THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
270 for moose?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Would you consider using a 270 on a moose hunt? What loading combination (Bullet/Powder) would you suggest?

Thanks


------------------------------------
Klaatu barada nikto
 
Posts: 107 | Location: Middle Maine | Registered: 07 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
67 grain MRP
160 grain nosler Par.
Fed 215 primer
Norma brass


DRSS: HQ Scandinavia. Chapters in Sweden & Norway
 
Posts: 2805 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
While the 270 and even smaller cartridges will certainly kill moose,I prefer a larger cartridge myself.The partition,tsx ,failsafe or bearclaw bullets all work well on moose especially if you want to use a smaller cartridge.
 
Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A good friend took a Wyoming Shiras moose with his .270 shooting 150 grain Nosler Partitions. One shot kill in the lungs.
 
Posts: 10505 | Location: Texas... time to secede!! | Registered: 12 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Would you consider using a 270 on a moose hunt?



Only if I didn't have something bigger.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I don't know how wary moose are in your area but in Wyoming it is far harder to get a tag than a moose. Factory 150 grain corelokts and power points work just fine. If you must shoot thru a shoulder bone (why?) a bigger cartridge might be better.


Leftists are intellectually vacant, but there is no greater pleasure than tormenting the irrational.
 
Posts: 2899 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
vapodogs got it right...or use a heavy northfork and go for the lung/heart shot


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
As a person who shot his first moose 36 years ago with a 7x57 using non-premium 139 gr. Hornady spire-point bullets, I certainly wouldn't say a.270 won't be adequate, particulary with 150 Nosler to 170 gr. (Barnes original) bullets.

I will say, though, that I'd greatly prefer something along the line of a .30-06 with 200 gr. Nosler Partitions or 220 gr. bullets of almost any make. Even bigger bore and bullet would be even better.

A Moose is not hard to kill, but it IS a big animal...mature ones are commonly circa 7' tall at the shoulder and from 1,000 to 1,500 or more pounds live weight...so to kill it quickly on a reliable basis, a little more power than for Mule Deer or even Elk won't do any harm.


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Brad
posted Hide Post
I wouldn't hesitate to use a 130 TSX, 140 FS or ANY 150 grainer on ANY moose.
 
Posts: 3526 | Registered: 27 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Years ago I used the .270 and 30-06 on elk and moose and had few problems, but ocassionally ended up on a rather long track...

Today I use the 300 H&H and 338..I like that extra edge on both, particularly elk that tend to make a lot of down hill tracks in steep Idaho, it puts them down quicker and allows me to take a raking shot in the thick timber we have....


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42320 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of fusino
posted Hide Post
Sure, you can use a .270 on Moose, and if you're a good shot you probably won't have a problem. However if you own something .30 caliber and above, why not use it? I personally would suggest more bullet.


--->Happiness is nothing but health and a poor memory<---Albert Schweitzer
--->All I ever wanted was to be somebody; I guess I should have been more specific<---Lily Tomlin
 
Posts: 435 | Registered: 09 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thank you very much for your replies. Much appreciated.


------------------------------------
Klaatu barada nikto
 
Posts: 107 | Location: Middle Maine | Registered: 07 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jens poulsen:
67 grain MRP
160 grain nosler Par.
Fed 215 primer
Norma brass

If I had to use a 270 then this would be the load I would use without hesitation and never give it a second thought. It does work.
 
Posts: 740 | Location: CT/AZ USA | Registered: 14 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Moose are not tough, they are just BIG. Penetration is the key, and a 160 partition 270 at 2800 fps will penetrate exactly the same as a 200 gr 300 Win mag at the same velocity. The size of the hole will make no difference.
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Afton, VA | Registered: 31 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
The size of the hole will make no difference.


Given that as an unqualified truth, then any .222 bullet which will penetrate the Moose
would be just as good?


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sabot:
Moose are not tough, they are just BIG. Penetration is the key, and a 160 partition 270 at 2800 fps will penetrate exactly the same as a 200 gr 300 Win mag at the same velocity. The size of the hole will make no difference.


Lot of moose in Virginia is there?


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Would you consider using a 270 on a moose hunt? What loading combination (Bullet/Powder) would you suggest?

Yes I would consider using my 270 on moose, but I would much prefer to use my 338-06.

I would personally would use the 160 gr Nosler Partition or a Barnes 150gr TSX. BUt, I would guess any 150 premium bullet would work.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've taken a few moose in past years with a 270 win and 150gr corelokts (before the "premiums" came on the scene). Perhaps not the "ideal" caliber or bullet, but certainly sufficient today if the shooter does his/her part. If you are accurate with your rifle, and have the patience to wait for a good broadside shot, the 270 will kill any moose out there.
 
Posts: 678 | Location: lived all over | Registered: 06 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Alberta Canuck:
quote:
The size of the hole will make no difference.


Given that as an unqualified truth, then any .222 bullet which will penetrate the Moose
would be just as good?


Sorry, I meant the difference between a .308 and a .277 bullet penetrating the same distance.
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Afton, VA | Registered: 31 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cobra:
quote:
Originally posted by Sabot:
Moose are not tough, they are just BIG. Penetration is the key, and a 160 partition 270 at 2800 fps will penetrate exactly the same as a 200 gr 300 Win mag at the same velocity. The size of the hole will make no difference.


Only dead ones brought back from Maine...wonder if they wandered in from canada?

Lot of moose in Virginia is there?
 
Posts: 1111 | Location: Afton, VA | Registered: 31 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Enigma
posted Hide Post
Hello Ursus,

I hunt moose with some family members every year. One of us uses a 270 winchester and has killed many moose over the last 40 years. Moose are not hard to kill as long as you hit the vitals. One of the guys uses a 308, another one uses a 7mm Rem Mag and I use a 375H&H. All of them work great as long as you don't shoot them in the ass. I also find that as long as you don't push bullets past 2700fps, all of this premium bullet stuff is kind of BS. Premium bullets are better, no doubt about it but most moose in Québec are killed by hunters that don't reload and don't know the difference between coreloks and partition. They go to Canadian tire and buy a box of whatever is available. I'm not saying its the way to go, but that is the way it is.

Enigma
 
Posts: 347 | Location: Canada | Registered: 30 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've seen a lot of moose killed with a 30-30 and none wounded. Just pick your shot.

the chef
 
Posts: 2763 | Registered: 11 March 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cobra:
quote:
Originally posted by Sabot:
Moose are not tough, they are just BIG. Penetration is the key, and a 160 partition 270 at 2800 fps will penetrate exactly the same as a 200 gr 300 Win mag at the same velocity. The size of the hole will make no difference.


Lot of moose in Virginia is there?


NOt the type you can hunt... but I have seen some real fat assed ones there... Several of them were my female cousins....

As they said above, they can be 7 ft tall at the shoulder and weight 1000 to 1500 lbs... especially when they are pissed at that time of the month... sofa

cheers
seafire
thumb
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
Good one, Seafire!!

I gather your cousins aren't members of the AR forums?


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by calgarychef1:
I've seen a lot of moose killed with a 30-30 and none wounded. Just pick your shot.

the chef


There is no doubt smaller cartridges will kill virtually anything. I just prefer that the Moose I shoot die about where they are standing when I shoot them...especially if they are standing next to a beaver pond or a muskeg, or a bunch of blow-down. Up along the Little Smokey or around Calling Lake or over in the Swan Hills, where I used to guide/hunt in Alberta there is lots of brush, muskeg, jackstraws, and assorted dense bush. I don't like having to look for or haul those suckers through, over, or around any more crap than I have to.

As you know, moose are rather phlegmatic animals, which basically means they aren't as easily affected by hydrostatic "shock" the same way smaller deer are. So, for "instant" kills, I personally like cartridges with somewhat bigger bullets than the .270 normally has.

Used to have a friend who was a partner in the Custom Gun Shop in Edmonton (Doug Paul), who in the late 60's/early 70's hunted his moose with a .243 Rem M600 wiith Nosler Partitions and he never lost any wounded ones either...but then he was on a Ski-Doo in moderately deep snow and would cruise up beside them and put one in through the boiler room and try to immediately put the next in the back of the skull.


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'll second the benefit of having them die quickly. I've had them end up upside down in water, ditches full of brush and other spots where cutting them up and hauling them out was just too much work.
 
Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002Reply With Quote
One Of Us
Picture of KWard
posted Hide Post
I would go with the 150 grain Nosler partition bullet if I was using my .270 for a moose or an elk, nut since I have a 7mm RemMag and a .300 H&H mag I would most likey have them with me on such a hunt.
 
Posts: 319 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 31 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Mighty Peace
posted Hide Post
After seeing the performance of my rifle I got last season that the fiance took over (Tikka T3 LS 270WSM with a Leupold VX3 3.5x10x40 BC) shooting 140gr. Winchester Supreme ammo Accubonds on her large mulie buck and cow elk, I would say the 270WSM is good for moose.

I went and bought the same rifle with a Leupold VX3 4.5x14x40 BC scope. Just sighted it in with reloads: 140gr. Accubonds, Winchester brass, 215 Federal primers, 71.0gr. of Retumbo. This is a compressed load. Groups are 3/8". All I need for next trip to the range is a chrony, but should be around 3200ft/s. Next loads to try will be with Barnes TSX 140gr.

I would think that the 270Win would be just as good shooting moose with Accubonds, Partition Golds, Failsafes or BArne TSX as the 270WSM.
 
Posts: 431 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 02 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boom stick
posted Hide Post
http://www.northforkbullets.com/270-150.htm

i dont think you can get a better bullet than this in the 270...just wish they made it in a 180 grain Big Grin but seriously...the tough controled and large expansion and good weight retention not to mention accuracy make this bullet deserve sainthood.


577 BME 3"500 KILL ALL 358 GREMLIN 404-375

*we band of 45-70ers* (Founder)
Single Shot Shooters Society S.S.S.S. (Founder)
 
Posts: 27619 | Location: Where tech companies are trying to control you and brainwash you. | Registered: 29 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
How well do the 150gr. North Forks work with the .270WSM?


________



"...And on the 8th day, God created beer so those crazy Canadians wouldn't take over the world..."
 
Posts: 539 | Location: Winnipeg, MB. | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of RMiller
posted Hide Post
I have an alaska hunting book in which the author says that any talk about the 270 win and moose is just that---- talk.

At work a while back I was talking moose hunting with guy who has shot a couple dozen moose with his 270. I asked him what his favorite bullet was for shooting moose with. He said "150 grain". Big Grin I left it at that and just talked more about hunting and less about gear.

I would pick a 130 or heavier barnes x, the 140 failsafe , the 150 partition or the north forks for the 270 win.

I have shot moose with 210 part 338win, 250 part 338win, 165 X 308 win and two with my bow. Tomorrow the season opens and I'll be taking my 300 Winny with 200 TSX's. Smiler


--------------------
THANOS WAS RIGHT!
 
Posts: 9823 | Location: Montana | Registered: 25 June 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Large bullets don't necessarily do better. A raking shot on my last bull stopped on the diaphagm due to inadequate penetration. A bonded 232gr 9.3 bullet that overexpanded. I'm sure that a 160gr 277 partition would have killed that bull.

Yes I will use a heavier bullet next year.
 
Posts: 2032 | Registered: 05 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have taken a few moose mostly with medium bores but I have also used the 264 WM w/140gr bullets. I will not recommend light calibers like the 270 for moose in all fairness to the animal, I know that even a 243 will take a moose but in all honestly I would have a hard time justifying anything lass than a 7mm with 175gr bullets, a 30 or 338 would be better if the hunter could handle the recoil.
bigbull
 
Posts: 408 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 06 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of BlackHawk1
posted Hide Post
An aquaintance of mine shot a moose cow 5 times with a .270 before it went down (details of load used unknown). He was impressed. I'm not.

I have never been moose hunting, but if given the chance, I would probably pick my .375 H&H using 300gr. loads. My .45-70 using 400-420gr. loads would also be considered.

Big animal, big bullets.


BH1

There are no flies on 6.5s!
 
Posts: 707 | Location: Nebraska | Registered: 23 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have hunted with the "Im a great hunter all I need for elk is a .270 or 243, even a 30-30" and yes I have shot elk with the .270 and the 30-30....

But, I have had to track a lot of elk down and kill them for myself and even more for others that bragged their poweress with small calibers, it gripes the crap out of me to be around these kind of hunters, sooner or later you will have to follow the bull down into some dark recess that kills you to pack out of.

I use a .338 and I'm glad I opted for more rifle, life has been better and easier...


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42320 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Where are you hunting/ The 270 is the legal minimum in Ontario, but not legal in Quebec. All my experinced moose hunting buddies are unanimous that a 300mag is the way to go. I'd use a 338 myself because I don't have a 300mag.
 
Posts: 3174 | Location: Warren, PA | Registered: 08 August 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia