THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AMERICAN BIG GAME HUNTING FORUMS

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
THE WORST GUNWRITERS OF ALL TIME
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Folks,
Now that we have examined the great ones a bit, let us give equal time to the not so great ones.
My pick for this category is overblown, egotistical oafs such as Craig Boddington. He should be ashamed of using his reserve commission rank on his byline and why does he only write about hunts most average hunters could afford in their wildest dreams?
Who is bankrolling this turkey?
A close second to CB is Ross Seyfried. He has wide field experience but always seems to come off as a real horses nether region.
Now what does everyone else think?
HBB
 
Posts: 376 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Wayne Van Zwoll. The hack ought to be arrested for impersonating a writer.

Dis-honorable mention goes to most of the young "writers" flailing away at the keyboards at Hunting and G&A. Its always a mistake to let the interns write stories instead of the grown-ups.

 
Posts: 1372 | Location: USA | Registered: 18 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Sooner>
posted
Craig Boddington gets my vote. I have never seen a man who could write page after page in a magazine and say absoulutely nothing!
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'll put a vote in the slot for Seyfried.
 
Posts: 1723 | Location: wyo | Registered: 03 March 2001Reply With Quote
<buffalo_buster>
posted
My vote goes to Boddington as well. I find his writing very biased and most of his information utterly useless.

I respectfully disagree with Mac's pick since I consider Wayne, a good gun writer.
BB

 
Reply With Quote
<Hitman>
posted
I also disagree with JMac about Wayne Van Zwoll. Wayne Van Zwoll is excellent writer and know his stuff

------------------
Brooks Carmichael

 
Reply With Quote
<Hitman>
posted
Boddington has ego with no end. I would also vote for Boddington as one of the worst if not the worst.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Gents,

There is a need to distinguish between a writer whose style we don't like, whose viewpoints we don't like, and whose personality we don't like.

I do not like many of Wayne Van Zwoll's viewpoints. He and I do not see eye-to-eye on many things. Yet, he is quite experienced and shows what appears to me to be an attractive humility in his prose. I would happily share a campfire with him, even though I disagree doggedly with many of his views. The campfire discussions would be worth the cost of admission.

The late Col. Charles Askins' patriotic & shooting accomplishments are beyond denial. Honorable service in the U.S. Army and the Border Patrol. By all accounts he was an excellent target & field shot. He was also a hunter of great experience. Having said all that, I don't think I've ever read a writer whose work was laced with a more arrogant attitude. The title of his book, "Unrepentant Sinner", is indicative of the attitude his work projected. Bill Jordan was a man of similar accomplishments but a much better attitude.

I have disagreed with some of Col. Boddington's perspectives. For instance, he likes .308 caliber and larger bores for long range work on deer, and I see no problem with the 6.5, .270, and 7mm cartridges with appropriate bullets. He is one of the most experienced hunters writing today. If he writes of many expensive hunts that you and I can only dream of, that's what his editors want him to do. I will probably never hunt the 3-legged blue-bellied sheep of Cucamongistan, but doing it and writing about it sells magazines, and that's precisely what all 'zine editors want. The rank of full-bird colonel is an accomplishment, be it in reserves or active duty, and I see no problem with him adding it to his byline.

Stan Trzoniec's photography is excellent but I do not care for his writing style, nor that of Clair Rees.

My favorite was the late Finn Aagard. It will be awhile before we see his equal. I like John Barsness and am learning to appreciate Brian Pearce.

BigIron

 
Posts: 526 | Registered: 29 June 2000Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Worst writer? First one that comes to mind is Rick Jamison.
 
Posts: 1148 | Location: The Hunting Fields | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Bakes
posted Hide Post
I know I'm an Aussie and havn't been bought up with the writers you guys have but I have read some "Yank" magazines that I bought and have been given (thanks RAB some more comming your way)!So here is an objective Aussie view. One guy that I don't like much is Jeff Cooper. All his talk about "family member" seems a bit elitest. I like Grits Gresham, Bart Skelton and Rick Jamison for their style of writing. As to Craig Boddington, it would be nice if he got to the point and didn't repeat himself so much other than that I don't mind him.
Well thats my 2 bobs worth.
Bakes
 
Posts: 8085 | Location: Bloody Queensland where every thing is 20 years behind the rest of Australia! | Registered: 25 January 2001Reply With Quote
<Bill>
posted
Hands down, Craig "Wish I was a real Marine" Boddington, total whore. You can get that guy to praise anything and I cannot stand to hear another account of his story about hunting deer with Ed Weatherby and the 270 wby.
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Brad
posted Hide Post
Clair Reese and Clay Harvey are two that come to mind automatically.

While Seyfied's style is a bit verbose, he knows his stuff and has "been there, done it." Same for Boddington, except his style is the exact opposite of Seyfrieds... paint drying quality. I like Wayne VanZwoll... like Seyfried and Boddington, he's been there, done it and is a darn sight more readable than either of them.

 
Posts: 3523 | Registered: 27 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I started to post on here then decided I didn't want to be a part of this...Its a little trite...but I guess when they go public they are open to critisism.....

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42203 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I think the guys name is Brian Pearce. He sounds like an Elmer Kieth wanna be. I read an article of his once and I swear I was sitting there thinking where have I heard this before? I started thumbing through "Sixguns" and there it was. Same story. Sean
 
Posts: 537 | Location: Vermont | Registered: 04 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of WyoJoe
posted Hide Post
I will have to respectfully disagree with the people who posted on Ross Seyfried. I called him out of the clear blue the other day. I had some questions abotu an article he wrote. He to time to answer ALL of my questions & give me some loading data. We discussed big bores. Me being a neophyte in the .40+ range at NO time did I ever feel he was talking down to me. The man was truely gracious in taking his time & helping someone along. We were on the phone for about a half hour.

As to Craig Boddington. I have read his material since the 70's. If I am correct he used to be active duty who decided to go reserves. He does get dry at time but I don't think he is any worse than if I tried to write a story of my experiences. My own writing style would be more like, Went hunting, saw a deer, killed it.

 
Posts: 1172 | Location: Cheyenne, WY | Registered: 15 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
This is so subjective that �best� and �worst� are probably non sequiturs. �Best liked� and �least liked� would be more appropriate.

As far as the graciousness of gun writers, we probably don�t know the half of it. Every now and then I rent a table at a gun show to try to clean out the closet and sell a gun or two (to make room for more). Seems like sitting behind a table is an implied invitation for every Tom, Dick and Harry to bend your ear ceaselessly about THEIR rifle, THEIR loads, what THEY did fifty years ago. Try to hold a two way conversation and you find out right quick that they (95% of them) don�t want to hear anything but the sound of THEIR voices telling you about THEIR experiences and opinions. I can only imagine these poor gun writers being descended upon at every banquet by a torrent of folks wanting to tell the famous person all about THEMSELVES. Sitting and listening for even ten minutes is polite, doing it for the twentieth person in a row is graciousness with a capital G. I can see why JOC was deemed an old curmudgeon in his later years and can�t say as I blame him any.

FWIW, the only writer I�ve met is Brian Pearson. Seen John Taffin at the Boise shows occasionally but never really chatted with him. Brian is a big, tall fellow and a decent guy judging from the total 8 minutes of discourse I�ve had with him.

Also, like WyoJoe says, try writing something about anything and let twenty people read it and tell you what they think about your writing. I figure the first requirement for a successful gun writer is not so much gun knowledge or writing skill but just a thick skin.

 
Posts: 1027 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I won't be a part of the feeding frenzy but I will say that I have known most of the gunwriters because of the nature of my business and they are just people, some good and some not so good....

Ross Seyfried is a gentleman of the first order and NOONE has any more hunting experience or knowledge of guns than he has.

Craig Boddington has probably hunted and shot as much game as any American todate. Craigs a pretty humble guy..

Charlie Askins, what you see is what you get and he went around the horn several times and was not in the least consumed with himself, he just didn't give a hoot what outhers thought about him...He was a stright shooter....

there are others that are as counterfiet as a wooden nickle, but I'll wait and tell them to their face and I have on several ocassions...

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42203 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Brad
posted Hide Post
Yeah, Ray... after I posted on this thread I regretted it... even though I defended Boddington, Seyfried and VanZwoll, I did list Reese and Harvey as two I don't care for. I do stand by that... I don't like those two in as far as their writing style and content. However, I will not attack a person's CHARACTER as many on this thread apparently feel the liberty to do. Even if I knew these guys and didn't like them personally, it would never appear on a public board... how some folks here think they can make judgments about the character of a man they've never met shows the nature of their own character...
 
Posts: 3523 | Registered: 27 June 2000Reply With Quote
<phurley>
posted
He who is without sin, cast the first stone. Good shooting.

------------------

 
Reply With Quote
<Bill>
posted
My statement above may have come across the wrong way, my problem with some authors is that they are using thier soapbox as part of an advertisement for whichever company pays them best.(whos to say I wouldn't do the same thing in thier shoes)
Anyone of us would be an adaquate super experienced gunwriter given the free hunts and donated equipment alot of these guys get.
The difference between some of these new writers and old timers like Jack O'Conor or Bob Hagel, is that the old timers were not caught up in a never ending sales pitch.

[This message has been edited by Bill (edited 03-28-2001).]

 
Reply With Quote
<Doc Garnett>
posted
I doubt seriously if many, if any of us on this forum could hold a candle to any of the writers mentioned in terms of the COMBINATION of writing skills, shooting skills, hunting and general firearms experience, AND the ability to write profusely, intelligently while under the constant pressure of deadlines. Personally, I have learned much from all of them and feel that I owe them all a debt of gratitude for sharing their knowledge, opinions and even their predjudices.
Having said that, I do think it would have been better if Craig Boddington had declined to trade on his honorable and admirable service to our country. On the other hand, I am not the one trying to make a living in what must be a real dog-eat-dog business. He can share my campfire and his experience with me anytime.
Ross Seyfried strikes me as forthright communicator, experienced hunter, accomplished marksman, and a thoughtful gentleman to boot.
Similarly, Wayne Van Zwoll, Rick Jamison and Brian Pearce (sp?) are excellent communicators and far more knowledgeable than I.
If you read the more common gun magazines, you need to understand that to stay in business, they must be in the business of pleasing their advertisers. Pleasing the readership is only a means by which they sell space to advertisers. It must be a nerve-wracking tightrope.
I think that as group, gunwriters deserve more credit and more respect than some of the posts in this thread seem to imply.
-- Doc
 
Reply With Quote
<The Willowed Field>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Doc Garnett:
Pleasing the readership is only a means by which they sell space to advertisers. It must be a nerve-wracking tightrope.
I think that as group, gunwriters deserve more credit and more respect than some of the posts in this thread seem to imply.
-- Doc [/B]

Please, spare me the wet hanky.

If one writes for a living and prostitutes his integrity to advertisers, he is not worth my valuable time to read his garbage.

The great writer cherishes the trust of his readers. His audience is not the advertisers.

Gun and hunting writing is especially seductive to the would-be prostitute. The temptation of freebies galore seem to make many men willing to set a price on their intergrity.

This is not about opinions. Diverse and controversial opinions make for interesting reading.

The mark of the great gun, hunting and outdoor writers is that their opinions are truly based on their experience and love for the sport, and they did not sell out, regardless of where they hunted, what kind of arms they used, or what their socio-economic status and means were.

 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I cast all my votes for the empty head CRAIG BODDINGTON. He writes lots of words which say absolutely nothing. He was at 2001 SCI for a book signing. Perhaps I should have challeneged him to a debate because he sure doesn't know how to take a position and support it.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
<The Willowed Field>
posted
And while we are on the subject of personal titles...

Many of us have earned titles of one sort or another in various fields of endeavor, and are justifiably proud of them. To preface one's name with that title is entirely appropriate in the field in which it was earned. It makes the statement that one is deserving of honor and recognition.

However, in this day and age, unless you are the President of the United States or a member of royalty, it is generally considered quite boorish to use one's title outside its context. Beyond a certain naive age, most of us do not lay down alms merely because of a title earned in some other discipline.

Yes, I understand that military officers have the right to use their title. But that tradition is holdover from a long-past era of social order. No one is begrudging them the use of their rank if they are commenting on a military or foreign affairs topic. It rings hollow, however, and cheapens its status through use in other contexts.

Someone, somewhere, sometime apparently decided that the title "Colonel" was a sure-fire way to lend instant credibilty to anything from fried chicken to guns and hunting. Why this is so defies rational explanation.

Surveying the field of such personalities, it appears that several Colonels have made their way through the shooting field over the years. The more poignant observer might remark that among gun writers, this title was also a rather good indicator to the reader of some other, less desirable traits.

Nonetheless, our esteemed Colonels are not the only ones to fall victim to this syndrome. Several doctors and lawyers are also hanging their monikers in their bylines. No Indian Chiefs have been sighted yet.

One character has advertised his shooting school under the title of "Dr." Is he a Doctor of Shooting? Or perhaps this is a one-stop shooting and medical clinic?

Would we have the same respect for the the man if every article and book he wrote was authored by "Professor Jack O'Connor?"

Regardless, I must side with those that take exception to the unabashed hawking of credentials without context. The practice, while perhaps not quite shameful, is at the very least laughable.

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I feel like I am reading challenged. I don't know any of the people mentioned. I just look at the pictures, read the reloading data, and wonder why I should spend $$$ for the latest and greatest gadget or new improved firearm. If I want to know anything about hunting or the field, I go and do. Guess I am becoming a fossil.

------------------
"If you can keep your head about you when all others are loosing theirs and blaiming it on you..."

 
Posts: 614 | Location: Miami, Florida USA | Registered: 02 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm with you Doc, I can't deny a gun scribe the right to support his family and stay on the job...A gunscribes sins are far less than say our last president.....

A Willowed Field??? Now thats right up there with Col., Welcome aboard and mind your bad manners over here, were all friends....

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42203 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
<quickdraw>
posted
If you're going to knock Boddington, he has some faults AS A WRITER. I think his experience is envieable. He certainly has a tremendous knowledge of firearms. However, I think he is a bit boring when he writes about guns. His hunting stuff is much better, but still leaves something to be desired. I've also caught a lot of errors (grammar, type, etc.) in his books and just think that's annoying.

A lot of the faults we see with writers is that often we look for things in the wrong place or writers don't use an appropriate style. Hemingway and Ruark focused more on characters than implements. They developed their stories more into literature than how to articles. I enjoy that sort of work greatly. However, Capstick is the only writer I know that could deep interesting characters and useful "how-to" information.

That said, I for one don't care much for Jeff Cooper.

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thank goodness I only made Sergeant so I can still have some credibility.

[This message has been edited by Jim in Idaho (edited 03-28-2001).]

 
Posts: 1027 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
<Fat Bastard>
posted
I hereby proclaim myself "CHIEF Fat Bastard".

Willow, the "doctor" you speak of was a chiropractor before he became a shooting instructor/shooting school operator. What that does for shooting, I don't know, but I do know that after a long weekend on their feet, his students often ask him (jokingly) to perform an "adjustment" (he no longer practices).

 
Reply With Quote
<The Willowed Field>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:

A Willowed Field??? Now thats right up there with Col., Welcome aboard and mind your bad manners over here, were all friends....

[/B]


"Bad manners?"

I have read these chat forums frequently and have generally refrained from making a comment based on atmosphere I observed. The above quote is an example of why.

Since when, in a polite debate, is it "bad manners" to present an argument and comment on the topic? Only in a world where the inhabitants are lacking in either a sense of humor or a sense of perspective other than their own.

The post topic asked a question, and begged the naming of names. I declined to name any names, but instead pointed out some of the attributes of the great writer, not merely the writer earning a buck at whatever cost. I also pointed out some of the absurdities attendant to writing and selling oneself.

If this is somehow bad manners, I suggest those that feel this way limit their reading to the back of a cereal box, so as not to be offended by any wiff of controversy, or the necessity to think.

We pick out own pen names here. I teach my children not to poke fun at another's name. However, many children who cannot respond intelligently to an argument like to make fun of the messenger's name.

But of course that isn't bad manners.

 
Reply With Quote
<Doc Garnett>
posted
The Willowed Field -- Clearly, you have learned to write with skill and discipline and your "handle" suggests a literary bent, which I, for one, do not ascribe to pretentiousness or bad taste. I do, however, agree as I stated or implied in my previous post, that I find it unattractive to trade on one's service to the Constitution. Using one's military title for personal financial gain is about a half step over the line, in my humble opinion. Still, I admire Boddington, if only for the sheer energy it must take do produce such volume. And I imagine him to be a pretty good guy to be around if one likes accomplished people, as I do.
My comments regarding the competitiveness of popular magazine publishing, the gun and hunting genre in particular, was not meant as a signal to present hankies. I am suggesting that those who complain about the the promotional thrust of articles in gun magazines lack an understanding and, therefore, an appreciation of the gunwriter's "job description". Part of that job description is "do not offend and scare off those who pay the bills!" While it is true that subscribers and readers attract advertisers, it is also true that the advertisers are the customers who really pay the bills. This competing requirement to attract readers/subscribers, who want unvarnished fact and flawless analysis, in order to attract advertisers, who conversely want promotion, is the "tightrope" to which I referred in my earlier post. It is a mark of naivete on the part of the reader to be disappointed in articles which do not excoriate the host magazine's advertisers. Maybe those who must whine about the realities of the enthusiasts publishing business could use that wet hanky you mentioned. Personally, I'll just use my sleeve.
Regards -- Doc Garnett
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Willowed Field,
Surly you have noticed that many of us do not use other than our own names and even include addresses and telephone numbers...I see little difference in Col. or willowed field, both are titles and I do think it is in bad taste and without manners to condem a person who is a Col. and who is proud of the Marine Corps, and he is proud of the corps,I assure you of that...Now I have not been rude to you nor have I made any demands, I merely made a suggestion and you seem to have some anomosity about that..I assure you it was made to keep the post intelligent and the conversation civil...If I have upset you then I apoligise..so behave your bad self (humor again) and welcome aboard.

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42203 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Doc Garnett>
posted
Speaking for myself and mindful that some of you may think I've said enough already, let me just add that I am still far enough down on the learning curve that I am able to benefit from even the least of the gunwriters. If I were to be critical of those who do what they do better than I and have helped me in the process, I'd be violating one of Knute Rockne's favorite maxims:"You shouldn't spit on man's head when you are standing on his shoulders."
-- Doc
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The Willowed Field,
Welcome aboard Willow. These are a pretty good bunch of guys on this FORUM. I enjoyed your posts, I hope you stick around.

Daryl

 
Posts: 536 | Location: Whitehorse, Yukon | Registered: 28 May 2002Reply With Quote
<Zeke>
posted
I had a short list of bad writers that I thought about adding the this thread. However, I changed my mind at the last minute. My problem with the mass-produced firearms press is not with the writers. It is with the magazines that read more like info-mercials. We all know which magazines I am talking about. I decided a long time ago not to buy those useless gun rags and spend the money on important stuff like powder and bullets. When I stopped reading those rags, my exposure to those hacks masquerading as journalists was substantially reduced and I got to shoot more too.
Later
ZM
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
THe other side of the coin is that I like Seyfried's writing a lot. Matunas and Van Zwoll are good.

Anyone want to comment on Layne Simpson?

 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
<Mads>
posted
i'm chokked!
My favorites into gunwritings is Seyfreid, van Zwoll,Bordington,L. Simpson and Barness.
A quit few is on your worst list!

Can it be due to different tastes between Scandinavians and Americans?


Have a nice weekend

Mads

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Holy Smoke! I'm not sure if I should do this or not. While I will not pick a person to bash and I do not mean this as a backdoor approach-cuz if you knew me I don't work that way-I have to share the most half bakes "observation" I've ever read. Jon Sundra was talking about the 25-06 not being "Big" enough for Caribou. In the text he related how "we" shot (I don't remember the exact number-more than one) caribou at 500 plus yards and hit them (multiple times3-5) and none of them were killed quickly!!!

In my observation anyone who can not figure that out should not be in print period. No I don't want to get the "long range" thing started again. What irritates me most about dumb people or those who prostitute themselves to sell products is the legions of "innocent" readers that don't know any better and take someones bad advice and loose an animal or two on a very expensive hunt due to some statement a writter made that was just plain wrong. Yes we ALL make mistakes but those who do this for profit and with no regard for their fellow hunter are a festering sore on our sport. Yes I will give you an example. My last African hunt was to Zimbabwe, I shared the camp with a retired school superintendent from a major southern city. He was shooting a very nice Steyr 30-06 with a Kahles (astrological 3X20something with 50MM objective lens) great quality but not what he needed for lowveld hunting where my average shot was 75-90 yards. It was a matter of getting the bullet through the brush to the target. Not being able to see at a distance. Great scope wrong application. He was also loaded with 150 grain Sierra bullets. I'm not kicking the '06,rifle,scope,bullet. But that combination is what some "gun writter" wrote as best all around for Africa. We all know that's a relative term. Yes for duiker, Impala etc. But NOT Zebra, Kudu, Eland, Waterbuck etc. which is what he wanted to hunt. Very bad statement for an "authority" to make without explaination or qualification. To say the least the guy killed four animals and lost three-that we know of. Maybe my whole sore spot is with irresponsible journalism. Good Shooting "Z"

 
Posts: 352 | Location: Grand Island, NE. USA | Registered: 26 January 2001Reply With Quote
<1LoneWolf>
posted
Beating a Dead Horse. I like the man's hunts, probably couldn't afford too many though. Craig Boddington has shared some useful info with us, however for the most part he says very little that is new.

Biggest reason he gets my vote:

His seemingly unwavering stance that only a 30 cailber can do the trick. Now, I love the 30-06, but I have seen the 6.5 Swede do a nice job...and also its semi-new ballistic twin, the 260 Remington. This is an annoying opinion, that he is entitled to of course, but I think he does "the young hunter a disservice" by making him "accept more recoil than he might be ready to handle.

If the 460 WBY is the first cartridge you ever fire, you may never choose to take a second shot. If your 90 pounds and all bones, at age 12, a 30-06 might do the same to you. I like new blood coming into hunting, not being scared away by a gun writer who has a love affair with a 30.

------------------
Live Free! Madison, Jefferson and all the boys paid for it, and so did our very own fathers.

 
Reply With Quote
<George Hoffman>
posted
Gentlemen.
I doubt any of us in their shoes would do much different. I have known most of the old school writers and hunted with some.
I do know one thing for sure. They are all
better at it than I am.
 
Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia