during most of the month, i am in irving - we can argue .. i'll buy you a beer or two to wet your whistle and make certain we can keep it up

I still do not see on the surface of it how this scheme is any different than the last executive attempt the S. Ct., rejected.

Can anyone explain the distinction that makes this attempt less constitutionally suspect?

Otherwise, I see this nothing more than a crass, political stunt to motivate the base. Now, that in and of itself is not the issue to me. The issue is a President should not flaunt, engage in executive action that is most likely not anchored in constitutional power given to the executive.