quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

quote:

Originally posted by Kensco:
The lemmings will follow Trump over the cliff without any thought involved. ("L" in ledvm I suspect stands for "lemming".) I voted for Romney.

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

Really, how often is expertise in goat-humping needed in Court, at least outside Texas...

quote:

Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Ledvm, don't they ask for a CV when they depose you?

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

I don’t remember being asked the question above but here is the answer.

Each of the multiple times I have served as an expert witness…I get asked if I have served as an expert witness before. I answer yes (except for the first obviously). Then they ask can you tell us how many times. Early on I gave them a number…latter I just replied several and don’t remember how many…as that is the truth. They ask if I can supply a list and I tell them I don’t keep a record of them…as I don’t. That is at the beginning of almost all depositions and it ends as that…never anything more.

I am an industry recognized expert in equine orthopedics, especially of the western performance horse, and surgery. My CV in that regard stands on its own merits. I don’t seek legal work…it seeks me.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

I don’t remember being asked the question above but here is the answer.

Each of the multiple times I have served as an expert witness…I get asked if I have served as an expert witness before. I answer yes (except for the first obviously). Then they ask can you tell us how many times. Early on I gave them a number…latter I just replied several and don’t remember how many…as that is the truth. They ask if I can supply a list and I tell them I don’t keep a record of them…as I don’t. That is at the beginning of almost all depositions and it ends as that…never anything more.

I am an industry recognized expert in equine orthopedics, especially of the western performance horse, and surgery. My CV in that regard stands on its own merits. I don’t seek legal work…it seeks me.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

I don’t remember being asked the question above but here is the answer.

Each of the multiple times I have served as an expert witness…I get asked if I have served as an expert witness before. I answer yes (except for the first obviously). Then they ask can you tell us how many times. Early on I gave them a number…latter I just replied several and don’t remember how many…as that is the truth. They ask if I can supply a list and I tell them I don’t keep a record of them…as I don’t. That is at the beginning of almost all depositions and it ends as that…never anything more.

I am an industry recognized expert in equine orthopedics, especially of the western performance horse, and surgery. My CV in that regard stands on its own merits. I don’t seek legal work…it seeks me.

I take expert depositions all the time. Can't remember the last time a retained expert witness didn't provide a list of all cases that they have testified in for the previous four years pursuant to the Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum that I serve on every expert. It is required per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 195.5 Expert Disclosures and Reports. There are more requirements now!

Disclosures. Without awaiting a discovery request, a party must provide the following for any testifying expert:
(1) the expert’s name, address, and telephone number;

(2) the subject matter on which the expert will testify;

(3) the general substance of the expert’s mental impressions and opinions and a brief summary of the basis for them, or if the expert is not retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party, documents reflecting such information;

(4) if the expert is retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party:

(A) all documents, tangible things, reports, models, or data compilations that have been provided to, reviewed by, or prepared by or for the expert in anticipation of the expert’s testimony;

(B) the expert’s current resume and bibliography;

(C) the expert’s qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(D) except when the expert is the responding party’s attorney and is testifying to attorney fees, a list of all other cases in which, during the previous four years, the expert testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(E) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the expert’s study and testimony in the case.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

I don’t remember being asked the question above but here is the answer.

Each of the multiple times I have served as an expert witness…I get asked if I have served as an expert witness before. I answer yes (except for the first obviously). Then they ask can you tell us how many times. Early on I gave them a number…latter I just replied several and don’t remember how many…as that is the truth. They ask if I can supply a list and I tell them I don’t keep a record of them…as I don’t. That is at the beginning of almost all depositions and it ends as that…never anything more.

I am an industry recognized expert in equine orthopedics, especially of the western performance horse, and surgery. My CV in that regard stands on its own merits. I don’t seek legal work…it seeks me.

I take expert depositions all the time. Can't remember the last time a retained expert witness didn't provide a list of all cases that they have testified in for the previous four years pursuant to the Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum that I serve on every expert. It is required per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 195.5 Expert Disclosures and Reports. There are more requirements now!

Disclosures. Without awaiting a discovery request, a party must provide the following for any testifying expert:
(1) the expert’s name, address, and telephone number;

(2) the subject matter on which the expert will testify;

(3) the general substance of the expert’s mental impressions and opinions and a brief summary of the basis for them, or if the expert is not retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party, documents reflecting such information;

(4) if the expert is retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party:

(A) all documents, tangible things, reports, models, or data compilations that have been provided to, reviewed by, or prepared by or for the expert in anticipation of the expert’s testimony;

(B) the expert’s current resume and bibliography;

(C) the expert’s qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(D) except when the expert is the responding party’s attorney and is testifying to attorney fees, a list of all other cases in which, during the previous four years, the expert testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(E) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the expert’s study and testimony in the case.

The last case I did was in Federal Court in Dallas. I was deposed by an attorney and firm you would know. It settled in mediation and never went to court. But I never was forced to submit a list. At this stage in my life, it would be impossible for me to submit an accurate list as I didn’t keep one.

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

I don’t remember being asked the question above but here is the answer.

Each of the multiple times I have served as an expert witness…I get asked if I have served as an expert witness before. I answer yes (except for the first obviously). Then they ask can you tell us how many times. Early on I gave them a number…latter I just replied several and don’t remember how many…as that is the truth. They ask if I can supply a list and I tell them I don’t keep a record of them…as I don’t. That is at the beginning of almost all depositions and it ends as that…never anything more.

I am an industry recognized expert in equine orthopedics, especially of the western performance horse, and surgery. My CV in that regard stands on its own merits. I don’t seek legal work…it seeks me.

I take expert depositions all the time. Can't remember the last time a retained expert witness didn't provide a list of all cases that they have testified in for the previous four years pursuant to the Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum that I serve on every expert. It is required per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 195.5 Expert Disclosures and Reports. There are more requirements now!

Disclosures. Without awaiting a discovery request, a party must provide the following for any testifying expert:
(1) the expert’s name, address, and telephone number;

(2) the subject matter on which the expert will testify;

(3) the general substance of the expert’s mental impressions and opinions and a brief summary of the basis for them, or if the expert is not retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party, documents reflecting such information;

(4) if the expert is retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party:

(A) all documents, tangible things, reports, models, or data compilations that have been provided to, reviewed by, or prepared by or for the expert in anticipation of the expert’s testimony;

(B) the expert’s current resume and bibliography;

(C) the expert’s qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(D) except when the expert is the responding party’s attorney and is testifying to attorney fees, a list of all other cases in which, during the previous four years, the expert testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(E) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the expert’s study and testimony in the case.

The last case I did was in Federal Court in Dallas. I was deposed by an attorney and firm you would know. It settled in mediation and never went to court. But I never was forced to submit a list. At this stage in my life, it would be impossible for me to submit an accurate list as I didn’t keep one.

It it never went to court, how was it in federal court?

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by MJines:

quote:

Originally posted by Jefffive:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ledvm:
You think I would remember the case number and headings from legal documents from 15 years ago off the top of my head?

So, you testified once. 15 years ago.

And, this qualifies you as expert witness extraordinaire?

Once??? Where did you get that? You would think a lawyer could read for content better.

I told a stry of one instance because it fit the context of this discussion.

Part of qualifying as an "expert witness" is presenting all previous examples of having been accepted as such in Court.

. . . I asked him about that above. Crickets.

I don’t remember being asked the question above but here is the answer.

Each of the multiple times I have served as an expert witness…I get asked if I have served as an expert witness before. I answer yes (except for the first obviously). Then they ask can you tell us how many times. Early on I gave them a number…latter I just replied several and don’t remember how many…as that is the truth. They ask if I can supply a list and I tell them I don’t keep a record of them…as I don’t. That is at the beginning of almost all depositions and it ends as that…never anything more.

I am an industry recognized expert in equine orthopedics, especially of the western performance horse, and surgery. My CV in that regard stands on its own merits. I don’t seek legal work…it seeks me.

I take expert depositions all the time. Can't remember the last time a retained expert witness didn't provide a list of all cases that they have testified in for the previous four years pursuant to the Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum that I serve on every expert. It is required per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 195.5 Expert Disclosures and Reports. There are more requirements now!

Disclosures. Without awaiting a discovery request, a party must provide the following for any testifying expert:
(1) the expert’s name, address, and telephone number;

(2) the subject matter on which the expert will testify;

(3) the general substance of the expert’s mental impressions and opinions and a brief summary of the basis for them, or if the expert is not retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party, documents reflecting such information;

(4) if the expert is retained by, employed by, or otherwise subject to the control of the responding party:

(A) all documents, tangible things, reports, models, or data compilations that have been provided to, reviewed by, or prepared by or for the expert in anticipation of the expert’s testimony;

(B) the expert’s current resume and bibliography;

(C) the expert’s qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(D) except when the expert is the responding party’s attorney and is testifying to attorney fees, a list of all other cases in which, during the previous four years, the expert testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(E) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the expert’s study and testimony in the case.

The last case I did was in Federal Court in Dallas. I was deposed by an attorney and firm you would know. It settled in mediation and never went to court. But I never was forced to submit a list. At this stage in my life, it would be impossible for me to submit an accurate list as I didn’t keep one.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Democrats, not Republicans, not Trump, have put the USA on the highway to hell.

quote:

Originally posted by Kensco:
Back to the original statement, The Last Sane Republican. https://www.cnn.com/videos/pol...-negotiation-vpx.cnn He can see the stupidity in the Trump plan. It's a shame the MAGA morons can't see it.

I think ledvm and the rest of the MAGGats have the same philosophy as Trump, "go ahead and hurt the country, we don't care, as long as our guy gets elected".

quote:

Are you regressive in worldview, thinking yesteryear is the standard, achievable, and loathing demographics and other changes in reality?

quote:

Originally posted by Magine Enigam:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Democrats, not Republicans, not Trump, have put the USA on the highway to hell.

I'm sure that you "believe" that, along with millions of others.

It is hard for many, me in particular, to understand the depth of that rabbit hole. But you represent and express it as well as can be.

For starters, I don't understand how you, as a keen representation of nowadays GOPers, can categorize fellow Americans as hell bound, dragging the country with them.

Who are you to judge such profound things?

Are you regressive in worldview, thinking yesteryear is the standard, achievable, and loathing demographics and other changes in reality?

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Yeah, it was Democrats that stormed the Capital to keep a defeated president in power.

It was a Democrat president who reached out to the nation and decried a false election to keep power.

It was a Democrat President that refused to engage in the peaceful transition of power.

It was a Democrat that mused about hanging his VP to stay in power.

It was a Democrat who asked Republicans not to pass legislation on the border.

It was a Democrat that refused to use his power as Commander in Chief to defend our Government, our Constitution, and our election.

It is a Democratic Governor and Attorney General in Texas defying the rule of law.

It is Democrats that want to destroy religious freedom by imposing upon all citizens a sects view of God, and end government’s equal treatment of citizens when confronted with religion.

Oh wait, those were GOP/Right folks.



posted 25 January 2024 17:25 Hide Post
The GOP strategy is as follows:

1-Strengthen Putin in the Ukraine by denying aid.
2-Strengthen Hammas by denying aid.
3-Keep the border open as much as possible because President Trump’s campaign does not want President Biden to sign the bill.
4-Scapegoat and villainize gay people.
5-Ban books and art.
6/Force women w dying or dead fetuses to give birth.
7-Force children to deliver to term the products of rape.
8-Defy the S.Ct., concerning the border.

You are the abomination and not gay people.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Democrats, not Republicans, not Trump, have put the USA on the highway to hell.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
MM,
If The Great State of Texas keeps on…you will be forced to move to just save face.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
MM,
If The Great State of Texas keeps on…you will be forced to move to just save face.

If the Great State of Texas keeps on, it will have a reckoning like the State of Carolina, State of Alabama and Mississippi had end did when they tried to defy the Supreme Court and due exercise of federal power under the Constitution.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
Democrats, not Republicans, not Trump, have put the USA on the highway to hell.

I rest my case…just read above^^^

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
MM,
If The Great State of Texas keeps on…you will be forced to move to just save face.

If the Great State of Texas keeps on, it will have a reckoning like the State of Carolina, State of Alabama and Mississippi had end did when they tried to defy the Supreme Court and due exercise of federal power under the Constitution.

Maybe…guess we’ll find out.

Kinda like I have told many who have told me they were going to whip my ass.

I always reply: “yeah…maybe…but you still gotta get it done.”

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
MM,
If The Great State of Texas keeps on…you will be forced to move to just save face.

If the Great State of Texas keeps on, it will have a reckoning like the State of Carolina, State of Alabama and Mississippi had end did when they tried to defy the Supreme Court and due exercise of federal power under the Constitution.

Maybe…guess we’ll find out.

Kinda like I have told many who have told me they were going to whip my ass.

I always reply: “yeah…maybe…but you still gotta get it done.”

Yeah it worked out so well for those states and all of them during the Civil War.

I guess that racially gerrymandered district in Alabama is still there. I guess South Carolina is still nullifying Federal Law. I guess Mississippi and Alabama still have segregated schools. I guess Texas has a right to leave the Union.

All those things are false.

You are a senior citizen w the cardio of a worm. I would calm down. This is not a bar fight. This is tie rule of law versus the tyranny of a state. This is a state defying the Constitution. Your tough man act means nothing.

quote:

You are a senior citizen w the cardio of a worm.

quote:

Originally posted by ledvm:
To all the comments above. Looks like Texas is going to stay the course. Federal government is going to have to make the next move.