THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: DRG
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Those delta smell are very important Login/Join 
One of Us
posted
Much more important than water for fire control in southern California!!!!

The citizens of kookifornia need to wake up! Bike lanes don't seem so important when you home is burning.....
 
Posts: 42799 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
Much more important than water for fire control in southern California!!!!

The citizens of kookifornia need to wake up! Bike lanes don't seem so important when you home is burning.....



When Trump was on Joe Rogan, he talked about this very thing happening. No water to fight these fire.

Crazy.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3870 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
Much more important than water for fire control in southern California!!!!

The citizens of kookifornia need to wake up! Bike lanes don't seem so important when you home is burning.....


Delta smelt don't live this far south.


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14989 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Trump is butthurt that Biden worked with California to develop a better plan than what Trump tried to impose, which actually sends some water south from the "Delta" (unlike Trump's bullshit), but nothing about California's water distribution system either caused the current wildfires (any more than not raking forests did) or impacts the ability to fight them. In fact, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has the most water stored in its system in its history.

Trump is, as usual, both lying and full of shit.


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11210 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
Quite a bit more complicated I think.

Like Steves home in Arizona, southern California has to import its water over hundreds of miles. Neither LA or Arizona can sustain it's residents without importing resources like water.

To muddy that task, they recently came out of a severe drought, LA has had an exceptionally dry winter this year, (drought,) and the long running western water wars are hotter than ever. We've all read quite a bit recently about the Colorado River supply problems.

Not to mention the continual growth of residential development. There are homes in the bushes, homes in the trees. There are homes in the canyons, mountain tops, hillsides, valleys, plateaus, beaches, deserts and on the water.

I wonder how many non native Eucalyptus trees were planted and growing in and around LA? Eucalyptus in Australian means Roman Candle.

Palisades and greater LA is just the next location to go inferno after decades of fire suppression and zero range management. The brush is so thick the coyotes and mountain lions can grab the neighbors cats right out from under the backyard lights.

I did read yesterday that the firefighters were focusing on rescue and lifesaving not fighting the fire.

Places like LA have just done too much for too long to encourage this disaster.
 
Posts: 9816 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Id say you are correct Scott, And not the same issue, but in the same vein in our nation, some of the most popular areas to live, just suffer from too many people wanting to live there. I think its time in some situations to say, no more, live somewhere else.
 
Posts: 5069 | Location: South Island NZ | Registered: 21 July 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
https://californialocal.com/lo...20units%20per%20year.

500k new homes per year????????

We all agree resources are finite yes?

The sky only dumps so much water annually yes?

I'd like to be able to say I don't know where the water for 500 thousand new homes is going to come from, but I do know,.....it isn't coming.

Now, instead of grazers paying to have their stock graze open lands,......the managers of open lands are paying grazers to feed on the open lands.

Anybody care to tell us how many tons of greenhouse gasses are being pumped into the atmosphere by the Palisades fire?
Less or more than cow farts?
 
Posts: 9816 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Fires of that magnitude aren't put out, not with a Santa Ana wind behind them. It amounts to an 80 MPH blow torch, and the best strategy is to be careful about getting downwind of it. This one burned all the way to the ocean. Next few days, the minor ones will get snuffed, but not from rainfall.


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14989 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
https://x.com/greg_price11/sta...055198604017790?s=46


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 39028 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
With so much sea coast, why not desalination??

Process is relatively cheap now.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 70238 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
Quite a bit more complicated I think.

Like Steves home in Arizona, southern California has to import its water over hundreds of miles. Neither LA or Arizona can sustain it's residents without importing resources like water.

To muddy that task, they recently came out of a severe drought, LA has had an exceptionally dry winter this year, (drought,) and the long running western water wars are hotter than ever. We've all read quite a bit recently about the Colorado River supply problems.

Not to mention the continual growth of residential development. There are homes in the bushes, homes in the trees. There are homes in the canyons, mountain tops, hillsides, valleys, plateaus, beaches, deserts and on the water.

I wonder how many non native Eucalyptus trees were planted and growing in and around LA? Eucalyptus in Australian means Roman Candle.

Palisades and greater LA is just the next location to go inferno after decades of fire suppression and zero range management. The brush is so thick the coyotes and mountain lions can grab the neighbors cats right out from under the backyard lights.

I did read yesterday that the firefighters were focusing on rescue and lifesaving not fighting the fire.

Places like LA have just done too much for too long to encourage this disaster.


Scott -

One small correction as to our drinking/general use water. We use the Salt and Verde Rivers chain of lakes and robust ground water here.

Arizona built the CAP canal (Central Arizona Project)many years ago. It goes from Lake Havasu all the way down to Tucson.

There are two separate pumping stations in Havasu. One, goes to SoCal, the other supplies the CAP. California sucks far more out than we do here.

They also take the a majority of the power generated by the Palo Verde nuclear plant west of town. There are 4 separate other power plants right near each other out by Palo Verde, they are NG powered.

California is a leach on Arizona's resources.

picture of the Havasu pumping plant.

https://calisphere.org/item/73...2b781f1775f402c2d9e/

Salt and Verde river chain.

https://www.srpnet.com/grid-wa...ter-recreation/lakes


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3870 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:


Good example of Trump proving he is among the three dumbest fucking humans alive. He's going to bring water from Canada to water forests in California? And where does he think 95% of rivers run to?


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11210 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Twenty miles outside Corpus Christi, Texas — an area so dry the local water company distributes shower timers at high school football games — the world’s richest man is nearly done building a lithium refinery that could require as much as eight-million gallons of water per day.

In a rare public update on the $1-billion project, Tesla in December said it was starting to test the ability to process lithium through the new factory. But the carmaker still doesn't have a contract for the water needed to operate the facility, presenting a hurdle for CEO Elon Musk’s goal of turning lithium into chemical products used to make electric vehicle batteries.


Link

Maybe Trump will bring him buckets of water from Canada...


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11210 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:


Good example of Trump proving he is among the three dumbest fucking humans alive. He's going to bring water from Canada to water forests in California? And where does he think 95% of rivers run to?


You are one of the three.


Old Corps
Semper Fi
FJB
 
Posts: 899 | Location: South Pacific NW | Registered: 09 January 2021Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
Quite a bit more complicated I think.

Like Steves home in Arizona, southern California has to import its water over hundreds of miles. Neither LA or Arizona can sustain it's residents without importing resources like water.

To muddy that task, they recently came out of a severe drought, LA has had an exceptionally dry winter this year, (drought,) and the long running western water wars are hotter than ever. We've all read quite a bit recently about the Colorado River supply problems.

Not to mention the continual growth of residential development. There are homes in the bushes, homes in the trees. There are homes in the canyons, mountain tops, hillsides, valleys, plateaus, beaches, deserts and on the water.

I wonder how many non native Eucalyptus trees were planted and growing in and around LA? Eucalyptus in Australian means Roman Candle.

Palisades and greater LA is just the next location to go inferno after decades of fire suppression and zero range management. The brush is so thick the coyotes and mountain lions can grab the neighbors cats right out from under the backyard lights.

I did read yesterday that the firefighters were focusing on rescue and lifesaving not fighting the fire.

Places like LA have just done too much for too long to encourage this disaster.


Scott -

One small correction as to our drinking/general use water. We use the Salt and Verde Rivers chain of lakes and robust ground water here.

Arizona built the CAP canal (Central Arizona Project)many years ago. It goes from Lake Havasu all the way down to Tucson.

There are two separate pumping stations in Havasu. One, goes to SoCal, the other supplies the CAP. California sucks far more out than we do here.

They also take the a majority of the power generated by the Palo Verde nuclear plant west of town. There are 4 separate other power plants right near each other out by Palo Verde, they are NG powered.

California is a leach on Arizona's resources.

picture of the Havasu pumping plant.

https://calisphere.org/item/73...2b781f1775f402c2d9e/

Salt and Verde river chain.

https://www.srpnet.com/grid-wa...ter-recreation/lakes


So stop taking our money, already. Selling your groundwater isn't smart.


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 14989 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Cali spends endless money on programs. Why are they not building reservoirs to catch the big rains they were getting? Not have to cross state lines for their own water.
 
Posts: 7671 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
To your question about reservoirs and Saeeds question about desalination, my guess is because it's not sexy. Projects look me that aren't interesting.

Things like High Speed rails, Climate Change and Reparations attract all the attention. Around water shortages just mean the farmers and other food producers need to be cut off 2020

Actually I am aware of at least two new reservoir plans.
 
Posts: 9816 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, if we dump ocean water on the fires at least it will inhibit forest regrowth for a while.
 
Posts: 11492 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
This is one.

https://sitesproject.org/


Old Corps
Semper Fi
FJB
 
Posts: 899 | Location: South Pacific NW | Registered: 09 January 2021Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Since CA last allowed a reservoir project, the population here has doubled. We get plenty of rain, just don't get an even amount every year. Need to save it when we have good years.

There were 3-4 decades of basically zero cleaning up dead wood and brush in forest lands.

State ran all the logging operations out in the 90's in a misguided effort to save the spotted owl.

Places I hunt, look like they have literally been fucking NUKED after the Creek Fire in 2020.

Size of these fires is pure mismanagement. If dead wood and brush were cleaned up, you'd have a fire but it wouldn't be a big deal, much less catastrophic.
 
Posts: 482 | Location: CA.  | Registered: 26 October 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When was the last reservoir put in?
I listened to some political nut on NPR this summer about the high speed rail project.
He was saying the state needs to get out there and take the farms and land it needed to get it through. The most important project in california!!! Hmm, I wonder if that still holds?
 
Posts: 7671 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by theback40:
When was the last reservoir put in?
I listened to some political nut on NPR this summer about the high speed rail project.
He was saying the state needs to get out there and take the farms and land it needed to get it through. The most important project in california!!! Hmm, I wonder if that still holds?


They built a new reservoir near Livermore CA some 20 or so years ago. They're talking about building another new one South East of that a few dozen miles. There's another central valley reservoir near Los Banos CA that they're talking about raising the elevation on the dam to increase capacity.

I've also read they are pursuing recharging groundwater supplies by pumping water into known drains like gravel fields.

On a central valley duck club I used to be familiar with one pond held water like a good plastic bucket. The water might evaporate or turn green, but none of it was seeping out the sides or bottom. A small levee away the other duck pond almost had a whirl pool effect draining your good pumped water right out the bottom like a commode.
 
Posts: 9816 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
Well, if we dump ocean water on the fires at least it will inhibit forest regrowth for a while.


Will be real useful inhibiting forest regrowth in the suburban neighborhoods that are burning.

Pacific Palisades was famous for its forests, as was the beachfront in Malibu.


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11210 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:


Good example of Trump proving he is among the three dumbest f*cking humans alive. He's going to bring water from Canada to water forests in California? And where does he think 95% of rivers run to?


did he join your little club in peckerwood county? i guess you and your deputy keagle needed a third?

uhm, but just for the sake of asking, where, oh high keagle, do YOU think 95% of water does? it certainly isn't "run to california" which would be topical .. you need to check your dosage


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40828 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Brush, dude.

Suburban folks put up trees and such.

It’s not like 1944 Japan in LA.

quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
Well, if we dump ocean water on the fires at least it will inhibit forest regrowth for a while.


Will be real useful inhibiting forest regrowth in the suburban neighborhoods that are burning.

Pacific Palisades was famous for its forests, as was the beachfront in Malibu.
 
Posts: 11492 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:

Pacific Palisades was famous for its forests, as was the beachfront in Malibu.


Neither was. You're dumber than I thought.


Old Corps
Semper Fi
FJB
 
Posts: 899 | Location: South Pacific NW | Registered: 09 January 2021Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
theback40 posted 10 January 2025 02:08 When was the last reservoir put in?

I thought it was '78, but a Google search says:

"The last major reservoir built in California was New Melones Lake in 1979. The Sites Reservoir is currently under construction and is expected to be completed in 2032."


Raising the dams on existing reservoirs is an excellent idea. As would be DIGGING THEM DEEPER DURING OUR DROUGHTS. And I think we could have less legal injunctions on those 2 ideas.

But those who run my state have higher priorities for the mass of tax dollars they collect from us.

Building reservoirs isn't sexy, and the real hard-core leftys want existing dams blown up, not new ones put in.
 
Posts: 482 | Location: CA.  | Registered: 26 October 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcraig:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:

Pacific Palisades was famous for its forests, as was the beachfront in Malibu.


Neither was. You're dumber than I thought.


If you know anybody who can read ask them to look up "sarcasm" for you, then try to explain it in grunts and gestures you can understand.


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11210 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Off the top of my head, the population has gone from low 20's million to 39mm since we did the last major reservoir.

Oh well, it's not like we need water to grow food or sustain human life at the most basic level.

My state would be the 5th largest economy in the world if it were a country, and the people in charge can't figure this shit out.

When African PHs complain about their governments on safari, I'm like... "Yeah, we do that where I live."
 
Posts: 482 | Location: CA.  | Registered: 26 October 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
Trump is butthurt that Biden worked with California to develop a better plan than what Trump tried to impose, which actually sends some water south from the "Delta" (unlike Trump's bullshit), but nothing about California's water distribution system either caused the current wildfires (any more than not raking forests did) or impacts the ability to fight them. In fact, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has the most water stored in its system in its history.

Trump is, as usual, both lying and full of shit.



Yeah....well.....how's that better plan working? Kookifornia,is burning like a Roman candle!

Dumb duck democrats cant manage manage shit.
 
Posts: 42799 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:
Originally posted by rcraig:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:

Pacific Palisades was famous for its forests, as was the beachfront in Malibu.


Neither was. You're dumber than I thought.


If you know anybody who can read ask them to look up "sarcasm" for you, then try to explain it in grunts and gestures you can understand.


Keep up the good work, moron. You're on the way to taking The Gold.


Old Corps
Semper Fi
FJB
 
Posts: 899 | Location: South Pacific NW | Registered: 09 January 2021Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rcraig:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:
Originally posted by rcraig:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:

Pacific Palisades was famous for its forests, as was the beachfront in Malibu.


Neither was. You're dumber than I thought.


If you know anybody who can read ask them to look up "sarcasm" for you, then try to explain it in grunts and gestures you can understand.


Keep up the good work, moron. You're on the way to taking The Gold.


Since it's obvious that you entered the discussion in a feeble attempt to insult me and nothing else I'll cordially invite you to go fuck yourself and wish you a nice day.


"If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”- Donald Trump
 
Posts: 11210 | Location: Tennessee | Registered: 09 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Years ago I read a proposal for a freshwater pipeline from Alaska to California. The cost was surprisingly low.

Such a pipeline wouldn't need a lot of structural support. The pipeline would be constructed of plastic and weighted to sink below wave action in storms. Unlike oil, a freshwater spill in the ocean would do no environmental damage. Rivers spill freshwater into the ocean every day.

Must be some reason the idea hasn't been pursued. Maybe California hasn't yet gotten desperate enough.
 
Posts: 7354 | Location: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, USA | Registered: 08 March 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott King:
To your question about reservoirs and Saeeds question about desalination, my guess is because it's not sexy. Projects look me that aren't interesting.

Things like High Speed rails, Climate Change and Reparations attract all the attention. Around water shortages just mean the farmers and other food producers need to be cut off 2020

Actually I am aware of at least two new reservoir plans.


California has lots of sunshine, you can power the desal from solar, or are they waiting until they figure out how to run it from oil Big Grin
 
Posts: 7537 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Years ago I read a proposal for a freshwater pipeline from Alaska to California. The cost was surprisingly low.

Such a pipeline wouldn't need a lot of structural support. The pipeline would be constructed of plastic and weighted to sink below wave action in storms. Unlike oil, a freshwater spill in the ocean would do no environmental damage. Rivers spill freshwater into the ocean every day.

Must be some reason the idea hasn't been pursued. Maybe California hasn't yet gotten desperate enough.


Interesting concept.

I forwarded an idea I had to the Bureau of Reclamation years ago. I was watching the news and they were covering one of the many floods we have in the midwest.

My idea was to have a large canal, somewhat like we already have here in Arizona. It would take water from flooded areas, and disperse it throughout the country, to holding lakes to be used as irrigation.

Lots of technical issues to engineer around but it makes sense to take water away from floods and send it to drought areas.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3870 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Scott King
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
quote:
Originally posted by RolandtheHeadless:
Years ago I read a proposal for a freshwater pipeline from Alaska to California. The cost was surprisingly low.

Such a pipeline wouldn't need a lot of structural support. The pipeline would be constructed of plastic and weighted to sink below wave action in storms. Unlike oil, a freshwater spill in the ocean would do no environmental damage. Rivers spill freshwater into the ocean every day.

Must be some reason the idea hasn't been pursued. Maybe California hasn't yet gotten desperate enough.


Interesting concept.

I forwarded an idea I had to the Bureau of Reclamation years ago. I was watching the news and they were covering one of the many floods we have in the midwest.

My idea was to have a large canal, somewhat like we already have here in Arizona. It would take water from flooded areas, and disperse it throughout the country, to holding lakes to be used as irrigation.

Lots of technical issues to engineer around but it makes sense to take water away from floods and send it to drought areas.


Well, unless those in the flood areas don't want to share.

I think I understand that the Mississippi River is suffering from low water and the river delta is being degraded by salt water incursions. There's not enough flood water making it all the way to the Mississippi Delta and ocean.

I know the Sacramento Valley was designed to flood, that was the original intent and those flood waters were meant to recharge ground water and rinse out the Sacramento/ San Joaquin River Delta and bay. By not rinsing out the San Francisco bay they had some toxic algae blooms.

When I lived there 30 years ago the sentiment was that LA and other car flung arid communities should get there water elsewhere.

These arid climates are trying to make something of themselves they weren't meant to be.

As Saeed said, desalinization seems reasonable.

I have no interest in a pipeline connecting Alaska to California. Once that leash is made, demands come with it.
 
Posts: 9816 | Location: Dillingham Alaska | Registered: 10 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To some extent, the ground water runoff issue affects the Mississippi.

Here in MN we have been doing a lot of flood prevention programs which essentially try and stop water from entering rivers very quickly. How do they do this? Retaining ponds. Which the folks living next to like as full time water bodies… so they do not get drained out to maintain the river.

Similarly the whole pollution aspect has stopped storm sewers from draining into the river. They go into water treatment plants and a sizable amount of water evaporates in the holding ponds and is rather slowly released, giving less runoff overall.

And let’s not get too deep into the ogallala aquifer issue.

We fill it through our lakes and streams (particularly Lake Superior) yet we are not allowed to use the water (MN is not a water rights state, yet the feds tell us that aquifer is dedicated to folks to the south) and they have been sucking so much out of it that we are having lake depth issues with it.

California should be told to deal with its own mess (desalination sounds like a good idea) and too bad if some celebrities lose their oceanfront view because they have to indulge in eminent domain.
 
Posts: 11492 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:
Originally posted by rcraig:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:
quote:
Originally posted by rcraig:
quote:
Originally posted by Jefffive:

Pacific Palisades was famous for its forests, as was the beachfront in Malibu.


Neither was. You're dumber than I thought.


If you know anybody who can read ask them to look up "sarcasm" for you, then try to explain it in grunts and gestures you can understand.


Keep up the good work, moron. You're on the way to taking The Gold.


Since it's obvious that you entered the discussion in a feeble attempt to insult me and nothing else I'll cordially invite you to go fuck yourself and wish you a nice day.


As was once said,

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

Carry on.


Old Corps
Semper Fi
FJB
 
Posts: 899 | Location: South Pacific NW | Registered: 09 January 2021Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Baker 458, 45 + years since the last one built is amazing. Is it one of those, always talked about, but never done, things?
Who can think millions more people, but no increase in water is sustainable?
 
Posts: 7671 | Registered: 10 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
To some extent, the ground water runoff issue affects the Mississippi.

Here in MN we have been doing a lot of flood prevention programs which essentially try and stop water from entering rivers very quickly. How do they do this? Retaining ponds. Which the folks living next to like as full time water bodies… so they do not get drained out to maintain the river.

Similarly the whole pollution aspect has stopped storm sewers from draining into the river. They go into water treatment plants and a sizable amount of water evaporates in the holding ponds and is rather slowly released, giving less runoff overall.

And let’s not get too deep into the ogallala aquifer issue.

We fill it through our lakes and streams (particularly Lake Superior) yet we are not allowed to use the water (MN is not a water rights state, yet the feds tell us that aquifer is dedicated to folks to the south) and they have been sucking so much out of it that we are having lake depth issues with it.

California should be told to deal with its own mess (desalination sounds like a good idea) and too bad if some celebrities lose their oceanfront view because they have to indulge in eminent domain.


You would think that being able to afford beachfront property that they could have put in an exterior spinkler system using the water right smack dab in front of them.


Give me a home where the buffalo roam and I'll show you a house full of buffalo shit.
 
Posts: 1807 | Location: IOWA | Registered: 27 October 2018Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2025 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia