we need to address, and if you believe that such shootings seem to involve certain common elements, what is your proposed solution?


Again, you're coming from the "let's do something, anything" mindset. Better to do nothing than the wrong thing. Maybe there is only so much a free society can do to suppress mass violence.

When you tell me the cause of the increase in mass shootings, I might be able to come up with something.

There are a few things that would probably help, including better background checks, hardening schools, and more funding for mental health care. But they've all been discussed. I have nothing new to suggest, absent more information as to the cause of these incidents.
 
Posts: 7027 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
Punish the criminals.

NOT the tool!

How many people die of drunk driving?

Ban cars?

Bank drinking?


Or the converse of that argument … allow anyone and everyone to buy whatever that want. Pop in to your local store and pick up an RPG7, or a bag of phosphorus grenades, a sawn off shotgun, a 20mm auto cannon, a few claymores

… it’s not the RPG7 that kills people Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 7445 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
. . . and while we wait for the mental health efforts to bear fruit over the next decade, we just keep burying mass shooting victims, telling their families that our prayers are with them and generally lamenting the decline in civility in society. That’s comforting.


Not from schools if we follow my approach.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
A law that prevents the transfer of external box magazine feed, button release, semi automatic rifles to 18-20 year olds would have prevented this mass murder.


I take issue with this statement. More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.

Or are you suggesting the urge to kill came from an inanimate object, like an evil demon-possessed AR?


A) They are not shotguns. One can buy a shotgun over the counter (pump) for 400 bucks. They are using the more expensive rifle described above. Despite what some here have stated, no you can not kill as many as fast and efficient w a plugged or unplugged 4-8 round shotgun as you can the above described rifle.

B) The Uvalde shooter purchased the above described rifle bc it was the best tool for the job.

Now, I fully admit, such a restriction is going to have a hard time at the S. Ct. given the New York case. Unless, the opportunity gives the opposition another bite at the apple.
 
Posts: 12633 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.


This seems to be a common retort . . . and one that is made without any factual or empirical basis. Let's hear about all the mass shooters that tried to buy an AR or a semi-automatic pistol, were denied or otherwise unable to, who then used a Rem 870 or a Marlin 336 to commit their atrocity. I think the "let's do nothing and hope for a better outcome" crowd have their standard list of bromides they like to throw out in response to these situations, e.g., people kill, not guns, take away the guns and they will use something else, punish the criminal not the gun, etc. The statements all sound appealing but really translate to let's do nothing and hope for a different outcome. Hope is not a strategy.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
. . . and while we wait for the mental health efforts to bear fruit over the next decade, we just keep burying mass shooting victims, telling their families that our prayers are with them and generally lamenting the decline in civility in society. That’s comforting.


Not from schools if we follow my approach.


While you are at it, maybe you can convince the mass shooters to confine themselves to attacking schools, not churches, synagogues, community centers, malls, grocery stores, bars and restaurants, places of employment, government buildings, etc. . . . or perhaps we just "harden" those too and spend life going from cage to cage.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.


This seems to be a common retort . . . and one that is made without any factual or empirical basis. Let's hear about all the mass shooters that tried to buy an AR or a semi-automatic pistol, were denied or otherwise unable to, who then used a Rem 870 or a Marlin 336 to commit their atrocity. I think the "let's do nothing and hope for a better outcome" crowd have their standard list of bromides they like to throw out in response to these situations, e.g., people kill, not guns, take away the guns and they will use something else, punish the criminal not the gun, etc. The statements all sound appealing but really translate to let's do nothing and hope for a different outcome. Hope is not a strategy.


They will adapt.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
. . . I thought you were the fellow that liked to focus on facts not speculation. Fact is the mass shooters are using ARs and semi-automatic pistols.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
. . . and while we wait for the mental health efforts to bear fruit over the next decade, we just keep burying mass shooting victims, telling their families that our prayers are with them and generally lamenting the decline in civility in society. That’s comforting.


Not from schools if we follow my approach.


Who's going to pay for it, 115,000 schools in the US? A tax on each gun or round of ammo sold maybe?

And based on recent evidence you are also going to need the "harden" shopping malls, places of worship and places of entertainment?

Does it not strike you that something fundamental is wrong with your society if you need armed guards and metal detectors at schools, malls and churches?
 
Posts: 7445 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.


This seems to be a common retort . . . and one that is made without any factual or empirical basis. Let's hear about all the mass shooters that tried to buy an AR or a semi-automatic pistol, were denied or otherwise unable to, who then used a Rem 870 or a Marlin 336 to commit their atrocity. I think the "let's do nothing and hope for a better outcome" crowd have their standard list of bromides they like to throw out in response to these situations, e.g., people kill, not guns, take away the guns and they will use something else, punish the criminal not the gun, etc. The statements all sound appealing but really translate to let's do nothing and hope for a different outcome. Hope is not a strategy.


They will adapt.



Maybe, maybe not. In any event, you're option limits them to 5 shells and 1 in the tube plus one shell at a time reloading. That configuration would not be nearly as effective as a magazine fed rifle with a 30 round capacity and the ability to load 30 more shots in 2-3 seconds. I own that M4 by the way.


-Every damn thing is your own fault if you are any good.

 
Posts: 16304 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nute:


Does it not strike you that something fundamental is wrong with your society if you need armed guards and metal detectors at schools, malls and churches?


Yes, emphatically yes.
 
Posts: 9654 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
A law that prevents the transfer of external box magazine feed, button release, semi automatic rifles to 18-20 year olds would have prevented this mass murder.


I take issue with this statement. More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.

Or are you suggesting the urge to kill came from an inanimate object, like an evil demon-possessed AR?


A) They are not shotguns. One can buy a shotgun over the counter (pump) for 400 bucks. They are using the more expensive rifle described above. Despite what some here have stated, no you can not kill as many as fast and efficient w a plugged or unplugged 4-8 round shotgun as you can the above described rifle.

B) The Uvalde shooter purchased the above described rifle bc it was the best tool for the job.

Now, I fully admit, such a restriction is going to have a hard time at the S. Ct. given the New York case. Unless, the opportunity gives the opposition another bite at the apple.


Earlier you posted this: "Uvalde elementary school shooting, May 24, 2022: A heavily armed 18-year-old spent over an hour in a fourth-grade classroom, killing 19 students and two adults, while law enforcement officers gathered outside."

Don't you think a guy could kill 21 people in an HOUR with a shotgun?
 
Posts: 7027 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
. . . why talk about hypotheticals, the fact is he killed 21 people with an AR that he bought as soon as he turned 18. Could he have killed them with a hole punch in an hour, maybe, and when mass murderers start using hole punches to kill people then we can have a conversation about whether those need to be more tightly regulated.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
I could go for this part....bit that's about it.

We could also enforce our existing laws and actually incarcerate criminals....

We could put hard labor back in our prison systems.....


The US already has, by far, the highest incarceration rate.

What's behind many crimes is a disturbed mental healt. Either directl, or indirectly through substance use. The reason why so many people suffer from a disturbed mental health are myriad. No security (job, financial, health) all leads to higher stress, which impacts mental health, for example. The whole polarisation in society also doesn't help. Increasing job, financial and health security touches on core values of people, which also touch on the core values of parties, and as such, they get reinforced by politics and polarisation. Removing guns might maybe (temporarily) reduce mass shootings, but it doesn't address the underlying issues, which drive people to a state where they don't see another way than a mass shooting.
 
Posts: 670 | Registered: 08 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Just FYI, there are 12 shot extended tube magazines available (used in 3 gun)… I think you can get 20+ shells in using the mini shells.

Point is, ban the AR, and they move to a different gun… then that becomes the new ban du jour. after a time, you end up in an absolutely restricted system.

We banned full autos made after 86… however, no crimes have been committed by legally owned machine guns of note. It was done because some folks pressed a scare through.

If you want an example of switching, look at England. They banned guns, and yet they still have gun deaths, and have an accelerating violent crime rate.

One thing criminologists don’t like talking about is that diverse communities have more violence than single ethnic ones. Are we going to ban multiracial communities over that? I thought not.

Canada wants to ban rifles with more than so much energy… yet that has not been a problem as far as crime (who uses a .460 WBY to hold up a store?)

Fundamentally, if you want a reasonable compromise, it needs to be shown to be fundamentally effective, not some silly if we ban AR 15’s there will be less crime committed by AR 15 using criminals.

The problem is society has encouraged some behaviors that have led to a percentage committing atrocities. How do you stop the atrocities? While limiting access to some objects might make the acts harder to accomplish, it does nothing to solve the underlying issue.

How do you fix the underlying issue?

Unless you are willing to allow some significant inroads against privacy and freedom, I’m not sure you can.

Say as Lane mentioned above, you make physicians report serious mental issues… and you get complete buy in on the part of the medical community…

Are you going to force treatment?

Are you going to allow restrictions on a group of people because they have a “statistically higher risk of committing crime?” Not every person with a violent fantasy acts on it (in fact, given the popularity of dystopian movies, I’d venture to say many more have these than commit violence)- so if Fred says “I thought the movie Kill Bill was a good movie” and his doc hears that (and is of the right persuasion) that individual instantly loses all self defense rights?

Yes, at its basis, freedom requires accepting some risks.

How much we are willing to tolerate is a social issue. Our founders would be flabbergasted by how much restriction we tolerate… but also would be struck dumb by how much more we are capable of, without any apparent effort. What would Ben Franklin think if he saw the space x rocket ship?
 
Posts: 11200 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
quote:
A law that prevents the transfer of external box magazine feed, button release, semi automatic rifles to 18-20 year olds would have prevented this mass murder.


I take issue with this statement. More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.

Or are you suggesting the urge to kill came from an inanimate object, like an evil demon-possessed AR?


A) They are not shotguns. One can buy a shotgun over the counter (pump) for 400 bucks. They are using the more expensive rifle described above. Despite what some here have stated, no you can not kill as many as fast and efficient w a plugged or unplugged 4-8 round shotgun as you can the above described rifle.

B) The Uvalde shooter purchased the above described rifle bc it was the best tool for the job.

Now, I fully admit, such a restriction is going to have a hard time at the S. Ct. given the New York case. Unless, the opportunity gives the opposition another bite at the apple.


Earlier you posted this: "Uvalde elementary school shooting, May 24, 2022: A heavily armed 18-year-old spent over an hour in a fourth-grade classroom, killing 19 students and two adults, while law enforcement officers gathered outside."

Don't you think a guy could kill 21 people in an HOUR with a shotgun?


No, I do not. The efficient fire power of these weapons (I am using my prior definition) is beyond that of even an unplugged shotgun.

Any one who denies this is free to spend the weekend here. You can run the shotgun. I will run the AR against the clock. We will see how much more I fire, hit, and reload faster than the pump or Benelli.

I think the Uvalde Mass Murder would have feared off law enforcement having to manually reload every 3-5 shots.

Our society is much less restrictive with firearms than the 18th and 19th centuries. The S. Ct interpretation of the Bill of Rights allowed it. States barred firearm possession bases on race in the 1870s.

The Founders would be shocked that we have tried to create a Federal level of citizenship to the detriment of independent states.
 
Posts: 12633 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
. . . why talk about hypotheticals, the fact is he killed 21 people with an AR that he bought as soon as he turned 18. Could he have killed them with a hole punch in an hour, maybe, and when mass murderers start using hole punches to kill people then we can have a conversation about whether those need to be more tightly regulated.


That's an interesting argument. It suggests that if mass murderers do turn to shotguns, you'd be willing to talk about banning shotguns. Next would be handguns, I suppose.

I like hypotheticals. Like analogies (lol), they can shed light on issues that are not clearly discerned due to being clouded by emotionalism or other sentiment.
 
Posts: 7027 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
I think hypotheticals make for interesting esoteric arguments. Here, however, we are dealing with the reality that most mass shootings involve AR-style rifles and semi-automatic high capacity pistols. And we are not talking about hypothetical dead children and adults they are very real to their parents and families. Would seem sensible to address the reality confronting us as opposed to hypotheticals that we can all spin out all day long and that may or may not ever come to pass.


Mike
 
Posts: 21865 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Here is another consideration, purely political and the S. Ct. not with standing, would we rather a) as conservatives/GOP negotiate in good faith on popular firearm reform, or b) continue to be the the party of no and have the Assault Weapons Ban return?

I will be honest. I would have no issue adding centerfire, button magazine release, external magazine rifles added as transferable NFA weapons requiring the stamp, but more importantly the more extensive, slower back ground check.
 
Posts: 12633 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Kanec
posted Hide Post
And I have no problem to call tightening of regulations on regular basic by politician for everything that happens in life as “ hunger for power “ simple controlling sickness
 
Posts: 201 | Location: Heart of Europe where East meets the West | Registered: 19 January 2023Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nute:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
. . . and while we wait for the mental health efforts to bear fruit over the next decade, we just keep burying mass shooting victims, telling their families that our prayers are with them and generally lamenting the decline in civility in society. That’s comforting.


Not from schools if we follow my approach.


Who's going to pay for it, 115,000 schools in the US? A tax on each gun or round of ammo sold maybe?

And based on recent evidence you are also going to need the "harden" shopping malls, places of worship and places of entertainment?
Does it not strike you that something fundamental is wrong with your society if you need armed guards and metal detectors at schools, malls and churches?


100% Nute our society is SICK! No question about it. The reason I will NEVER give up any of my guns.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by MJines:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
More likely the killers would have used shotguns or other firearms to carry out their massacres.


This seems to be a common retort . . . and one that is made without any factual or empirical basis. Let's hear about all the mass shooters that tried to buy an AR or a semi-automatic pistol, were denied or otherwise unable to, who then used a Rem 870 or a Marlin 336 to commit their atrocity. I think the "let's do nothing and hope for a better outcome" crowd have their standard list of bromides they like to throw out in response to these situations, e.g., people kill, not guns, take away the guns and they will use something else, punish the criminal not the gun, etc. The statements all sound appealing but really translate to let's do nothing and hope for a different outcome. Hope is not a strategy.


They will adapt.



Maybe, maybe not. In any event, you're option limits them to 5 shells and 1 in the tube plus one shell at a time reloading. That configuration would not be nearly as effective as a magazine fed rifle with a 30 round capacity and the ability to load 30 more shots in 2-3 seconds. I own that M4 by the way.


You better stick to lawyering. 2020

Fly around in a helicopter and shoot hogs where the targets never end with both an AR and a Benelli M4 and and at the end of each trip tell me your kill rate with each. I do it a couple of times a month. I can tell you which is the most lethal.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38438 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Aren't we talking about what if we ban ARs? A hypothetical question.

Your answer seems to be, "Then mass murder incidents will decrease."

Show me how that works. The evil ARs do not drive people to murder. Some mass murderers use handguns (e.g., VA Tech). More recently, automobiles and a ball bat have been used.

If anything becomes popular with killers, let's ban it.
 
Posts: 7027 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: