THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
How About a WAR?? Login/Join 
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted
As usual, the TDS on the ARPF is so pervasive that one and all have ignored the most important political news of the year, decade, maybe the century.

Will Ukraine use the Biden admin green light to strike deep into Russia and usher in a more global war.
WW3 perhaps?
 
Posts: 3394 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
As usual, the TDS on the ARPF is so pervasive that one and all have ignored the most important political news of the year, decade, maybe the century.

Will Ukraine use the Biden admin green light to strike deep into Russia and usher in a more global war.
WW3 perhaps?


The CIA’s Puppet has already fired them into Russia.

Anyone would hazard a guess as to why the present idiots ruling America decided just now to let him do that?

Very simple.

To put the new government in a bind!

Killing people to advance your political agenda is a known the world over about America!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69275 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Why not? War is the U.S. national sport, and the cornerstone of the American economy.

So - Booyah, Semper Fi, and Thank You For Your Service. Here’s your medal, now go and boost our bottom line.

The fortunate sons will reap the profits, the hicks, the spics and the niggers will be nicely thinned out, and once the dim bulb MAGAts catch on, they’ll be drooling. War is good, Donkey, as long as you get to stay home and count the money.

Where are Dick n’ Dubya when you really need them? They had that Freedom & Liberty stuff down pat.
 
Posts: 6030 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
Putin just updated his rules of engagement!

Previously they were supposed to only use nuclear weapons if attacked by a nuclear armed country.

Now they have made it they will use nuclear weapons if attacked by a non nuclear country backed by a nuclear powered country!

America and NATO are going to get what they asked for now!

Ex-members of the Warsaw Pact were not supposed to be invited into NATO!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69275 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 6030 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
As usual, the TDS on the ARPF is so pervasive that one and all have ignored the most important political news of the year, decade, maybe the century.

Will Ukraine use the Biden admin green light to strike deep into Russia and usher in a more global war.
WW3 perhaps?


Who attacked first? Russia.

If WWII happens it will be because Russia snd China attempt to seize more territory.
 
Posts: 12616 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah. I really do not understand how naive or blind so many seem to be. This will be entirely Russias fault if they choose to make this nuclear. But they won't. It's brinkmanship and Russian bullying. It's also no different to US standing rules of use.

https://www.armscontrol.org/ac...-use-nuclear-weapons
 
Posts: 4835 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If Russia and China believe there is no consequences for territorial aggression, they will continue their current paths.

Article 5 is real.
 
Posts: 12616 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
Yeah. I really do not understand how naive or blind so many seem to be. This will be entirely Russias fault if they choose to make this nuclear. But they won't. It's brinkmanship and Russian bullying. It's also no different to US standing rules of use.

https://www.armscontrol.org/ac...-use-nuclear-weapons


JFK at least had the balls to face down Khrushchev - but then, he hadn’t borrowed millions of dollars from Khrushchev so he wasn’t indebted to him.

Makes a difference, apparently.
 
Posts: 6030 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
Putin just updated his rules of engagement!

Previously they were supposed to only use nuclear weapons if attacked by a nuclear armed country.

Now they have made it they will use nuclear weapons if attacked by a non nuclear country backed by a nuclear powered country!

America and NATO are going to get what they asked for now!

Ex-members of the Warsaw Pact were not supposed to be invited into NATO!


Ex members of the Warsaw pact can do what the hell they like. They dont have a Russian boot on their necks any more so can decide for themselves. It shouldn't come as much as a surprise that they don't want to go back to being governed by Russia.

The countries who have given the most to Ukraine measured as a percentage of GDP are the ex soviet states .... who evidently would prefer not to go back to bing soviet states.
 
Posts: 7438 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
As usual, the TDS on the ARPF is so pervasive that one and all have ignored the most important political news of the year, decade, maybe the century.

Will Ukraine use the Biden admin green light to strike deep into Russia and usher in a more global war.
WW3 perhaps?


Who attacked first? Russia.

If WWII happens it will be because Russia snd China attempt to seize more territory.


We sat back and did nothing in 2014 when Putin helped himself to Crimea. So he felt it wouldn't be a problem to come back for more.
 
Posts: 7438 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
Russia started it…

I’m sure that’s great consolation to all the parents of young men to be sent to the grinder.

I ask, what is a “winning” result in Ukraine?

Not a wishlist, but realistic diplomatic or military action which you would consider a victory.
 
Posts: 3394 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
Prettyup to date article here:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/6...otiated-end-war.aspx

Zelenskyy will not make ending the war any easier by striking further into Russia.
More likely, a “negotiated end” to the war will be another casualty.
He should listen to his countrymen and end the bloodshed while that opportunity still exists.
 
Posts: 3394 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
Russia started it…

I’m sure that’s great consolation to all the parents of young men to be sent to the grinder.

I ask, what is a “winning” result in Ukraine?

Not a wishlist, but realistic diplomatic or military action which you would consider a victory.


Yes Russia started it, AND if you continue to slow Russia to take territory you will have the war you fear.
 
Posts: 12616 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
Prettyup to date article here:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/6...otiated-end-war.aspx

Zelenskyy will not make ending the war any easier by striking further into Russia.
More likely, a “negotiated end” to the war will be another casualty.
He should listen to his countrymen and end the bloodshed while that opportunity still exists.

And do what? Throw Putin the keys? Do you think a Putin will be satisfied with less than the whole enchilada? He’ll just laugh and move on Poland, followed by the Baltic states.

You do not, ever, appease a despot. You either kill the sonofabitch or he kills you.

This is a fight to the finish, and Zelenskyy knows it.
 
Posts: 6030 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
Prettyup to date article here:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/6...otiated-end-war.aspx

Zelenskyy will not make ending the war any easier by striking further into Russia.
More likely, a “negotiated end” to the war will be another casualty.
He should listen to his countrymen and end the bloodshed while that opportunity still exists.

And do what? Throw Putin the keys? Do you think a Putin will be satisfied with less than the whole enchilada? He’ll just laugh and move on Poland, followed by the Baltic states.

You do not, ever, appease a despot. You either kill the sonofab!tch or he kills you.

This is a fight to the finish, and Zelenskyy knows it.

Except he actually did quit in 2014 - and i expect he'll quit before 1/21/25 - or at least sue for peace -- the first couple rounds at the negotiation table will be bad for everyone -

strange, though, how putin invades ukraine on biden's watches (including as veep) -


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40075 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”
 
Posts: 12616 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
This is certainly a reasonable option.

I doubt Zelensky will agree to it as return of Crimea is a major point to the Ukrainians.

The Ukrainians would undoubtedly consider removal of the option of joining NATO a stab in the back, and the current administration has stated that it should be something for the future.

Putin, who knows what he will agree to, as the rationale for the war is very cloudy on his end.



quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”
 
Posts: 11198 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Putin isn’t real big on respecting treaties. He’s the sort that will shake hands with one hand and slip a knife between your ribs with the other.

The Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation, and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, also known as the "Big Treaty",[2][3] was an agreement signed in 1997 between Ukraine and Russia, which fixed the principle of strategic partnership, the recognition of the inviolability of existing borders, and respect for territorial integrity and mutual commitment not to use its territory to harm the security of each other. The treaty prevents Ukraine and Russia from invading one another's country respectively, and declaring war.[4]
 
Posts: 6030 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 14 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”


I predict that this is exactly what Trump will offer to both Zelenskyy and Putin.
I also predict that Zelenskyy will be the one to defy the deal.

DAMN!!
LHeym500 s more MAGA than he thinks!
 
Posts: 3394 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nute:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
As usual, the TDS on the ARPF is so pervasive that one and all have ignored the most important political news of the year, decade, maybe the century.

Will Ukraine use the Biden admin green light to strike deep into Russia and usher in a more global war.
WW3 perhaps?


Who attacked first? Russia.

If WWII happens it will be because Russia snd China attempt to seize more territory.


We sat back and did nothing in 2014 when Putin helped himself to Crimea. So he felt it wouldn't be a problem to come back for more.


You gave Palestine to The Zionists.

And just look where that has gotten us.

November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69275 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”


I predict that this is exactly what Trump will offer to both Zelenskyy and Putin.
I also predict that Zelenskyy will be the one to defy the deal.

DAMN!!
LHeym500 s more MAGA than he thinks!


If Trump offers the above outline, and Zelensky rejects it. I will be the first to say no more. I will also say Trump in offering the above outline did the right thing.

It takes one side to fight. It takes 2 sides to make peace.
 
Posts: 12616 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”


I predict that this is exactly what Trump will offer to both Zelenskyy and Putin.
I also predict that Zelenskyy will be the one to defy the deal.

DAMN!!
LHeym500 s more MAGA than he thinks!


No surprise that he would refuse the offer. After all, Putin stole over a third of his country… popcorn


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13604 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Trump is going to allow Russia to keep a portion Ukraine.

This appears to be a stalemate, but Ukraine can’t go 15 rounds, certainly can’t without US assistance. Ukraine has gone 3 rounds and requitted itself self well, but simply doesn’t have the manpower for many more rounds.

I agree with the writer above, Biden gave his approval to put the turd in Trump’s pocket.
 
Posts: 8635 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Schrodinger:
Trump is going to allow Russia to keep a portion Ukraine.

This appears to be a stalemate, but Ukraine can’t go 15 rounds, certainly can’t without US assistance. Ukraine has gone 3 rounds and requitted itself self well, but simply doesn’t have the manpower for many more rounds.

I agree with the writer above, Biden gave his approval to put the turd in Trump’s pocket.


He has to, or, at least the Western World has to.
The alternative is that Europe will be enveloped in war once again and I, for one, do not think it’s worth it.
Just study European history to see that political boundaries and borders have been changing for thousands of years.
Let’s not pretend that this cannot happen again.
 
Posts: 3394 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah if the west forces Ukraine into a bad compromise now, then at the very least Europe will be in the same situation in 10-20 years. Most likely in Ukraine again but possible in the Baltics. I think giving up the areas Russia held pre 22 might be a compromise if needed. But really I think Russia has to get too the stage of offering that. Not the other way around. Russia needs to realise it needs a way out. With the economy crashing and things getting harder, that's a year or so away yet.
 
Posts: 4835 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
Yeah if the west forces Ukraine into a bad compromise now, then at the very least Europe will be in the same situation in 10-20 years. Most likely in Ukraine again but possible in the Baltics. I think giving up the areas Russia held pre 22 might be a compromise if needed. But really I think Russia has to get too the stage of offering that. Not the other way around. Russia needs to realise it needs a way out. With the economy crashing and things getting harder, that's a year or so away yet.


Keep on dreaming!

The West have shot themselves in the foot!

All the economic sanctions, including against individuals, are totally against international law.

Imagine if the world did the same to America each time they invade and destroy other countries??

All on the pretention of giving them "democracy"!

Something NO CONUTRY IN THE WEST know what it means!

Remember your brand new PM replacing Horse Teeth not sure what a woman is? rotflmo


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69275 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yeah, and he didn't last very long. As Ive said before, your only justification for your rulers is aligning them with out worst. But guess what... We are not ruled. We remove our chosen leaders when they become fools.
 
Posts: 4835 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I try to kind of keep up, but what the hell is BATO?
 
Posts: 3845 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”


I predict that this is exactly what Trump will offer to both Zelenskyy and Putin.
I also predict that Zelenskyy will be the one to defy the deal.

DAMN!!
LHeym500 s more MAGA than he thinks!


No surprise that he would refuse the offer. After all, Putin stole over a third of his country… popcorn


If yuh are referring to Crimea, you are correct t. The issue is Ukraine cannot expel Russia now from Ukraine proper. Russia will never concede Crimea, and so full scale War by the West, Ukraine will never expel Russia from Crimea.

A negotiated peace is just that. The election proved no one cares about Ukraine.
 
Posts: 12616 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
I try to kind of keep up, but what the hell is BATO?


slip of the finger I presume. The B and N are next to each other on the keyboard.
 
Posts: 4835 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
They should call it SHITO!

Every war they got involved in with America has been shit! rotflmo


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69275 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Egypt and Saudi Arabia, for instance, support the Sudanese army. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), Libya and Russia (through the Wagner Group) support the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.

The UAE has emerged as the foreign player most invested in the war. It views resource-rich, strategically located Sudan as an opportunity to expand its influence and control in the Middle East and east Africa.

Since 2018, the UAE has invested over US$6 billion in the country. This includes foreign reserves in the Sudanese central bank, agriculture projects and a Red Sea port. The UAE has also recruited and paid fighters from Sudan, drawn mostly from the Rapid Support Forces, to join its conflict in Yemen.

Since 2019, the UAE has undermined Sudan’s democratic transition following the ouster of long-serving president Omar al-Bashir. Abu Dhabi empowered both the army and the paramilitary force against the civilian wing of the government. With the outbreak of the civil war, the UAE has focused on the Rapid Support Forces.


And in those few sentences, we may come to understand your position on Ukraine as well.
 
Posts: 4835 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”


I predict that this is exactly what Trump will offer to both Zelenskyy and Putin.
I also predict that Zelenskyy will be the one to defy the deal.

DAMN!!
LHeym500 s more MAGA than he thinks!


No surprise that he would refuse the offer. After all, Putin stole over a third of his country… popcorn


If yuh are referring to Crimea, you are correct t. The issue is Ukraine cannot expel Russia now from Ukraine proper. Russia will never concede Crimea, and so full scale War by the West, Ukraine will never expel Russia from Crimea.

A negotiated peace is just that. The election proved no one cares about Ukraine.


A"freeze the situation where the front line is now" solution is not going to work. Putin will not accept the loss of Russian territory (the bit which Ukraine currently occupies in Kursk) or foreign troops on Russian territory.

Zelensky has been very clever in taking this foothold as it compromises Trumps ability to force such a cessation of the war along those lines.
 
Posts: 7438 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Without a full commitment of Western Troops, Ukraine cannot expel Russia from Ukraine. Ukraine cannot expel Russia from Crimea.

There is no unilateral victory for Ukraine to find on the battlefield so Western commitment of forces. I do not support that.
 
Posts: 12616 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nute:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
I have said many times what I would accept insist upon if o were in the WH.

1) Withdrawal of all Russian Forces from Ukraine.
2) A concession that BATO membership shall not be extended to Ukraine.
3) Ukraine and the West recognize Crimea annexation (we never have, Russia will never give it up, and Ukraine cannot take it back)
And
5) Withdrawal of all sanctions upon Russia.

If Russia were agreeable and Ukraine not to the above, my position would be, “ That is fine, but you do so without our financial and hardware support.”

If Russia were not agreeable, my position would be, “ That is fine, but we will continue to give Ukraine all the aid and green lights they need to prevent you from winning.”


I predict that this is exactly what Trump will offer to both Zelenskyy and Putin.
I also predict that Zelenskyy will be the one to defy the deal.

DAMN!!
LHeym500 s more MAGA than he thinks!


No surprise that he would refuse the offer. After all, Putin stole over a third of his country… popcorn


If yuh are referring to Crimea, you are correct t. The issue is Ukraine cannot expel Russia now from Ukraine proper. Russia will never concede Crimea, and so full scale War by the West, Ukraine will never expel Russia from Crimea.

A negotiated peace is just that. The election proved no one cares about Ukraine.


A"freeze the situation where the front line is now" solution is not going to work. Putin will not accept the loss of Russian territory (the bit which Ukraine currently occupies in Kursk) or foreign troops on Russian territory.

Zelensky has been very clever in taking this foothold as it compromises Trumps ability to force such a cessation of the war along those lines.


Very clever using US long range weapons one day, and British ones the next too. Makes it harder for Putin to lay individual blame and threaten a single nation with Nukes. It also shows why it's important that Sholtz comes on board with their Taurus missiles.

Also Chinese registered ship, out of a Russian port with Russian captain rips up the communication cables between Finland and Europe. Bet china is fuming.
 
Posts: 4835 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
The British missiles they have been using were a joint development with France, but im not sure if the french have given permission to use them in Russian territory.

They have been used to hit the Crimea bridge already.
 
Posts: 7438 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
I try to kind of keep up, but what the hell is BATO?


slip of the finger I presume. The B and N are next to each other on the keyboard.

Well crap! I should have been able to figure that out on my own. Bill.
 
Posts: 3845 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
quote:
Originally posted by shankspony:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill Leeper:
I try to kind of keep up, but what the hell is BATO?


slip of the finger I presume. The B and N are next to each other on the keyboard.

Well crap! I should have been able to figure that out on my own. Bill.


and yet, you shouldn't have to - reviewing a post before making it is common courtesy


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40075 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
Is there any way to spin this as Trumps fault? Are you lefties going to continue to support this administration as "capable", right up to a Nuclear conflict?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2sezhsnCPs


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3651 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: